DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
28
1
–
+2.01
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
25
2
–
+1.81
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
27
3
2
+1.74
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
42
4
–
+1.73
–
–
–
–
31
5
2
+1.70
–
–
–
–
34
6
7
+1.69
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
35
7
9
+1.57
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
26
8
1
+1.55
–
–
–
–
30
9
5
+1.52
–
–
–
–
29
10
2
+1.50
–
–
–
–
35
11
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
42
12
2
+1.49
–
–
–
–
37
13
2
+1.48
–
–
–
–
34
14
1
+1.46
–
–
–
–
35
15
9
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
42
16
10
+1.42
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
17
–
+1.41
–
–
–
–
28
18
1
+1.41
–
–
–
–
28
19
10
+1.41
–
–
–
–
32
20
–
+1.38
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
27
21
–
+1.38
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
30
22
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
27
23
7
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
33
24
1
+1.32
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
25
2
+1.29
–
–
–
–
33
26
3
+1.28
–
–
–
–
45
27
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
45
28
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
30
29
11
+1.25
–
–
–
–
37
30
5
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
29
31
–
+1.22
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
32
32
–
+1.18
–
–
–
–
31
33
1
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
38
34
5
+1.15
–
–
–
–
33
35
1
+1.12
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
33
36
1
+1.09
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
28
37
1
+1.08
–
–
–
–
33
38
5
+1.07
–
–
–
–
39
39
1
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
36
40
1
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
24
41
1
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 GrahamG. Marsh Graham  Marsh
41
42
18
+0.99
–
–
–
–
38
43
–
+0.99
–
–
–
–
25
44
–
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Upper Brett  Upper
27
45
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
31
46
–
+0.90
–
–
–
–
29
47
–
+0.90
–
–
–
–
27
48
–
+0.87
–
–
–
–
30
49
–
+0.86
–
–
–
–
34
50
–
+0.86
–
–
–
–
32
51
–
+0.86
–
–
–
–
36
52
–
+0.86
–
–
–
–
44
53
–
+0.84
–
–
–
–
27
54
–
+0.84
–
–
–
–
29
55
–
+0.82
–
–
–
–
28
56
–
+0.82
–
–
–
–
32
57
–
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
31
58
–
+0.80
–
–
–
–
35
59
–
+0.80
–
–
–
–
33
60
1
+0.78
–
–
–
–
29
61
14
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. North Andy  North
35
62
4
+0.73
–
–
–
–
24
63
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
32
64
4
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
28
65
2
+0.66
–
–
–
–
35
66
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
25
67
2
+0.59
–
–
–
–
28
68
1
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Inman Joe  Inman
37
69
1
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
31
70
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
33
71
1
+0.55
–
–
–
–
36
72
1
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
45
73
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
34
74
2
+0.50
–
–
–
–
25
75
2
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
28
76
2
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
32
77
1
+0.47
–
–
–
–
44
78
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
28
79
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
33
80
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
25
81
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
25
82
2
+0.41
–
–
–
–
27
83
27
+0.39
–
–
–
–
25
84
15
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
23
85
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
27
86
2
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
27
87
2
+0.38
–
–
–
–
32
88
5
+0.37
–
–
–
–
39
89
3
+0.36
–
–
–
–
27
90
14
+0.36
–
–
–
–
36
91
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
27
92
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
33
93
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
34
94
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
49
95
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
27
96
18
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
23
97
2
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
26
98
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
27
99
3
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Pfeil Mark  Pfeil
34
100
2
+0.29
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.