DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
25
1
–
+2.11
–
–
–
–
28
2
3
+1.87
–
–
–
–
32
3
1
+1.83
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
42
4
1
+1.82
–
–
–
–
35
5
2
+1.78
–
–
–
–
35
6
2
+1.72
–
–
–
–
28
7
8
+1.71
–
–
–
–
30
8
2
+1.64
–
–
–
–
28
9
3
+1.62
–
–
–
–
27
10
1
+1.61
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
41
11
2
+1.61
–
–
–
–
37
12
2
+1.55
–
–
–
–
45
13
5
+1.51
–
–
–
–
30
14
3
+1.48
–
–
–
–
45
15
2
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
16
4
+1.41
–
–
–
–
32
17
1
+1.41
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
27
18
4
+1.41
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
26
19
3
+1.41
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
35
20
4
+1.38
–
–
–
–
33
21
–
+1.38
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
42
22
3
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
23
7
+1.34
–
–
–
–
29
24
3
+1.30
–
–
–
–
31
25
–
+1.29
–
–
–
–
33
26
3
+1.28
–
–
–
–
31
27
1
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
24
28
6
+1.24
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
30
29
–
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
32
30
3
+1.21
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
27
31
1
+1.14
–
–
–
–
33
32
5
+1.14
–
–
–
–
33
33
2
+1.12
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
33
34
3
+1.10
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
35
35
1
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
30
36
8
+1.06
–
–
–
–
27
37
3
+1.04
–
–
–
–
35
38
2
+1.02
–
–
–
–
37
39
–
+0.96
–
–
–
–
29
40
2
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
33
41
20
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
32
42
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
33
43
–
+0.89
–
–
–
–
28
44
11
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
27
45
–
+0.84
–
–
–
–
25
46
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
29
47
4
+0.82
–
–
–
–
44
48
2
+0.78
–
–
–
–
39
49
10
+0.78
–
–
–
–
32
50
4
+0.78
–
–
–
–
28
51
1
+0.74
–
–
–
–
31
52
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
31
53
9
+0.70
–
–
–
–
34
54
4
+0.68
–
–
–
–
29
55
8
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
45
56
–
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Upper Brett  Upper
26
57
–
+0.68
–
–
–
–
29
58
30
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
28
59
17
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
32
60
16
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
38
61
12
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
30
62
10
+0.62
–
–
–
–
38
63
13
+0.62
–
–
–
–
36
64
4
+0.61
–
–
–
–
25
65
5
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Smith Mike  Smith
34
66
6
+0.57
–
–
–
–
35
67
4
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Inman Joe  Inman
37
68
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
29
69
3
+0.54
–
–
–
–
30
70
3
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
27
71
3
+0.53
–
–
–
–
38
72
18
+0.53
–
–
–
–
49
73
4
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
32
74
1
+0.51
–
–
–
–
33
75
4
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
28
76
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
35
77
–
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
26
78
31
+0.48
–
–
–
–
30
79
1
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
25
80
17
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
28
81
–
+0.45
–
–
–
–
26
82
–
+0.44
–
–
–
–
27
83
10
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. North Andy  North
35
84
31
+0.44
–
–
–
–
32
85
2
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
32
86
4
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Bland John  Bland
39
87
2
+0.40
–
–
–
–
27
88
2
+0.40
–
–
–
–
27
89
24
+0.40
–
–
–
–
25
90
12
+0.40
–
–
–
–
37
91
7
+0.38
–
–
–
–
33
92
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 PaulP. Way Paul  Way
22
93
4
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
27
94
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
27
95
1
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
27
96
9
+0.33
–
–
–
–
33
97
2
+0.33
–
–
–
–
30
98
19
+0.33
–
–
–
–
36
99
3
+0.32
–
–
–
–
44
100
2
+0.30
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.