DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
28
1
–
+2.36
–
–
–
–
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
22
2
1
+2.22
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
26
3
1
+2.21
–
–
–
–
34
4
1
+1.95
–
–
–
–
35
5
1
+1.84
–
–
–
–
33
6
–
+1.77
–
–
–
–
41
7
12
+1.68
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
28
8
1
+1.67
–
–
–
–
25
9
2
+1.59
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
41
10
1
+1.59
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
42
11
3
+1.58
–
–
–
–
32
12
2
+1.53
–
–
–
–
38
13
3
+1.50
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
39
14
1
+1.48
–
–
–
–
33
15
10
+1.48
–
–
–
–
39
16
4
+1.44
–
–
–
–
43
17
–
+1.43
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
35
18
3
+1.38
–
–
–
–
48
19
3
+1.33
–
–
–
–
26
20
2
+1.31
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
25
21
6
+1.29
–
–
–
–
37
22
6
+1.28
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
32
23
4
+1.26
–
–
–
–
38
24
2
+1.23
–
–
–
–
34
25
3
+1.23
–
–
–
–
41
26
2
+1.20
–
–
–
–
31
27
4
+1.20
–
–
–
–
43
28
2
+1.11
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
27
29
11
+1.08
–
–
–
–
40
30
1
+1.07
–
–
–
–
31
31
2
+1.03
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
39
32
3
+1.02
–
–
–
–
28
33
13
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
37
34
–
+0.99
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
39
35
3
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
42
36
9
+0.98
–
–
–
–
40
37
2
+0.95
–
–
–
–
34
38
2
+0.95
–
–
–
–
27
39
4
+0.88
–
–
–
–
38
40
2
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
40
41
3
+0.87
–
–
–
–
40
42
3
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
32
43
5
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
39
44
4
+0.83
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
36
45
4
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
29
46
5
+0.81
–
–
–
–
28
47
5
+0.80
–
–
–
–
32
48
5
+0.80
–
–
–
–
40
49
6
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
32
50
4
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
36
51
17
+0.76
–
–
–
–
30
52
6
+0.76
–
–
–
–
40
53
6
+0.75
–
–
–
–
33
54
6
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
44
55
1
+0.73
–
–
–
–
45
56
5
+0.73
–
–
–
–
38
57
7
+0.72
–
–
–
–
32
58
4
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
40
59
3
+0.69
–
–
–
–
27
60
23
+0.69
–
–
–
–
33
61
10
+0.67
–
–
–
–
 PeterP. Baker Peter  Baker
30
62
15
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
31
63
6
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 TrevorT. Dodds Trevor  Dodds
38
64
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
34
65
–
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Gump Scott  Gump
32
66
1
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
41
67
3
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
44
68
1
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
34
69
9
+0.56
–
–
–
–
38
70
1
+0.55
–
–
–
–
36
71
11
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
36
72
9
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 HarrisonH. Frazar Harrison  Frazar
26
73
1
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Damron Robert  Damron
25
74
1
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Ozaki Joe  Ozaki
42
75
4
+0.49
–
–
–
–
38
76
12
+0.49
–
–
–
–
27
77
18
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
29
78
31
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 GrantG. Waite Grant  Waite
33
79
11
+0.47
–
–
–
–
23
80
6
+0.45
–
–
–
–
34
81
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
35
82
8
+0.44
–
–
–
–
35
83
–
+0.43
–
–
–
–
35
84
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Fabel Brad  Fabel
42
85
9
+0.42
–
–
–
–
37
86
2
+0.42
–
–
–
–
31
87
6
+0.41
–
–
–
–
46
88
–
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
29
89
14
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 RickR. Fehr Rick  Fehr
35
90
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
33
91
18
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
34
92
3
+0.36
–
–
–
–
35
93
24
+0.36
–
–
–
–
28
94
–
+0.34
–
–
–
–
47
95
1
+0.33
–
–
–
–
31
96
5
+0.33
–
–
–
–
31
97
1
+0.33
–
–
–
–
37
98
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
34
99
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 GregG. Kraft Greg  Kraft
34
100
13
+0.31
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.