DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
23
1
–
+3.27
–
–
–
–
35
2
1
+2.03
–
–
–
–
36
3
1
+2.01
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
29
4
1
+1.97
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
27
5
1
+1.94
–
–
–
–
41
6
–
+1.79
–
–
–
–
27
7
–
+1.78
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
38
8
–
+1.78
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
42
9
1
+1.77
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
36
10
1
+1.73
–
–
–
–
26
11
1
+1.62
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
35
12
5
+1.60
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
31
13
2
+1.57
–
–
–
–
34
14
3
+1.53
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
26
15
5
+1.38
–
–
–
–
42
16
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
30
17
4
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
19
18
3
+1.36
–
–
–
–
29
19
5
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
43
20
2
+1.34
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
33
21
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
33
22
2
+1.24
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
30
23
2
+1.21
–
–
–
–
40
24
2
+1.18
–
–
–
–
28
25
2
+1.17
–
–
–
–
40
26
2
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
43
27
4
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 CarlosC. Franco Carlos  Franco
34
28
10
+1.15
–
–
–
–
35
29
10
+1.11
–
–
–
–
32
30
1
+1.09
–
–
–
–
38
31
1
+1.04
–
–
–
–
29
32
5
+1.04
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
29
33
–
+1.02
–
–
–
–
42
34
2
+1.00
–
–
–
–
37
35
3
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 JonathanJ. Kaye Jonathan  Kaye
29
36
2
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 BobB. May Bob  May
31
37
5
+0.98
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
32
38
11
+0.92
–
–
–
–
42
39
2
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
40
40
–
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
31
41
2
+0.86
–
–
–
–
44
42
4
+0.83
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Watts Brian  Watts
33
43
8
+0.82
–
–
–
–
31
44
8
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
39
45
3
+0.79
–
–
–
–
35
46
4
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
38
47
2
+0.75
–
–
–
–
44
48
1
+0.74
–
–
–
–
39
49
2
+0.74
–
–
–
–
37
50
2
+0.74
–
–
–
–
35
51
2
+0.73
–
–
–
–
30
52
10
+0.73
–
–
–
–
37
53
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
36
54
3
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
45
55
–
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
33
56
13
+0.69
–
–
–
–
35
57
1
+0.67
–
–
–
–
35
58
1
+0.67
–
–
–
–
33
59
11
+0.66
–
–
–
–
35
60
–
+0.66
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
41
61
–
+0.66
–
–
–
–
36
62
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
28
63
13
+0.63
–
–
–
–
39
64
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
31
65
3
+0.62
–
–
–
–
33
66
3
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
28
67
23
+0.62
–
–
–
–
37
68
5
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
35
69
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
41
70
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
39
71
3
+0.59
–
–
–
–
36
72
16
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
39
73
2
+0.59
–
–
–
–
27
74
7
+0.56
–
–
–
–
36
75
2
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 EdwardE. Fryatt Edward  Fryatt
28
76
2
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
42
77
12
+0.55
–
–
–
–
30
78
4
+0.54
–
–
–
–
29
79
–
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
38
80
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
37
81
–
+0.53
–
–
–
–
41
82
1
+0.53
–
–
–
–
34
83
2
+0.52
–
–
–
–
30
84
11
+0.49
–
–
–
–
30
85
2
+0.47
–
–
–
–
34
86
2
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 TedT. Tryba Ted  Tryba
32
87
3
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Reid Mike  Reid
45
88
1
+0.45
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Gump Scott  Gump
33
89
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 J.L.J. Lewis J.L.  Lewis
39
90
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
39
91
1
+0.42
–
–
–
–
37
92
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
33
93
31
+0.40
–
–
–
–
39
94
–
+0.40
–
–
–
–
32
95
23
+0.39
–
–
–
–
45
96
1
+0.39
–
–
–
–
38
97
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
34
98
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 AlexA. Cejka Alex  Cejka
28
99
13
+0.37
–
–
–
–
46
100
2
+0.37
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.