DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
29
1
–
+2.71
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
42
2
–
+2.16
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
36
3
–
+1.85
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
25
4
–
+1.84
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
35
5
–
+1.81
–
–
–
–
27
6
–
+1.64
–
–
–
–
30
7
8
+1.54
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
45
8
1
+1.51
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
38
9
1
+1.47
–
–
–
–
41
10
1
+1.46
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
36
11
–
+1.41
–
–
–
–
35
12
–
+1.40
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
37
13
–
+1.37
–
–
–
–
39
14
2
+1.28
–
–
–
–
42
15
5
+1.28
–
–
–
–
29
16
2
+1.22
–
–
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
25
17
–
+1.22
–
–
–
–
36
18
–
+1.18
–
–
–
–
42
19
–
+1.16
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
34
20
8
+1.13
–
–
–
–
 TimT. Clark Tim  Clark
29
21
1
+1.12
–
–
–
–
36
22
1
+1.09
–
–
–
–
41
23
1
+1.08
–
–
–
–
 BenB. Crane Ben  Crane
29
24
1
+1.06
–
–
–
–
35
25
1
+1.06
–
–
–
–
34
26
1
+1.05
–
–
–
–
31
27
1
+1.05
–
–
–
–
34
28
9
+1.03
–
–
–
–
28
29
–
+1.00
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
44
30
–
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
32
31
–
+0.94
–
–
–
–
 JustinJ. Rose Justin  Rose
25
32
–
+0.94
–
–
–
–
32
33
1
+0.93
–
–
–
–
28
34
1
+0.92
–
–
–
–
37
35
1
+0.88
–
–
–
–
46
36
2
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
41
37
2
+0.86
–
–
–
–
 BradleyB. Dredge Bradley  Dredge
32
38
3
+0.84
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
48
39
1
+0.84
–
–
–
–
23
40
1
+0.83
–
–
–
–
33
41
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
30
42
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 HarrisonH. Frazar Harrison  Frazar
34
43
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
46
44
1
+0.80
–
–
–
–
26
45
1
+0.78
–
–
–
–
25
46
1
+0.78
–
–
–
–
34
47
4
+0.78
–
–
–
–
50
48
–
+0.78
–
–
–
–
 BrandtB. Jobe Brandt  Jobe
40
49
–
+0.78
–
–
–
–
29
50
–
+0.78
–
–
–
–
38
51
24
+0.77
–
–
–
–
31
52
–
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
35
53
5
+0.73
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
39
54
1
+0.72
–
–
–
–
 VaughnV. Taylor Vaughn  Taylor
29
55
1
+0.71
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
49
56
1
+0.69
–
–
–
–
45
57
–
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 NiclasN. Fasth Niclas  Fasth
33
58
2
+0.67
–
–
–
–
39
59
–
+0.66
–
–
–
–
40
60
–
+0.65
–
–
–
–
46
61
1
+0.64
–
–
–
–
41
62
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
37
63
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
 JasonJ. Bohn Jason  Bohn
32
64
1
+0.63
–
–
–
–
45
65
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
 JohnJ. Daly John  Daly
39
66
2
+0.58
–
–
–
–
40
67
3
+0.57
–
–
–
–
 PaulP. Casey Paul  Casey
28
68
21
+0.57
–
–
–
–
36
69
13
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
51
70
1
+0.56
–
–
–
–
23
71
28
+0.54
–
–
–
–
26
72
6
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 CarlosC. Franco Carlos  Franco
40
73
2
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 J.L.J. Lewis J.L.  Lewis
45
74
2
+0.52
–
–
–
–
29
75
2
+0.51
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
46
76
3
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 J.J.J. Henry J.J.  Henry
30
77
3
+0.50
–
–
–
–
 JerryJ. Kelly Jerry  Kelly
38
78
3
+0.50
–
–
–
–
34
79
3
+0.50
–
–
–
–
36
80
2
+0.49
–
–
–
–
47
81
2
+0.49
–
–
–
–
34
82
2
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 JasonJ. Gore Jason  Gore
31
83
2
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Lynn David  Lynn
32
84
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
42
85
1
+0.44
–
–
–
–
42
86
1
+0.43
–
–
–
–
 BillB. Haas Bill  Haas
23
87
1
+0.42
–
–
–
–
29
88
1
+0.42
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
48
89
1
+0.41
–
–
–
–
31
90
–
+0.40
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
35
91
–
+0.40
–
–
–
–
38
92
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 TedT. Purdy Ted  Purdy
32
93
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
30
94
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
41
95
34
+0.39
–
–
–
–
31
96
1
+0.39
–
–
–
–
43
97
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
45
98
1
+0.38
–
–
–
–
35
99
1
+0.36
–
–
–
–
30
100
5
+0.36
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.