DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 TigerT. Woods Tiger  Woods
32
1
–
+3.51
1
–
–
–
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
28
2
–
+2.04
5
–
–
–
38
3
–
+1.95
2
–
–
–
39
4
–
+1.90
6
2
–
–
26
5
–
+1.80
7
–
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
38
6
–
+1.80
11
–
–
–
 AnthonyA. Kim Anthony  Kim
23
7
–
+1.72
8
2
–
–
35
8
–
+1.55
12
–
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
45
9
–
+1.45
3
–
–
–
37
10
–
+1.44
4
–
–
–
37
11
–
+1.39
31
–
–
–
36
12
–
+1.38
23
1
–
–
30
13
–
+1.38
27
–
–
–
32
14
–
+1.31
10
–
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
38
15
3
+1.31
22
1
–
–
37
16
1
+1.29
34
1
–
–
31
17
1
+1.28
25
3
–
–
41
18
1
+1.27
13
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
39
19
–
+1.23
9
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
38
20
–
+1.22
16
–
–
–
27
21
1
+1.16
29
–
–
–
27
22
5
+1.14
32
8
–
–
 HunterH. Mahan Hunter  Mahan
26
23
1
+1.12
38
1
–
–
 PaulP. Casey Paul  Casey
31
24
1
+1.12
41
–
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
35
25
–
+1.06
14
–
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
44
26
5
+1.04
28
2
–
–
32
27
6
+0.99
35
2
–
–
 Jeev MilkhaJ. Singh Jeev Milkha  Singh
36
28
2
+0.99
58
3
–
–
 JustinJ. Rose Justin  Rose
28
29
1
+0.97
15
–
–
–
 KenK. Duke Ken  Duke
39
30
5
+0.96
79
2
–
–
35
31
2
+0.95
39
–
–
–
 PatP. Perez Pat  Perez
32
32
2
+0.95
66
1
–
–
34
33
9
+0.94
42
–
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
28
34
3
+0.93
17
–
–
–
31
35
3
+0.92
18
–
–
–
 TimT. Clark Tim  Clark
32
36
–
+0.89
40
2
–
–
31
37
–
+0.89
48
–
–
–
29
38
8
+0.88
33
1
–
–
34
39
13
+0.88
54
2
–
–
33
40
1
+0.87
97
3
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
48
41
2
+0.85
19
–
–
–
34
42
2
+0.84
49
2
–
–
37
43
–
+0.78
74
1
–
–
 BrinyB. Baird Briny  Baird
36
44
–
+0.78
93
4
–
–
 BrianB. Gay Brian  Gay
36
45
7
+0.78
100
5
–
–
32
46
–
+0.76
24
1
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
41
47
–
+0.76
82
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
44
48
3
+0.75
20
–
–
–
44
49
7
+0.73
53
1
–
–
27
50
1
+0.73
63
1
–
–
 CharlieC. Wi Charlie  Wi
36
51
3
+0.71
115
4
–
–
44
52
1
+0.70
50
1
–
–
28
53
2
+0.67
21
–
–
–
 BenB. Crane Ben  Crane
32
54
–
+0.67
84
–
–
–
28
55
18
+0.65
212
5
–
–
 MartinM. Kaymer Martin  Kaymer
23
56
1
+0.65
36
–
–
–
38
57
22
+0.64
147
13
–
–
29
58
22
+0.59
95
4
–
–
39
59
6
+0.58
37
5
–
–
44
60
6
+0.58
44
1
–
–
31
61
3
+0.58
61
2
–
–
 BrianB. Davis Brian  Davis
34
62
15
+0.58
169
4
–
–
28
63
2
+0.57
151
7
–
–
 MathewM. Goggin Mathew  Goggin
34
64
10
+0.57
101
4
–
–
 RyujiR. Imada Ryuji  Imada
32
65
13
+0.57
55
1
–
–
32
66
16
+0.57
26
2
–
–
26
67
5
+0.56
45
–
–
–
44
68
26
+0.55
165
20
–
–
33
69
18
+0.54
110
5
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
40
70
7
+0.54
47
1
–
–
27
71
7
+0.54
51
1
–
–
28
72
5
+0.54
119
6
–
–
49
73
20
+0.53
172
7
–
–
29
74
2
+0.52
133
–
–
–
49
75
9
+0.51
159
–
–
–
25
76
7
+0.51
107
–
–
–
 JasonJ. Bohn Jason  Bohn
35
77
6
+0.50
152
15
–
–
 DarrenD. Clarke Darren  Clarke
40
78
3
+0.50
62
2
–
–
34
79
7
+0.50
75
1
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
39
80
5
+0.48
46
2
–
–
 AnthonyA. Wall Anthony  Wall
33
81
22
+0.46
173
13
–
–
 MichaelM. Allen Michael  Allen
49
82
34
+0.46
180
47
–
–
39
83
3
+0.45
188
13
–
–
38
84
1
+0.45
129
7
–
–
 OliverO. Wilson Oliver  Wilson
28
85
2
+0.43
52
1
–
–
30
86
38
+0.43
118
59
–
–
34
87
17
+0.42
207
11
–
–
37
88
1
+0.42
90
–
–
–
26
89
1
+0.41
59
2
–
–
 GregoryG. Bourdy Gregory  Bourdy
26
90
29
+0.40
113
6
–
–
 AlexA. Noren Alex  Noren
26
91
9
+0.40
143
6
–
–
33
92
13
+0.39
102
2
–
–
42
93
33
+0.39
78
1
–
–
 AndresA. Romero Andres  Romero
27
94
5
+0.39
30
–
–
–
 KevinK. Na Kevin  Na
25
95
17
+0.38
211
5
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
49
96
4
+0.37
343
1
–
–
24
97
29
+0.37
71
5
–
–
41
98
3
+0.36
88
5
–
–
 BillB. Haas Bill  Haas
26
99
14
+0.36
224
2
–
–
41
100
18
+0.36
81
1
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.