DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
36
1
–
+2.09
–
–
–
–
33
2
–
+2.00
–
–
–
–
36
3
–
+2.00
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
38
4
–
+1.95
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
30
5
8
+1.95
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
31
6
1
+1.87
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
28
7
2
+1.85
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
30
8
2
+1.82
–
–
–
–
28
9
1
+1.76
–
–
–
–
31
10
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
30
11
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
38
12
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
41
13
2
+1.70
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
33
14
–
+1.63
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
33
15
3
+1.61
–
–
–
–
28
16
–
+1.53
–
–
–
–
30
17
2
+1.39
–
–
–
–
38
18
1
+1.38
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
32
19
5
+1.38
–
–
–
–
30
20
11
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
26
21
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
34
22
4
+1.30
–
–
–
–
34
23
2
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
29
24
29
+1.18
–
–
–
–
39
25
5
+1.18
–
–
–
–
34
26
1
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
34
27
–
+1.12
–
–
–
–
30
28
6
+1.12
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
29
–
+1.09
–
–
–
–
36
30
6
+1.08
–
–
–
–
33
31
2
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
29
32
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
40
33
7
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
36
34
9
+1.00
–
–
–
–
33
35
5
+0.99
–
–
–
–
36
36
13
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
36
37
4
+0.96
–
–
–
–
31
38
13
+0.96
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
28
39
5
+0.96
–
–
–
–
25
40
3
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
45
41
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
29
42
10
+0.94
–
–
–
–
31
43
13
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
31
44
5
+0.94
–
–
–
–
36
45
7
+0.87
–
–
–
–
36
46
1
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
30
47
19
+0.86
–
–
–
–
32
48
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
29
49
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
27
50
2
+0.77
–
–
–
–
32
51
4
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
27
52
3
+0.75
–
–
–
–
29
53
9
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
31
54
3
+0.74
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
42
55
7
+0.71
–
–
–
–
34
56
3
+0.71
–
–
–
–
36
57
4
+0.70
–
–
–
–
26
58
8
+0.69
–
–
–
–
48
59
1
+0.69
–
–
–
–
36
60
6
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
29
61
5
+0.65
–
–
–
–
34
62
–
+0.64
–
–
–
–
32
63
1
+0.64
–
–
–
–
34
64
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
29
65
–
+0.60
–
–
–
–
30
66
4
+0.59
–
–
–
–
22
67
7
+0.58
–
–
–
–
39
68
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
29
69
6
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
28
70
2
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
29
71
16
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
30
72
17
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
27
73
25
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
29
74
7
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 DickD. Mast Dick  Mast
37
75
6
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
28
76
10
+0.42
–
–
–
–
31
77
6
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
25
78
7
+0.41
–
–
–
–
30
79
16
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
30
80
7
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
30
81
4
+0.37
–
–
–
–
29
82
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
36
83
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
35
84
5
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
26
85
3
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
27
86
12
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
27
87
11
+0.33
–
–
–
–
31
88
16
+0.33
–
–
–
–
23
89
5
+0.32
–
–
–
–
28
90
27
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
27
91
–
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
35
92
4
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 BarryB. Lane Barry  Lane
27
93
7
+0.29
–
–
–
–
25
94
18
+0.27
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
33
95
5
+0.27
–
–
–
–
36
96
3
+0.26
–
–
–
–
24
97
17
+0.25
–
–
–
–
32
98
3
+0.21
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
26
99
7
+0.20
–
–
–
–
31
100
4
+0.20
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.