DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
40
1
–
+2.33
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
27
2
2
+2.28
–
–
–
–
38
3
3
+2.20
–
–
–
–
34
4
2
+2.19
–
–
–
–
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
21
5
2
+2.18
–
–
–
–
42
6
1
+1.99
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
27
7
2
+1.94
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
41
8
–
+1.69
–
–
–
–
34
9
–
+1.69
–
–
–
–
33
10
–
+1.68
–
–
–
–
25
11
–
+1.67
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
35
12
–
+1.56
–
–
–
–
27
13
–
+1.52
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
38
14
–
+1.49
–
–
–
–
37
15
–
+1.49
–
–
–
–
32
16
1
+1.46
–
–
–
–
40
17
1
+1.45
–
–
–
–
32
18
1
+1.44
–
–
–
–
31
19
3
+1.39
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
25
20
–
+1.38
–
–
–
–
33
21
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
47
22
1
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
39
23
1
+1.36
–
–
–
–
24
24
–
+1.33
–
–
–
–
42
25
1
+1.29
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
43
26
1
+1.29
–
–
–
–
37
27
1
+1.25
–
–
–
–
39
28
3
+1.24
–
–
–
–
44
29
–
+1.21
–
–
–
–
27
30
1
+1.20
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
34
31
2
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
39
32
2
+1.16
–
–
–
–
30
33
5
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
39
34
4
+1.08
–
–
–
–
30
35
1
+1.06
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
39
36
1
+1.05
–
–
–
–
39
37
2
+1.05
–
–
–
–
35
38
2
+1.02
–
–
–
–
37
39
3
+1.00
–
–
–
–
26
40
8
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
28
41
–
+1.00
–
–
–
–
43
42
1
+1.00
–
–
–
–
32
43
1
+0.98
–
–
–
–
40
44
15
+0.97
–
–
–
–
37
45
1
+0.94
–
–
–
–
39
46
9
+0.94
–
–
–
–
33
47
1
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
35
48
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
39
49
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
31
50
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
36
51
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
42
52
5
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
41
53
–
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Damron Robert  Damron
24
54
9
+0.87
–
–
–
–
30
55
1
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
24
56
1
+0.84
–
–
–
–
36
57
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
28
58
19
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
38
59
2
+0.79
–
–
–
–
45
60
3
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
35
61
3
+0.79
–
–
–
–
45
62
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
30
63
–
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
38
64
2
+0.75
–
–
–
–
38
65
2
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
36
66
1
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 TrevorT. Dodds Trevor  Dodds
37
67
1
+0.67
–
–
–
–
29
68
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
34
69
1
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
38
70
17
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
26
71
11
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
47
72
–
+0.60
–
–
–
–
50
73
–
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
36
74
4
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
28
75
1
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
31
76
7
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
37
77
2
+0.55
–
–
–
–
37
78
2
+0.54
–
–
–
–
33
79
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
39
80
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
43
81
17
+0.52
–
–
–
–
34
82
1
+0.51
–
–
–
–
31
83
24
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
30
84
21
+0.46
–
–
–
–
30
85
14
+0.46
–
–
–
–
42
86
18
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 CostantinoC. Rocca Costantino  Rocca
41
87
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Frost David  Frost
37
88
3
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
39
89
3
+0.42
–
–
–
–
45
90
–
+0.37
–
–
–
–
33
91
7
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
31
92
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Gamez Robert  Gamez
28
93
18
+0.35
–
–
–
–
45
94
21
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
43
95
–
+0.32
–
–
–
–
38
96
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
27
97
6
+0.31
–
–
–
–
 ClarenceC. Rose Clarence  Rose
39
98
1
+0.29
–
–
–
–
33
99
10
+0.29
–
–
–
–
33
100
1
+0.27
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.