DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
31
1
–
+2.25
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
39
2
–
+2.08
–
–
–
–
29
3
2
+1.97
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
31
4
1
+1.88
–
–
–
–
28
5
2
+1.78
–
–
–
–
34
6
–
+1.71
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
32
7
3
+1.70
–
–
–
–
23
8
–
+1.63
–
–
–
–
37
9
1
+1.58
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
32
10
1
+1.57
–
–
–
–
29
11
1
+1.55
–
–
–
–
34
12
3
+1.53
–
–
–
–
37
13
1
+1.53
–
–
–
–
28
14
13
+1.41
–
–
–
–
32
15
2
+1.39
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
31
16
5
+1.37
–
–
–
–
32
17
1
+1.32
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
29
18
4
+1.30
–
–
–
–
26
19
5
+1.30
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
27
20
1
+1.28
–
–
–
–
31
21
2
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
33
22
10
+1.18
–
–
–
–
30
23
4
+1.18
–
–
–
–
34
24
2
+1.17
–
–
–
–
39
25
8
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
30
26
10
+1.13
–
–
–
–
41
27
7
+1.12
–
–
–
–
37
28
–
+1.09
–
–
–
–
32
29
4
+1.09
–
–
–
–
26
30
6
+1.05
–
–
–
–
31
31
2
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
29
32
9
+1.00
–
–
–
–
35
33
–
+0.98
–
–
–
–
35
34
–
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
29
35
–
+0.98
–
–
–
–
35
36
5
+0.96
–
–
–
–
37
37
5
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
30
38
9
+0.93
–
–
–
–
37
39
2
+0.92
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
31
40
9
+0.92
–
–
–
–
39
41
3
+0.90
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
36
42
12
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
33
43
13
+0.87
–
–
–
–
31
44
5
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
30
45
1
+0.85
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
37
46
23
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
29
47
6
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
46
48
2
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
43
49
6
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
35
50
13
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
31
51
5
+0.75
–
–
–
–
29
52
–
+0.75
–
–
–
–
29
53
2
+0.73
–
–
–
–
37
54
6
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
46
55
–
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
34
56
16
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
32
57
5
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
31
58
2
+0.66
–
–
–
–
30
59
14
+0.66
–
–
–
–
27
60
2
+0.66
–
–
–
–
34
61
4
+0.65
–
–
–
–
33
62
3
+0.65
–
–
–
–
33
63
5
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
41
64
3
+0.62
–
–
–
–
25
65
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
30
66
4
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 DesD. Smyth Des  Smyth
36
67
11
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
26
68
8
+0.54
–
–
–
–
42
69
19
+0.54
–
–
–
–
33
70
20
+0.53
–
–
–
–
27
71
18
+0.52
–
–
–
–
28
72
1
+0.51
–
–
–
–
40
73
1
+0.50
–
–
–
–
33
74
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
31
75
3
+0.48
–
–
–
–
37
76
4
+0.45
–
–
–
–
24
77
13
+0.44
–
–
–
–
30
78
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
27
79
32
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
35
80
12
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
36
81
20
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
31
82
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
37
83
1
+0.40
–
–
–
–
26
84
18
+0.40
–
–
–
–
28
85
20
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
28
86
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
35
87
4
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
30
88
11
+0.37
–
–
–
–
49
89
18
+0.36
–
–
–
–
24
90
4
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
27
91
10
+0.34
–
–
–
–
30
92
13
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
28
93
11
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
31
94
18
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
36
95
2
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
23
96
1
+0.31
–
–
–
–
37
97
4
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
49
98
2
+0.29
–
–
–
–
37
99
12
+0.29
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
34
100
2
+0.28
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.