DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
33
1
–
+2.04
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
31
2
1
+1.85
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
33
3
1
+1.80
–
–
–
–
25
4
2
+1.75
–
–
–
–
30
5
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
36
6
1
+1.64
–
–
–
–
41
7
2
+1.64
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
33
8
5
+1.63
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
45
9
1
+1.60
–
–
–
–
39
10
4
+1.53
–
–
–
–
31
11
4
+1.49
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
30
12
2
+1.48
–
–
–
–
41
13
6
+1.47
–
–
–
–
27
14
2
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
34
15
2
+1.43
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
25
16
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
34
17
6
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
33
18
1
+1.33
–
–
–
–
35
19
4
+1.27
–
–
–
–
37
20
1
+1.25
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
32
21
1
+1.18
–
–
–
–
37
22
4
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
32
23
3
+1.16
–
–
–
–
35
24
1
+1.14
–
–
–
–
31
25
1
+1.13
–
–
–
–
33
26
9
+1.09
–
–
–
–
32
27
5
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
30
28
4
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
35
29
17
+1.02
–
–
–
–
34
30
3
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
41
31
1
+1.02
–
–
–
–
28
32
1
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
34
33
4
+1.01
–
–
–
–
39
34
20
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
48
35
7
+0.97
–
–
–
–
39
36
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
32
37
2
+0.97
–
–
–
–
30
38
10
+0.96
–
–
–
–
36
39
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
29
40
4
+0.94
–
–
–
–
34
41
16
+0.94
–
–
–
–
24
42
2
+0.93
–
–
–
–
28
43
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
32
44
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
35
45
12
+0.90
–
–
–
–
 NolanN. Henke Nolan  Henke
26
46
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
51
47
6
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
31
48
14
+0.85
–
–
–
–
35
49
4
+0.83
–
–
–
–
31
50
8
+0.83
–
–
–
–
28
51
5
+0.77
–
–
–
–
33
52
10
+0.75
–
–
–
–
33
53
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
24
54
5
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
29
55
13
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
33
56
16
+0.69
–
–
–
–
33
57
6
+0.68
–
–
–
–
37
58
1
+0.68
–
–
–
–
41
59
11
+0.66
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
30
60
19
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
28
61
11
+0.62
–
–
–
–
27
62
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
39
63
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
37
64
9
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
38
65
1
+0.59
–
–
–
–
35
66
3
+0.58
–
–
–
–
39
67
14
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
32
68
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
33
69
12
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Claar Brian  Claar
31
70
6
+0.55
–
–
–
–
30
71
8
+0.54
–
–
–
–
27
72
26
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
39
73
3
+0.53
–
–
–
–
31
74
12
+0.52
–
–
–
–
35
75
22
+0.50
–
–
–
–
44
76
8
+0.49
–
–
–
–
30
77
16
+0.48
–
–
–
–
33
78
2
+0.47
–
–
–
–
27
79
5
+0.46
–
–
–
–
35
80
13
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
39
81
3
+0.46
–
–
–
–
39
82
10
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
36
83
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
38
84
11
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
38
85
26
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
40
86
10
+0.42
–
–
–
–
32
87
4
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Wrenn Robert  Wrenn
31
88
11
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Martin Miguel Angel  Martin
29
89
14
+0.39
–
–
–
–
43
90
19
+0.38
–
–
–
–
32
91
15
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
34
92
21
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
36
93
5
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
29
94
10
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Knox Kenny  Knox
34
95
12
+0.37
–
–
–
–
39
96
14
+0.36
–
–
–
–
32
97
–
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 StanS. Utley Stan  Utley
29
98
17
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
29
99
–
+0.35
–
–
–
–
31
100
15
+0.34
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.