DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
35
1
–
+2.15
–
–
–
–
29
2
–
+2.15
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
40
3
2
+1.81
–
–
–
–
30
4
1
+1.80
–
–
–
–
30
5
1
+1.79
–
–
–
–
33
6
–
+1.66
–
–
–
–
24
7
3
+1.58
–
–
–
–
36
8
1
+1.56
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
32
9
1
+1.55
–
–
–
–
33
10
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
35
11
–
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
35
12
1
+1.33
–
–
–
–
36
13
1
+1.27
–
–
–
–
32
14
2
+1.22
–
–
–
–
38
15
5
+1.21
–
–
–
–
32
16
2
+1.20
–
–
–
–
26
17
2
+1.16
–
–
–
–
38
18
4
+1.14
–
–
–
–
31
19
4
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
31
20
13
+1.07
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
28
21
8
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
34
22
8
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
31
23
2
+1.01
–
–
–
–
40
24
1
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
29
25
33
+0.97
–
–
–
–
27
26
5
+0.96
–
–
–
–
33
27
10
+0.96
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
32
28
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
30
29
5
+0.95
–
–
–
–
27
30
–
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
30
31
6
+0.92
–
–
–
–
 Billy RayB. Brown Billy Ray  Brown
26
32
17
+0.89
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
33
33
10
+0.88
–
–
–
–
38
34
21
+0.87
–
–
–
–
38
35
8
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
32
36
–
+0.83
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
37
37
11
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
44
38
21
+0.81
–
–
–
–
38
39
7
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
36
40
–
+0.80
–
–
–
–
42
41
10
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
28
42
11
+0.78
–
–
–
–
34
43
2
+0.78
–
–
–
–
43
44
3
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
38
45
2
+0.77
–
–
–
–
36
46
4
+0.77
–
–
–
–
29
47
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
24
48
10
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
31
49
12
+0.75
–
–
–
–
30
50
6
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
33
51
12
+0.74
–
–
–
–
25
52
4
+0.72
–
–
–
–
28
53
7
+0.69
–
–
–
–
40
54
19
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
30
55
21
+0.66
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
31
56
24
+0.65
–
–
–
–
41
57
9
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
27
58
7
+0.62
–
–
–
–
27
59
20
+0.60
–
–
–
–
33
60
7
+0.58
–
–
–
–
31
61
2
+0.58
–
–
–
–
38
62
13
+0.56
–
–
–
–
27
63
2
+0.55
–
–
–
–
34
64
7
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
29
65
4
+0.53
–
–
–
–
30
66
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
32
67
17
+0.52
–
–
–
–
30
68
–
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
38
69
15
+0.51
–
–
–
–
32
70
–
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
47
71
19
+0.49
–
–
–
–
31
72
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
27
73
3
+0.48
–
–
–
–
32
74
2
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
30
75
8
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
35
76
12
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
33
77
12
+0.45
–
–
–
–
34
78
9
+0.44
–
–
–
–
29
79
15
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
42
80
2
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
36
81
3
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
32
82
25
+0.39
–
–
–
–
44
83
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
50
84
11
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
43
85
3
+0.38
–
–
–
–
32
86
9
+0.38
–
–
–
–
38
87
25
+0.38
–
–
–
–
30
88
7
+0.38
–
–
–
–
41
89
12
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 J.C.J. Snead J.C.  Snead
49
90
9
+0.33
–
–
–
–
28
91
12
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
28
92
8
+0.32
–
–
–
–
34
93
19
+0.31
–
–
–
–
50
94
3
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
37
95
29
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
38
96
4
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
29
97
11
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
32
98
8
+0.27
–
–
–
–
32
99
4
+0.27
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
35
100
–
+0.25
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.