DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
38
1
–
+2.23
–
–
–
–
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
21
2
–
+2.19
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
40
3
–
+2.17
–
–
–
–
42
4
–
+2.14
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
27
5
1
+2.10
–
–
–
–
33
6
1
+2.01
–
–
–
–
25
7
1
+2.01
–
–
–
–
34
8
1
+1.98
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
27
9
4
+1.97
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
41
10
1
+1.79
–
–
–
–
27
11
1
+1.72
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
34
12
–
+1.57
–
–
–
–
37
13
1
+1.51
–
–
–
–
37
14
1
+1.50
–
–
–
–
37
15
–
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
38
16
–
+1.44
–
–
–
–
24
17
–
+1.44
–
–
–
–
33
18
–
+1.40
–
–
–
–
32
19
–
+1.39
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
25
20
–
+1.39
–
–
–
–
42
21
3
+1.36
–
–
–
–
40
22
1
+1.34
–
–
–
–
47
23
1
+1.31
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
39
24
1
+1.30
–
–
–
–
33
25
1
+1.21
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
43
26
3
+1.20
–
–
–
–
34
27
–
+1.17
–
–
–
–
31
28
3
+1.15
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
43
29
3
+1.15
–
–
–
–
40
30
–
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
36
31
–
+1.14
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
40
32
1
+1.12
–
–
–
–
33
33
1
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
36
34
1
+1.10
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Ogrin David  Ogrin
39
35
7
+1.10
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
35
36
2
+1.04
–
–
–
–
39
37
1
+1.04
–
–
–
–
32
38
1
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Kite Tom  Kite
47
39
–
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
41
40
1
+0.99
–
–
–
–
35
41
1
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
24
42
8
+0.96
–
–
–
–
39
43
1
+0.96
–
–
–
–
44
44
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
30
45
–
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
40
46
–
+0.94
–
–
–
–
38
47
–
+0.92
–
–
–
–
26
48
1
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
29
49
2
+0.91
–
–
–
–
30
50
10
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
38
51
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
31
52
8
+0.82
–
–
–
–
46
53
5
+0.81
–
–
–
–
43
54
–
+0.80
–
–
–
–
36
55
3
+0.80
–
–
–
–
31
56
1
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Smith Chris  Smith
28
57
7
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
35
58
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
28
59
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
37
60
1
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
35
61
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
37
62
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
29
63
7
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
26
64
10
+0.69
–
–
–
–
37
65
7
+0.68
–
–
–
–
30
66
5
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Damron Robert  Damron
24
67
1
+0.65
–
–
–
–
27
68
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
39
69
8
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
38
70
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
45
71
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 RonnieR. Black Ronnie  Black
39
72
9
+0.59
–
–
–
–
43
73
3
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
38
74
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
50
75
–
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Fabel Brad  Fabel
41
76
10
+0.55
–
–
–
–
33
77
12
+0.53
–
–
–
–
34
78
1
+0.52
–
–
–
–
39
79
1
+0.49
–
–
–
–
32
80
11
+0.49
–
–
–
–
26
81
9
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
31
82
3
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 TrevorT. Dodds Trevor  Dodds
37
83
3
+0.47
–
–
–
–
32
84
17
+0.45
–
–
–
–
26
85
–
+0.45
–
–
–
–
39
86
3
+0.45
–
–
–
–
31
87
11
+0.45
–
–
–
–
39
88
6
+0.44
–
–
–
–
33
89
2
+0.42
–
–
–
–
42
90
1
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 WayneW. Levi Wayne  Levi
45
91
2
+0.40
–
–
–
–
39
92
4
+0.39
–
–
–
–
30
93
9
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 CostantinoC. Rocca Costantino  Rocca
41
94
4
+0.38
–
–
–
–
27
95
1
+0.37
–
–
–
–
33
96
11
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
30
97
2
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
29
98
1
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 NolanN. Henke Nolan  Henke
32
99
4
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
43
100
–
+0.34
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.