DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
38
1
–
+2.23
–
–
–
–
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
21
2
2
+2.20
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
40
3
1
+2.18
–
–
–
–
42
4
5
+2.14
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
27
5
2
+2.12
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
27
6
1
+2.10
–
–
–
–
33
7
1
+2.02
–
–
–
–
25
8
1
+2.01
–
–
–
–
34
9
3
+1.96
–
–
–
–
27
10
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
41
11
1
+1.70
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
34
12
3
+1.57
–
–
–
–
37
13
8
+1.53
–
–
–
–
37
14
1
+1.51
–
–
–
–
37
15
2
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
38
16
2
+1.45
–
–
–
–
24
17
2
+1.45
–
–
–
–
32
18
2
+1.41
–
–
–
–
32
19
7
+1.40
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
25
20
2
+1.40
–
–
–
–
40
21
5
+1.34
–
–
–
–
47
22
2
+1.31
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
39
23
7
+1.30
–
–
–
–
42
24
4
+1.25
–
–
–
–
31
25
6
+1.23
–
–
–
–
33
26
4
+1.21
–
–
–
–
34
27
11
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
39
28
9
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
43
29
–
+1.17
–
–
–
–
40
30
6
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
36
31
4
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
43
32
1
+1.13
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
39
33
8
+1.12
–
–
–
–
33
34
2
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
36
35
12
+1.10
–
–
–
–
39
36
2
+1.04
–
–
–
–
32
37
4
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
35
38
17
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
47
39
4
+1.00
–
–
–
–
30
40
4
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
41
41
15
+0.99
–
–
–
–
35
42
7
+0.99
–
–
–
–
44
43
4
+0.96
–
–
–
–
39
44
5
+0.95
–
–
–
–
30
45
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
40
46
8
+0.95
–
–
–
–
38
47
12
+0.93
–
–
–
–
45
48
–
+0.92
–
–
–
–
26
49
9
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
24
50
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
29
51
4
+0.91
–
–
–
–
36
52
2
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
38
53
–
+0.82
–
–
–
–
43
54
–
+0.81
–
–
–
–
31
55
10
+0.79
–
–
–
–
29
56
7
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
35
57
–
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
28
58
6
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
37
59
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
31
60
18
+0.75
–
–
–
–
39
61
19
+0.74
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
34
62
3
+0.72
–
–
–
–
37
63
3
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Smith Chris  Smith
28
64
2
+0.71
–
–
–
–
33
65
1
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Damron Robert  Damron
24
66
8
+0.66
–
–
–
–
27
67
12
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
38
68
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
45
69
–
+0.61
–
–
–
–
43
70
1
+0.59
–
–
–
–
30
71
1
+0.59
–
–
–
–
37
72
13
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
38
73
7
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
26
74
6
+0.57
–
–
–
–
50
75
–
+0.57
–
–
–
–
31
76
–
+0.56
–
–
–
–
34
77
–
+0.52
–
–
–
–
39
78
5
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
31
79
9
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 TrevorT. Dodds Trevor  Dodds
37
80
1
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
39
81
1
+0.48
–
–
–
–
39
82
9
+0.48
–
–
–
–
39
83
–
+0.47
–
–
–
–
30
84
51
+0.46
–
–
–
–
26
85
7
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Fabel Brad  Fabel
41
86
2
+0.45
–
–
–
–
33
87
9
+0.43
–
–
–
–
39
88
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
42
89
–
+0.42
–
–
–
–
25
90
10
+0.40
–
–
–
–
32
91
16
+0.39
–
–
–
–
34
92
4
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
45
93
–
+0.38
–
–
–
–
27
94
33
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 NolanN. Henke Nolan  Henke
32
95
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
36
96
7
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
29
97
12
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 CostantinoC. Rocca Costantino  Rocca
41
98
20
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
30
99
4
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
43
100
2
+0.34
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.