DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
29
1
–
+2.80
–
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
42
2
–
+2.26
–
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
35
3
–
+2.10
–
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
35
4
–
+2.02
–
–
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
36
5
1
+1.89
–
–
–
–
35
6
1
+1.77
–
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
25
7
1
+1.74
–
–
–
–
27
8
2
+1.67
–
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
36
9
2
+1.62
–
–
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
38
10
1
+1.52
–
–
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
24
11
–
+1.51
–
–
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
44
12
–
+1.45
–
–
–
–
41
13
–
+1.45
–
–
–
–
 TimT. Clark Tim  Clark
29
14
3
+1.44
–
–
–
–
35
15
6
+1.30
–
–
–
–
41
16
2
+1.29
–
–
–
–
33
17
1
+1.27
–
–
–
–
38
18
3
+1.24
–
–
–
–
33
19
1
+1.22
–
–
–
–
36
20
1
+1.21
–
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
32
21
1
+1.15
–
–
–
–
30
22
–
+1.11
–
–
–
–
33
23
–
+1.07
–
–
–
–
45
24
–
+1.06
–
–
–
–
42
25
–
+1.04
–
–
–
–
35
26
4
+1.02
–
–
–
–
 FredF. Funk Fred  Funk
49
27
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
28
28
1
+0.97
–
–
–
–
39
29
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
39
30
1
+0.95
–
–
–
–
32
31
–
+0.94
–
–
–
–
35
32
–
+0.91
–
–
–
–
 RichardR. Green Richard  Green
34
33
1
+0.88
–
–
–
–
50
34
1
+0.87
–
–
–
–
 ThomasT. Bjorn Thomas  Bjorn
34
35
1
+0.83
–
–
–
–
35
36
1
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 GregG. Owen Greg  Owen
33
37
5
+0.82
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
41
38
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
35
39
1
+0.81
–
–
–
–
29
40
2
+0.80
–
–
–
–
 NickN. Price Nick  Price
48
41
8
+0.80
–
–
–
–
46
42
1
+0.79
–
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
41
43
17
+0.77
–
–
–
–
30
44
10
+0.75
–
–
–
–
45
45
2
+0.75
–
–
–
–
31
46
2
+0.74
–
–
–
–
34
47
14
+0.74
–
–
–
–
34
48
1
+0.74
–
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
35
49
3
+0.73
–
–
–
–
37
50
2
+0.72
–
–
–
–
33
51
6
+0.69
–
–
–
–
 JayJ. Haas Jay  Haas
51
52
3
+0.68
–
–
–
–
 Richard S.R. Johnson Richard S.  Johnson
28
53
14
+0.67
–
–
–
–
34
54
4
+0.67
–
–
–
–
25
55
3
+0.66
–
–
–
–
29
56
3
+0.65
–
–
–
–
 BradB. Faxon Brad  Faxon
43
57
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 CoreyC. Pavin Corey  Pavin
45
58
2
+0.64
–
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
46
59
2
+0.63
–
–
–
–
30
60
2
+0.62
–
–
–
–
30
61
2
+0.60
–
–
–
–
42
62
–
+0.59
–
–
–
–
26
63
–
+0.58
–
–
–
–
23
64
30
+0.58
–
–
–
–
25
65
18
+0.56
–
–
–
–
 BrandtB. Jobe Brandt  Jobe
39
66
12
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 JerryJ. Kelly Jerry  Kelly
38
67
1
+0.55
–
–
–
–
41
68
2
+0.55
–
–
–
–
 RyujiR. Imada Ryuji  Imada
28
69
2
+0.54
–
–
–
–
41
70
10
+0.53
–
–
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
47
71
3
+0.52
–
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
35
72
5
+0.50
–
–
–
–
43
73
9
+0.48
–
–
–
–
 VaughnV. Taylor Vaughn  Taylor
29
74
9
+0.48
–
–
–
–
41
75
6
+0.47
–
–
–
–
31
76
15
+0.47
–
–
–
–
 BenB. Crane Ben  Crane
29
77
5
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 BrianB. Davis Brian  Davis
30
78
12
+0.46
–
–
–
–
 J.L.J. Lewis J.L.  Lewis
44
79
24
+0.44
–
–
–
–
 PatP. Perez Pat  Perez
29
80
2
+0.44
–
–
–
–
30
81
43
+0.44
–
–
–
–
38
82
2
+0.43
–
–
–
–
29
83
37
+0.43
–
–
–
–
30
84
33
+0.42
–
–
–
–
31
85
2
+0.42
–
–
–
–
25
86
10
+0.42
–
–
–
–
40
87
2
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
36
88
–
+0.39
–
–
–
–
 JonathanJ. Kaye Jonathan  Kaye
34
89
1
+0.39
–
–
–
–
42
90
3
+0.38
–
–
–
–
 HunterH. Mahan Hunter  Mahan
23
91
17
+0.38
–
–
–
–
41
92
19
+0.36
–
–
–
–
 StephenS. Leaney Stephen  Leaney
36
93
7
+0.36
–
–
–
–
42
94
3
+0.35
–
–
–
–
47
95
16
+0.35
–
–
–
–
 RobertR. Damron Robert  Damron
32
96
31
+0.35
–
–
–
–
36
97
1
+0.34
–
–
–
–
 AlexA. Cejka Alex  Cejka
34
98
1
+0.33
–
–
–
–
39
99
10
+0.32
–
–
–
–
23
100
40
+0.32
–
–
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.