PGA Tour 
 DP World Tour
 LIV Golf
 Korn Ferry Tour
 Challenge Tour
| FedExCup |
 Projected Schedules 
 Projected Standings
 Current Standings
 PGA Tour Schedule
UPDATED —
Schedule Model Methodology
This table displays the probabilities (based on our season-long simulations) of each PGA Tour member starting each tournament on the 2026 schedule. We start by predicting a baseline probability for each player/event based on their age, position on the priority list, their DG and OWGR rank, their history at the event, and their general playing patterns (e.g. overall playing frequency, participation in DPWT events). For the Signature Events and the Majors (plus The Players), qualified players are locked into the field. During season simulations, players may also gain entry into certain events based on their performance, which overrides the baseline probability. In some cases, we manually adjust probabilities when we have reliable information that a player has commited to play (or not play) a tournament. These cases are denoted with a triangle, with more details available on hover.
Contributors: 
Eddie Bajek
, 
@Robopz
News/Announcements 
 | Manual Adjustments 
Player
Proj
Starts
SIG
Sentry
Sony Open 
The AMEX 
Farmers 
WMPO 
SIG
AT&T Pebble 
SIG
Genesis Inv 
Cognizant 
SIG
Arnold Palmer 
Puerto Rico 
PLYRS
The Players 
Valspar 
Houston Open 
Valero 
MAJ
Masters 
SIG
RBC Heritage 
Field
Zurich Classic 
SIG
Miami
SIG
Truist
Myrtle Beach
MAJ
Field
PGA
CJ CUP
Charles Schwab
SIG
Memorial
Canadian Open
MAJ
Field
U.S. Open
SIG
Travelers
John Deere
Scottish Open
ISCO
MAJ
Field
The Open
Corales
3M Open
Rocket
Wyndham
St. Jude
BMW Champ
PLAYOFFS
TOUR Champ
 SCHEFFLER Scottie
 S. Scheffler
1
1
1
 19.4 — — 1 — T3 T4 T12 — T24 — T22 — — — 2 2 — >99% >99% <1% >99%
9% 		47% >99% 11% >99% >99% 7% 65% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MCILROY Rory
 R. McIlroy
1
8
2
 16.3 — — — — — T14 T2 — WD — T46 — — — 1 — — >99% >99% <1% >99% 3% 8% >99% 19% >99% >99% 1%
>99% 		<1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FITZPATRICK Matt
 M. Fitzpatrick
1
2
3
 21.4 — — T63 — 9 T14 T24 — T41 — 2 1 — — T18 1 >99% >99% <1% >99% 8% 20% >99% 15% >99% >99% 4% 92% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 SCHAUFFELE Xander
 X. Schauffele
1
11
9
 20.1 — — — CUT T41 T19 T7 — T24 — 3 T4 — — T9 T12 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 6% 19% >99% 12% >99% >99% 6% 71% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 YOUNG Cameron
 C. Young
1
4
4
 19.4 — — — T22 T41 T55 T7 — T3 — 1 — — — T3 T25 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 12% 32% >99% 26% >99% >99% 13% 58% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 HENLEY Russell
 R. Henley
1
15
8
 19.6 — T19 T8 — — T19 CUT — T6 — T13 — — CUT T3 T25 —
>99% 		>99% <1% 99% 5% 21% >99% 11% >99% >99% 7% 36% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 82%
 ABERG Ludvig
 L. Aberg
1
9
14
 20.3 — — WD CUT — T37 T20 — T3 — T5 — — T5 T21 T4 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 10% 24% >99% 19% >99% >99% 12% 67% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MORIKAWA Collin
 C. Morikawa
1
3
6
 19.2 — CUT — — T54 1 T7 — 5 — WD — — — T7 T4 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 7% 31% >99% 12% >99% >99% 7% 67% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FLEETWOOD Tommy
 T. Fleetwood
1
16
7
 18.2 — — — — — T4 T7 — 49 — T8 — — T10 T33 T52 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 6% 21% >99% 18% >99% >99% 3% 89% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 83%
 MATSUYAMA Hideki
 H. Matsuyama
1
18
15
 19.9 — T13 — T11 2 T8 T28 — T41 — T27 — — T21 T12 — — >99% >99% <1% 99% 9% 33% >99% 14% >99% >99% 7% 46% <1% >99% <1% <1% 2% 4% >99% >99% 73%
 KIM Si Woo
 S. Kim
1
10
26
 23.3 — T11 T6 T2 T3 T45 T34 — T13 — T50 — — T10 47 3 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 77% >99% 23% 97% >99% 50% 60% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 7% >99% >99% 98%
 MACINTYRE Robert
 R. MacIntyre
1
17
12
 21.1 — T4 T38 — — T37 T20 — T24 — 4 — — T2 CUT T42 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 23% 62% >99% 33% >99% >99% 14% 88% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 10% >99% >99% 81%
 BURNS Sam
 S. Burns
1
22
29
 20.4 — — T27 — CUT T6 CUT — CUT — T13 — T21 — T7 T16 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 19% 40% >99% 30% >99% >99% 16% 60% <1% >99% <1% 9% 2% 8% >99% 96% 59%
 CANTLAY Patrick
 P. Cantlay
1
33
31
 19.5 — — T13 CUT — T14 T37 — CUT — T32 T7 — — T12 T8 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 10% 17% >99% 16% >99% >99% 9% 40% <1% >99% <1% 1% 5% 6% >99% 88% 56%
 MCNEALY Maverick
 M. McNealy
1
39
30
 22.0 — T24 — 10 T13 T29 CUT — T13 — T32 — — T21 T18 T16 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 29% 63% >99% 32% >99% >99% 34% 53% <1% >99% <1% 21% 6% 20% >99% 86% 55%
 ENGLISH Harris
 H. English
1
31
18
 21.1 — — T27 T22 T28 T24 T22 — T24 — CUT — T21 — T30 T4 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 14% 59% >99% 19% >99% >99% 12% 62% <1% >99% <1% 2% 1% 14% >99% 85% 44%
 KNAPP Jake
 J. Knapp
2
13
37
 22.2 — T11 — T5 8 T8 6 — — — CUT — T6 — 11 T74 — >99% >99% <1% 98% 79% 99% >99% 48% 79% >99% 74% 67% <1% 62% 3% 3% 6% 18% >99% >99% 88%
 BRIDGEMAN Jacob
 J. Bridgeman
1
5
19
 22.7 — T4 T13 — T18 T8 1 — T18 — T5 T14 — — T41 T33 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 39% 86% >99% 25% >99% >99% 61% 58% <1% >99% <1% 1% <1% 4% >99% >99% >99%
 HOVLAND Viktor
 V. Hovland
1
52
25
 18.5 — — — — T10 T58 T41 — T13 — T13 CUT — — T18 T42 — >99% >99% <1% 98% 16% 9% >99% 27% >99% >99% 12% 83% <1% >99% <1% 9% 12% 14% 86% 60% 29%
 ROSE Justin
 J. Rose
1
14
5
 17.8 — — CUT 1 — T37 CUT — CUT — T13 — — — T3 — — >99% >99% <1% >99% 2% 24% >99% 13% >99% >99% 2% 66% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 70%
 GOTTERUP Chris
 C. Gotterup
1
6
11
 22.9 — 1 — T18 1 T37 CUT — T18 — T56 — T6 — T24 T25 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 38% 89% >99% 28% >99% >99% 61% 69% <1% >99% <1% 2% <1% 6% >99% >99% >99%
 BHATIA Akshay
 A. Bhatia
1
7
24
 21.1 — — CUT CUT T3 T6 T16 — 1 — T13 — — — CUT T16 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 23% 74% >99% 26% >99% >99% 28% 53% <1% >99% <1% 2% 2% 5% >99% >99% >99%
 SPAUN J.J.
 J.J. Spaun
1
29
10
 21.8 — T40 — CUT — T45 CUT — CUT — T24 CUT — 1 CUT T25 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 24% 78% >99% 25% >99% >99% 28% 54% <1% >99% <1% 7% 2% 25% >99% 89% 49%
 SCOTT Adam
 A. Scott
3
28
53
 18.9 — T40 T24 T30 — — 4 — T11 — T56 — T21 — T24 — — >99% 95% <1% 97% 32% 74% 80% 32% 74% 73% 13% 89% <1% >99% <1% 1% 2% 6% >99% 82% 43%
 FOWLER Rickie
 R. Fowler
1
36
56
 19.9 — — T18 — T18 T19 T28 — T9 — T42 — CUT CUT — T8 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 10% 54% >99% 24% 92% >99% 40% 40% <1% 82% 3% 6% 13% 27% 99% 69% 29%
 GRIFFIN Ben
 B. Griffin
1
74
16
 26.1 — T19 T24 — T28 T37 T41 — CUT — CUT CUT T28 — T33 T33 >99% >99% <1% >99% 70% 86% >99% 53% >99% >99% 84% 56% 4% >99% <1% 56% 37% 80% 85% 64% 34%
 LOWRY Shane
 S. Lowry
1
40
35
 19.9 — — — — — T8 T24 T2 CUT — CUT — T28 — T30 T42 >99% >99% <1% 99% 9% 13% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 6% 53% <1% >99% <1% 2% 2% 14% 96% 64% 27%
 NOREN Alex
 A. Noren
4
60
21
 19.0 — — CUT CUT — T29 T12 — T24 — T32 — — T30 T30 T65 — 63% 53% 20% 92% 58% 70% 54% 57% >99% 60% 17% 98% <1% >99% <1% 7% 20% 42% 53% 29% 11%
 LEE Min Woo
 M. Lee
2
12
32
 21.0 — — T38 — T28 T2 T12 — T6 — T32 — T3 — CUT T60 — >99% >99% <1% 97% 58% 91% >99% 26% 78% >99% 9% 84% <1% 56% <1% <1% 6% <1% >99% >99% 91%
 SPIETH Jordan
 J. Spieth
2
37
51
 20.0 — T24 — — CUT T29 T12 — T11 — T32 T11 — T63 T12 T33 — 45% 40% 13% 92% 67% 99% 44% 41% 68% 53% 44% 61% <1% >99% <1% 4% 18% 32% 96% 59% 25%
 DAY Jason
 J. Day
1
42
38
 18.6 — — T2 T38 — T24 CUT — CUT — T59 — T6 — T12 T42 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 6% 9% >99% 22% 92% >99% 38% 25% <1% 83% 3% 2% 6% 17% 90% 50% 18%
 HOJGAARD Nicolai
 N. Hojgaard
3
27
36
 21.6 — — — T22 T3 — — T6 T24 — T27 T55 2 — CUT T55 — >99% >99% <1% 94% 70% 87% 85% 62% 72% 87% 22% 99% <1% >99% <1% 1% 21% 15% >99% 92% 56%
 STRAKA Sepp
 S. Straka
1
19
13
 20.3 — — CUT — T18 T2 T50 — T13 — T8 — — CUT T41 T42 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 14% 50% >99% 18% >99% >99% 27% 63% <1% >99% <1% 2% 1% 10% >99% 97% 47%
 BRADLEY Keegan
 K. Bradley
1
75
27
 19.5 — CUT — T43 — T29 CUT — CUT — T50 T55 — — T21 T12 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 22% 25% >99% 32% >99% >99% 18% 30% 2% >99% <1% 33% 25% 57% 61% 36% 14%
 GERARD Ryan
 R. Gerard
1
21
33
 24.1 — 2 T2 T11 — T45 T28 T23 CUT — T27 — CUT — T38 T33 >99% >99% <1% >99% 36% 73% >99% 27% 94% >99% 57% 53% <1% 77% 3% 4% 5% 22% >99% 98% 61%
 HALL Harry
 H. Hall
1
51
63
 23.0 — T6 T24 — CUT T24 CUT — T9 — CUT — T28 — CUT T65 — >99% >99% <1% 97% 59% 86% >99% 51% >99% >99% 58% 54% 1% >99% <1% 38% 29% 67% 85% 53% 20%
 THEEGALA Sahith
 S. Theegala
3
26
74
 24.3 — T31 T8 T7 T18 T60 T22 — T6 — T32 CUT T10 — — T25 >99% >99% <1% 93% 70% 95% 88% 51% 71% 82% 61% 66% <1% 48% 17% 20% 11% 20% >99% 91% 49%
 KITAYAMA Kurt
 K. Kitayama
1
24
34
 21.2 — T40 CUT — T24 T48 T2 — T18 — CUT — T60 — 51 T8 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 56% >99% 23% 95% >99% 28% 48% <1% 81% 1% 10% 3% 16% >99% 93% 46%
 TAYLOR Nick
 N. Taylor
1
59
67
 22.2 — T13 T27 — T28 T24 T28 — T38 — T42 CUT — T28 T41 T60 — >99% >99% <1% 97% 26% 41% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 28% 57% <1% >99% <1% 16% 7% 52% 55% 27% 8%
 STEVENS Sam
 S. Stevens
1
43
46
 24.9 — T31 T6 T30 T35 T55 T16 — CUT — 58 — 5 — T24 T65 >99% >99% <1% 99% 41% 81% >99% 44% 90% >99% 87% 54% <1% 73% 16% 39% 15% 64% 94% 66% 30%
 CONNERS Corey
 C. Conners
1
67
44
 20.0 — T24 — — CUT T70 T37 — T33 — T13 T14 — — T49 T55 — >99% >99% <1% 96% 24% 19% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 22% 62% <1% >99% <1% 23% 15% 44% 56% 29% 9%
 MITCHELL Keith
 K. Mitchell
3
58
107
 21.1 — T66 T44 T11 T41 T52 — T6 T33 — T46 — T14 CUT — — 17% 14% 47% 79% 82% 99% 29% 65% 54% 23% 85% 67% 1% 42% 26% 59% 54% 71% 57% 31% 12%
 MCCARTY Matt
 M. McCarty
3
41
47
 24.3 — T55 T2 T18 CUT T67 T24 — T41 — CUT CUT — T39 T24 T12 55% 48% 31% 90% 85% 99% 42% 61% 66% 56% 77% 64% <1% 46% 17% 25% 36% 61% 93% 57% 25%
 THOMAS Justin
 J. Thomas
1
66
17
 15.4 — — — — — — — — CUT — T8 T30 — — T41 T77 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 20% 12% >99% 31% >99% >99% 20% 66% <1% >99% <1% 31% 24% 42% 57% 30% 10%
 HISATSUNE Ryo
 R. Hisatsune
3
25
57
 24.4 — CUT T44 T2 T10 T8 T45 — T33 — T13 T30 — T8 — T60 — >99% >99% <1% 92% 89% 99% 88% 64% 72% 85% 85% 84% <1% 43% 7% 17% 27% 44% >99% 94% 51%
 THORBJORNSEN Michael
 M. Thorbjornsen
3
54
60
 22.4 — — CUT T18 T3 T78 — CUT T33 — T22 — T14 CUT — T33 43% 37% 41% 81% 89% 99% 37% 69% 58% 50% 78% 81% <1% 38% 24% 36% 52% 63% 81% 53% 26%
 WOODLAND Gary
 G. Woodland
3
20
45
 20.7 — CUT 72 CUT T64 — — CUT — — CUT T14 1 — T33 T8 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 4% 42% >99% 26% >99% >99% 11% 53% <1% 87% 1% 5% 2% 16% >99% 95% 32%
 SMALLEY Alex
 A. Smalley
3
68
104
 22.3 — T40 T44 CUT T35 T19 — T52 — — T24 T46 T21 T14 — — 17% 15% 77% 70% 95% 99% 27% 73% 48% 25% 95% 60% 9% 35% 51% 70% 72% 88% 56% 32% 12%
 BEZUIDENHOUT Christiaan
 C. Bezuidenhout
3
100
94
 20.5 — — T38 T27 CUT — — T37 — T8 CUT T30 T51 T39 — — 20% 16% 71% 51% 93% 99% 25% 74% 34% 22% 89% 81% 5% 31% 34% 85% 72% 93% 34% 17% 6%
 FOX Ryan
 R. Fox
1
53
54
 17.1 — — — — T24 T24 T7 — T24 — — — CUT — CUT T16 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 23% 22% >99% 38% 88% >99% 9% 84% <1% >99% <1% 6% 5% 43% 58% 27% 7%
 SMITH Jordan
 J. Smith
4
48
68
 21.6 — T66 T27 CUT T16 — — T23 — — CUT 3 T44 CUT — T16 36% 59% 30% 88% 82% 92% 37% 70% 62% 40% 52% 99% <1% >99% <1% 11% 18% 52% 75% 43% 17%
 COODY Pierceson
 P. Coody
5
35
55
 22.3 — T13 T18 T2 T10 T48 T16 — CUT — CUT T55 WD — — T16 — 42% 38% 40% 91% 84% 99% 36% 59% 67% 50% 85% 67% 3% 43% 34% 25% 40% 52% 97% 57% 21%
 CLARK Wyndham
 W. Clark
2
70
70
 21.9 — — T13 T65 T35 T58 T41 — — — T42 CUT CUT — T21 T16 33% 26% 41% >99% 87% 95% 32% 61% >99% 36% 36% 87% <1% >99% <1% 51% 45% 57% 57% 33% 13%
 BERGER Daniel
 D. Berger
1
30
40
 20.9 — T6 T56 — T16 T75 CUT T32 2 — T66 — — — CUT T42 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 12% 49% >99% 31% 93% >99% 38% 39% <1% >99% <1% 5% 6% 29% >99% 64% 20%
 OLESEN Thorbjorn
 T. Olesen
3
130
105
 16.6 — — — CUT CUT — — T40 — — CUT CUT T14 T49 — — — 14% 9% 85% 32% 91% 70% 24% 87% 24% 17% 72% 97% <1% 28% 14% 82% 88% 91% 18% 9% 3%
 PARRY John
 J. Parry
4
79
83
 20.1 — T19 T56 T43 T35 — — T63 — T8 — T55 T48 T14 — — 24% 20% 71% 74% 87% 90% 33% 77% 47% 24% 56% 99% <1% >99% <1% 35% 33% 81% 34% 17% 5%
 MCGREEVY Max
 M. McGreevy
3
95
78
 23.5 — CUT T27 T30 T48 T29 CUT T40 — — T50 CUT T19 CUT — — 28% 22% 75% 56% 96% 99% 28% 84% 37% 29% 93% 70% 12% 31% 57% 85% 77% 95% 43% 24% 8%
 HOJGAARD Rasmus
 R. Hojgaard
3
83
59
 19.2 — — T44 T30 T24 — — T9 — CUT CUT T68 T28 — 53 — — 40% 29% 49% 63% 86% 71% 19% 81% 44% 34% 52% 99% <1% >99% <1% 56% 76% 73% 31% 15% 4%
 HARMAN Brian
 B. Harman
1
56
50
 20.1 — T61 CUT — CUT T19 T50 — 50 — T11 — — T39 T33 T25 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 17% 44% >99% 26% >99% >99% 12% 72% <1% >99% <1% 11% 8% 44% 49% 21% 6%
 PUTNAM Andrew
 A. Putnam
7
47
88
 18.1 — — T2 CUT — — — CUT T44 — T32 T30 T44 T5 — T42 23% 20% 25% 88% 46% 79% 24% 44% 60% 16% 67% 71% 3% 48% 31% 32% 45% 26% 42% 15% 3%
 CAULEY Bud
 B. Cauley
1
44
65
 20.7 — T24 CUT — T68 T37 CUT — T18 — T32 74 — T21 — 7 — >99% >99% <1% 99% 18% 51% >99% 37% 90% >99% 53% 34% <1% 75% 9% 16% 12% 53% 77% 37% 11%
 KIM Michael
 M. Kim
1
50
43
 23.1 — T31 CUT — T18 72 CUT — T33 — CUT T30 — T2 CUT T25 — >99% >99% <1% 98% 33% 77% >99% 48% 88% >99% 85% 47% 3% 72% 18% 31% 27% 79% 64% 28% 7%
 POSTON J.T.
 J.T. Poston
1
115
79
 21.8 — — T38 — T35 T37 CUT — CUT — T50 — CUT T21 — T60 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 50% 47% >99% 64% 61% >99% 94% 24% 47% 53% 38% 84% 54% 95% 38% 20% 6%
 YELLAMARAJU Sudarshan
 S. Yellamaraju
5
32
118
 22.4 — T13 CUT T56 T54 — — T17 — T37 T5 — T6 T14 — T52 89% 69% 19% 85% 84% >99% 44% 55% 62% 40% 86% 55% 3% 34% 34% 20% 36% 41% >99% 60% 23%
 MCCARTHY Denny
 D. McCarthy
1
99
93
 22.6 — T40 T56 T49 — T55 T47 — CUT — CUT T26 T12 CUT — T65 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 37% 29% >99% 54% 68% >99% 90% 40% 20% 55% 31% 56% 48% 90% 28% 12% 3%
 REITAN Kristoffer
 K. Reitan
4
86
48
 21.4 — CUT — T30 T41 — — T17 — — T66 CUT CUT T10 T41 — 48% 38% 58% 66% 94% 88% 25% 86% 42% 44% 77% 99% <1% >99% <1% 58% 63% 86% 41% 21% 7%
 KOEPKA Brooks
 B. Koepka
8
57
125
 16.4 — — — T56 CUT — — T9 — — T13 T18 CUT — T12 — 11% 9% 23% >99% 71% 93% 24% 39% >99% 18% 31% 45% <1% >99% <1% 30% 37% 31% 48% 25% 9%
 MEISSNER Mac
 M. Meissner
3
113
116
 21.3 — T40 T63 T49 T18 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T28 T30 — — 11% 10% 89% 32% 99% 99% 19% 89% 25% 19% 98% 32% 64% 20% 76% 96% 93% 98% 33% 18% 6%
 CASTILLO Ricky
 R. Castillo
7
38
86
 19.8 — T31 T44 T43 — — — 5 — 1 T70 T46 T44 — — T60 — 24% >99% <1% >99% 89% 99% 26% 62% 63% 31% 82% 55% 2% 35% 29% 29% 41% 67% 90% 44% 14%
 RAI Aaron
 A. Rai
2
121
41
 19.9 — T50 — — — T73 T28 T23 — — CUT CUT — — 48 — 51% 41% 56% 43% 96% 98% 29% 90% 28% 48% 84% 93% 4% >99% <1% 83% 86% 97% 35% 18% 6%
 WALLACE Matt
 M. Wallace
7
63
69
 19.3 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T40 T51 T2 — T55 31% 85% 11% 83% 78% 90% 28% 71% 54% 28% 51% 95% <1% 41% 38% 57% 58% 67% 42% 19% 6%
 THOMPSON Davis
 D. Thompson
3
93
120
 20.8 — — CUT T43 T64 — — T60 — 4 CUT T46 CUT T14 — — 11% 17% 75% 46% 95% 99% 22% 77% 34% 22% 97% 40% 23% 24% 54% 86% 89% 92% 44% 26% 10%
 RODGERS Patrick
 P. Rodgers
2
34
73
 22.3 — 3 T44 T27 T60 T52 T34 — T24 — T11 T40 CUT CUT — T16 — 44% 29% 38% 92% 80% 99% 28% 58% 68% 29% 77% 82% <1% 45% 6% 31% 25% 66% 92% 31% 7%
 HOMA Max
 M. Homa
3
55
117
 18.2 — — T27 CUT T66 — T37 T13 — — T32 CUT — CUT T9 T69 — 9% 5% 49% 80% 76% 99% 18% 56% 53% 10% 67% 43% 2% 39% 14% 38% 50% 72% 29% 11% 2%
 BRENNAN Michael
 M. Brennan
3
107
49
 24.3 — CUT T56 DQ T48 — — T52 — T26 69 CUT T28 — T24 T42 48% 38% 59% >99% 99% 99% 25% 83% 32% 46% 90% 65% 20% 23% 52% 93% 85% 95% 45% 26% 10%
 DUMONT DE CHASSART Adrien
 A. Dumont De Chassart
5
78
150
 20.0 — T24 69 CUT CUT — — T23 — T26 — T26 T12 T49 — — 5% 8% 82% 51% 94% 96% 15% 77% 37% 13% 90% 77% 6% 21% 50% 68% 75% 84% 30% 15% 4%
 KIRK Chris
 C. Kirk
2
123
96
 20.0 — CUT CUT — CUT T52 — CUT T47 — T27 — T51 T36 — — 17% 12% 75% 41% 86% 95% 26% 73% 25% 14% 83% 28% 51% 29% 46% 89% 91% 95% 15% 6% 1%
 NOVAK Andrew
 A. Novak
1
64
52
 24.3 — — CUT T7 CUT T48 T47 — T38 — CUT T55 — T14 CUT T16 >99% >99% <1% 96% 49% 74% >99% 48% >99% >99% 62% 52% 2% >99% <1% 51% 24% 77% 58% 30% 10%
 COLE Eric
 E. Cole
3
94
119
 21.0 — CUT T27 T27 CUT — — T37 — CUT T32 CUT T51 T14 — — 10% 7% 83% 56% 94% 99% 20% 81% 35% 12% 94% 42% 25% 30% 39% 83% 60% 96% 20% 9% 2%
 PENDRITH Taylor
 T. Pendrith
1
89
81
 22.9 — T6 CUT CUT — T34 T45 — T38 — T46 CUT CUT — — T71 >99% >99% <1% >99% 43% 28% >99% 66% 73% >99% 57% 29% 24% 58% 35% 80% 44% 84% 44% 23% 7%
 LI Haotong
 H. Li
4
80
80
 21.3 — T55 T8 T11 CUT — — T32 CUT — CUT — CUT CUT T38 — 25% 20% 72% 65% 90% 87% 20% 82% 43% 23% 70% 99% <1% >99% <1% 49% 56% 83% 28% 13% 4%
 JAEGER Stephan
 S. Jaeger
2
62
98
 18.7 — — CUT T5 T28 T67 — CUT — — T62 T7 T28 T59 — — 17% 14% 54% 80% 85% 98% 22% 55% 52% 14% 76% 29% 4% 38% 18% 33% 63% 85% 25% 10% 2%
 IM Sungjae
 S. Im
1
97
76
 19.1 — — — — — — — — CUT — CUT T4 T60 — 46 T42 — >99% >99% <1% 83% 62% 45% >99% 61% >99% >99% 85% 53% 11% >99% <1% 87% 47% 87% 49% 27% 9%
 HOEY Rico
 R. Hoey
3
105
82
 23.5 — T50 WD T70 T24 T67 CUT CUT — — T62 T26 T28 T39 — — 24% 19% 79% 48% 97% 99% 23% 87% 32% 25% 96% 34% 59% 24% 71% 93% 87% 97% 34% 18% 6%
 RAMEY Chad
 C. Ramey
3
84
149
 21.4 — T71 T63 T22 T48 — — T17 — CUT T27 T64 T28 T39 — — 4% 4% 91% 54% 95% >99% 13% 78% 36% 8% 95% 23% 54% 25% 66% 88% 81% 94% 19% 8% 2%
 PENGE Marco
 M. Penge
4
65
39
 22.6 — — — CUT CUT T64 T16 — — — CUT T4 CUT T21 T49 T77 53% 48% 44% 80% 89% 87% 25% 80% >99% 50% 66% 99% <1% >99% <1% 34% 46% 74% 49% 25% 8%
 YU Kevin
 K. Yu
2
112
106
 20.8 — — CUT CUT — T70 CUT CUT — — CUT T30 CUT 7 — — 15% 12% 87% 35% 98% 99% 15% 89% 25% 15% 98% 57% 31% 18% 71% 97% 88% 99% 22% 10% 3%
 ECKROAT Austin
 A. Eckroat
3
116
157
 20.2 — CUT CUT T49 CUT — — T40 — T42 — CUT T39 T10 — — 3% 5% 90% 23% 98% 99% 12% 80% 21% 10% 95% 38% 44% 14% 70% 98% 94% 98% 19% 8% 2%
 ZALATORIS Will
 W. Zalatoris
9
146
310
 13.4 — — T18 CUT — — — — — — — — CUT T67 — — — <1% <1% 94% 5% 95% 83% 9% 72% 11% 9% 92% 17% 79% 8% 83% 85% 93% 90% 12% 5% 1%
 ROY Kevin
 K. Roy
3
81
140
 19.8 — T13 CUT CUT T13 — — T23 — — T59 73 T65 T30 — — 5% 4% 85% 60% 92% 99% 16% 72% 38% 9% 87% 22% 41% 27% 56% 75% 66% 92% 21% 9% 2%
 GHIM Doug
 D. Ghim
7
134
183
 18.6 — T55 CUT T59 — — — CUT — T26 — T40 CUT T30 — — 2% 4% 84% 17% 88% 56% 11% 82% 17% 9% 97% 39% 56% 14% 84% 97% 98% 80% 17% 8% 2%
 WHALEY Vince
 V. Whaley
3
136
127
 21.6 — T40 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 CUT T68 T28 T54 — — 8% 6% 93% 25% 98% 99% 12% 90% 19% 9% 98% 26% 72% 16% 81% 97% 96% >99% 11% 4% 1%
 NEERGAARD-PETERSEN Rasmus
 R. Neergaard-Petersen
4
153
75
 18.9 — — — T49 T41 — — T40 — 68 — T55 CUT — CUT — 29% 20% 79% 31% 98% 79% 16% 94% 22% 25% 89% 99% <1% >99% <1% 92% 91% 97% 18% 8% 2%
 VALIMAKI Sami
 S. Valimaki
3
110
58
 21.2 — — CUT CUT T41 T34 T37 CUT — — CUT — — T14 CUT T55 — 39% 28% 70% >99% 98% 97% 17% 80% 30% 32% 88% 87% 3% 20% 26% 94% 90% 95% 16% 7% 1%
 POWER Seamus
 S. Power
7
111
175
 18.8 — T31 T63 T11 — — — T52 — CUT T70 T30 CUT CUT — — 2% 2% 75% 33% 75% 51% 12% 64% 23% 6% 91% 30% 65% 21% 73% 87% 85% 68% 13% 5% <1%
 MOUW William
 W. Mouw
3
90
122
 20.6 — T71 CUT CUT CUT — — T6 — — T24 — T44 CUT — T55 9% 7% 88% >99% 98% 99% 13% 75% 33% 12% 88% 50% 22% 18% 52% 89% 80% 93% 24% 10% 2%
 FISK Steven
 S. Fisk
3
96
123
 20.6 — CUT CUT CUT — T60 — T37 — — T62 CUT T48 T54 — T12 — 7% 5% 91% >99% 98% 99% 13% 75% 30% 11% 87% 47% 28% 19% 55% 91% 78% 95% 19% 8% 2%
 GREYSERMAN Max
 M. Greyserman
2
108
66
 21.1 — — T56 CUT CUT T37 T24 — T18 — CUT — CUT — CUT — 33% 24% 73% 48% 96% >99% 19% 84% 30% 27% 89% 62% 26% 22% 65% 96% 91% 98% 18% 8% 2%
 BLANCHET Chandler
 C. Blanchet
5
71
108
 20.8 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — 2 — T18 CUT CUT — T33 13% 46% 44% 68% 88% 98% 13% 70% 44% 10% 88% 49% 22% 27% 54% 64% 68% 86% 21% 8% 1%
 KIM Tom
 T. Kim
3
109
139
 20.2 — T61 T38 T65 T35 — T34 59 — — — T18 T56 CUT — — 6% 6% 88% 29% 97% 97% 13% 86% 24% 13% 94% 57% 23% 13% 58% 93% 97% 93% 22% 10% 3%
 HODGES Lee
 L. Hodges
7
98
135
 19.7 — T6 CUT CUT — — — T40 — — T59 T18 T65 CUT — — 6% 5% 91% 43% 94% 98% 13% 82% 30% 10% 98% 63% 31% 19% 71% 95% 91% 94% 20% 9% 2%
 BLAIR Zac
 Z. Blair
9
147
240
 9.6 — T50 — — — — — — — T8 — CUT — — — — 1% 2% 73% 15% 56% 43% 4% 20% 7% 3% 58% <1% 87% 12% 60% 61% 19% 31% 3% <1% <1%
 SMOTHERMAN Austin
 A. Smotherman
5
45
87
 19.9 — CUT T8 CUT CUT — — T2 WD — T13 CUT — T36 — T74 23% 16% 57% 87% 80% 98% 19% 56% 58% 20% 74% 35% 10% 34% 31% 22% 30% 67% 48% 17% 4%
 HUGHES Mackenzie
 M. Hughes
2
120
128
 19.8 — — CUT T59 T28 T34 — T23 — — CUT T55 CUT CUT — — 6% 5% 90% 33% 94% 94% 15% 86% 21% 9% 73% 54% 32% 18% 56% 97% 79% 96% 12% 5% 1%
 DOU Zecheng
 Z. Dou
5
92
191
 20.6 — T55 73 T49 T13 — — T17 — T57 CUT CUT T21 CUT — — 1% 2% 90% 35% 94% 95% 9% 77% 26% 7% 92% 52% 28% 14% 66% 80% 82% 89% 15% 5% 1%
 GLOVER Lucas
 L. Glover
1
139
92
 19.4 — — — — — T64 CUT — T24 — CUT CUT CUT WD — T42 — >99% >99% <1% 77% 33% 31% >99% 62% 56% >99% 84% 16% 67% 55% 36% 77% 46% 98% 5% 2% <1%
 MOORE Taylor
 T. Moore
7
61
148
 16.3 — — T56 T49 — — — T2 T44 — T50 CUT CUT T39 — — 4% 3% 40% 70% 52% 67% 9% 50% 46% 5% 73% 50% 8% 24% 35% 54% 81% 34% 17% 7% 1%
 KUCHAR Matt
 M. Kuchar
7
174
170
 15.6 — — T44 CUT — — — CUT — — — CUT T56 CUT — — 1% <1% 72% 32% 69% 51% 14% 68% 18% 2% 85% 17% 77% 23% 65% 87% 92% 86% 2% <1% <1%
 HOSSLER Beau
 B. Hossler
7
124
166
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT — — — T23 — T37 — CUT T21 T49 — — 2% 2% 97% 21% 96% 95% 9% 87% 17% 6% >99% 25% 74% 12% 83% 98% 97% 97% 11% 4% <1%
 BAUCHOU Zach
 Z. Bauchou
5
88
171
 20.6 — 70 T13 T59 T48 — — T23 — T21 T50 CUT CUT T28 — — 2% 2% 88% 43% 92% 96% 8% 74% 29% 6% 92% 35% 43% 15% 70% 80% 81% 90% 13% 5% <1%
 KIM S.H.
 S.H. Kim
5
69
137
 10.0 — T13 T18 63 T54 — — CUT — T42 CUT T7 CUT T21 — — —
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1% 		<1% <1% <1%
 SCHMID Matti
 M. Schmid
2
77
91
 22.4 — CUT CUT T56 CUT T73 49 T9 — T5 T46 T40 74 — — — 19% 13% 81% 66% 93% 99% 13% 83% 41% 16% 74% 76% 3% 21% 62% 86% 73% 94% 18% 7% 2%
 BROWN Dan
 D. Brown
4
126
95
 19.2 — T19 CUT T30 CUT — — T40 — — — CUT CUT CUT — — 17% 11% 87% 31% 96% 74% 13% 92% 21% 12% 83% 99% <1% >99% <1% 89% 86% 98% 8% 3% <1%
 ECHAVARRIA Nico
 N. Echavarria
2
23
42
 21.7 — CUT CUT — CUT T8 CUT 1 T44 — T66 — CUT — CUT 81 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 13% 47% >99% 31% 93% >99% 65% 41% <1% 67% 9% 3% 14% 40% >99% 46% 4%
 KEEFER Johnny
 J. Keefer
5
73
71
 23.2 — T61 T27 T43 T41 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T3 CUT CUT T69 31% 29% 60% 69% 90% 96% 14% 76% >99% 26% 92% 54% 21% 20% 64% 72% 79% 86% 30% 12% 3%
 FINAU Tony
 T. Finau
2
72
114
 19.7 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 18 T28 — — — T70 T18 T39 T49 — 82 10% 7% 58% 72% 85% 98% 14% 50% 43% 8% 38% 26% 3% 27% 12% 82% 38% 80% 11% 4% <1%
 LIPSKY David
 D. Lipsky
7
49
89
 17.7 — — T44 T18 — — — CUT — T37 — 2 CUT — — T71 20% >99% <1% 88% 71% 97% 18% 64% 58% 12% 86% 32% 31% 34% 54% 50% 49% 63% 31% 8% 1%
 VENTURA Kris
 K. Ventura
7
156
246
 16.8 — — CUT T22 — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 1% 84% 11% 83% 43% 5% 73% 13% 4% 91% 23% 75% 8% 89% 93% 97% 75% 6% 2% <1%
 KANAYA Takumi
 T. Kanaya
3
119
130
 21.0 — T31 CUT CUT T60 — — T17 — CUT 73 T46 T60 62 — — 7% 5% 93% 27% 97% 94% 8% 88% 20% 6% 91% 67% 22% 11% 70% 94% 93% 98% 6% 2% <1%
 HORSCHEL Billy
 B. Horschel
3
91
99
 21.1 — 74 T27 CUT CUT T48 — 62 T13 — — T68 CUT T36 — 80 14% 9% 74% 64% 82% 98% 18% 67% 36% 9% 59% 38% 21% >99% <1% 63% 50% 95% 7% 2% <1%
 DAHMEN Joel
 J. Dahmen
7
85
182
 17.0 — — T38 T7 CUT — — T9 CUT — CUT T64 — CUT — — 1% 1% 63% 52% 57% 59% 8% 59% 32% 4% 82% 30% 39% 20% 74% 76% 85% 50% 10% 4% <1%
 JOHNSON Zach
 Z. Johnson
9
180
329
 6.3 — T61 T70 — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 38% 13% 26% 15% <1% 6% 5% <1% 23% <1% 41% >99% <1% 31% 11% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 RYDER Sam
 S. Ryder
7
128
217
 17.0 — — T27 T59 — — — CUT — CUT — T64 T60 T21 — — <1% 1% 87% 17% 78% 52% 5% 75% 14% 2% 93% 18% 81% 10% 82% 97% 97% 78% 4% 1% <1%
 CROWE Trace
 T. Crowe
5
 —
193
 11.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% 1% 97% 16% 96% 93% 6% 86% 15% 5% 98% 30% 68% 8% 88% 98% 96% 98% 6% 2% <1%
 FORD David
 D. Ford
3
106
251
 18.7 — T50 T13 CUT — — — T32 — T16 CUT T46 CUT T59 — — — <1% <1% 97% 15% 97% 93% 6% 82% 16% 6% 97% 45% 41% 6% 81% 91% 93% 93% 10% 3% <1%
 SIMPSON Webb
 W. Simpson
3
145
427
 12.9 — T55 — — CUT — — CUT — — — T18 — WD — — — <1% <1% 89% 4% 90% 94% 3% 61% 8% 3% 70% 2% 60% 6% 53% 73% 81% 94% 3% <1% <1%
 MOLINARI Francesco
 F. Molinari
9
 —
252
 3.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 22% 18% 20% <1% <1% 12% 6% <1% 2% 88% <1% >99% <1% 10% 26% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 VILIPS Karl
 K. Vilips
3
103
153
 19.7 — — T18 T38 CUT — — CUT — — CUT T64 T19 CUT — T33 3% 3% 94% 31% 99% 99% 7% 81% 24% 5% 93% 39% 30% 9% 57% 96% 88% 98% 9% 3% <1%
 GRILLO Emiliano
 E. Grillo
2
114
109
 20.2 — CUT CUT T38 CUT T64 — T56 — — CUT T7 T71 CUT — — — 11% 6% 89% 39% 92% 97% 11% 82% 23% 8% 89% 29% 59% 14% 77% 98% 89% 98% 6% 2% <1%
 WU Dylan
 D. Wu
6
131
343
 18.8 — T31 T44 CUT — — — 66 — T50 — T26 CUT CUT — — <1% 1% 97% 5% 97% 94% 5% 80% 9% 5% 98% 7% 91% 4% 91% 95% 92% 95% 7% 2% <1%
 HIGGO Garrick
 G. Higgo
3
158
84
 21.3 — — — CUT CUT T60 CUT T40 — — CUT CUT T69 CUT — T52 22% 15% 82% 30% 98% 96% 10% 85% 20% 16% 90% 38% 50% 10% 70% 99% 95% 99% 6% 2% <1%
 LEBIODA Hank
 H. Lebioda
5
127
206
 19.6 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — T40 — T61 — T14 CUT T54 — — <1% 1% 95% 16% 94% 86% 5% 81% 13% 3% 93% 13% 83% 8% 87% 92% 89% 97% 5% 1% <1%
 SNEDEKER Brandt
 B. Snedeker
9
141
267
 10.4 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — T18 — T39 — — <1% <1% 75% 17% 34% 24% 1% 16% 6% <1% 24% <1% 44% 11% 20% 32% 8% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 EWART A.J.
 A.J. Ewart
6
76
214
 20.5 — CUT T44 T49 T28 — — T13 — T26 CUT T11 CUT T30 — — <1% 2% 90% 42% 93% 98% 6% 73% 31% 5% 95% 27% 43% 10% 74% 75% 77% 88% 13% 5% <1%
 SADDIER Adrien
 A. Saddier
4
162
97
 19.0 — CUT T70 CUT T60 — — T56 — CUT — CUT T39 CUT — — — 15% 9% 89% 34% 94% 69% 13% 91% 20% 12% 78% 98% <1% >99% <1% 89% 83% 98% 6% 2% <1%
 PAVON Matthieu
 M. Pavon
3
87
236
 18.9 — T55 T27 T38 CUT — — T17 — T42 CUT T11 T51 CUT — — <1% 1% 87% 36% 91% 95% 4% 74% 26% 3% 63% 57% 3% 10% 23% 69% 47% 93% 4% 1% <1%
 YOUNG Carson
 C. Young
9
171
168
 11.3 — — T44 — — — — T52 — T66 — — — CUT — — 10% 6% 76% 22% 55% 30% 2% 28% 8% 1% 57% <1% 87% 8% 80% 73% 45% 39% 1% <1% <1%
 PHILLIPS Chandler
 C. Phillips
3
101
160
 20.0 — T19 T63 CUT T66 — — T63 — — CUT T55 CUT T8 — — 2% 2% 95% 35% 95% 98% 6% 84% 24% 4% 95% 23% 57% 10% 75% 94% 91% 97% 8% 2% <1%
 NAKAJIMA Keita
 K. Nakajima
4
181
129
 15.9 — CUT CUT 64 71 — — WD — — — — — — — — 6% 4% 95% 22% 97% 66% 6% 93% 16% 6% 87% 97% <1% >99% <1% 94% 94% 98% 4% 1% <1%
 VEGAS Jhonattan
 J. Vegas
1
104
111
 19.8 — — CUT CUT — T78 44 — T18 — CUT — T14 CUT — T74 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 28% 18% >99% 57% 63% >99% 55% 15% 35% 42% 45% 83% 41% 91% 7% 2% <1%
 VANDERLAAN John
 J. VanDerLaan
5
144
260
 19.8 — CUT CUT T43 T60 — — CUT — T21 — T46 CUT CUT — — <1% 1% 96% 10% 95% 91% 4% 83% 12% 4% 97% 18% 79% 4% 91% 96% 95% 97% 5% 2% <1%
 SVENSSON Adam
 A. Svensson
6
149
375
 18.9 — T40 CUT CUT — — — CUT — T26 — CUT CUT T39 — — <1% 1% 97% 4% 96% 96% 4% 83% 8% 5% >99% 3% 95% 3% 94% 98% 96% 96% 6% 2% <1%
 MONTGOMERY Taylor
 T. Montgomery
9
 —
180
 7.2 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — 6% 4% 73% 20% 52% 10% <1% 22% 6% <1% 46% <1% 80% 7% 66% 65% 30% 32% <1% <1% <1%
 POTGIETER Aldrich
 A. Potgieter
2
46
77
 18.8 — — CUT CUT CUT T60 5 — CUT — CUT — T21 — CUT T25 — 26% 17% 51% >99% 87% 97% 8% 58% 55% 20% 65% 47% <1% 15% 22% 54% 58% 61% 29% 8% 1%
 KOHLES Ben
 B. Kohles
9
182
296
 6.8 — — — — — — — — — T42 — — — — — — <1% <1% 71% 10% 47% 24% 1% 14% 4% <1% 45% <1% 75% 5% 72% 54% 26% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 GOODWIN Noah
 N. Goodwin
9
 —
306
 7.0 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 73% 6% 57% 19% 2% 19% 4% 1% 50% <1% 76% 3% 66% 56% 42% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIFFIN Lanto
 L. Griffin
7
 —
220
 14.6 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 88% 17% 71% 28% 3% 77% 13% 1% 91% 10% 89% 7% 91% 98% 98% 78% 2% <1% <1%
 HOGE Tom
 T. Hoge
1
82
115
 21.9 — T40 T8 T70 CUT T14 CUT — CUT — CUT — T71 CUT — T71 >99% >99% <1% 90% 19% 25% >99% 45% 71% >99% 37% 25% 10% 39% 31% 78% 33% 77% 7% 2% <1%
 GONZALEZ Emilio
 E. Gonzalez
5
178
189
 13.9 — T50 CUT T65 WD — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 98% 16% 96% 89% 3% 86% 14% 2% 96% 26% 71% 5% 90% 98% 98% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 NYHOLM Pontus
 P. Nyholm
5
102
234
 19.5 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — T13 — T16 — CUT T14 CUT — — <1% <1% 92% 22% 92% 90% 3% 77% 19% 2% 94% 19% 67% 5% 84% 89% 90% 92% 4% 1% <1%
 SIGG Greyson
 G. Sigg
9
 —
294
 6.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 78% 8% 52% 26% 1% 17% 4% 1% 58% <1% 84% 3% 73% 69% 44% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 SVENSSON Jesper
 J. Svensson
7
150
188
 15.5 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT T69 CUT — — <1% 1% 86% 17% 75% 6% 3% 84% 14% 2% 65% 95% 1% 6% 39% 84% 93% 70% 3% <1% <1%
 HUBBARD Mark
 M. Hubbard
3
142
156
 21.2 — T66 CUT 69 CUT — — T23 — T42 CUT CUT CUT T65 — — 2% 2% 96% 26% 94% 97% 7% 88% 16% 3% 96% 18% 76% 8% 89% 97% 93% >99% 4% 1% <1%
 SKINNS David
 D. Skinns
9
138
255
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — T8 — T30 — — — — <1% <1% 76% 19% 34% 12% 1% 16% 5% <1% 29% <1% 86% 8% 55% 36% 11% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 SPRINGER Hayden
 H. Springer
9
T172
239
 7.5 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — — — <1% <1% 79% 12% 53% 21% 1% 23% 5% 1% 52% <1% 85% 4% 75% 65% 42% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 NOH S.Y.
 S.Y. Noh
9
 —
347
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 20% 6% 26% <1% <1% 10% 3% <1% 14% 13% 25% 3% 29% 36% 65% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 CHATFIELD Davis
 D. Chatfield
5
165
265
 19.7 — CUT T63 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 — T40 CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 97% 8% 96% 89% 3% 84% 10% 2% 97% 15% 81% 3% 91% 98% 97% 97% 3% <1% <1%
 FISHBURN Patrick
 P. Fishburn
7
169
179
 17.8 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T46 CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 98% 21% 92% 78% 4% 86% 14% 2% 97% 13% 86% 6% 91% 98% 97% 97% 2% <1% <1%
 SHIPLEY Neal
 N. Shipley
5
191
163
 20.0 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — 2% 1% 97% 18% 96% 87% 3% 88% 14% 2% 97% 28% 69% 4% 92% 99% 98% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 HADWIN Adam
 A. Hadwin
9
164
244
 8.0 — — — — — — — CUT — T21 — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 56% 18% 33% 8% <1% 20% 5% <1% 32% <1% 77% 6% 36% 59% 19% 27% <1% <1% <1%
 SUBER Jackson
 J. Suber
7
159
207
 16.5 — — CUT T70 — — — T63 — CUT — CUT T28 CUT — — <1% <1% 85% 13% 77% 23% 2% 78% 13% 1% 90% 21% 78% 3% 93% 96% 99% 80% 1% <1% <1%
 PETERSON Paul
 P. Peterson
9
137
242
 7.0 — — — — — — — — — T5 — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 69% 17% 35% 13% <1% 16% 5% <1% 27% <1% 77% 5% 60% 33% 14% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 WALKER Danny
 D. Walker
3
125
221
 20.7 — CUT CUT T38 CUT — — T40 — T61 T62 T18 68 T67 — — <1% <1% 99% 13% 96% 97% 2% 87% 11% 1% 94% 14% 74% 4% 89% 97% 92% >99% 1% <1% <1%
 CHAMP Cameron
 C. Champ
9
 —
304
 5.9 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 58% 8% 45% 9% <1% 17% 4% <1% 38% <1% 68% 2% 42% 39% 31% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 STREELMAN Kevin
 K. Streelman
9
129
384
 13.0 — — CUT CUT — — — T32 — T8 — T68 — T39 — — <1% <1% 63% 7% 47% 18% 1% 51% 8% <1% 59% 1% 91% 4% 64% 71% 71% 46% <1% <1% <1%
 SILVERMAN Ben
 B. Silverman
9
151
249
 7.4 — — — — — — — T40 — T16 — — — — — — <1% <1% 77% 16% 38% 17% <1% 19% 5% <1% 35% <1% 85% 4% 50% 46% 19% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 KIZZIRE Patton
 P. Kizzire
3
122
275
 18.3 — T24 CUT — 72 — — T13 — — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 96% 14% 90% 92% 2% 75% 11% 1% 91% 3% 92% 5% 71% 96% 88% 96% 1% <1% <1%
 KIM Chan
 C. Kim
9
166
287
 9.6 — — CUT — — — — T56 — T26 — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 76% 11% 39% 17% <1% 18% 4% <1% 38% <1% 82% 3% 69% 50% 24% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 LAMPRECHT Christo
 C. Lamprecht
5
168
204
 18.8 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — CUT — T50 — — CUT T49 — — <1% <1% 97% 13% 95% 84% 2% 87% 12% 2% 97% 21% 77% 2% 93% 98% 98% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 SALINDA Isaiah
 I. Salinda
7
157
254
 16.5 — CUT CUT T30 — — — CUT — T50 — T46 CUT — — — — <1% <1% 96% 10% 92% 75% 2% 83% 10% 2% 96% 14% 83% 2% 93% 97% 96% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 VAN ROOYEN Erik
 E. Van Rooyen
2
175
167
 20.1 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT CUT CUT T48 T59 — — 1% <1% 91% 24% 86% 77% 4% 86% 14% 2% 65% 44% 32% 5% 80% 98% 96% 97% 1% <1% <1%
 FRITTELLI Dylan
 D. Frittelli
9
 —
408
 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 21% 4% 21% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 4% 70% <1% 1% 2% 15% 43% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE S.T.
 S.T. Lee
5
179
300
 13.4 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 97% 7% 93% 82% 1% 81% 8% 1% 95% 9% 87% 1% 92% 97% 96% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 SCHENK Adam
 A. Schenk
3
117
147
 22.1 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 77 — T60 — — CUT CUT CUT T39 — T33 3% 2% 95% >99% 96% 98% 5% 79% 18% 3% 91% 13% 68% 5% 50% 97% 88% 98% 3% <1% <1%
 CAMPBELL Brian
 B. Campbell
1
140
100
 23.1 — CUT CUT — T54 T78 CUT — CUT — CUT WD CUT — T24 T77 — >99% >99% <1% >99% 58% 23% >99% 71% 48% >99% 76% 16% 60% 18% 67% 97% 73% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 CLANTON Luke
 L. Clanton
3
133
219
 18.8 — CUT WD CUT — — — CUT — T5 — CUT 75 70 — — <1% <1% 98% 10% 96% 83% 2% 88% 10% 2% 98% 19% 79% 2% 95% 98% 98% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 WARING Paul
 P. Waring
9
152
302
 7.9 — — — — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 T30 — — — <1% <1% 48% 12% 32% <1% <1% 20% 4% <1% 6% 86% <1% 3% 3% 18% 24% 35% <1% <1% <1%
 NORLANDER Henrik
 H. Norlander
9
183
341
 7.2 — — — CUT — — — — — T57 — T68 — — — — <1% <1% 75% 8% 35% 6% <1% 20% 3% <1% 26% <1% 25% 2% 46% 42% 17% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNCAN Tyler
 T. Duncan
9
T187
479
 5.1 — — — — — — — — — T50 — — — — — — <1% <1% 17% 4% 21% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 21% 2% 61% 1% 50% 39% 63% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 HIRATA Kensei
 K. Hirata
5
143
210
 19.5 — T24 CUT 74 T54 — — CUT — CUT — T46 CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 97% 12% 94% 70% 2% 88% 11% 2% 94% 36% 55% 2% 88% 97% 96% 97% 2% <1% <1%
 GOMEZ Fabian
 F. Gomez
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — <1% <1% 18% 7% 11% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 8% 5% 47% 2% 31% 28% 42% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGHSMITH Joe
 J. Highsmith
2
135
138
 21.5 — T66 CUT CUT T54 T75 — 67 — — T42 CUT CUT T67 — T33 — 4% 2% 96% >99% 97% 94% 3% 84% 14% 3% 94% 25% 61% 3% 76% >99% 96% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 PAUL Jeremy
 J. Paul
9
155
316
 7.4 — — — CUT — — — — — T8 — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 69% 7% 37% 7% <1% 17% 3% <1% 25% <1% 56% 1% 47% 33% 20% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 LOWER Justin
 J. Lower
7
161
213
 16.4 — — CUT T30 — — — CUT — CUT — T55 CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 86% 19% 63% 22% 2% 78% 12% <1% 85% 10% 89% 3% 96% 97% 98% 77% <1% <1% <1%
 MULLINAX Trey
 T. Mullinax
9
 —
410
 5.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — <1% <1% 52% 3% 37% 7% <1% 13% 2% <1% 39% <1% 48% <1% 34% 47% 27% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 KNOX Russell
 R. Knox
9
 —
368
 3.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 7% 14% <1% <1% 7% 3% <1% 8% 2% 49% 1% 33% 25% 46% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 MALNATI Peter
 P. Malnati
3
163
 — 19.0 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 — CUT T65 T63 — — <1% <1% 97% 4% 91% 95% <1% 75% 6% <1% 93% <1% 89% 1% 61% 97% 90% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 KANG Jeffrey
 J. Kang
5
170
241
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 T65 — — <1% <1% 96% 14% 88% 76% 1% 82% 11% <1% 91% 10% 86% 2% 91% 96% 93% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 GARNETT Brice
 B. Garnett
3
160
410
 18.9 — T31 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T50 — CUT T71 CUT — — <1% <1% 97% 5% 91% 94% <1% 75% 7% <1% 88% <1% 91% 1% 70% 92% 78% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 STANGER Jimmy
 J. Stanger
9
132
 — 10.6 — — CUT — — — — T32 — T26 — T30 T56 CUT — — <1% <1% 45% 3% 40% <1% <1% 14% 2% <1% 33% 5% 44% <1% 42% 42% 59% 31% <1% <1% <1%
 HARDY Nick
 N. Hardy
9
 —
492
 7.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 27% 3% 25% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 43% 2% 72% <1% 74% 71% 87% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGS Harry
 H. Higgs
9
 —
292
 8.1 — — CUT — — — — CUT — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 66% 10% 32% 7% <1% 17% 3% <1% 31% <1% 78% 1% 67% 50% 25% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 BYRD Jonathan
 J. Byrd
9
 — — 3.7 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 13% 7% 9% <1% <1% 5% 3% <1% 4% 1% 45% 2% 27% 15% 27% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 LAIRD Martin
 M. Laird
9
T189
422
 2.4 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — — — — <1% <1% 21% 6% 11% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 4% 17% 4% <1% 4% 18% 35% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 HOFFMAN Charley
 C. Hoffman
9
 —
412
 14.6 — — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 49% 7% 37% 12% <1% 55% 6% <1% 26% 1% 72% 2% 91% 75% 80% 50% <1% <1% <1%
 MARTIN Ben
 B. Martin
9
 —
425
 5.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 20% 4% 16% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 19% 2% 60% <1% 69% 46% 65% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 HOSHINO Rikuya
 R. Hoshino
9
 —
409
 3.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 42% 3% 30% <1% <1% 18% 2% <1% 9% 73% <1% <1% 5% 31% 59% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 VILLEGAS Camilo
 C. Villegas
9
192
469
 8.3 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — 63 — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 22% 6% 12% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 15% 1% 47% 1% 20% 27% 52% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNLAP Nick
 N. Dunlap
3
186
270
 17.4 — T61 WD — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 97% 6% 96% 83% <1% 88% 8% <1% 98% 3% 78% <1% 80% >99% 99% >99% <1% <1% <1%
 REAVIE Chez
 C. Reavie
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 19% 6% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 10% 1% 54% 1% 37% 29% 44% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 WILLETT Danny
 D. Willett
9
176
406
 10.0 — — — — — — — CUT — T42 — CUT T56 — CUT — — <1% <1% 58% 4% 44% 1% <1% 68% 6% <1% 34% 63% 2% <1% 26% 67% 86% 37% <1% <1% <1%
 ROZO Marcelo
 M. Rozo
6
184
491
 18.2 — CUT CUT T65 CUT — — CUT — 65 — CUT — CUT — — <1% <1% 98% 4% 91% 84% <1% 76% 6% <1% 93% 2% 94% <1% 92% 93% 87% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 TOSTI Alejandro
 A. Tosti
6
167
319
 19.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — T30 CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 99% 6% 92% 76% <1% 81% 7% <1% 97% 5% 92% <1% 96% 94% 97% 94% <1% <1% <1%
 RILEY Davis
 D. Riley
2
118
124
 21.2 — T6 T56 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 CUT CUT T60 — CUT — 5% 3% 95% >99% 90% 87% 2% 86% 17% 2% 81% 32% 48% 2% 72% 98% 97% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 MERRITT Troy
 T. Merritt
9
194
 — 3.8 — — — — — — — — — T66 — — — — — — <1% <1% 24% 5% 12% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 3% 60% <1% <1% 3% 15% 33% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 LIST Luke
 L. List
9
 — — 5.7 — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 24% 5% 15% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 15% 9% 38% 1% 32% 42% 65% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 COODY Parker
 P. Coody
9
 — — 4.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 47% 2% 45% <1% <1% 16% 2% <1% 39% 4% 53% <1% 46% 66% 81% 46% <1% <1% <1%
 GORDON Will
 W. Gordon
9
 — — 4.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 54% 4% 38% 6% <1% 17% 2% <1% 40% <1% 72% <1% 38% 55% 38% 18% <1% <1% <1%
 KISNER Kevin
 K. Kisner
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 42% 5% 21% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 21% 1% 69% <1% 42% 49% 57% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 STALLINGS Scott
 S. Stallings
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 31% 5% 26% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 7% 2% 34% 1% 21% 20% 37% 37% <1% <1% <1%
 TODD Brendon
 B. Todd
9
 — — 9.3 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — — — <1% <1% 79% 5% 62% 32% <1% 62% 6% <1% 77% <1% 84% <1% 75% 76% 91% 81% <1% <1% <1%
 MCGIRT William
 W. McGirt
9
 — — 2.8 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — <1% <1% 14% 7% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% 1% 50% 1% 32% 13% 29% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 THOMPSON Michael
 M. Thompson
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 37% 6% 28% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 16% 3% 40% <1% 29% 43% 49% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 STUARD Brian
 B. Stuard
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 6% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 7% 1% 58% 1% 40% 22% 43% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 TWAY Kevin
 K. Tway
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 4% 16% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 10% 5% 33% <1% 29% 35% 59% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE K.H.
 K.H. Lee
9
 — — 9.5 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — CUT CUT — — — <1% <1% 54% 3% 54% 8% <1% 58% 5% <1% 71% 2% 74% <1% 79% 91% 95% 57% <1% <1% <1%
 KODAIRA Satoshi
 S. Kodaira
9
 — — 1.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 19% 4% 14% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 4% 37% 3% <1% 4% 18% 44% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 LANDRY Andrew
 A. Landry
9
 — — 4.0 — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 21% 5% 14% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 17% 4% 57% <1% 44% 42% 67% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 LASHLEY Nate
 N. Lashley
9
 — — 3.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 31% 6% 30% <1% <1% 14% 2% <1% 30% 1% 33% <1% 55% 57% 52% 42% <1% <1% <1%
 HARRINGTON Padraig
 P. Harrington
9
 — — 4.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 18% >99% 6% <1% <1% 6% >99% <1% 2% 21% 9% >99% <1% 9% 15% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 BADDELEY Aaron
 A. Baddeley
9
 — — 7.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 91% 6% 66% 23% <1% 69% 6% <1% 62% <1% 97% 1% 93% 96% 92% 83% <1% <1% <1%
 DUFNER Jason
 J. Dufner
9
 — — 5.0 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% >99% 7% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 1% 23% 4% 2% 6% 8% 18% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 PALMER Ryan
 R. Palmer
9
 — — 5.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 21% 8% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 15% <1% 52% 2% 31% 33% 41% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 PIERCY Scott
 S. Piercy
9
 — — 3.7 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 13% 7% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% 1% 47% 1% 29% 17% 25% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 HAAS Bill
 B. Haas
9
 — — 2.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 20% 6% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 11% 4% 53% <1% 39% 33% 52% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 WATNEY Nick
 N. Watney
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 6% 9% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 3% 9% 16% 1% 9% 14% 29% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 BAE Sangmoon
 S. Bae
9
 — — 2.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 20% 5% 13% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 15% 4% 55% <1% 43% 39% 61% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 OVERTON Jeff
 J. Overton
9
 — — 1.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 22% 5% 11% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 3% 53% 2% <1% 6% 19% 38% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 COOK Austin
 A. Cook
9
 — — 4.5 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 4% 16% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 12% 1% 50% <1% 36% 32% 61% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 WERENSKI Richy
 R. Werenski
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 16% 4% 16% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 14% 2% 52% <1% 39% 35% 65% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 DONALD Luke
 L. Donald
9
 — — 1.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 16% 7% 7% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% <1% 57% <1% 1% 1% 3% 16% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 WISE Aaron
 A. Wise
9
 — — 10.9 — — — CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 62% 3% 59% 9% <1% 63% 5% <1% 76% 2% 79% <1% 79% 93% 98% 58% <1% <1% <1%
 NORRMAN Vincent
 V. Norrman
9
 — — 6.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 59% 2% 63% 5% <1% 68% 5% <1% 58% 4% 67% <1% 70% 91% 98% 53% <1% <1% <1%
 HUH John
 J. Huh
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 40% 5% 33% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 23% 4% 42% <1% 34% 51% 63% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 LINGMERTH David
 D. Lingmerth
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 40% 5% 30% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 19% 4% 42% <1% 33% 46% 55% 44% <1% <1% <1%
 HADLEY Chesson
 C. Hadley
9
 — — 3.8 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — <1% <1% 21% 4% 14% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 15% 1% 55% <1% 35% 40% 62% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 LONG Adam
 A. Long
9
 — — 4.5 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — <1% <1% 16% 4% 13% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 10% 1% 54% <1% 38% 29% 56% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 PAN C.T.
 C.T. Pan
9
 — — 6.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 64% 3% 52% 6% 1% 59% 5% 1% 65% <1% 76% <1% 70% 71% 93% 48% <1% <1% <1%
 LINDHEIM Nicholas
 N. Lindheim
9
 — — 4.1 — — — — — — — — — WD — — — — — — — <1% <1% 38% 5% 27% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 16% 3% 43% <1% 31% 41% 47% 44% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIBBLE Cody
 C. Gribble
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 21% 4% 16% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 19% 5% 57% <1% 44% 47% 72% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 MCCUMBER Tyler
 T. McCumber
9
 — — 6.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 61% 4% 53% 8% <1% 61% 5% <1% 69% 2% 81% <1% 77% 90% 97% 60% <1% <1% <1%
 SARGENT Gordon
 G. Sargent
3
148
 — 18.5 — CUT CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT CUT T54 — — <1% <1% 99% 2% 97% 83% 1% 83% 5% <1% 98% 3% 94% <1% 95% 97% 97% 95% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPOS Rafael
 R. Campos
3
154
 — 19.3 — CUT T44 CUT CUT — — CUT — T16 — CUT CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 99% 4% 93% 94% <1% 79% 6% <1% 92% <1% 93% <1% 90% 96% 87% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 SINGH Vijay
 V. Singh
9
177
 — 4.0 — T40 — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 18% >99% 5% <1% <1% 4% 3% <1% 1% 2% 23% 4% 11% 8% 6% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 DAVIS Cam
 C. Davis
2
185
 — 17.0 — CUT CUT T70 73 — — CUT — — CUT CUT — — — — <1% <1% 93% 16% 89% 87% <1% 79% 11% <1% 73% 8% 69% 1% 71% >99% 98% 99% <1% <1% <1%
 HAHN James
 J. Hahn
9
193
 — 3.8 — — — — — — — — — 64 — — — — — — <1% <1% 14% 6% 10% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 6% 1% 49% <1% 24% 17% 34% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 BREHM Ryan
 R. Brehm
9
T172
 — 4.3 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — — — <1% <1% 23% 5% 14% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 11% 7% 40% <1% 34% 25% 45% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 CAPAN III Frankie
 F. Capan III
9
T187
 — 10.2 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T50 — — — CUT — — <1% <1% 68% 5% 39% 5% <1% 18% 3% <1% 35% <1% 70% <1% 59% 52% 40% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 STREB Robert
 R. Streb
9
T189
 — 4.2 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — — — <1% <1% 15% 5% 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 9% 1% 53% <1% 29% 24% 48% 12% <1% <1% <1%