DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
34
1
3
+2.03
–
–
–
–
32
2
–
+1.99
–
–
–
–
34
3
2
+1.93
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
32
4
3
+1.92
–
–
–
–
29
5
2
+1.89
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
39
6
–
+1.85
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
31
7
2
+1.84
–
–
–
–
29
8
1
+1.71
–
–
–
–
32
9
1
+1.66
–
–
–
–
23
10
2
+1.55
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
29
11
–
+1.52
–
–
–
–
37
12
7
+1.50
–
–
–
–
36
13
–
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
33
14
4
+1.40
–
–
–
–
31
15
11
+1.37
–
–
–
–
37
16
1
+1.36
–
–
–
–
32
17
7
+1.35
–
–
–
–
33
18
4
+1.33
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
32
19
3
+1.30
–
–
–
–
31
20
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
41
21
8
+1.23
–
–
–
–
37
22
–
+1.23
–
–
–
–
29
23
8
+1.22
–
–
–
–
26
24
1
+1.17
–
–
–
–
37
25
4
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
31
26
2
+1.13
–
–
–
–
39
27
3
+1.11
–
–
–
–
25
28
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
32
29
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
30
30
3
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
34
31
4
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
30
32
7
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
28
33
1
+1.01
–
–
–
–
25
34
3
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
34
35
4
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
30
36
–
+0.98
–
–
–
–
33
37
18
+0.92
–
–
–
–
37
38
6
+0.92
–
–
–
–
35
39
17
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
30
40
–
+0.90
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
37
41
–
+0.90
–
–
–
–
33
42
4
+0.89
–
–
–
–
31
43
3
+0.85
–
–
–
–
33
44
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
29
45
7
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
35
46
16
+0.79
–
–
–
–
39
47
3
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
31
48
5
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
37
49
2
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
27
50
3
+0.76
–
–
–
–
42
51
16
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
29
52
2
+0.74
–
–
–
–
36
53
15
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
31
54
9
+0.73
–
–
–
–
31
55
7
+0.73
–
–
–
–
37
56
2
+0.72
–
–
–
–
31
57
4
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
28
58
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
30
59
11
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
28
60
2
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
23
61
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
35
62
13
+0.69
–
–
–
–
34
63
3
+0.68
–
–
–
–
30
64
1
+0.65
–
–
–
–
29
65
10
+0.65
–
–
–
–
27
66
7
+0.64
–
–
–
–
41
67
–
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
31
68
17
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
32
69
4
+0.63
–
–
–
–
26
70
8
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
31
71
5
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
31
72
–
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
42
73
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
22
74
8
+0.52
–
–
–
–
26
75
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
29
76
7
+0.52
–
–
–
–
28
77
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
36
78
20
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
36
79
15
+0.51
–
–
–
–
49
80
1
+0.50
–
–
–
–
34
81
1
+0.46
–
–
–
–
37
82
1
+0.45
–
–
–
–
40
83
12
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
27
84
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
29
85
1
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 Billy RayB. Brown Billy Ray  Brown
26
86
1
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
34
87
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
29
88
2
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
31
89
12
+0.36
–
–
–
–
31
90
–
+0.36
–
–
–
–
31
91
–
+0.36
–
–
–
–
42
92
5
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
44
93
–
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
31
94
–
+0.33
–
–
–
–
35
95
8
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
46
96
6
+0.33
–
–
–
–
38
97
2
+0.28
–
–
–
–
33
98
10
+0.28
–
–
–
–
29
99
12
+0.25
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
46
100
12
+0.22
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.