DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
24
1
–
+3.84
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
30
2
–
+2.24
–
–
–
–
30
3
–
+2.17
–
–
–
–
37
4
1
+1.98
–
–
–
–
27
5
1
+1.92
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
28
6
–
+1.85
–
–
–
–
42
7
2
+1.68
–
–
–
–
40
8
3
+1.63
–
–
–
–
36
9
2
+1.60
–
–
–
–
 BobB. May Bob  May
31
10
11
+1.57
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
27
11
8
+1.56
–
–
–
–
33
12
6
+1.53
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
37
13
1
+1.49
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Perry Chris  Perry
38
14
4
+1.48
–
–
–
–
45
15
–
+1.48
–
–
–
–
40
16
2
+1.47
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
30
17
8
+1.46
–
–
–
–
41
18
10
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
33
19
4
+1.44
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
43
20
7
+1.44
–
–
–
–
27
21
4
+1.42
–
–
–
–
29
22
6
+1.40
–
–
–
–
35
23
3
+1.40
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
32
24
2
+1.37
–
–
–
–
28
25
5
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
20
26
–
+1.31
–
–
–
–
32
27
2
+1.30
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
40
28
–
+1.24
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
30
29
5
+1.21
–
–
–
–
36
30
8
+1.20
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
29
31
4
+1.16
–
–
–
–
37
32
1
+1.15
–
–
–
–
38
33
6
+1.09
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
32
34
2
+1.09
–
–
–
–
34
35
8
+1.06
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
44
36
4
+1.05
–
–
–
–
30
37
4
+1.03
–
–
–
–
39
38
4
+1.03
–
–
–
–
29
39
7
+1.00
–
–
–
–
31
40
1
+0.99
–
–
–
–
36
41
6
+0.96
–
–
–
–
37
42
3
+0.95
–
–
–
–
28
43
6
+0.93
–
–
–
–
26
44
–
+0.91
–
–
–
–
40
45
4
+0.91
–
–
–
–
39
46
10
+0.89
–
–
–
–
42
47
6
+0.89
–
–
–
–
30
48
8
+0.85
–
–
–
–
36
49
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
31
50
2
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
44
51
7
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Orr Gary  Orr
33
52
7
+0.81
–
–
–
–
38
53
13
+0.81
–
–
–
–
34
54
22
+0.80
–
–
–
–
40
55
–
+0.79
–
–
–
–
35
56
1
+0.77
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
36
57
15
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
34
58
4
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 J.P.J. Hayes J.P.  Hayes
35
59
6
+0.75
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
39
60
1
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
43
61
1
+0.73
–
–
–
–
32
62
5
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Jones Steve  Jones
41
63
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
33
64
1
+0.70
–
–
–
–
30
65
6
+0.70
–
–
–
–
 LarryL. Mize Larry  Mize
41
66
14
+0.69
–
–
–
–
43
67
6
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
34
68
7
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 JonathanJ. Kaye Jonathan  Kaye
30
69
5
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 PhillipP. Price Phillip  Price
33
70
29
+0.60
–
–
–
–
36
71
2
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 SteveS. Pate Steve  Pate
39
72
22
+0.58
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
43
73
3
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 JerryJ. Kelly Jerry  Kelly
33
74
13
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
36
75
3
+0.54
–
–
–
–
32
76
3
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
34
77
3
+0.48
–
–
–
–
30
78
10
+0.48
–
–
–
–
37
79
11
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 CarlosC. Franco Carlos  Franco
35
80
2
+0.46
–
–
–
–
45
81
4
+0.46
–
–
–
–
42
82
9
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
46
83
1
+0.45
–
–
–
–
33
84
–
+0.44
–
–
–
–
26
85
–
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
39
86
32
+0.42
–
–
–
–
37
87
36
+0.42
–
–
–
–
30
88
14
+0.40
–
–
–
–
41
89
8
+0.38
–
–
–
–
40
90
21
+0.38
–
–
–
–
50
91
1
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 AndrewA. Magee Andrew  Magee
38
92
29
+0.36
–
–
–
–
33
93
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
30
94
8
+0.36
–
–
–
–
37
95
4
+0.36
–
–
–
–
32
96
3
+0.35
–
–
–
–
38
97
8
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 Jay DonJ. Blake Jay Don  Blake
41
98
4
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
42
99
7
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 JoeJ. Ozaki Joe  Ozaki
44
100
29
+0.32
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.