DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
28
1
–
+2.08
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
25
2
1
+1.89
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
42
3
1
+1.87
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
27
4
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
30
5
1
+1.63
–
–
–
–
31
6
4
+1.62
–
–
–
–
30
7
2
+1.57
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
8
3
+1.56
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
26
9
1
+1.53
–
–
–
–
35
10
2
+1.53
–
–
–
–
28
11
7
+1.53
–
–
–
–
 GrahamG. Marsh Graham  Marsh
41
12
4
+1.52
–
–
–
–
28
13
–
+1.52
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
42
14
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
29
15
2
+1.47
–
–
–
–
27
16
9
+1.46
–
–
–
–
37
17
1
+1.44
–
–
–
–
34
18
9
+1.40
–
–
–
–
34
19
1
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
35
20
4
+1.37
–
–
–
–
33
21
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
22
–
+1.36
–
–
–
–
35
23
9
+1.34
–
–
–
–
32
24
1
+1.30
–
–
–
–
31
25
3
+1.29
–
–
–
–
33
26
1
+1.27
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
33
27
1
+1.27
–
–
–
–
45
28
9
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
30
29
–
+1.25
–
–
–
–
33
30
–
+1.20
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
27
31
–
+1.15
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
42
32
–
+1.13
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
31
33
1
+1.09
–
–
–
–
37
34
1
+1.08
–
–
–
–
45
35
2
+1.06
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
29
36
–
+1.06
–
–
–
–
29
37
5
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
24
38
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
33
39
7
+1.01
–
–
–
–
27
40
9
+0.98
–
–
–
–
34
41
10
+0.98
–
–
–
–
38
42
3
+0.97
–
–
–
–
32
43
3
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
36
44
9
+0.94
–
–
–
–
44
45
5
+0.94
–
–
–
–
36
46
24
+0.93
–
–
–
–
39
47
3
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
28
48
7
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Upper Brett  Upper
27
49
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
32
50
7
+0.87
–
–
–
–
31
51
13
+0.81
–
–
–
–
25
52
1
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
38
53
12
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
32
54
9
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
31
55
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
29
56
9
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
32
57
6
+0.76
–
–
–
–
33
58
19
+0.71
–
–
–
–
28
59
3
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
25
60
2
+0.68
–
–
–
–
33
61
2
+0.67
–
–
–
–
27
62
10
+0.67
–
–
–
–
29
63
6
+0.66
–
–
–
–
35
64
3
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. North Andy  North
35
65
19
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
28
66
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
28
67
5
+0.62
–
–
–
–
35
68
14
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Inman Joe  Inman
37
69
3
+0.59
–
–
–
–
24
70
28
+0.57
–
–
–
–
36
71
11
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
45
72
4
+0.55
–
–
–
–
38
73
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
32
74
11
+0.53
–
–
–
–
25
75
30
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
27
76
1
+0.50
–
–
–
–
49
77
1
+0.50
–
–
–
–
25
78
6
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
27
79
12
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
27
80
8
+0.48
–
–
–
–
36
81
18
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
27
82
11
+0.46
–
–
–
–
44
83
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
23
84
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
32
85
11
+0.44
–
–
–
–
33
86
8
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
28
87
2
+0.41
–
–
–
–
34
88
7
+0.40
–
–
–
–
39
89
2
+0.40
–
–
–
–
34
90
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
25
91
23
+0.38
–
–
–
–
25
92
–
+0.38
–
–
–
–
29
93
–
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
28
94
9
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
32
95
12
+0.37
–
–
–
–
36
96
16
+0.36
–
–
–
–
26
97
6
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 TonyT. Sills Tony  Sills
29
98
4
+0.35
–
–
–
–
30
99
13
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
28
100
5
+0.35
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.