DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
25
1
–
+2.01
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
42
2
–
+1.94
–
–
–
–
28
3
–
+1.93
–
–
–
–
32
4
–
+1.82
–
–
–
–
35
5
–
+1.77
–
–
–
–
27
6
3
+1.73
–
–
–
–
35
7
1
+1.71
–
–
–
–
28
8
–
+1.65
–
–
–
–
30
9
2
+1.60
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
41
10
–
+1.60
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
27
11
–
+1.54
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
26
12
1
+1.53
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
42
13
9
+1.53
–
–
–
–
28
14
2
+1.48
–
–
–
–
30
15
1
+1.46
–
–
–
–
33
16
7
+1.43
–
–
–
–
33
17
1
+1.43
–
–
–
–
45
18
1
+1.43
–
–
–
–
37
19
4
+1.43
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
20
2
+1.42
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
21
3
+1.42
–
–
–
–
29
22
3
+1.40
–
–
–
–
45
23
3
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
35
24
1
+1.33
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
33
25
1
+1.32
–
–
–
–
31
26
1
+1.32
–
–
–
–
34
27
6
+1.30
–
–
–
–
31
28
–
+1.28
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
32
29
2
+1.27
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
24
30
1
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
31
31
1
+1.22
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
35
32
3
+1.16
–
–
–
–
37
33
4
+1.13
–
–
–
–
33
34
2
+1.11
–
–
–
–
33
35
1
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
30
36
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
27
37
1
+1.03
–
–
–
–
29
38
4
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
29
39
9
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
33
40
1
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
32
41
2
+0.93
–
–
–
–
28
42
–
+0.87
–
–
–
–
31
43
21
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
27
44
1
+0.83
–
–
–
–
35
45
5
+0.83
–
–
–
–
25
46
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
33
47
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
38
48
12
+0.81
–
–
–
–
34
49
5
+0.81
–
–
–
–
32
50
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
44
51
10
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
25
52
5
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
45
53
3
+0.74
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
27
54
12
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
32
55
1
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
31
56
3
+0.70
–
–
–
–
29
57
5
+0.69
–
–
–
–
39
58
7
+0.69
–
–
–
–
25
59
4
+0.64
–
–
–
–
28
60
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Upper Brett  Upper
26
61
5
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
38
62
3
+0.61
–
–
–
–
27
63
2
+0.59
–
–
–
–
49
64
14
+0.59
–
–
–
–
36
65
–
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
28
66
4
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 TonyT. Sills Tony  Sills
29
67
28
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
28
68
–
+0.54
–
–
–
–
29
69
2
+0.51
–
–
–
–
44
70
24
+0.50
–
–
–
–
38
71
14
+0.50
–
–
–
–
33
72
–
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
30
73
6
+0.49
–
–
–
–
27
74
3
+0.48
–
–
–
–
26
75
31
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
32
76
16
+0.47
–
–
–
–
35
77
4
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
27
78
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
27
79
25
+0.46
–
–
–
–
33
80
17
+0.46
–
–
–
–
30
81
–
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
27
82
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Smith Mike  Smith
34
83
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
32
84
3
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Inman Joe  Inman
37
85
30
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. North Andy  North
35
86
–
+0.43
–
–
–
–
34
87
11
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 PaulP. Way Paul  Way
22
88
19
+0.41
–
–
–
–
30
89
–
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Bland John  Bland
39
90
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
30
91
21
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
28
92
10
+0.39
–
–
–
–
27
93
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
35
94
6
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
27
95
16
+0.37
–
–
–
–
33
96
21
+0.37
–
–
–
–
25
97
17
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
27
98
4
+0.32
–
–
–
–
42
99
1
+0.31
–
–
–
–
33
100
–
+0.28
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.