DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 1990, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour and European Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
37
1
–
+1.91
–
–
–
–
 AndyA. Bean Andy  Bean
33
2
3
+1.79
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
28
3
1
+1.71
–
–
–
–
28
4
1
+1.67
–
–
–
–
 RaymondR. Floyd Raymond  Floyd
43
5
1
+1.67
–
–
–
–
 CalvinC. Peete Calvin  Peete
42
6
–
+1.62
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
36
7
–
+1.59
–
–
–
–
36
8
–
+1.53
–
–
–
–
29
9
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
29
10
1
+1.44
–
–
–
–
36
11
7
+1.34
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
26
12
3
+1.33
–
–
–
–
34
13
1
+1.33
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
27
14
1
+1.31
–
–
–
–
27
15
–
+1.29
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
30
16
–
+1.27
–
–
–
–
36
17
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 DanD. Pohl Dan  Pohl
31
18
2
+1.24
–
–
–
–
32
19
7
+1.22
–
–
–
–
29
20
1
+1.22
–
–
–
–
37
21
7
+1.20
–
–
–
–
 JohnnyJ. Miller Johnny  Miller
38
22
1
+1.19
–
–
–
–
31
23
1
+1.19
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Koch Gary  Koch
33
24
–
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 SandyS. Lyle Sandy  Lyle
28
25
13
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
34
26
3
+1.13
–
–
–
–
46
27
–
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
26
28
–
+1.11
–
–
–
–
34
29
6
+1.09
–
–
–
–
34
30
–
+1.08
–
–
–
–
32
31
2
+1.03
–
–
–
–
31
32
–
+1.01
–
–
–
–
26
33
1
+0.98
–
–
–
–
34
34
2
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 TonyT. Sills Tony  Sills
30
35
10
+0.97
–
–
–
–
28
36
3
+0.94
–
–
–
–
29
37
–
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 IsaoI. Aoki Isao  Aoki
43
38
11
+0.92
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
31
39
8
+0.92
–
–
–
–
 JodieJ. Mudd Jodie  Mudd
25
40
1
+0.89
–
–
–
–
30
41
1
+0.85
–
–
–
–
45
42
1
+0.84
–
–
–
–
39
43
3
+0.82
–
–
–
–
34
44
3
+0.80
–
–
–
–
46
45
–
+0.79
–
–
–
–
34
46
7
+0.78
–
–
–
–
34
47
1
+0.74
–
–
–
–
 KenK. Brown Ken  Brown
29
48
3
+0.71
–
–
–
–
34
49
2
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
28
50
5
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
40
51
3
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 WillieW. Wood Willie  Wood
25
52
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
26
53
11
+0.69
–
–
–
–
33
54
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
29
55
3
+0.66
–
–
–
–
32
56
10
+0.66
–
–
–
–
33
57
1
+0.60
–
–
–
–
34
58
1
+0.59
–
–
–
–
31
59
8
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 HowardH. Twitty Howard  Twitty
37
60
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
31
61
12
+0.55
–
–
–
–
27
62
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
29
63
2
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
32
64
4
+0.45
–
–
–
–
28
65
4
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 HubertH. Green Hubert  Green
39
66
4
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Burns George  Burns
36
67
10
+0.43
–
–
–
–
39
68
4
+0.43
–
–
–
–
32
69
7
+0.41
–
–
–
–
39
70
7
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
28
71
4
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
28
72
6
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
24
73
10
+0.37
–
–
–
–
30
74
13
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
27
75
4
+0.37
–
–
–
–
25
76
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 EdE. Fiori Ed  Fiori
32
77
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
35
78
11
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Wiebe Mark  Wiebe
28
79
6
+0.33
–
–
–
–
23
80
6
+0.32
–
–
–
–
27
81
3
+0.32
–
–
–
–
28
82
3
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. Lye Mark  Lye
33
83
1
+0.30
–
–
–
–
38
84
4
+0.28
–
–
–
–
27
85
11
+0.28
–
–
–
–
 ChipC. Beck Chip  Beck
29
86
22
+0.27
–
–
–
–
29
87
12
+0.26
–
–
–
–
 MarkM. James Mark  James
32
88
2
+0.26
–
–
–
–
37
89
15
+0.25
–
–
–
–
 DaveD. Barr Dave  Barr
34
90
2
+0.24
–
–
–
–
 DesD. Smyth Des  Smyth
33
91
3
+0.23
–
–
–
–
 GeorgeG. Archer George  Archer
46
92
14
+0.22
–
–
–
–
30
93
2
+0.21
–
–
–
–
37
94
3
+0.19
–
–
–
–
 BrettB. Upper Brett  Upper
27
95
7
+0.17
–
–
–
–
 EamonnE. Darcy Eamonn  Darcy
33
96
2
+0.17
–
–
–
–
 T.c.T. Chen T.c.  Chen
27
97
24
+0.16
–
–
–
–
39
98
2
+0.16
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
24
99
8
+0.15
–
–
–
–
35
100
10
+0.14
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.