PGA Tour 
 DP World Tour
 LIV Golf
 Korn Ferry Tour
 Challenge Tour
| FedExCup |
 Projected Schedules 
 Projected Standings
 Current Standings
 PGA Tour Schedule
UPDATED —
Schedule Model Methodology
This table displays the probabilities (based on our season-long simulations) of each PGA Tour member starting each tournament on the 2026 schedule. We start by predicting a baseline probability for each player/event based on their age, position on the priority list, their DG and OWGR rank, their history at the event, and their general playing patterns (e.g. overall playing frequency, participation in DPWT events). For the Signature Events and the Majors (plus The Players), qualified players are locked into the field. During season simulations, players may also gain entry into certain events based on their performance, which overrides the baseline probability. In some cases, we manually adjust probabilities when we have reliable information that a player has commited to play (or not play) a tournament. These cases are denoted with a triangle, with more details available on hover.
Contributors: 
Eddie Bajek
, 
@Robopz
News/Announcements 
 | Manual Adjustments 
Player
Proj
Starts
SIG
Sentry
Sony Open 
The AMEX 
Farmers 
WMPO 
SIG
AT&T Pebble 
SIG
Genesis Inv 
Cognizant 
SIG
Arnold Palmer 
Puerto Rico 
PLYRS
The Players 
Valspar 
Houston Open 
Valero 
MAJ
Masters 
SIG
RBC Heritage 
Zurich Classic 
SIG
Cadillac 
SIG
Truist 
Myrtle Beach 
MAJ
Field
PGA 
CJ CUP
Charles Schwab
SIG
Memorial
Canadian Open
MAJ
Field
U.S. Open
SIG
Travelers
John Deere
ISCO
Scottish Open
MAJ
Field
The Open
Corales
3M Open
Rocket
Wyndham
St. Jude
BMW Champ
PLAYOFFS
TOUR Champ
 SCHEFFLER Scottie
 S. Scheffler
1
2
1
 20.3 — — 1 — T3 T4 T12 — T24 — T22 — — — 2 2 — 2 — —
>99% 		48% >99% 10% >99% >99% 7% <1% 66% >99% <1%
>99% 		<1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 YOUNG Cameron
 C. Young
1
1
3
 19.4 — — — T22 T41 T55 T7 — T3 — 1 — — — T3 T25 — 1 T10 — 11% 34% >99% 22% >99% >99% 12% <1% 59% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MCILROY Rory
 R. McIlroy
1
10
2
 15.3 — — — — — T14 T2 — WD — T46 — — — 1 — — — T19 — 3% 8% >99% 18% >99% >99% 1% <1%
>99% 		>99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FITZPATRICK Matt
 M. Fitzpatrick
1
3
4
 21.2 — — T63 — 9 T14 T24 — T41 — 2 1 — — T18 1 1 — T52 — 7% 20% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 4% <1% 92% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 ABERG Ludvig
 L. Aberg
1
9
15
 19.3 — — WD CUT — T37 T20 — T3 — T5 — — T5 T21 T4 — — T8 — 10% 24% >99% 17% >99% >99% 11% <1% 67% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FLEETWOOD Tommy
 T. Fleetwood
1
11
6
 18.3 — — — — — T4 T7 — 49 — T8 — — T10 T33 T52 — T23 T5 — 5% 23% >99% 15% >99% >99% 2% <1% 89% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% 96%
 SCHAUFFELE Xander
 X. Schauffele
1
16
11
 19.1 — — — CUT T41 T19 T7 — T24 — 3 T4 — — T9 T12 — — T60 — 7% 18% >99% 11% >99% >99% 7% <1% 72% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% 95%
 HENLEY Russell
 R. Henley
1
24
9
 18.5 — T19 T8 — — T19 CUT — T6 — T13 — — CUT T3 T25 — T49 — — 6% 20% >99% 12% >99% >99% 8% <1% 36% >99% <1% <1% <1% 3% >99% >99% 64%
 CANTLAY Patrick
 P. Cantlay
1
34
30
 18.5 — — T13 CUT — T14 T37 — CUT — T32 T7 — — T12 T8 — — T10 — 10% 17% >99% 15% >99% >99% 9% <1% 41% >99% <1% 2% 6% 6% >99% 89% 52%
 MORIKAWA Collin
 C. Morikawa
1
4
5
 19.1 — CUT — — T54 1 T7 — 5 — WD — — — T7 T4 — T62 — — 7% 32% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 7% <1% 67% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FOWLER Rickie
 R. Fowler
1
17
37
 20.3 — — T18 — T18 T19 T28 — T9 — T42 — CUT CUT — T8 — T9 T2 — 7% 59% >99% 17% 95% >99% 32% <1% 45% 88% 1% <1% 3% 7% >99% >99% 78%
 KIM Si Woo
 S. Kim
1
7
22
 23.3 — T11 T6 T2 T3 T45 T34 — T13 — T50 — — T10 47 3 — T4 T65 — 18% 78% >99% 21% 97% >99% 48% <1% 61% >99% <1% <1% <1% 5% >99% >99% >99%
 SPAUN J.J.
 J.J. Spaun
1
18
8
 21.9 — T40 — CUT — T45 CUT — CUT — T24 CUT — 1 CUT T25 — T14 T5 — 20% 80% >99% 20% >99% >99% 24% <1% 56% >99% <1% 2% <1% 12% >99% >99% 80%
 BURNS Sam
 S. Burns
1
30
35
 21.1 — — T27 — CUT T6 CUT — CUT — T13 — T21 — T7 T16 — T38 T37 — 23% 38% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 19% <1% 60% >99% <1% 14% 3% 12% >99% 95% 51%
 MACINTYRE Robert
 R. MacIntyre
1
27
12
 20.1 — T4 T38 — — T37 T20 — T24 — 4 — — T2 CUT T42 — — T60 — 27% 60% >99% 34% >99% >99% 17% <1% 89% >99% <1% 1% 2% 18% >99% >99% 64%
 MCNEALY Maverick
 M. McNealy
1
44
33
 21.9 — T24 — 10 T13 T29 CUT — T13 — T32 — — T21 T18 T16 — T30 T37 — 31% 64% >99% 31% >99% >99% 36% <1% 52% >99% <1% 30% 11% 30% 98% 71% 33%
 SCOTT Adam
 A. Scott
3
19
46
 19.9 — T40 T24 T30 — — 4 — T11 — T56 — T21 — T24 — — T4 T24 — 27% 77% >99% 26% 79% >99% 10% <1% 90% >99% <1% <1% <1% 2% >99% >99% 74%
 KNAPP Jake
 J. Knapp
2
21
39
 20.3 — T11 — T5 8 T8 6 — — — CUT — T6 — 11 T74 — — — — 81% >99% >99% 48% 77% >99% 77% <1% 68% 59% 5% 5% 9% 25% >99% >99% 80%
 HOJGAARD Nicolai
 N. Hojgaard
3
15
29
 22.1 — — — T22 T3 — — T6 T24 — T27 T55 2 — CUT T55 — T23 T2 — 65% 89% >99% 54% 78% >99% 18% <1% 99% >99% <1% <1% 9% 5% >99% >99% 91%
 GOTTERUP Chris
 C. Gotterup
1
6
10
 22.9 — 1 — T18 1 T37 CUT — T18 — T56 — T6 — T24 T25 — T38 T14 — 38% 90% >99% 25% >99% >99% 61% <1% 71% >99% <1% 1% <1% 5% >99% >99% >99%
 LEE Min Woo
 M. Lee
2
12
31
 21.1 — — T38 — T28 T2 T12 — T6 — T32 — T3 — CUT T60 — T18 T14 — 58% 92% >99% 23% 80% >99% 9% <1% 85% 58% <1% <1% 7% <1% >99% >99% 94%
 HOVLAND Viktor
 V. Hovland
1
59
27
 18.5 — — — — T10 T58 T41 — T13 — T13 CUT — — T18 T42 — T38 T31 — 18% 8% >99% 26% >99% >99% 15% <1% 84% >99% <1% 14% 18% 20% 80% 50% 22%
 ENGLISH Harris
 H. English
1
37
21
 20.9 — — T27 T22 T28 T24 T22 — T24 — CUT — T21 — T30 T4 — T55 T24 — 14% 58% >99% 19% >99% >99% 13% <1% 62% >99% <1% 3% 2% 20% >99% 71% 27%
 NOREN Alex
 A. Noren
4
46
18
 20.0 — — CUT CUT — T29 T12 — T24 — T32 — — T30 T30 T65 — T7 T31 — 49% 73% 55% 48% >99% 65% 13% <1% 98% >99% <1% 2% 10% 24% 92% 51% 20%
 BHATIA Akshay
 A. Bhatia
1
8
23
 21.1 — — CUT CUT T3 T6 T16 — 1 — T13 — — — CUT T16 — T23 T37 — 23% 74% >99% 25% >99% >99% 28% <1% 55% >99% <1% 2% 2% 5% >99% >99% >99%
 LOWRY Shane
 S. Lowry
1
45
38
 18.7 — — — — — T8 T24 T2 CUT — CUT — T28 — T30 T42 CUT T23 — — 10% 12% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 6% <1% 54% >99% <1% 3% 3% 19% 94% 51% 18%
 HALL Harry
 H. Hall
1
42
57
 23.0 — T6 T24 — CUT T24 CUT — T9 — CUT — T28 — CUT T65 — T30 T8 — 55% 87% >99% 43% >99% >99% 54% <1% 56% >99% <1% 24% 19% 55% >99% 75% 34%
 MATSUYAMA Hideki
 H. Matsuyama
1
26
17
 19.6 — T13 — T11 2 T8 T28 — T41 — T27 — — T21 T12 — — T53 71 — 10% 30% >99% 14% >99% >99% 8% <1% 44% >99% <1% 2% 6% 9% >99% 96% 37%
 GRIFFIN Ben
 B. Griffin
1
39
14
 25.1 — T19 T24 — T28 T37 T41 — CUT — CUT CUT T28 — T33 T33 T10 3 T63 — 52% 88% >99% 34% >99% >99% 71% <1% 56% >99% <1% 19% 14% 55% >99% 84% 41%
 KITAYAMA Kurt
 K. Kitayama
1
23
34
 21.4 — T40 CUT — T24 T48 T2 — T18 — CUT — T60 — 51 T8 — T9 T19 — 19% 59% >99% 21% 95% >99% 29% <1% 50% 83% <1% 7% 2% 13% >99% >99% 60%
 ROSE Justin
 J. Rose
1
20
7
 17.5 — — CUT 1 — T37 CUT — CUT — T13 — — — T3 — — T65 T45 — 3% 23% >99% 13% >99% >99% 2% <1% 65% >99% <1% <1% <1% 3% >99% >99% 41%
 BRADLEY Keegan
 K. Bradley
1
72
32
 19.3 — CUT — T43 — T29 CUT — CUT — T50 T55 — — T21 T12 — T49 T19 — 20% 26% >99% 28% >99% >99% 18% 1% 30% >99% <1% 32% 25% 57% 54% 27% 9%
 SPIETH Jordan
 J. Spieth
2
40
51
 21.1 — T24 — — CUT T29 T12 — T11 — T32 T11 — T63 T12 T33 — T18 T52 — 68% 99% 38% 39% 67% 49% 45% <1% 61% >99% <1% 5% 19% 34% >99% 60% 23%
 SMALLEY Alex
 A. Smalley
3
35
78
 23.7 — T40 T44 CUT T35 T19 — T52 — — T24 T46 T21 T14 — — T2 T7 T17 — 88% 99% 43% 60% 67% 46% 90% <1% 67% 47% 28% 24% 37% 59% >99% 81% 37%
 STRAKA Sepp
 S. Straka
1
14
13
 20.4 — — CUT — T18 T2 T50 — T13 — T8 — — CUT T41 T42 — T4 T63 — 12% 50% >99% 14% >99% >99% 24% <1% 63% >99% <1% <1% <1% 5% >99% >99% 73%
 TAYLOR Nick
 N. Taylor
1
47
58
 22.5 — T13 T27 — T28 T24 T28 — T38 — T42 CUT — T28 T41 T60 — T9 T14 — 22% 45% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 23% <1% 62% >99% <1% 7% 3% 36% 93% 47% 15%
 BRIDGEMAN Jacob
 J. Bridgeman
1
5
19
 22.7 — T4 T13 — T18 T8 1 — T18 — T5 T14 — — T41 T33 — T65 T52 — 37% 83% >99% 22% >99% >99% 61% <1% 57% >99% <1% 1% <1% 6% >99% >99% >99%
 MCCARTY Matt
 M. McCarty
3
28
43
 25.8 — T55 T2 T18 CUT T67 T24 — T41 — CUT CUT — T39 T24 T12 T10 T9 T10 — 81% 99% 87% 53% 72% 80% 72% <1% 65% 51% 11% 10% 20% 41% >99% 95% 43%
 REITAN Kristoffer
 K. Reitan
4
13
25
 22.0 — CUT — T30 T41 — — T17 — — T66 CUT CUT T10 T41 — T2 T14 1 — 28% 32% >99% 34% 95% >99% 24% <1% 99% >99% <1% <1% <1% 7% >99% >99% 83%
 THOMAS Justin
 J. Thomas
1
58
16
 15.5 — — — — — — — — CUT — T8 T30 — — T41 T77 — T23 13 — 17% 14% >99% 25% >99% >99% 18% <1% 67% >99% <1% 20% 18% 32% 77% 44% 17%
 FITZPATRICK Alex
 A. Fitzpatrick
9
22
83
 12.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 T9 4 — 40% 49% >99% 36% 93% >99% 24% <1% 98% 72% <1% 2% 1% 18% >99% >99% 52%
 CONNERS Corey
 C. Conners
1
70
50
 20.0 — T24 — — CUT T70 T37 — T33 — T13 T14 — — T49 T55 — T30 T31 — 25% 19% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 23% <1% 61% >99% <1% 26% 19% 48% 48% 22% 6%
 DAY Jason
 J. Day
1
51
41
 18.2 — — T2 T38 — T24 CUT — CUT — T59 — T6 — T12 T42 — T38 68 — 7% 8% >99% 24% 89% >99% 42% <1% 24% 80% 4% 5% 10% 26% 73% 26% 6%
 WOODLAND Gary
 G. Woodland
3
25
47
 20.9 — CUT 72 CUT T64 — — CUT — — CUT T14 1 — T33 T8 — T38 T17 — 9% 55% >99% 20% >99% >99% 7% <1% 59% 86% <1% 8% 2% 14% >99% 98% 32%
 GERARD Ryan
 R. Gerard
1
29
36
 24.0 — 2 T2 T11 — T45 T28 T23 CUT — T27 — CUT — T38 T33 34 T30 T65 — 38% 69% >99% 28% 93% >99% 60% <1% 52% 74% 5% 7% 11% 34% >99% 91% 34%
 MITCHELL Keith
 K. Mitchell
3
71
109
 21.7 — T66 T44 T11 T41 T52 — T6 T33 — T46 — T14 CUT — — T30 T55 — — 86% 99% 21% 69% 47% 15% 89% 3% 67% 38% 33% 72% 67% 81% 48% 24% 8%
 BEZUIDENHOUT Christiaan
 C. Bezuidenhout
3
89
92
 20.5 — — T38 T27 CUT — — T37 — T8 CUT T30 T51 T39 — — T17 — — T6 90% >99% 23% 67% 39% 21% 86% 3% 83% 33% 25% 80% 70% 91% 29% 13% 3%
 THORBJORNSEN Michael
 M. Thorbjornsen
3
62
63
 22.0 — — CUT T18 T3 T78 — CUT T33 — T22 — T14 CUT — T33 T13 T53 — — 90% 99% 20% 70% 53% 37% 81% 1% 81% 35% 28% 50% 65% 76% 68% 35% 13%
 MEISSNER Mac
 M. Meissner
3
93
103
 20.7 — T40 T63 T49 T18 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T28 T30 — — T10 — — T9 — 98% >99% 20% 83% 35% 21% 97% 49% 37% 27% 66% 92% 89% 96% 38% 20% 7%
 COODY Pierceson
 P. Coody
5
41
55
 23.3 — T13 T18 T2 T10 T48 T16 — CUT — CUT T55 WD — — T16 — T38 T24 — 86% 99% 28% 60% 65% 46% 88% 6% 68% 42% 36% 27% 45% 55% >99% 60% 22%
 BERGER Daniel
 D. Berger
1
36
42
 20.9 — T6 T56 — T16 T75 CUT T32 2 — T66 — — — CUT T42 — T23 T45 — 13% 48% >99% 30% 91% >99% 41% <1% 40% >99% <1% 6% 10% 35% >99% 56% 14%
 RAI Aaron
 A. Rai
2
108
44
 19.9 — T50 — — — T73 T28 T23 — — CUT CUT — — 48 — T24 — — 5 95% 98% 34% 85% 34% 50% 82% 2% 94% >99% <1% 74% 82% 96% 37% 20% 7%
 THOMPSON Davis
 D. Thompson
3
80
127
 19.9 — — CUT T43 T64 — — T60 — 4 CUT T46 CUT T14 — — T6 — — T13 — 94% >99% 19% 70% 40% 18% 96% 11% 42% 27% 44% 80% 88% 91% 42% 23% 8%
 COLE Eric
 E. Cole
3
74
116
 19.9 — CUT T27 T27 CUT — — T37 — CUT T32 CUT T51 T14 — — T6 — — T6 — 91% 99% 23% 71% 45% 13% 90% 9% 46% 40% 23% 67% 47% 93% 24% 10% 2%
 CLARK Wyndham
 W. Clark
2
79
71
 20.9 — — T13 T65 T35 T58 T41 — — — T42 CUT CUT — T21 T16 T20 — — — 90% 95% 24% 62% >99% 28% 40% <1% 86% >99% <1% 64% 59% 68% 43% 22% 7%
 HARMAN Brian
 B. Harman
1
65
53
 20.2 — T61 CUT — CUT T19 T50 — 50 — T11 — — T39 T33 T25 — T38 T31 — 21% 43% >99% 28% >99% >99% 15% <1% 73% >99% <1% 15% 11% 52% 45% 17% 4%
 PUTNAM Andrew
 A. Putnam
7
52
82
 19.9 — — T2 CUT — — — CUT T44 — T32 T30 T44 T5 — T42 CUT T18 T37 — 47% 79% 25% 44% 59% 19% 69% 3% 73% 48% 32% 33% 47% 27% 62% 20% 5%
 POSTON J.T.
 J.T. Poston
1
113
79
 21.7 — — T38 — T35 T37 CUT — CUT — T50 — CUT T21 — T60 — T49 T24 — 48% 49% >99% 61% 62% >99% 94% 43% 25% 53% 38% 84% 56% 95% 38% 18% 6%
 KIM Michael
 M. Kim
1
55
45
 23.2 — T31 CUT — T18 72 CUT — T33 — CUT T30 — T2 CUT T25 — T18 T48 — 35% 77% >99% 47% 87% >99% 86% 4% 47% 72% 19% 36% 33% 83% 65% 22% 5%
 THEEGALA Sahith
 S. Theegala
3
33
76
 23.7 — T31 T8 T7 T18 T60 T22 — T6 — T32 CUT T10 — — T25 T24 T30 69 — 70% 93% 35%
>99% 		68% 39% 63% 1% 62% 42% 22% 33% 21% 31% >99% 66% 18%
 SMITH Jordan
 J. Smith
4
60
68
 21.3 — T66 T27 CUT T16 — — T23 — — CUT 3 T44 CUT — T16 CUT T55 — — 85% 91% 25% 72% 56% 30% 58% <1% 99% >99% <1% 20% 29% 66% 61% 29% 10%
 OLESEN Thorbjorn
 T. Olesen
3
146
110
 14.9 — — — CUT CUT — — T40 — — CUT CUT T14 T49 — — — — — — — 90% 69% 19% 85% 22% 11% 72% <1% 97% 27% 13% 84% 90% 93% 12% 5% 1%
 HISATSUNE Ryo
 R. Hisatsune
3
32
59
 23.7 — CUT T44 T2 T10 T8 T45 — T33 — T13 T30 — T8 — T60 — T65 T45 — 89% 99% 43% 65% 67% 53% 86% <1% 83% 40% 8% 28% 41% 58% >99% 78% 28%
 STEVENS Sam
 S. Stevens
1
49
49
 24.8 — T31 T6 T30 T35 T55 T16 — CUT — 58 — 5 — T24 T65 T13 T18 70 — 40% 78% >99% 44% 88% >99% 87% 1% 50% 69% 20% 47% 22% 73% 94% 51% 17%
 CAULEY Bud
 B. Cauley
1
54
66
 21.0 — T24 CUT — T68 T37 CUT — T18 — T32 74 — T21 — 7 — T38 T37 — 22% 49% >99% 39% 87% >99% 57% 2% 34% 71% 13% 22% 18% 61% 78% 35% 11%
 YELLAMARAJU Sudarshan
 S. Yellamaraju
5
38
105
 22.6 — T13 CUT T56 T54 — — T17 — T37 T5 — T6 T14 — T52 34 T30 T19 — 86% 99% 22% 56% 61% 24% 87% 4% 58% 34% 37% 25% 43% 49% >99% 55% 17%
 HOJGAARD Rasmus
 R. Hojgaard
3
94
64
 19.4 — — T44 T30 T24 — — T9 — CUT CUT T68 T28 — 53 — — — — T24 89% 68% 16% 82% 36% 31% 57% <1% 99% >99% <1% 63% 83% 79% 27% 12% 3%
 KOEPKA Brooks
 B. Koepka
8
66
125
 17.8 — — — T56 CUT — — T9 — — T13 T18 CUT — T12 — CUT — — T11 74% 93% 21%
>99% 		>99% 18% 35% <1% 46% >99% <1% 37% 43% 37% 48% 23% 7%
 FOX Ryan
 R. Fox
1
61
56
 17.5 — — — — T24 T24 T7 — T24 — — — CUT — CUT T16 — T30 67 — 25% 19% >99%
>99% 		85% >99% 10% <1% 84% >99% <1% 9% 7% 50% 46% 17% 4%
 MCCARTHY Denny
 D. McCarthy
1
96
99
 22.3 — T40 T56 T49 — T55 T47 — CUT — CUT T26 T12 CUT — T65 — T30 T48 — 33% 28% >99% 50% 69% >99% 88% 17% 39% 55% 28% 53% 49% 90% 21% 8% 2%
 WALLACE Matt
 M. Wallace
7
68
69
 20.2 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T40 T51 T2 — T55 T30 T23 T37 — 80% 89% 24% 71% 51% 25% 52% <1% 95% 40% 40% 62% 64% 71% 36% 14% 4%
 PARRY John
 J. Parry
4
85
87
 19.9 — T19 T56 T43 T35 — — T63 — T8 — T55 T48 T14 — — T13 — — T31 87% 88% 25% 77% 42% 16% 58% <1% 99% >99% <1% 41% 41% 86% 20% 8% 2%
 HOMA Max
 M. Homa
3
64
123
 20.0 — — T27 CUT T66 — T37 T13 — — T32 CUT — CUT T9 T69 — T38 T52 — 79% 99% 15% 58% 48% 7% 71% 3% 43% 35% 17% 44% 55% 76% 31% 11% 2%
 ROY Kevin
 K. Roy
3
73
121
 19.2 — T13 CUT CUT T13 — — T23 — — T59 73 T65 T30 — — T32 — — T3 — 91% 99% 27% 67% 44% 16% 85% 29% 28% 33% 48% 67% 62% 91% 23% 9% 2%
 NOVAK Andrew
 A. Novak
1
67
54
 24.4 — — CUT T7 CUT T48 T47 — T38 — CUT T55 — T14 CUT T16 T10 T65 T24 — 50% 75% >99% 46% >99% >99% 64% 3% 53% >99% <1% 56% 28% 81% 54% 24% 7%
 RODGERS Patrick
 P. Rodgers
2
43
73
 23.3 — 3 T44 T27 T60 T52 T34 — T24 — T11 T40 CUT CUT — T16 — T65 T24 — 82% 99% 22% 60% 62% 24% 80% <1% 83% 43% 9% 38% 31% 72% 96% 26% 5%
 MCGREEVY Max
 M. McGreevy
3
114
80
 23.5 — CUT T27 T30 T48 T29 CUT T40 — — T50 CUT T19 CUT — — T32 — — CUT 98% 99% 18% 87% 27% 21% 96% 22% 68% 23% 70% 95% 90% 99% 24% 11% 3%
 BRENNAN Michael
 M. Brennan
3
123
52
 22.7 — CUT T56 DQ T48 — — T52 — T26 69 CUT T28 — T24 T42 CUT — — — >99% >99% 17% 86% 25% 39% 94% 27% 65% 18% 63% 97% 94% 98% 28% 14% 5%
 PENDRITH Taylor
 T. Pendrith
1
92
86
 22.9 — T6 CUT CUT — T34 T45 — T38 — T46 CUT CUT — — T71 CUT T38 T37 — 43% 29% >99% 64% 72% >99% 59% 25% 30% 58% 36% 85% 52% 88% 32% 14% 4%
 KIRK Chris
 C. Kirk
2
137
98
 19.4 — CUT CUT — CUT T52 — CUT T47 — T27 — T51 T36 — — CUT — — — 85% 96% 23% 71% 22% 10% 84% 51% 27% 27% 47% 90% 94% 97% 9% 3% <1%
 CASTILLO Ricky
 R. Castillo
7
48
90
 20.5 — T31 T44 T43 — — — 5 — 1 T70 T46 T44 — — T60 — T55 T60 — 90% >99% 14% 64% 57% 20% 85% 4% 53% 30% 36% 42% 54% 76% 85% 29% 8%
 DUMONT DE CHASSART Adrien
 A. Dumont De Chassart
5
88
154
 19.4 — T24 69 CUT CUT — — T23 — T26 — T26 T12 T49 — — T17 — — T31 — 94% 95% 8% 77% 31% 6% 92% 9% 76% 18% 58% 78% 84% 90% 17% 6% 1%
 IM Sungjae
 S. Im
1
56
67
 18.1 — — — — — — — — CUT — CUT T4 T60 — 46 T42 — T65 T5 — 41% 52% >99% 39% >99% >99% 69% <1% 56% >99% <1% 50% 19% 62% 74% 33% 9%
 ECKROAT Austin
 A. Eckroat
3
95
165
 19.4 — CUT CUT T49 CUT — — T40 — T42 — CUT T39 T10 — — T6 — — T19 — 96% 99% 8% 69% 28% 7% 92% 23% 37% 17% 56% 95% 92% 96% 16% 7% 1%
 KIM Tom
 T. Kim
3
104
142
 19.9 — T61 T38 T65 T35 — T34 59 — — — T18 T56 CUT — — CUT — — T6 — 96% 98% 14% 83% 26% 13% 93% 19% 59% 15% 53% 91% 97% 93% 22% 10% 3%
 GLOVER Lucas
 L. Glover
1
109
93
 19.2 — — — — — T64 CUT — T24 — CUT CUT CUT WD — T42 — T14 T37 — 28% 41% >99% 52% 65% >99% 80% 46% 19% 64% 24% 60% 33% 96% 9% 2% <1%
 GREYSERMAN Max
 M. Greyserman
2
116
70
 22.3 — — T56 CUT CUT T37 T24 — T18 — CUT — CUT — CUT — CUT T38 — T31 97% >99% 17% 84% 26% 24% 91% 27% 64% 22% 68% 98% 94% 99% 15% 6% 1%
 ZALATORIS Will
 W. Zalatoris
9
160
334
 12.3 — — T18 CUT — — — — — — — — CUT T67 — — — — — — — 96% 84% 4% 69% 10% 5% 93% 80% 14% 8% 83% 86% 95% 90% 9% 3% <1%
 GHIM Doug
 D. Ghim
7
118
187
 18.3 — T55 CUT T59 — — — CUT — T26 — T40 CUT T30 — — T6 — — T19 — 86% 58% 8% 78% 18% 6% 97% 55% 37% 14% 82% 97% 98% 75% 17% 7% 2%
 PENGE Marco
 M. Penge
4
78
40
 21.4 — — — CUT CUT T64 T16 — — — CUT T4 CUT T21 T49 T77 T30 — — — 91% 85% 19% 82% >99% 45% 70% <1% 99% >99% <1% 51% 60% 85% 33% 14% 4%
 MOUW William
 W. Mouw
3
107
132
 19.8 — T71 CUT CUT CUT — — T6 — — T24 — T44 CUT — T55 T26 — — — 99% 99% 8% 78% 26% 7% 92% 35% 48% 15% 64% 95% 89% 97% 18% 7% 1%
 HOSSLER Beau
 B. Hossler
7
103
148
 19.2 — CUT CUT CUT — — — T23 — T37 — CUT T21 T49 — — CUT — — T3 — 94% 97% 21% 81% 26% 14% 98% 67% 29% 18% 70% 95% 94% 93% 17% 7% 2%
 SMOTHERMAN Austin
 A. Smotherman
5
53
84
 21.4 — CUT T8 CUT CUT — — T2 WD — T13 CUT — T36 — T74 CUT T60 T19 — 84% 98% 16% 59% 55% 17% 78% 14% 37% 34% 35% 28% 37% 72% 55% 16% 4%
 BAUCHOU Zach
 Z. Bauchou
5
87
175
 20.2 — 70 T13 T59 T48 — — T23 — T21 T50 CUT CUT T28 — — T13 — — T24 — 92% 98% 6% 70% 31% 4% 93% 39% 39% 19% 66% 79% 82% 90% 12% 4% <1%
 NEERGAARD-PETERSEN Rasmus
 R. Neergaard-Petersen
4
126
77
 19.2 — — — T49 T41 — — T40 — 68 — T55 CUT — CUT — T4 — — CUT 97% 79% 12% 93% 22% 21% 89% <1% 99% >99% <1% 90% 91% 97% 16% 7% 2%
 DOU Zecheng
 Z. Dou
5
97
182
 20.4 — T55 73 T49 T13 — — T17 — T57 CUT CUT T21 CUT — — CUT — — T13 — 94% 95% 7% 76% 26% 5% 93% 29% 57% 15% 68% 84% 87% 92% 11% 4% <1%
 HOEY Rico
 R. Hoey
3
120
88
 23.6 — T50 WD T70 T24 T67 CUT CUT — — T62 T26 T28 T39 — — T26 — — T53 98% 99% 15% 89% 24% 17% 98% 65% 32% 18% 79% 97% 94% 99% 22% 10% 2%
 WHALEY Vince
 V. Whaley
3
151
143
 21.1 — T40 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 CUT T68 T28 T54 — — CUT — — CUT — 98% 99% 8% 88% 18% 5% 97% 74% 23% 14% 83% 97% 97% >99% 7% 2% <1%
 RAMEY Chad
 C. Ramey
3
102
156
 20.9 — T71 T63 T22 T48 — — T17 — CUT T27 T64 T28 T39 — — T32 — — CUT — 96% 99% 8% 82% 26% 4% 96% 70% 21% 19% 76% 95% 90% 98% 11% 4% <1%
 FISK Steven
 S. Fisk
3
112
134
 20.7 — CUT CUT CUT — T60 — T37 — — T62 CUT T48 T54 — T12 — — — T38 99% 99% 9% 79% 23% 7% 91% 40% 46% 15% 65% 95% 86% 97% 16% 6% 1%
 LI Haotong
 H. Li
4
99
80
 21.6 — T55 T8 T11 CUT — — T32 CUT — CUT — CUT CUT T38 — CUT — — CUT 93% 81% 14% 86% 32% 19% 76% <1% 99% >99% <1% 69% 72% 92% 17% 6% 2%
 MOORE Taylor
 T. Moore
7
69
150
 16.3 — — T56 T49 — — — T2 T44 — T50 CUT CUT T39 — — T20 — — T17 — 55% 67% 9% 50% 42% 4% 76% 10% 50% 23% 39% 60% 85% 38% 15% 5% <1%
 HUGHES Mackenzie
 M. Hughes
2
132
144
 19.3 — — CUT T59 T28 T34 — T23 — — CUT T55 CUT CUT — — CUT — T52 — — 94% 94% 10% 85% 19% 4% 76% 36% 51% 16% 60% 98% 85% 97% 7% 2% <1%
 KIM S.H.
 S.H. Kim
5
83
146
 10.0 — T13 T18 63 T54 — — CUT — T42 CUT T7 CUT T21 — — — — — — —
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1% 		<1% <1% <1%
 JAEGER Stephan
 S. Jaeger
2
75
100
 19.0 — — CUT T5 T28 T67 — CUT — — T62 T7 T28 T59 — — CUT — — CUT 86% 97% 16% 57% 44% 9% 79% 10% 26% 29% 26% 46% 75% 90% 10% 3% <1%
 ECHAVARRIA Nico
 N. Echavarria
2
31
48
 21.8 — CUT CUT — CUT T8 CUT 1 T44 — T66 — CUT — CUT 81 — T55 T31 — 25% 58% >99% 25% 92% >99% 57% <1% 47% 66% 6% 7% 13% 39% >99% 44% 4%
 VALIMAKI Sami
 S. Valimaki
3
127
60
 20.8 — — CUT CUT T41 T34 T37 CUT — — CUT — — T14 CUT T55 — — — CUT 98% 96% 13% 83% 22% 29% 90% 6% 86% 15% 37% 97% 96% 98% 10% 3% <1%
 HORSCHEL Billy
 B. Horschel
3
86
117
 21.1 — 74 T27 CUT CUT T48 — 62 T13 — — T68 CUT T36 — 80 T6 — — T53 83% 98% 14% 61% 37% 5% 58% 16% 37% >99% <1% 54% 47% 93% 6% 2% <1%
 FINAU Tony
 T. Finau
2
76
119
 19.8 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 18 T28 — — — T70 T18 T39 T49 — 82 CUT — T31 — — 87% 99% 13%
>99% 		41% 6% 39% 4% 26% 27% 13% 85% 44% 82% 9% 3% <1%
 POWER Seamus
 S. Power
7
110
183
 18.3 — T31 T63 T11 — — — T52 — CUT T70 T30 CUT CUT — — T10 — — T60 — 72% 45% 7% 60% 21% 2% 89% 68% 25% 18% 74% 86% 87% 67% 6% 2% <1%
 YU Kevin
 K. Yu
2
125
111
 20.1 — — CUT CUT — T70 CUT CUT — — CUT T30 CUT 7 — — CUT — — T53 — 99% 99% 9% 91% 19% 9% 98% 39% 53% 12% 79% 99% 94% >99% 9% 3% <1%
 RYDER Sam
 S. Ryder
7
131
210
 17.0 — — T27 T59 — — — CUT — CUT — T64 T60 T21 — — CUT — — T17 — 80% 55% 5% 75% 15% 2% 94% 79% 20% 12% 81% 97% 98% 80% 5% 1% <1%
 SCHMID Matti
 M. Schmid
2
84
97
 22.6 — CUT CUT T56 CUT T73 49 T9 — T5 T46 T40 74 — — — T10 — — CUT 95% 98% 10% 83% 38% 11% 77% 4% 76% 20% 64% 90% 78% 95% 15% 5% <1%
 HODGES Lee
 L. Hodges
7
111
149
 19.0 — T6 CUT CUT — — — T40 — — T59 T18 T65 CUT — — T24 — — T67 — 95% 97% 7% 84% 22% 4% 99% 38% 58% 14% 79% 98% 96% 97% 10% 4% <1%
 KUCHAR Matt
 M. Kuchar
7
174
178
 15.4 — — T44 CUT — — — CUT — — — CUT T56 CUT — — CUT — — T24 — 67% 48% 13% 64% 18% 1% 86% 77% 16% 20% 66% 87% 91% 84% 1% <1% <1%
 LIPSKY David
 D. Lipsky
7
57
91
 18.8 — — T44 T18 — — — CUT — T37 — 2 CUT — — T71 T26 71 T24 — 73% 96% 17% 64% 53% 11% 88% 38% 31% 32% 58% 55% 56% 68% 31% 6% 1%
 SNEDEKER Brandt
 B. Snedeker
9
63
131
 12.4 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — T18 — T39 — — T30 — — 1 11% 35% >99% 6% 31% 98% 7% 1% <1% 35% 2% <1% <1% 2% 7% 1% <1%
 BLAIR Zac
 Z. Blair
9
159
256
 9.4 — T50 — — — — — — — T8 — CUT — — — — CUT — — T60 — 53% 40% <1% 18% 6% <1% 55% 84% <1% 8% 58% 63% 22% 31% 1% <1% <1%
 BROWN Dan
 D. Brown
4
130
102
 19.6 — T19 CUT T30 CUT — — T40 — — — CUT CUT CUT — — T13 — — CUT 95% 73% 11% 91% 20% 9% 83% <1% 99% >99% <1% 89% 87% 98% 6% 2% <1%
 JOHNSON Zach
 Z. Johnson
9
192
354
 5.7 — T61 T70 — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — 27% 15% <1% 5% 4% <1% 24% 40% <1% >99% <1% 29% 13% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 KANAYA Takumi
 T. Kanaya
3
129
139
 20.6 — T31 CUT CUT T60 — — T17 — CUT 73 T46 T60 62 — — T26 — — T38 — 97% 93% 5% 87% 17% 3% 92% 25% 65% 9% 72% 96% 95% 99% 3% <1% <1%
 VILIPS Karl
 K. Vilips
3
101
164
 19.2 — — T18 T38 CUT — — CUT — — CUT T64 T19 CUT — T33 T13 — — T24 — 99% 99% 4% 77% 24% 3% 92% 28% 38% 9% 53% 95% 88% 97% 7% 2% <1%
 VENTURA Kris
 K. Ventura
7
105
265
 16.0 — — CUT T22 — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — T2 — — CUT — 73% 45% 2% 62% 18% 2% 85% 69% 20% 8% 82% 80% 93% 55% 5% 1% <1%
 BLANCHET Chandler
 C. Blanchet
5
81
112
 22.1 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — 2 — T18 CUT CUT — T33 CUT 72 T52 — 88% 96% 9% 71% 37% 7% 88% 31% 43% 19% 64% 73% 76% 90% 10% 3% <1%
 KEEFER Johnny
 J. Keefer
5
82
74
 23.3 — T61 T27 T43 T41 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T3 CUT CUT T69 CUT — — T31 91% 95% 10% 76% >99% 21% 93% 28% 53% 17% 69% 81% 86% 91% 17% 6% 1%
 POTGIETER Aldrich
 A. Potgieter
2
50
75
 20.5 — — CUT CUT CUT T60 5 — CUT — CUT — T21 — CUT T25 — T14 T48 — 90% 98% 9% 57% 55% 23% 70% <1% 53% 18% 23% 53% 60% 62% 60% 14% 2%
 GRIFFIN Lanto
 L. Griffin
7
152
206
 14.7 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — — CUT — — T13 — — T13 — 74% 36% 5% 76% 15% 2% 92% 85% 14% 11% 87% 97% 98% 78% 2% <1% <1%
 SIMPSON Webb
 W. Simpson
3
153
425
 12.9 — T55 — — CUT — — CUT — — — T18 — WD — — — — T48 — — 90% 94% 2% 58% 7% 1% 70% 60% 1% 5% 52% 72% 84% 94% 2% <1% <1%
 HUBBARD Mark
 M. Hubbard
3
91
114
 21.3 — T66 CUT 69 CUT — — T23 — T42 CUT CUT CUT T65 — — CUT — — 2 — 90% >99% 73% 78% 33% 37% 91% 40% 29% 20% 72% 82% 80% 96% 10% 3% <1%
 CROWE Trace
 T. Crowe
5
138
200
 10.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T4 — — T67 — 96% 93% 3% 83% 13% 2% 97% 70% 29% 7% 89% 97% 96% 98% 5% 1% <1%
 FORD David
 D. Ford
3
122
264
 17.7 — T50 T13 CUT — — — T32 — T16 CUT T46 CUT T59 — — — — — — — 98% 90% 3% 85% 12% 3% 98% 51% 42% 4% 87% 96% 96% 96% 7% 2% <1%
 SPRINGER Hayden
 H. Springer
9
106
247
 6.4 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — — — T2 — — T24 — 47% 31% <1% 15% 8% <1% 45% 59% <1% 6% 59% 36% 24% 11% 1% <1% <1%
 NAKAJIMA Keita
 K. Nakajima
4
169
133
 15.6 — CUT CUT 64 71 — — WD — — — — — — — — CUT — — T13 — 96% 67% 5% 92% 16% 4% 87% <1% 98% >99% <1% 94% 95% 98% 4% <1% <1%
 VEGAS Jhonattan
 J. Vegas
1
117
126
 20.2 — — CUT CUT — T78 44 — T18 — CUT — T14 CUT — T74 — T60 T52 — 35% 18% >99% 58% 54% >99% 63% 50% 15% 39% 51% 90% 50% 94% 5% <1% <1%
 KOHLES Ben
 B. Kohles
9
158
303
 6.8 — — — — — — — — — T42 — — — — — — T13 — — T31 — 49% 28% <1% 13% 4% <1% 44% 72% <1% 6% 68% 49% 25% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 GRILLO Emiliano
 E. Grillo
2
128
115
 20.8 — CUT CUT T38 CUT T64 — T56 — — CUT T7 T71 CUT — — — — — CUT 92% 95% 9% 83% 18% 5% 92% 66% 27% 11% 83% 99% 92% 98% 5% 1% <1%
 PAVON Matthieu
 M. Pavon
3
98
254
 18.8 — T55 T27 T38 CUT — — T17 — T42 CUT T11 T51 CUT — — T20 — — CUT — 92% 94% 2% 75% 20% 1% 68% 6% 56% 8% 29% 76% 57% 95% 3% <1% <1%
 SADDIER Adrien
 A. Saddier
4
177
101
 18.4 — CUT T70 CUT T60 — — T56 — CUT — CUT T39 CUT — — — — — — 93% 67% 10% 90% 19% 9% 77% <1% 98% >99% <1% 89% 86% 98% 5% 1% <1%
 SVENSSON Adam
 A. Svensson
6
155
392
 18.8 — T40 CUT CUT — — — CUT — T26 — CUT CUT T39 — — T26 — — T45 — 97% 96% 2% 81% 7% 2% >99% 96% 2% 3% 93% 99% 97% 96% 4% <1% <1%
 LEBIODA Hank
 H. Lebioda
5
121
215
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — T40 — T61 — T14 CUT T54 — — T6 — — 74 — 93% 84% 2% 78% 14% 1% 92% 83% 12% 6% 86% 89% 88% 96% 2% <1% <1%
 SKINNS David
 D. Skinns
9
141
258
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — T8 — T30 — — — — CUT — — T24 — 36% 17% <1% 13% 6% <1% 28% 82% <1% 10% 50% 35% 12% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 FISHBURN Patrick
 P. Fishburn
7
161
189
 17.7 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T46 CUT CUT — — CUT — — T19 — 93% 83% 3% 84% 15% 1% 98% 85% 15% 7% 89% 98% 97% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 DAHMEN Joel
 J. Dahmen
7
100
193
 18.0 — — T38 T7 CUT — — T9 CUT — CUT T64 — CUT — — CUT T62 — CUT — 59% 46% 4% 63% 23% <1% 84% 58% 24% 12% 84% 86% 91% 59% 3% <1% <1%
 EWART A.J.
 A.J. Ewart
6
90
218
 20.3 — CUT T44 T49 T28 — — T13 — T26 CUT T11 CUT T30 — — T20 — — CUT — 94% 97% 2% 75% 24% 1% 96% 57% 25% 7% 82% 85% 85% 92% 6% 1% <1%
 MOLINARI Francesco
 F. Molinari
9
 —
266
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 16% <1% <1% 10% 6% <1% 1% <1% 83% >99% <1% 9% 27% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGO Garrick
 G. Higgo
3
173
85
 21.7 — — — CUT CUT T60 CUT T40 — — CUT CUT T69 CUT — T52 CUT — — T67 98% 95% 7% 84% 19% 14% 88% 53% 34% 8% 69% >99% 96% 99% 3% <1% <1%
 NYHOLM Pontus
 P. Nyholm
5
115
241
 19.5 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — T13 — T16 — CUT T14 CUT — — CUT — — T31 — 94% 90% 2% 78% 14% 2% 96% 74% 20% 4% 89% 93% 94% 94% 4% <1% <1%
 PETERSON Paul
 P. Peterson
9
135
237
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — T5 — CUT — — — — CUT — — T11 — 38% 18% <1% 14% 5% <1% 27% 74% <1% 7% 56% 31% 14% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 YOUNG Carson
 C. Young
9
180
177
 11.0 — — T44 — — — — T52 — T66 — — — CUT — — 35 — — T67 — 49% 24% <1% 26% 7% <1% 57% 88% <1% 6% 82% 73% 48% 38% <1% <1% <1%
 WU Dylan
 D. Wu
6
147
355
 18.5 — T31 T44 CUT — — — 66 — T50 — T26 CUT CUT — — CUT — — CUT — 96% 91% 1% 79% 8% 1% 98% 93% 5% 2% 92% 96% 94% 96% 2% <1% <1%
 SIGG Greyson
 G. Sigg
9
 —
304
 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — 51% 23% <1% 15% 4% <1% 60% 87% <1% 3% 77% 71% 49% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 SUBER Jackson
 J. Suber
7
154
208
 16.6 — — CUT T70 — — — T63 — CUT — CUT T28 CUT — — CUT — — T19 — 78% 25% 1% 76% 12% <1% 91% 75% 23% 4% 93% 96% >99% 79% 2% <1% <1%
 MONTGOMERY Taylor
 T. Montgomery
9
 —
190
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 49% 7% <1% 19% 6% <1% 47% 82% <1% 5% 69% 65% 32% 32% <1% <1% <1%
 GONZALEZ Emilio
 E. Gonzalez
5
187
198
 12.7 — T50 CUT T65 WD — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 95% 88% 2% 83% 12% 1% 96% 73% 24% 4% 91% 98% 98% 99% 1% <1% <1%
 NOH S.Y.
 S.Y. Noh
9
 —
359
 2.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25% <1% <1% 9% 3% <1% 14% 25% 12% 2% 29% 34% 66% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 VAN ROOYEN Erik
 E. Van Rooyen
2
164
174
 20.0 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT CUT CUT T48 T59 — — T17 — — T38 — 88% 83% 4% 85% 15% 1% 68% 28% 48% 6% 78% 98% 96% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 VANDERLAAN John
 J. VanDerLaan
5
157
276
 19.5 — CUT CUT T43 T60 — — CUT — T21 — T46 CUT CUT — — CUT — — T60 — 94% 87% <1% 80% 10% <1% 96% 82% 14% 3% 92% 97% 96% 97% 2% <1% <1%
 PHILLIPS Chandler
 C. Phillips
3
119
166
 19.7 — T19 T63 CUT T66 — — T63 — — CUT T55 CUT T8 — — 35 — — CUT — 95% 96% 2% 87% 16% 1% 96% 73% 18% 5% 86% 98% 95% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 HOGE Tom
 T. Hoge
1
77
124
 20.5 — T40 T8 T70 CUT T14 CUT — CUT — CUT — T71 CUT — T71 T6 T62 72 — — 14% 20% >99% 39% 72% >99% 32% 6% 23% 34% 29% 72% 30% 72% 3% <1% <1%
 CAMPBELL Brian
 B. Campbell
1
140
104
 23.2 — CUT CUT — T54 T78 CUT — CUT — CUT WD CUT — T24 T77 — T49 T52 — 61% 29% >99% 68% 48% >99% 78% 58% 18% 22% 63% 97% 74% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 SVENSSON Jesper
 J. Svensson
7
165
202
 15.3 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT T69 CUT — — CUT — — CUT — 72% 4% 1% 82% 13% <1% 63% 1% 93% 3% 37% 86% 95% 72% <1% <1% <1%
 GOODWIN Noah
 N. Goodwin
9
 —
323
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 51% 12% <1% 17% 3% <1% 48% 78% <1% 1% 68% 57% 47% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 SHIPLEY Neal
 N. Shipley
5
185
173
 19.7 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — — T38 — 95% 85% 2% 86% 13% 1% 97% 73% 25% 3% 92% 99% 98% 99% 1% <1% <1%
 CHAMP Cameron
 C. Champ
9
 —
313
 5.2 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — 42% 7% <1% 15% 3% <1% 39% 69% <1% 2% 43% 41% 35% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 WARING Paul
 P. Waring
9
167
301
 7.4 — — — — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 T30 — — — — — — — 34% <1% <1% 17% 4% <1% 6% <1% 89% 4% 3% 18% 26% 38% <1% <1% <1%
 KIM Chan
 C. Kim
9
178
298
 9.6 — — CUT — — — — T56 — T26 — — — CUT — — CUT — — T45 — 39% 15% <1% 16% 4% <1% 38% 83% <1% 3% 70% 49% 26% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 HADWIN Adam
 A. Hadwin
9
175
262
 8.0 — — — — — — — CUT — T21 — CUT — — — — T26 — — T53 — 30% 5% <1% 18% 4% <1% 30% 73% <1% 3% 35% 57% 20% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 WALKER Danny
 D. Walker
3
134
223
 20.5 — CUT CUT T38 CUT — — T40 — T61 T62 T18 68 T67 — — CUT — — T38 — 95% 96% 1% 85% 12% <1% 93% 74% 13% 3% 89% 97% 93% >99% <1% <1% <1%
 GARNETT Brice
 B. Garnett
3
149
389
 18.9 — T31 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T50 — CUT T71 CUT — — T24 — — T19 — 93% 96% <1% 73% 7% <1% 90% 91% <1% 2% 69% 92% 79% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 STREELMAN Kevin
 K. Streelman
9
143
409
 13.1 — — CUT CUT — — — T32 — T8 — T68 — T39 — — CUT — — CUT — 44% 16% <1% 45% 7% <1% 56% 89% <1% 3% 62% 70% 74% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 LAMPRECHT Christo
 C. Lamprecht
5
179
217
 18.6 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — CUT — T50 — — CUT T49 — — CUT — — T60 — 94% 81% <1% 85% 11% <1% 97% 79% 18% 2% 93% 98% 98% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 SALINDA Isaiah
 I. Salinda
7
172
273
 15.3 — CUT CUT T30 — — — CUT — T50 — T46 CUT — — — — — — — — 91% 72% <1% 80% 10% <1% 96% 85% 12% 2% 92% 96% 97% 95% 1% <1% <1%
 CHATFIELD Davis
 D. Chatfield
5
163
287
 19.4 — CUT T63 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 — T40 CUT CUT — — T17 — — CUT — 94% 81% <1% 81% 9% <1% 96% 86% 10% 1% 93% 97% 97% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 NORLANDER Henrik
 H. Norlander
9
193
357
 7.4 — — — CUT — — — — — T57 — T68 — — — — CUT — — CUT — 34% 4% <1% 17% 3% <1% 25% 26% <1% 2% 46% 42% 19% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNLAP Nick
 N. Dunlap
3
162
285
 17.4 — T61 WD — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — T17 — — T24 — 97% 90% 1% 85% 8% 1% 99% 77% 4% 1% 78% >99% 99% >99% 1% <1% <1%
 LEE S.T.
 S.T. Lee
5
190
309
 12.3 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 92% 79% <1% 78% 8% <1% 94% 87% 7% 1% 91% 96% 96% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 SILVERMAN Ben
 B. Silverman
9
166
268
 7.1 — — — — — — — T40 — T16 — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 31% 10% <1% 15% 4% <1% 30% 81% <1% 2% 47% 45% 20% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 CLANTON Luke
 L. Clanton
3
145
238
 18.6 — CUT WD CUT — — — CUT — T5 — CUT 75 70 — — T26 — — T60 — 95% 79% <1% 86% 10% <1% 98% 83% 15% 1% 96% 98% 98% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 FRITTELLI Dylan
 D. Frittelli
9
 —
424
 1.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 3% <1% 67% <1% 2% 15% 45% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 GOMEZ Fabian
 F. Gomez
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 8% 46% 4% 2% 31% 27% 43% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 LOWER Justin
 J. Lower
7
168
227
 16.2 — — CUT T30 — — — CUT — CUT — T55 CUT CUT — — T32 — — T45 — 61% 20% 2% 76% 11% <1% 84% 90% 8% 3% 96% 97% 98% 76% <1% <1% <1%
 MALNATI Peter
 P. Malnati
3
176
 — 18.9 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 — CUT T65 T63 — — CUT — — T53 — 90% 95% <1% 73% 6% <1% 94% 89% <1% 1% 59% 97% 91% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 STANGER Jimmy
 J. Stanger
9
144
 — 11.2 — — CUT — — — — T32 — T26 — T30 T56 CUT — — CUT — — T38 — 42% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 33% 44% 5% <1% 42% 43% 62% 33% <1% <1% <1%
 HIRATA Kensei
 K. Hirata
5
156
235
 19.2 — T24 CUT 74 T54 — — CUT — CUT — T46 CUT CUT — — CUT — — T65 — 93% 64% <1% 86% 10% <1% 94% 61% 29% <1% 87% 96% 97% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGHSMITH Joe
 J. Highsmith
2
148
151
 21.3 — T66 CUT CUT T54 T75 — 67 — — T42 CUT CUT T67 — T33 — — — T67 97% 92% 2% 82% 13% 1% 93% 62% 22% 2% 74% >99% 97% 99% 1% <1% <1%
 MULLINAX Trey
 T. Mullinax
9
 —
435
 4.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — CUT — — — — 34% 6% <1% 11% 2% <1% 37% 50% <1% <1% 36% 48% 31% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 KANG Jeffrey
 J. Kang
5
142
260
 19.1 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 T65 — — T6 — — CUT — 87% 72% <1% 79% 10% <1% 91% 88% 8% 2% 91% 94% 91% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 KIZZIRE Patton
 P. Kizzire
3
136
294
 17.9 — T24 CUT — 72 — — T13 — — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — — CUT — 86% 83% <1% 74% 9% <1% 88% 93% 1% 2% 72% 96% 90% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNCAN Tyler
 T. Duncan
9
T195
 — 5.5 — — — — — — — — — T50 — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 25% 5% <1% 10% 2% <1% 23% 67% <1% <1% 53% 32% 16% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 KNOX Russell
 R. Knox
9
 —
382
 3.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 8% 49% 2% <1% 32% 25% 49% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 HOSHINO Rikuya
 R. Hoshino
9
 —
428
 2.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 31% <1% <1% 16% 2% <1% 9% <1% 74% <1% 5% 32% 62% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 HARDY Nick
 N. Hardy
9
184
 — 7.9 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — CUT — — T20 — — CUT — 37% 9% <1% 15% 2% <1% 51% 79% <1% <1% 78% 61% 40% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 HOFFMAN Charley
 C. Hoffman
9
 —
449
 14.1 — — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — — — — 37% 12% <1% 53% 6% <1% 27% 71% 1% 1% 90% 75% 83% 52% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGS Harry
 H. Higgs
9
 —
324
 8.3 — — CUT — — — — CUT — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 29% 5% <1% 15% 3% <1% 33% 80% <1% <1% 68% 48% 29% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 SCHENK Adam
 A. Schenk
3
133
155
 22.1 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 77 — T60 — — CUT CUT CUT T39 — T33 CUT — — CUT 96% 94% 2% 80% 13% <1% 89% 77% 8% 2% 55% 98% 91% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 REAVIE Chez
 C. Reavie
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — 9% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 10% 54% 1% 1% 36% 30% 49% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 RILEY Davis
 D. Riley
2
124
141
 21.2 — T6 T56 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 CUT CUT T60 — CUT — T20 — — T45 91% 86% 2% 86% 14% 1% 84% 55% 29% 2% 73% 98% 98% 99% <1% <1% <1%
 WILLETT Danny
 D. Willett
9
182
420
 10.3 — — — — — — — CUT — T42 — CUT T56 — CUT — — — — T45 — 43% 1% <1% 65% 6% <1% 35% 1% 63% <1% 25% 65% 87% 36% <1% <1% <1%
 VILLEGAS Camilo
 C. Villegas
9
189
468
 8.9 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — 63 — — — CUT — — CUT — — T45 — 20% 7% <1% 10% 2% <1% 21% 58% <1% 1% 26% 20% 11% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 MARTIN Ben
 B. Martin
9
139
446
 5.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — T4 — — CUT — 28% 5% <1% 9% 2% <1% 23% 61% <1% <1% 69% 26% 11% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 LAIRD Martin
 M. Laird
9
194
426
 2.8 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — — — — — — T65 — 20% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 7% 6% <1% 1% 6% 13% 4% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 ROZO Marcelo
 M. Rozo
6
188
494
 18.1 — CUT CUT T65 CUT — — CUT — 65 — CUT — CUT — — CUT — — T53 — 91% 84% <1% 74% 5% <1% 94% 94% 2% <1% 91% 94% 88% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 BYRD Jonathan
 J. Byrd
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — 7% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 4% 45% 1% 1% 27% 16% 31% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 PAUL Jeremy
 J. Paul
9
171
328
 7.4 — — — CUT — — — — — T8 — CUT — — — — CUT — — CUT — 30% 3% <1% 15% 3% <1% 23% 52% <1% <1% 45% 32% 20% 14% <1% <1% <1%
 TOSTI Alejandro
 A. Tosti
6
181
335
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — T30 CUT CUT — — CUT — — CUT — 92% 77% <1% 78% 6% <1% 97% 92% 5% <1% 96% 94% 97% 94% <1% <1% <1%
 GORDON Will
 W. Gordon
9
 —
386
 4.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — 37% 5% <1% 15% 2% <1% 42% 73% <1% <1% 38% 56% 39% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 COODY Parker
 P. Coody
9
 — — 4.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44% <1% <1% 15% 2% <1% 40% 52% 5% <1% 46% 65% 83% 47% <1% <1% <1%
 KISNER Kevin
 K. Kisner
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 20% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 22% 68% 1% <1% 40% 49% 59% 30% <1% <1% <1%
 STALLINGS Scott
 S. Stallings
9
 — — 2.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 8% 32% 2% <1% 20% 21% 40% 39% <1% <1% <1%
 MCGIRT William
 W. McGirt
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — 7% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 5% 50% 1% 1% 30% 12% 30% 13% <1% <1% <1%
 THOMPSON Michael
 M. Thompson
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 27% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 16% 38% 3% <1% 28% 42% 53% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 STUARD Brian
 B. Stuard
9
 — — 2.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 7% 57% 1% 1% 37% 22% 44% 14% <1% <1% <1%
 TWAY Kevin
 K. Tway
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 12% 35% 6% <1% 31% 34% 61% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE K.H.
 K.H. Lee
9
 — — 8.9 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — CUT CUT — — — — — — — 54% 9% <1% 56% 5% <1% 70% 73% 2% <1% 78% 91% 96% 57% <1% <1% <1%
 KODAIRA Satoshi
 S. Kodaira
9
 — — 1.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13% <1% <1% 9% 3% <1% 4% 3% 45% <1% 4% 18% 47% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 LANDRY Andrew
 A. Landry
9
 — — 3.7 — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 16% 57% 4% <1% 42% 41% 68% 18% <1% <1% <1%
 WATNEY Nick
 N. Watney
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — 8% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 2% 17% 10% 1% 9% 14% 33% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 HARRINGTON Padraig
 P. Harrington
9
 — — 3.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6% <1% <1% 5% >99% <1% 2% 10% 22% >99% <1% 9% 17% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 BADDELEY Aaron
 A. Baddeley
9
 — — 6.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 65% 23% <1% 67% 6% <1% 62% 97% <1% 1% 93% 95% 93% 82% <1% <1% <1%
 DUFNER Jason
 J. Dufner
9
 — — 4.9 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — 7% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 1% 4% 23% 2% 5% 8% 19% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 PALMER Ryan
 R. Palmer
9
 — — 5.1 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — CUT — — CUT — — — — 9% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 16% 52% 1% 2% 32% 32% 44% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 PIERCY Scott
 S. Piercy
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — 7% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% 47% 1% 1% 29% 16% 28% 14% <1% <1% <1%
 HAAS Bill
 B. Haas
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 11% 51% 4% <1% 37% 32% 53% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 LIST Luke
 L. List
9
 — — 5.6 — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — 15% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 16% 40% 8% <1% 33% 44% 69% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 LASHLEY Nate
 N. Lashley
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 29% <1% <1% 12% 2% <1% 30% 33% 1% 1% 53% 57% 57% 43% <1% <1% <1%
 BAE Sangmoon
 S. Bae
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 15% 55% 4% <1% 41% 39% 65% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 OVERTON Jeff
 J. Overton
9
 — — 1.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 4% 2% 53% <1% 6% 19% 39% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 HUH John
 J. Huh
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 32% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 23% 41% 4% <1% 33% 51% 65% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 COOK Austin
 A. Cook
9
 — — 4.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — 15% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 12% 50% 2% <1% 36% 33% 65% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 WERENSKI Richy
 R. Werenski
9
 — — 2.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 16% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 13% 52% 2% <1% 38% 34% 66% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 DONALD Luke
 L. Donald
9
 — — 2.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% <1% <1% 59% 2% <1% 3% 16% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 WISE Aaron
 A. Wise
9
 — — 11.2 — — — CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — 60% 9% <1% 60% 5% <1% 76% 79% 2% <1% 77% 93% 98% 59% <1% <1% <1%
 NORRMAN Vincent
 V. Norrman
9
 — — 5.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 62% 5% <1% 65% 5% <1% 57% 65% 4% <1% 69% 91% 98% 53% <1% <1% <1%
 LINGMERTH David
 D. Lingmerth
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 29% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 20% 42% 4% <1% 32% 46% 58% 44% <1% <1% <1%
 HADLEY Chesson
 C. Hadley
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — 14% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 15% 55% 2% <1% 35% 40% 65% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 LONG Adam
 A. Long
9
 — — 4.2 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — 13% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 10% 52% 1% <1% 37% 28% 59% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 PAN C.T.
 C.T. Pan
9
 — — 5.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 51% 6% <1% 56% 5% <1% 66% 75% <1% <1% 68% 72% 94% 50% <1% <1% <1%
 LINDHEIM Nicholas
 N. Lindheim
9
 — — 3.7 — — — — — — — — — WD — — — — — — — — — — — 26% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 17% 42% 3% <1% 31% 41% 50% 43% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIBBLE Cody
 C. Gribble
9
 — — 2.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 16% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 19% 54% 5% <1% 42% 46% 73% 18% <1% <1% <1%
 MCCUMBER Tyler
 T. McCumber
9
 — — 6.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 52% 9% <1% 57% 5% <1% 69% 80% 2% <1% 76% 91% 98% 59% <1% <1% <1%
 SARGENT Gordon
 G. Sargent
3
150
 — 18.5 — CUT CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT CUT T54 — — T17 — — CUT — 97% 84% <1% 81% 4% <1% 98% 93% 3% <1% 95% 98% 97% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPOS Rafael
 R. Campos
3
170
 — 19.3 — CUT T44 CUT CUT — — CUT — T16 — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — — CUT — 92% 94% <1% 77% 6% <1% 92% 92% <1% <1% 89% 96% 88% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 BREHM Ryan
 R. Brehm
9
183
 — 4.5 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 23% 1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 12% 36% <1% <1% 29% 18% 7% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 SINGH Vijay
 V. Singh
9
186
 — 2.8 — T40 — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — — 5% <1% <1% 3% 3% <1% 1% 22% 2% 4% 10% 8% 6% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 DAVIS Cam
 C. Davis
2
191
 — 16.8 — CUT CUT T70 73 — — CUT — — CUT CUT — — — — CUT — — T67 — 89% 87% <1% 75% 9% <1% 74% 68% 7% 1% 69% >99% 98% 99% <1% <1% <1%
 MERRITT Troy
 T. Merritt
9
197
 — 3.7 — — — — — — — — — T66 — — — — — — CUT — — T75 — 22% <1% <1% 12% 2% <1% 4% 1% <1% <1% 3% 10% 4% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 STREB Robert
 R. Streb
9
198
 — 4.7 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 22% 2% <1% 8% 2% <1% 13% 54% <1% <1% 29% 18% 9% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 HAHN James
 J. Hahn
9
199
 — 4.5 — — — — — — — — — 64 — — — — — — CUT — — CUT — 17% 2% <1% 6% 2% <1% 8% 54% <1% 1% 26% 13% 5% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 TODD Brendon
 B. Todd
9
200
 — 9.4 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — — — — — T67 — 62% 33% <1% 58% 6% <1% 77% 84% <1% <1% 74% 74% 91% 79% <1% <1% <1%
 CAPAN III Frankie
 F. Capan III
9
T195
 — 9.4 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T50 — — — CUT — — CUT — — — — 38% 5% <1% 16% 2% <1% 37% 72% <1% <1% 63% 51% 40% 18% <1% <1% <1%