DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
32
1
2
+1.94
–
–
–
–
32
2
1
+1.94
–
–
–
–
34
3
1
+1.93
–
–
–
–
29
4
–
+1.88
–
–
–
–
29
5
3
+1.86
–
–
–
–
34
6
1
+1.86
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
39
7
1
+1.86
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
31
8
1
+1.83
–
–
–
–
37
9
1
+1.76
–
–
–
–
32
10
1
+1.61
–
–
–
–
31
11
2
+1.50
–
–
–
–
23
12
1
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
29
13
1
+1.44
–
–
–
–
33
14
5
+1.39
–
–
–
–
36
15
–
+1.31
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
33
16
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
29
17
1
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
32
18
2
+1.24
–
–
–
–
37
19
3
+1.21
–
–
–
–
32
20
3
+1.21
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
30
21
9
+1.18
–
–
–
–
25
22
3
+1.16
–
–
–
–
35
23
18
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
31
24
4
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
30
25
1
+1.15
–
–
–
–
37
26
4
+1.14
–
–
–
–
26
27
1
+1.11
–
–
–
–
37
28
5
+1.06
–
–
–
–
39
29
2
+1.05
–
–
–
–
41
30
9
+1.05
–
–
–
–
31
31
13
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
34
32
2
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
37
33
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
30
34
1
+0.96
–
–
–
–
34
35
7
+0.96
–
–
–
–
33
36
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
35
37
6
+0.94
–
–
–
–
31
38
9
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
30
39
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
37
40
–
+0.91
–
–
–
–
31
41
9
+0.90
–
–
–
–
39
42
9
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
28
43
10
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
35
44
5
+0.87
–
–
–
–
35
45
7
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
31
46
3
+0.83
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
29
47
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
33
48
9
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
37
49
15
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
29
50
5
+0.80
–
–
–
–
28
51
7
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
31
52
13
+0.78
–
–
–
–
31
53
7
+0.77
–
–
–
–
30
54
9
+0.75
–
–
–
–
32
55
18
+0.75
–
–
–
–
42
56
–
+0.74
–
–
–
–
25
57
10
+0.74
–
–
–
–
29
58
3
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
27
59
5
+0.72
–
–
–
–
41
60
7
+0.72
–
–
–
–
37
61
8
+0.71
–
–
–
–
31
62
10
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
28
63
8
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
29
64
15
+0.66
–
–
–
–
36
65
8
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
28
66
7
+0.64
–
–
–
–
26
67
4
+0.61
–
–
–
–
49
68
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
30
69
3
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
31
70
2
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
36
71
6
+0.58
–
–
–
–
38
72
10
+0.57
–
–
–
–
28
73
8
+0.56
–
–
–
–
29
74
1
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
42
75
–
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
23
76
16
+0.54
–
–
–
–
34
77
11
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
27
78
9
+0.52
–
–
–
–
28
79
18
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
32
80
11
+0.51
–
–
–
–
34
81
19
+0.48
–
–
–
–
26
82
8
+0.47
–
–
–
–
40
83
3
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
46
84
16
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
31
85
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
35
86
3
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
36
87
9
+0.39
–
–
–
–
29
88
13
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 Billy RayB. Brown Billy Ray  Brown
26
89
3
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
31
90
1
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
44
91
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
34
92
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
22
93
8
+0.34
–
–
–
–
33
94
4
+0.33
–
–
–
–
49
95
19
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 J.C.J. Snead J.C.  Snead
48
96
9
+0.32
–
–
–
–
29
97
3
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
46
98
2
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
31
99
23
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
31
100
5
+0.29
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.