DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
28
1
–
+2.12
–
–
–
–
28
2
1
+1.78
–
–
–
–
27
3
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
37
4
–
+1.70
–
–
–
–
36
5
–
+1.66
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
26
6
2
+1.59
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
42
7
1
+1.54
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
43
8
1
+1.49
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
32
9
1
+1.42
–
–
–
–
29
10
3
+1.41
–
–
–
–
31
11
1
+1.33
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
30
12
5
+1.32
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
36
13
2
+1.32
–
–
–
–
36
14
11
+1.30
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
15
1
+1.27
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
34
16
4
+1.27
–
–
–
–
37
17
6
+1.26
–
–
–
–
32
18
5
+1.26
–
–
–
–
29
19
2
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
30
20
6
+1.25
–
–
–
–
31
21
1
+1.25
–
–
–
–
28
22
1
+1.24
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
27
23
4
+1.23
–
–
–
–
34
24
–
+1.21
–
–
–
–
34
25
7
+1.18
–
–
–
–
 TonyT. Sills Tony  Sills
30
26
3
+1.14
–
–
–
–
34
27
–
+1.14
–
–
–
–
29
28
2
+1.13
–
–
–
–
46
29
1
+1.10
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
33
30
1
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
28
31
2
+1.06
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
43
32
2
+1.05
–
–
–
–
39
33
3
+1.03
–
–
–
–
27
34
6
+1.02
–
–
–
–
46
35
2
+1.02
–
–
–
–
26
36
2
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
26
37
7
+1.01
–
–
–
–
33
38
1
+1.01
–
–
–
–
39
39
1
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
25
40
1
+1.00
–
–
–
–
30
41
6
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
31
42
10
+0.96
–
–
–
–
31
43
1
+0.94
–
–
–
–
36
44
21
+0.93
–
–
–
–
34
45
3
+0.87
–
–
–
–
34
46
3
+0.87
–
–
–
–
29
47
2
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
28
48
14
+0.83
–
–
–
–
44
49
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
34
50
4
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
25
51
7
+0.81
–
–
–
–
28
52
5
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
53
3
+0.77
–
–
–
–
27
54
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 GrahamG. Marsh Graham  Marsh
42
55
2
+0.74
–
–
–
–
31
56
–
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
36
57
3
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
29
58
9
+0.70
–
–
–
–
32
59
4
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
28
60
3
+0.64
–
–
–
–
33
61
4
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Clark Howard  Clark
31
62
3
+0.61
–
–
–
–
34
63
3
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Twitty Howard  Twitty
37
64
4
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
46
65
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
34
66
7
+0.57
–
–
–
–
38
67
6
+0.56
–
–
–
–
34
68
4
+0.56
–
–
–
–
28
69
1
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
26
70
3
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Grady Wayne  Grady
28
71
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
26
72
8
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
24
73
2
+0.46
–
–
–
–
32
74
1
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
29
75
6
+0.45
–
–
–
–
39
76
–
+0.43
–
–
–
–
37
77
17
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 RichardR. Zokol Richard  Zokol
27
78
4
+0.42
–
–
–
–
25
79
2
+0.37
–
–
–
–
25
80
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
27
81
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
33
82
21
+0.33
–
–
–
–
29
83
22
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
39
84
2
+0.30
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
32
85
2
+0.29
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
32
86
2
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Pfeil Mark  Pfeil
34
87
11
+0.28
–
–
–
–
30
88
3
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Green Ken  Green
27
89
3
+0.27
–
–
–
–
50
90
2
+0.27
–
–
–
–
 DesD. Smyth Des  Smyth
33
91
1
+0.26
–
–
–
–
27
92
1
+0.25
–
–
–
–
30
93
2
+0.24
–
–
–
–
37
94
2
+0.22
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. North Andy  North
35
95
3
+0.21
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Inman Joe  Inman
38
96
7
+0.21
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
29
97
5
+0.20
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
33
98
1
+0.20
–
–
–
–
39
99
2
+0.19
–
–
–
–
30
100
13
+0.19
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.