DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
39
1
–
+2.72
–
–
–
–
34
2
1
+2.09
–
–
–
–
35
3
1
+2.02
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
49
4
–
+1.95
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
36
5
–
+1.89
–
–
–
–
38
6
1
+1.82
–
–
–
–
38
7
5
+1.81
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
24
8
10
+1.69
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
37
9
3
+1.69
–
–
–
–
30
10
12
+1.63
–
–
–
–
30
11
6
+1.60
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
44
12
4
+1.56
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
28
13
3
+1.54
–
–
–
–
44
14
11
+1.49
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
34
15
6
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
36
16
3
+1.46
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
36
17
13
+1.41
–
–
–
–
33
18
7
+1.39
–
–
–
–
37
19
2
+1.36
–
–
–
–
28
20
5
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
40
21
2
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
32
22
2
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
51
23
–
+1.34
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
34
24
8
+1.32
–
–
–
–
42
25
11
+1.30
–
–
–
–
42
26
1
+1.26
–
–
–
–
33
27
1
+1.24
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
35
28
4
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
38
29
4
+1.22
–
–
–
–
34
30
2
+1.16
–
–
–
–
39
31
14
+1.15
–
–
–
–
29
32
3
+1.15
–
–
–
–
38
33
5
+1.10
–
–
–
–
24
34
3
+1.07
–
–
–
–
30
35
1
+1.07
–
–
–
–
37
36
1
+1.02
–
–
–
–
42
37
–
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
37
38
4
+0.98
–
–
–
–
42
39
–
+0.96
–
–
–
–
34
40
2
+0.95
–
–
–
–
34
41
12
+0.95
–
–
–
–
32
42
4
+0.94
–
–
–
–
41
43
2
+0.90
–
–
–
–
36
44
8
+0.88
–
–
–
–
28
45
6
+0.85
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
33
46
2
+0.84
–
–
–
–
40
47
–
+0.83
–
–
–
–
33
48
15
+0.83
–
–
–
–
29
49
20
+0.81
–
–
–
–
47
50
10
+0.81
–
–
–
–
37
51
15
+0.79
–
–
–
–
36
52
3
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
35
53
5
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
31
54
4
+0.75
–
–
–
–
41
55
12
+0.74
–
–
–
–
40
56
15
+0.72
–
–
–
–
35
57
5
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 RodgerR. Davis Rodger  Davis
43
58
7
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
42
59
3
+0.69
–
–
–
–
29
60
3
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
32
61
3
+0.67
–
–
–
–
28
62
33
+0.64
–
–
–
–
30
63
3
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
28
64
10
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
40
65
23
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
38
66
7
+0.62
–
–
–
–
39
67
5
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
31
68
13
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
39
69
15
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Ozaki Joe  Ozaki
38
70
2
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 BarryB. Lane Barry  Lane
33
71
10
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
42
72
5
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
30
73
1
+0.54
–
–
–
–
35
74
1
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
33
75
21
+0.52
–
–
–
–
34
76
–
+0.49
–
–
–
–
35
77
–
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 NolanN. Henke Nolan  Henke
29
78
14
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
33
79
1
+0.47
–
–
–
–
35
80
1
+0.47
–
–
–
–
36
81
6
+0.46
–
–
–
–
36
82
–
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
32
83
–
+0.43
–
–
–
–
33
84
2
+0.43
–
–
–
–
24
85
5
+0.41
–
–
–
–
33
86
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
30
87
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
36
88
2
+0.37
–
–
–
–
36
89
19
+0.36
–
–
–
–
31
90
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
28
91
3
+0.35
–
–
–
–
38
92
11
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 TedT. Tryba Ted  Tryba
27
93
4
+0.33
–
–
–
–
31
94
7
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Gump Scott  Gump
28
95
4
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 FultonF. Allem Fulton  Allem
36
96
5
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
25
97
13
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Roe Mark  Roe
31
98
1
+0.28
–
–
–
–
31
99
6
+0.23
–
–
–
–
27
100
3
+0.22
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.