DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
36
1
6
+2.10
–
–
–
–
33
2
–
+2.01
–
–
–
–
36
3
–
+2.00
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
38
4
–
+1.95
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
28
5
6
+1.86
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
30
6
3
+1.83
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
31
7
3
+1.81
–
–
–
–
28
8
–
+1.76
–
–
–
–
31
9
3
+1.75
–
–
–
–
30
10
9
+1.73
–
–
–
–
38
11
5
+1.72
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
32
12
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
30
13
8
+1.66
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
33
14
4
+1.63
–
–
–
–
41
15
2
+1.59
–
–
–
–
28
16
2
+1.56
–
–
–
–
38
17
12
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
34
18
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
29
19
8
+1.30
–
–
–
–
39
20
5
+1.29
–
–
–
–
34
21
2
+1.26
–
–
–
–
30
22
7
+1.25
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
26
23
4
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
32
24
3
+1.20
–
–
–
–
34
25
1
+1.17
–
–
–
–
40
26
4
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
34
27
13
+1.13
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
30
28
8
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
29
10
+1.09
–
–
–
–
31
30
2
+1.08
–
–
–
–
30
31
2
+1.07
–
–
–
–
29
32
12
+1.06
–
–
–
–
33
33
4
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
28
34
10
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
29
35
1
+1.03
–
–
–
–
36
36
5
+1.02
–
–
–
–
25
37
10
+1.02
–
–
–
–
36
38
–
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
31
39
5
+1.00
–
–
–
–
33
40
6
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
36
41
9
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
45
42
12
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
36
43
12
+0.95
–
–
–
–
29
44
9
+0.93
–
–
–
–
36
45
2
+0.87
–
–
–
–
32
46
5
+0.86
–
–
–
–
32
47
5
+0.85
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
42
48
3
+0.84
–
–
–
–
36
49
1
+0.83
–
–
–
–
29
50
1
+0.82
–
–
–
–
30
51
2
+0.81
–
–
–
–
27
52
11
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
29
53
5
+0.80
–
–
–
–
36
54
11
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
27
55
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
29
56
22
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
31
57
5
+0.75
–
–
–
–
48
58
4
+0.69
–
–
–
–
34
59
17
+0.68
–
–
–
–
22
60
1
+0.65
–
–
–
–
36
61
3
+0.65
–
–
–
–
34
62
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
34
63
7
+0.63
–
–
–
–
32
64
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
29
65
7
+0.60
–
–
–
–
26
66
5
+0.55
–
–
–
–
39
67
2
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
28
68
11
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 DickD. Mast Dick  Mast
37
69
17
+0.49
–
–
–
–
30
70
4
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
25
71
2
+0.46
–
–
–
–
31
72
8
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
30
73
4
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
27
74
7
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
29
75
11
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
27
76
5
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
30
77
7
+0.38
–
–
–
–
29
78
10
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
35
79
35
+0.36
–
–
–
–
24
80
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
29
81
6
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
26
82
7
+0.35
–
–
–
–
31
83
2
+0.33
–
–
–
–
23
84
9
+0.33
–
–
–
–
36
85
24
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
28
86
12
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
29
87
2
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
35
88
–
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
30
89
36
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
33
90
1
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
27
91
1
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
26
92
8
+0.27
–
–
–
–
36
93
30
+0.26
–
–
–
–
42
94
18
+0.26
–
–
–
–
30
95
28
+0.26
–
–
–
–
31
96
3
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
30
97
50
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
27
98
18
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 DesD. Smyth Des  Smyth
35
99
5
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 BarryB. Lane Barry  Lane
27
100
5
+0.23
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.