DG Rankings
The Data Golf Rankings are a ranking of the best golfers in the world according to our model. They are determined by averaging the field-strength-adjusted scores of each golfer across professional and amateur tournaments, with more recent rounds receiving more weight. More info.
Prior to 2010, the rankings are only based on PGA Tour, European Tour, and Korn Ferry Tour results. For this reason only the top 100 players are displayed.
Favourites Show
–
DG Ranking
Player Age Tours Rank Δ DG Index OWGR Δ DGP Δ
 SergioS. Garcia Sergio  Garcia
29
1
–
+2.31
2
–
–
–
38
2
–
+1.93
4
1
–
–
 AnthonyA. Kim Anthony  Kim
23
3
1
+1.81
9
3
–
–
 JimJ. Furyk Jim  Furyk
38
4
1
+1.79
13
–
–
–
39
5
1
+1.64
7
1
–
–
27
6
1
+1.56
8
1
–
–
35
7
1
+1.53
11
1
–
–
37
8
1
+1.45
3
1
–
–
41
9
1
+1.43
15
2
–
–
 VijayV. Singh Vijay  Singh
45
10
3
+1.38
5
–
–
–
31
11
8
+1.31
6
5
–
–
31
12
1
+1.31
32
1
–
–
37
13
1
+1.31
26
1
–
–
31
14
1
+1.24
24
–
–
–
 ErnieE. Els Ernie  Els
39
15
–
+1.24
10
1
–
–
 HunterH. Mahan Hunter  Mahan
26
16
2
+1.23
45
1
–
–
36
17
–
+1.21
21
2
–
–
 MikeM. Weir Mike  Weir
38
18
2
+1.16
22
1
–
–
27
19
1
+1.15
36
1
–
–
37
20
–
+1.06
38
–
–
–
 PaulP. Casey Paul  Casey
31
21
–
+1.04
42
1
–
–
29
22
1
+1.01
37
2
–
–
44
23
10
+0.99
54
23
–
–
 PatP. Perez Pat  Perez
32
24
1
+0.99
82
–
–
–
 KenK. Duke Ken  Duke
39
25
1
+0.98
81
–
–
–
28
26
1
+0.96
29
–
–
–
 K.J.K. Choi K.J.  Choi
38
27
3
+0.95
17
1
–
–
 AdamA. Scott Adam  Scott
28
28
6
+0.94
18
3
–
–
44
29
–
+0.89
53
1
–
–
 MartinM. Kaymer Martin  Kaymer
24
30
–
+0.88
25
–
–
–
31
31
–
+0.88
59
3
–
–
32
32
–
+0.87
12
4
–
–
 StephenS. Ames Stephen  Ames
44
33
1
+0.87
34
2
–
–
34
34
2
+0.82
64
1
–
–
34
35
2
+0.81
48
2
–
–
31
36
1
+0.80
61
1
–
–
 StewartS. Cink Stewart  Cink
35
37
9
+0.80
16
–
–
–
44
38
–
+0.78
68
4
–
–
34
39
1
+0.77
124
3
–
–
32
40
8
+0.77
44
4
–
–
28
41
–
+0.76
108
1
–
–
35
42
3
+0.75
46
3
–
–
 KennyK. Perry Kenny  Perry
48
43
7
+0.75
14
–
–
–
28
44
7
+0.74
69
4
–
–
33
45
3
+0.74
27
1
–
–
 MathewM. Goggin Mathew  Goggin
34
46
3
+0.73
57
–
–
–
26
47
15
+0.71
50
9
–
–
 DavidD. Toms David  Toms
42
48
4
+0.70
113
–
–
–
37
49
4
+0.70
99
2
–
–
26
50
4
+0.69
80
1
–
–
34
51
4
+0.69
70
3
–
–
 TimT. Clark Tim  Clark
33
52
3
+0.68
28
–
–
–
 Miguel AngelM. Jimenez Miguel Angel  Jimenez
45
53
–
+0.66
23
1
–
–
 AlexA. Noren Alex  Noren
26
54
–
+0.66
96
–
–
–
33
55
1
+0.63
131
6
–
–
44
56
1
+0.63
62
4
–
–
 Jeev MilkhaJ. Singh Jeev Milkha  Singh
37
57
1
+0.60
35
1
–
–
 BrianB. Gay Brian  Gay
37
58
3
+0.60
105
5
–
–
 OliverO. Wilson Oliver  Wilson
28
59
–
+0.60
39
1
–
–
29
60
8
+0.59
20
–
–
–
 CharlieC. Wi Charlie  Wi
37
61
1
+0.59
111
3
–
–
39
62
1
+0.58
43
1
–
–
38
63
–
+0.57
153
5
–
–
30
64
–
+0.57
122
2
–
–
 BrinyB. Baird Briny  Baird
36
65
–
+0.56
112
3
–
–
 BenB. Crane Ben  Crane
32
66
–
+0.55
101
1
–
–
33
67
–
+0.55
51
1
–
–
19
68
–
+0.54
40
1
–
–
 MichaelM. Allen Michael  Allen
49
69
–
+0.52
179
3
–
–
29
70
1
+0.52
185
7
–
–
29
71
2
+0.50
147
3
–
–
28
72
2
+0.49
211
1
–
–
28
73
2
+0.49
67
2
–
–
 AnthonyA. Wall Anthony  Wall
33
74
2
+0.47
109
1
–
–
 RyujiR. Imada Ryuji  Imada
32
75
3
+0.47
66
–
–
–
 RetiefR. Goosen Retief  Goosen
39
76
6
+0.46
49
4
–
–
 DavidD. Lynn David  Lynn
35
77
–
+0.46
145
2
–
–
33
78
–
+0.45
141
1
–
–
 RichardR. Green Richard  Green
37
79
–
+0.45
63
2
–
–
42
80
–
+0.43
92
–
–
–
 BobB. Tway Bob  Tway
49
81
–
+0.42
345
1
–
–
 BobB. Estes Bob  Estes
42
82
–
+0.41
295
5
–
–
49
83
–
+0.40
201
2
–
–
27
84
–
+0.39
209
5
–
–
32
85
1
+0.38
33
–
–
–
39
86
1
+0.37
55
1
–
–
 BernhardB. Langer Bernhard  Langer
51
87
2
+0.36
276
12
–
–
41
88
2
+0.35
98
–
–
–
31
89
2
+0.35
272
3
–
–
 DudleyD. Hart Dudley  Hart
40
90
2
+0.33
58
3
–
–
 JustinJ. Rose Justin  Rose
28
91
2
+0.32
19
–
–
–
25
92
2
+0.32
252
7
–
–
24
93
19
+0.31
65
3
–
–
39
94
1
+0.31
152
3
–
–
46
95
1
+0.31
169
2
–
–
49
96
1
+0.30
176
1
–
–
30
97
1
+0.30
136
1
–
–
49
98
1
+0.29
195
10
–
–
 BillB. Haas Bill  Haas
26
99
1
+0.28
253
1
–
–
46
100
1
+0.28
77
3
–
–
What is the DG Index?
The DG Index is an estimate of a player's current skill level. It is calculated as a weighted average of a player's field-strength-adjusted scores, with recent rounds receiving more weight, plus some adjustments for the overall recency of a player's data. It can be interpreted as our expectation for a golfer's next performance, in strokes gained per round, relative to our baseline player.