DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
39
1
–
+2.26
–
–
–
–
36
2
–
+1.96
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
38
3
1
+1.90
–
–
–
–
32
4
2
+1.84
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
36
5
2
+1.80
–
–
–
–
32
6
4
+1.79
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
39
7
2
+1.79
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
24
8
3
+1.69
–
–
–
–
37
9
–
+1.67
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
40
10
3
+1.65
–
–
–
–
41
11
3
+1.60
–
–
–
–
46
12
7
+1.55
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
26
13
3
+1.47
–
–
–
–
39
14
1
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
34
15
8
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
37
16
4
+1.35
–
–
–
–
33
17
2
+1.26
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
42
18
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
40
19
2
+1.17
–
–
–
–
32
20
4
+1.17
–
–
–
–
25
21
7
+1.15
–
–
–
–
38
22
1
+1.15
–
–
–
–
32
23
3
+1.15
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
36
24
16
+1.14
–
–
–
–
29
25
2
+1.11
–
–
–
–
35
26
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
39
27
7
+1.08
–
–
–
–
23
28
5
+1.05
–
–
–
–
38
29
4
+1.03
–
–
–
–
33
30
7
+1.03
–
–
–
–
43
31
5
+1.01
–
–
–
–
40
32
10
+1.01
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
38
33
3
+1.01
–
–
–
–
33
34
5
+1.00
–
–
–
–
35
35
15
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
26
36
5
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
33
37
5
+0.97
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
37
38
7
+0.94
–
–
–
–
44
39
13
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
30
40
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
 CostantinoC. Rocca Costantino  Rocca
40
41
3
+0.91
–
–
–
–
35
42
7
+0.90
–
–
–
–
29
43
8
+0.89
–
–
–
–
29
44
12
+0.86
–
–
–
–
42
45
2
+0.83
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
35
46
9
+0.83
–
–
–
–
35
47
5
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 HaleH. Irwin Hale  Irwin
51
48
4
+0.81
–
–
–
–
34
49
15
+0.81
–
–
–
–
31
50
15
+0.80
–
–
–
–
49
51
10
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Ozaki Joe  Ozaki
40
52
8
+0.76
–
–
–
–
31
53
10
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
32
54
1
+0.70
–
–
–
–
42
55
9
+0.70
–
–
–
–
44
56
1
+0.70
–
–
–
–
48
57
5
+0.69
–
–
–
–
31
58
10
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 MasashiM. Ozaki Masashi  Ozaki
49
59
–
+0.68
–
–
–
–
44
60
6
+0.66
–
–
–
–
 GrantG. Waite Grant  Waite
31
61
–
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
37
62
8
+0.64
–
–
–
–
29
63
16
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
37
64
6
+0.61
–
–
–
–
32
65
1
+0.61
–
–
–
–
35
66
21
+0.60
–
–
–
–
40
67
1
+0.59
–
–
–
–
36
68
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
30
69
–
+0.55
–
–
–
–
42
70
5
+0.54
–
–
–
–
38
71
10
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
38
72
6
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
46
73
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
30
74
3
+0.51
–
–
–
–
26
75
–
+0.50
–
–
–
–
41
76
7
+0.49
–
–
–
–
38
77
33
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
39
78
24
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Lohr Bob  Lohr
35
79
5
+0.46
–
–
–
–
36
80
32
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Morse John  Morse
38
81
11
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 BarryB. Lane Barry  Lane
35
82
3
+0.45
–
–
–
–
41
83
7
+0.45
–
–
–
–
36
84
4
+0.44
–
–
–
–
37
85
3
+0.43
–
–
–
–
34
86
4
+0.41
–
–
–
–
44
87
8
+0.41
–
–
–
–
37
88
4
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Fabel Brad  Fabel
40
89
4
+0.39
–
–
–
–
29
90
17
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
23
91
2
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
33
92
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
41
93
7
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
34
94
5
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Riley Wayne  Riley
33
95
14
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 CurtC. Byrum Curt  Byrum
37
96
5
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
32
97
14
+0.32
–
–
–
–
37
98
4
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
29
99
3
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
38
100
2
+0.31
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.