DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
30
1
–
+2.13
–
–
–
–
33
2
1
+1.86
–
–
–
–
36
3
3
+1.86
–
–
–
–
30
4
–
+1.79
–
–
–
–
38
5
–
+1.79
–
–
–
–
36
6
4
+1.76
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
28
7
5
+1.74
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
31
8
4
+1.70
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
30
9
2
+1.70
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
38
10
1
+1.63
–
–
–
–
30
11
2
+1.61
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
32
12
4
+1.58
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
34
13
–
+1.50
–
–
–
–
41
14
10
+1.40
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
26
15
1
+1.40
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
33
16
–
+1.40
–
–
–
–
31
17
2
+1.34
–
–
–
–
28
18
3
+1.34
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
32
19
7
+1.33
–
–
–
–
31
20
2
+1.33
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
30
21
1
+1.32
–
–
–
–
40
22
9
+1.31
–
–
–
–
28
23
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
34
24
2
+1.27
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
28
25
8
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
36
26
1
+1.19
–
–
–
–
33
27
12
+1.17
–
–
–
–
38
28
5
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
29
29
3
+1.14
–
–
–
–
29
30
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
39
31
11
+1.08
–
–
–
–
30
32
2
+1.08
–
–
–
–
34
33
8
+1.04
–
–
–
–
36
34
9
+1.03
–
–
–
–
26
35
–
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
31
36
7
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
37
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
32
38
5
+0.96
–
–
–
–
36
39
6
+0.96
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
45
40
10
+0.94
–
–
–
–
25
41
4
+0.92
–
–
–
–
29
42
2
+0.90
–
–
–
–
36
43
7
+0.88
–
–
–
–
27
44
14
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
42
45
6
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
31
46
2
+0.85
–
–
–
–
34
47
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
34
48
12
+0.78
–
–
–
–
29
49
5
+0.75
–
–
–
–
29
50
21
+0.74
–
–
–
–
36
51
7
+0.73
–
–
–
–
48
52
5
+0.72
–
–
–
–
32
53
1
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
26
54
1
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
36
55
6
+0.68
–
–
–
–
36
56
9
+0.68
–
–
–
–
30
57
8
+0.64
–
–
–
–
34
58
–
+0.64
–
–
–
–
36
59
5
+0.63
–
–
–
–
32
60
1
+0.61
–
–
–
–
36
61
10
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
27
62
6
+0.58
–
–
–
–
33
63
3
+0.58
–
–
–
–
39
64
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
30
65
2
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
29
66
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
29
67
3
+0.53
–
–
–
–
22
68
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
29
69
15
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
29
70
8
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
28
71
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
34
72
7
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
27
73
18
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
28
74
24
+0.48
–
–
–
–
30
75
–
+0.48
–
–
–
–
28
76
3
+0.47
–
–
–
–
31
77
3
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
29
78
10
+0.46
–
–
–
–
29
79
16
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 RichardR. Zokol Richard  Zokol
29
80
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
31
81
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
41
82
5
+0.42
–
–
–
–
24
83
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 J.C.J. Snead J.C.  Snead
47
84
9
+0.39
–
–
–
–
31
85
11
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 DickD. Mast Dick  Mast
36
86
10
+0.38
–
–
–
–
23
87
11
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
35
88
5
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
30
89
20
+0.35
–
–
–
–
26
90
4
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
33
91
2
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
29
92
–
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
27
93
13
+0.29
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
40
94
–
+0.29
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
45
95
4
+0.29
–
–
–
–
41
96
8
+0.27
–
–
–
–
 DesD. Smyth Des  Smyth
35
97
4
+0.25
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
25
98
12
+0.23
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
30
99
–
+0.22
–
–
–
–
42
100
13
+0.21
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.