DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
33
1
–
+2.37
–
–
–
–
36
2
1
+2.19
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
31
3
1
+2.06
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
28
4
–
+2.03
–
–
–
–
38
5
3
+1.93
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
30
6
1
+1.90
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
30
7
1
+1.85
–
–
–
–
36
8
1
+1.78
–
–
–
–
28
9
1
+1.73
–
–
–
–
28
10
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
31
11
1
+1.69
–
–
–
–
30
12
7
+1.64
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
38
13
–
+1.60
–
–
–
–
38
14
3
+1.58
–
–
–
–
33
15
–
+1.47
–
–
–
–
31
16
–
+1.46
–
–
–
–
34
17
–
+1.46
–
–
–
–
34
18
–
+1.46
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
32
19
3
+1.44
–
–
–
–
41
20
6
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
26
21
–
+1.36
–
–
–
–
40
22
2
+1.32
–
–
–
–
36
23
3
+1.21
–
–
–
–
27
24
16
+1.21
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
29
25
4
+1.19
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
33
26
3
+1.13
–
–
–
–
25
27
1
+1.03
–
–
–
–
40
28
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
30
29
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
45
30
2
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
33
31
4
+1.02
–
–
–
–
36
32
1
+1.00
–
–
–
–
30
33
10
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
31
34
9
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
34
35
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
36
36
1
+0.96
–
–
–
–
36
37
7
+0.96
–
–
–
–
30
38
3
+0.95
–
–
–
–
31
39
8
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
29
40
5
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
41
11
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
35
42
4
+0.91
–
–
–
–
36
43
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
30
44
6
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
30
45
16
+0.85
–
–
–
–
36
46
5
+0.85
–
–
–
–
31
47
13
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
29
48
9
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
30
49
15
+0.81
–
–
–
–
34
50
9
+0.79
–
–
–
–
48
51
2
+0.77
–
–
–
–
30
52
1
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
30
53
5
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
29
54
4
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
44
55
3
+0.72
–
–
–
–
42
56
20
+0.71
–
–
–
–
32
57
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
29
58
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
34
59
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
22
60
5
+0.68
–
–
–
–
32
61
4
+0.68
–
–
–
–
33
62
8
+0.67
–
–
–
–
30
63
5
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
31
64
5
+0.65
–
–
–
–
29
65
1
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
37
66
6
+0.63
–
–
–
–
32
67
5
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
27
68
5
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
35
69
4
+0.58
–
–
–
–
39
70
–
+0.55
–
–
–
–
29
71
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
38
72
10
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 DickD. Mast Dick  Mast
37
73
2
+0.51
–
–
–
–
28
74
6
+0.50
–
–
–
–
32
75
2
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
28
76
5
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
35
77
13
+0.48
–
–
–
–
26
78
1
+0.48
–
–
–
–
34
79
12
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
28
80
2
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
27
81
9
+0.44
–
–
–
–
29
82
17
+0.42
–
–
–
–
30
83
1
+0.40
–
–
–
–
24
84
10
+0.40
–
–
–
–
37
85
16
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
35
86
12
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
26
87
–
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
26
88
3
+0.33
–
–
–
–
28
89
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
24
90
7
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
30
91
–
+0.30
–
–
–
–
36
92
6
+0.28
–
–
–
–
31
93
–
+0.28
–
–
–
–
25
94
15
+0.27
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
28
95
–
+0.26
–
–
–
–
42
96
1
+0.24
–
–
–
–
23
97
13
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
29
98
–
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
29
99
3
+0.20
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
33
100
–
+0.19
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.