DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
24
1
1
+2.37
–
–
–
–
35
2
1
+2.29
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
33
3
–
+2.03
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
31
4
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
34
5
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
32
6
2
+1.69
–
–
–
–
33
7
3
+1.64
–
–
–
–
30
8
5
+1.57
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
45
9
–
+1.56
–
–
–
–
36
10
3
+1.53
–
–
–
–
30
11
3
+1.51
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
40
12
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
36
13
1
+1.45
–
–
–
–
29
14
14
+1.30
–
–
–
–
41
15
1
+1.30
–
–
–
–
43
16
1
+1.24
–
–
–
–
39
17
10
+1.20
–
–
–
–
24
18
1
+1.20
–
–
–
–
26
19
1
+1.19
–
–
–
–
26
20
1
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
31
21
5
+1.16
–
–
–
–
35
22
6
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
29
23
3
+1.12
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
34
24
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
40
25
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
30
26
5
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
33
27
4
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
24
28
6
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
33
29
7
+0.99
–
–
–
–
28
30
–
+0.98
–
–
–
–
28
31
12
+0.95
–
–
–
–
38
32
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
33
33
–
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
28
34
5
+0.92
–
–
–
–
33
35
3
+0.87
–
–
–
–
38
36
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
35
37
13
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
36
38
14
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
34
39
12
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
32
40
13
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
38
41
8
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
38
42
33
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
30
43
4
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Bland John  Bland
44
44
10
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
36
45
5
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
33
46
–
+0.77
–
–
–
–
30
47
8
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
31
48
7
+0.76
–
–
–
–
39
49
5
+0.74
–
–
–
–
33
50
9
+0.74
–
–
–
–
33
51
13
+0.74
–
–
–
–
27
52
5
+0.73
–
–
–
–
34
53
5
+0.73
–
–
–
–
34
54
8
+0.73
–
–
–
–
42
55
5
+0.73
–
–
–
–
37
56
31
+0.71
–
–
–
–
26
57
20
+0.70
–
–
–
–
38
58
16
+0.69
–
–
–
–
29
59
14
+0.68
–
–
–
–
39
60
24
+0.64
–
–
–
–
35
61
5
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Claar Brian  Claar
31
62
3
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
36
63
11
+0.64
–
–
–
–
26
64
16
+0.63
–
–
–
–
32
65
7
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
37
66
5
+0.61
–
–
–
–
29
67
–
+0.58
–
–
–
–
32
68
1
+0.56
–
–
–
–
31
69
12
+0.53
–
–
–
–
30
70
1
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 Billy RayB. Brown Billy Ray  Brown
27
71
5
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
33
72
29
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
31
73
10
+0.51
–
–
–
–
36
74
19
+0.50
–
–
–
–
39
75
5
+0.50
–
–
–
–
37
76
3
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
31
77
10
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
32
78
10
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
38
79
18
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
48
80
20
+0.46
–
–
–
–
50
81
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
32
82
9
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Ogle Brett  Ogle
26
83
11
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
28
84
8
+0.43
–
–
–
–
43
85
2
+0.40
–
–
–
–
32
86
1
+0.40
–
–
–
–
27
87
35
+0.39
–
–
–
–
35
88
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
30
89
6
+0.38
–
–
–
–
35
90
31
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
30
91
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
24
92
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
50
93
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
48
94
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
39
95
21
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
32
96
–
+0.32
–
–
–
–
29
97
15
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
29
98
30
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Gamez Robert  Gamez
22
99
14
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
31
100
2
+0.29
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.