DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
29
1
1
+2.62
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
42
2
1
+2.33
–
–
–
–
34
3
1
+2.06
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
35
4
1
+2.00
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
36
5
–
+1.93
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
35
6
2
+1.76
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
36
7
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
27
8
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
40
9
–
+1.64
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
38
10
–
+1.62
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
25
11
–
+1.47
–
–
–
–
33
12
7
+1.39
–
–
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
24
13
1
+1.30
–
–
–
–
46
14
–
+1.29
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
44
15
2
+1.27
–
–
–
–
35
16
–
+1.26
–
–
–
–
36
17
4
+1.24
–
–
–
–
45
18
16
+1.17
–
–
–
–
33
19
2
+1.17
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
32
20
2
+1.17
–
–
–
–
29
21
6
+1.14
–
–
–
–
39
22
–
+1.10
–
–
–
–
32
23
2
+1.05
–
–
–
–
35
24
4
+1.02
–
–
–
–
42
25
29
+1.01
–
–
–
–
35
26
2
+0.96
–
–
–
–
29
27
3
+0.94
–
–
–
–
38
28
3
+0.94
–
–
–
–
41
29
6
+0.93
–
–
–
–
49
30
2
+0.93
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
41
31
2
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 JerryJ. Kelly Jerry  Kelly
38
32
15
+0.89
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
41
33
24
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
51
34
4
+0.88
–
–
–
–
25
35
8
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
34
36
8
+0.88
–
–
–
–
47
37
21
+0.88
–
–
–
–
 GregG. Owen Greg  Owen
33
38
5
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 RichardR. Green Richard  Green
34
39
16
+0.86
–
–
–
–
27
40
4
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 TimT. Clark Tim  Clark
29
41
5
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
48
42
13
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
35
43
21
+0.81
–
–
–
–
41
44
4
+0.79
–
–
–
–
41
45
19
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
48
46
4
+0.76
–
–
–
–
35
47
8
+0.76
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
39
48
3
+0.75
–
–
–
–
37
49
10
+0.75
–
–
–
–
30
50
30
+0.74
–
–
–
–
29
51
17
+0.74
–
–
–
–
43
52
4
+0.73
–
–
–
–
32
53
4
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
35
54
19
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
46
55
9
+0.67
–
–
–
–
38
56
16
+0.67
–
–
–
–
30
57
20
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 CraigC. Parry Craig  Parry
39
58
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
25
59
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
31
60
9
+0.62
–
–
–
–
 Richard S.R. Johnson Richard S.  Johnson
28
61
2
+0.61
–
–
–
–
 JustinJ. Rose Justin  Rose
24
62
21
+0.60
–
–
–
–
34
63
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Dodd Stephen  Dodd
38
64
14
+0.59
–
–
–
–
34
65
13
+0.59
–
–
–
–
 VaughnV. Taylor Vaughn  Taylor
29
66
8
+0.59
–
–
–
–
31
67
5
+0.59
–
–
–
–
25
68
20
+0.59
–
–
–
–
33
69
7
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 TedT. Purdy Ted  Purdy
31
70
17
+0.57
–
–
–
–
41
71
2
+0.57
–
–
–
–
40
72
1
+0.56
–
–
–
–
41
73
3
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Leaney Stephen  Leaney
36
74
8
+0.55
–
–
–
–
45
75
6
+0.55
–
–
–
–
30
76
–
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 JonathanJ. Kaye Jonathan  Kaye
34
77
22
+0.54
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
45
78
11
+0.51
–
–
–
–
40
79
4
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 BrandtB. Jobe Brandt  Jobe
39
80
14
+0.50
–
–
–
–
41
81
19
+0.49
–
–
–
–
25
82
5
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Davis Brian  Davis
30
83
4
+0.47
–
–
–
–
30
84
11
+0.46
–
–
–
–
25
85
13
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
43
86
11
+0.42
–
–
–
–
33
87
4
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
47
88
10
+0.39
–
–
–
–
35
89
16
+0.38
–
–
–
–
27
90
4
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 BenB. Crane Ben  Crane
29
91
2
+0.35
–
–
–
–
44
92
7
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 ScottS. Hoch Scott  Hoch
49
93
2
+0.33
–
–
–
–
38
94
10
+0.33
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
36
95
9
+0.33
–
–
–
–
29
96
9
+0.32
–
–
–
–
42
97
6
+0.32
–
–
–
–
 J.J.J. Henry J.J.  Henry
30
98
2
+0.29
–
–
–
–
35
99
19
+0.29
–
–
–
–
39
100
10
+0.27
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.