DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
26
1
–
+3.11
–
–
–
–
32
2
–
+2.00
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
45
3
–
+1.91
–
–
–
–
30
4
1
+1.87
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
22
5
2
+1.85
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
32
6
2
+1.82
–
–
–
–
30
7
1
+1.80
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
39
8
1
+1.71
–
–
–
–
38
9
3
+1.69
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
33
10
1
+1.55
–
–
–
–
35
11
5
+1.45
–
–
–
–
32
12
–
+1.43
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Riley Chris  Riley
28
13
10
+1.42
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
35
14
4
+1.42
–
–
–
–
38
15
2
+1.39
–
–
–
–
39
16
6
+1.39
–
–
–
–
33
17
2
+1.37
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
46
18
10
+1.36
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
32
19
1
+1.35
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
42
20
2
+1.31
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Duval David  Duval
30
21
2
+1.28
–
–
–
–
31
22
5
+1.25
–
–
–
–
43
23
2
+1.23
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
36
24
10
+1.20
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
46
25
8
+1.15
–
–
–
–
44
26
6
+1.13
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
29
27
8
+1.10
–
–
–
–
47
28
1
+1.10
–
–
–
–
31
29
10
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
43
30
5
+1.06
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
34
31
1
+1.05
–
–
–
–
 JerryJ. Kelly Jerry  Kelly
35
32
6
+1.05
–
–
–
–
39
33
9
+1.04
–
–
–
–
37
34
1
+1.04
–
–
–
–
33
35
2
+1.01
–
–
–
–
35
36
8
+1.01
–
–
–
–
23
37
9
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
32
38
–
+0.97
–
–
–
–
40
39
6
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
41
40
8
+0.92
–
–
–
–
32
41
5
+0.89
–
–
–
–
39
42
2
+0.88
–
–
–
–
40
43
10
+0.85
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
31
44
1
+0.85
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
34
45
14
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
48
46
5
+0.83
–
–
–
–
32
47
4
+0.81
–
–
–
–
41
48
8
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
32
49
–
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 EduardoE. Romero Eduardo  Romero
48
50
3
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 NiclasN. Fasth Niclas  Fasth
30
51
17
+0.78
–
–
–
–
34
52
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 BrinyB. Baird Briny  Baird
30
53
4
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Faldo Nick  Faldo
45
54
2
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
44
55
11
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 JustinJ. Rose Justin  Rose
22
56
11
+0.74
–
–
–
–
32
57
23
+0.72
–
–
–
–
35
58
8
+0.72
–
–
–
–
37
59
17
+0.71
–
–
–
–
39
60
5
+0.71
–
–
–
–
33
61
2
+0.68
–
–
–
–
42
62
32
+0.66
–
–
–
–
28
63
5
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
22
64
17
+0.65
–
–
–
–
32
65
7
+0.64
–
–
–
–
42
66
5
+0.63
–
–
–
–
27
67
3
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Cook John  Cook
44
68
5
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
38
69
5
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 BobB. May Bob  May
33
70
–
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 GaryG. Evans Gary  Evans
33
71
–
+0.57
–
–
–
–
24
72
1
+0.56
–
–
–
–
37
73
4
+0.56
–
–
–
–
38
74
8
+0.56
–
–
–
–
37
75
10
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 PatP. Bates Pat  Bates
33
76
–
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Gay Brian  Gay
30
77
2
+0.53
–
–
–
–
41
78
22
+0.53
–
–
–
–
36
79
19
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 TomT. Byrum Tom  Byrum
41
80
3
+0.49
–
–
–
–
45
81
6
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 ChrisC. Smith Chris  Smith
33
82
2
+0.49
–
–
–
–
 RichR. Beem Rich  Beem
31
83
67
+0.49
–
–
–
–
38
84
12
+0.49
–
–
–
–
37
85
1
+0.48
–
–
–
–
42
86
1
+0.47
–
–
–
–
37
87
–
+0.47
–
–
–
–
41
88
26
+0.46
–
–
–
–
24
89
11
+0.45
–
–
–
–
47
90
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
39
91
13
+0.41
–
–
–
–
 GlenG. Day Glen  Day
36
92
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
42
93
16
+0.40
–
–
–
–
36
94
6
+0.37
–
–
–
–
35
95
–
+0.37
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
42
96
–
+0.35
–
–
–
–
44
97
–
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 J.P.J. Hayes J.P.  Hayes
37
98
6
+0.33
–
–
–
–
38
99
1
+0.32
–
–
–
–
33
100
10
+0.32
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.