DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
33
1
–
+2.49
–
–
–
–
31
2
–
+2.02
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
31
3
–
+2.00
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
31
4
5
+1.98
–
–
–
–
28
5
6
+1.97
–
–
–
–
36
6
–
+1.93
–
–
–
–
28
7
2
+1.92
–
–
–
–
33
8
1
+1.89
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
30
9
1
+1.88
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
28
10
6
+1.88
–
–
–
–
31
11
1
+1.87
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
31
12
–
+1.76
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
38
13
4
+1.72
–
–
–
–
38
14
1
+1.71
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
32
15
1
+1.66
–
–
–
–
34
16
3
+1.48
–
–
–
–
35
17
3
+1.47
–
–
–
–
30
18
3
+1.47
–
–
–
–
30
19
9
+1.46
–
–
–
–
38
20
2
+1.43
–
–
–
–
30
21
3
+1.39
–
–
–
–
40
22
1
+1.38
–
–
–
–
36
23
7
+1.35
–
–
–
–
22
24
2
+1.31
–
–
–
–
34
25
2
+1.27
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
33
26
3
+1.24
–
–
–
–
31
27
6
+1.18
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
28
2
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
45
29
9
+1.09
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
29
30
–
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
29
31
6
+1.04
–
–
–
–
40
32
13
+1.03
–
–
–
–
36
33
2
+0.98
–
–
–
–
25
34
2
+0.96
–
–
–
–
29
35
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
32
36
2
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
34
37
7
+0.95
–
–
–
–
28
38
12
+0.93
–
–
–
–
33
39
23
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
30
40
4
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
37
41
–
+0.91
–
–
–
–
37
42
5
+0.89
–
–
–
–
36
43
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
34
44
5
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
30
45
2
+0.84
–
–
–
–
41
46
6
+0.83
–
–
–
–
32
47
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
35
48
–
+0.82
–
–
–
–
32
49
3
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
45
50
6
+0.81
–
–
–
–
30
51
24
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
27
52
5
+0.78
–
–
–
–
35
53
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
36
54
1
+0.74
–
–
–
–
37
55
20
+0.74
–
–
–
–
25
56
7
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
30
57
7
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
27
58
1
+0.68
–
–
–
–
31
59
11
+0.64
–
–
–
–
24
60
1
+0.64
–
–
–
–
37
61
7
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
43
62
11
+0.60
–
–
–
–
48
63
11
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Fabel Brad  Fabel
32
64
2
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
45
65
11
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
29
66
25
+0.56
–
–
–
–
38
67
14
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
30
68
10
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
27
69
4
+0.56
–
–
–
–
36
70
9
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
32
71
25
+0.54
–
–
–
–
30
72
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
29
73
13
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
28
74
2
+0.53
–
–
–
–
42
75
13
+0.52
–
–
–
–
29
76
11
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 GrahamG. Marsh Graham  Marsh
44
77
6
+0.52
–
–
–
–
28
78
–
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
35
79
15
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
30
80
5
+0.44
–
–
–
–
27
81
21
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
33
82
30
+0.43
–
–
–
–
36
83
14
+0.42
–
–
–
–
39
84
5
+0.42
–
–
–
–
30
85
18
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
34
86
6
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
27
87
6
+0.41
–
–
–
–
24
88
14
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
28
89
1
+0.39
–
–
–
–
28
90
14
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
31
91
9
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
30
92
3
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
28
93
24
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
29
94
1
+0.33
–
–
–
–
32
95
–
+0.33
–
–
–
–
29
96
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
37
97
2
+0.31
–
–
–
–
31
98
2
+0.30
–
–
–
–
25
99
15
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
31
100
17
+0.30
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.