PGA Tour 
 DP World Tour
 LIV Golf
 Korn Ferry Tour
 Challenge Tour
| FedExCup |
 Projected Schedules 
 Projected Standings
 Current Standings
 PGA Tour Schedule
UPDATED —
Schedule Model Methodology
This table displays the probabilities (based on our season-long simulations) of each PGA Tour member starting each tournament on the 2026 schedule. We start by predicting a baseline probability for each player/event based on their age, position on the priority list, their DG and OWGR rank, their history at the event, and their general playing patterns (e.g. overall playing frequency, participation in DPWT events). For the Signature Events and the Majors (plus The Players), qualified players are locked into the field. During season simulations, players may also gain entry into certain events based on their performance, which overrides the baseline probability. In some cases, we manually adjust probabilities when we have reliable information that a player has commited to play (or not play) a tournament. These cases are denoted with a triangle, with more details available on hover.
Contributors: 
Eddie Bajek
, 
@Robopz
News/Announcements 
 | Manual Adjustments 
Player
Proj
Starts
SIG
Sentry
Sony Open 
The AMEX 
Farmers 
WMPO 
SIG
AT&T Pebble 
SIG
Genesis Inv 
Cognizant 
SIG
Arnold Palmer 
Puerto Rico 
PLYRS
Field
The Players 
Valspar
Houston Open
Valero
MAJ
Field
Masters
SIG
RBC Heritage
Zurich Classic
SIG
Miami
SIG
Truist
Myrtle Beach
MAJ
Field
PGA
CJ CUP
Charles Schwab
SIG
Memorial
Canadian Open
MAJ
Field
U.S. Open
SIG
Travelers
John Deere
Scottish Open
ISCO
MAJ
Field
The Open
Corales
3M Open
Rocket
Wyndham
St. Jude
BMW Champ
PLAYOFFS
TOUR Champ
 SCHEFFLER Scottie
 S. Scheffler
1
5
1
 20.3 — — 1 — T3 T4 T12 — T24 — 18% 32% 19% >99% >99% 14% >99% >99% <1% >99% 14% 48% >99% 16% >99% >99% 8% 64% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MCILROY Rory
 R. McIlroy
1
21
2
 18.1 — — — — — T14 T2 — WD — 20% 15% 22% >99% >99% 21% >99% >99% <1% >99% 6% 7% >99% 27% >99% >99% 2%
>99% 		<1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% 92%
 HENLEY Russell
 R. Henley
1
25
6
 19.8 — T19 T8 — — T19 CUT — T6 — 19% 9%
>99% 		>99% >99% 15% >99% >99% <1% 99% 8% 19% >99% 15% >99% >99% 8% 31% <1% >99% <1% <1% 1% 5% >99% 89% 62%
 FLEETWOOD Tommy
 T. Fleetwood
1
18
3
 18.8 — — — — — T4 T7 — 49 — 32% 9%
>99% 		>99% >99% 15% >99% >99% <1% >99% 8% 23% >99% 23% >99% >99% 3% 87% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 2% >99% 96% 77%
 SCHAUFFELE Xander
 X. Schauffele
1
37
10
 20.5 — — — CUT T41 T19 T7 — T24 —
>99% 		9% 28% >99% >99% 20% >99% >99% <1% >99% 12% 13% >99% 20% >99% >99% 10% 72% <1% >99% <1% 2% 2% 5% 98% 90% 68%
 YOUNG Cameron
 C. Young
1
12
15
 20.5 — — — T22 T41 T55 T7 — T3 — 39% 16% 17% >99% >99% 28% >99% >99% <1% >99% 18% 32% >99% 37% >99% >99% 18% 55% <1% >99% <1% <1% 4% 7% >99% 98% 84%
 KIM Si Woo
 S. Kim
1
9
28
 24.6 — T11 T6 T2 T3 T45 T34 — T13 — 21%
>99% 		24% >99% >99% 56% >99% >99% <1% >99% 27% 78% >99% 32% 94% >99% 56% 61% <1% >99% <1% 2% 2% 16% >99% >99% 89%
 MORIKAWA Collin
 C. Morikawa
1
1
4
 20.8 — CUT — — T54 1 T7 — 5 — 17% 11%
>99% 		>99% >99% 25% >99% >99% <1% >99% 9% 32% >99% 15% >99% >99% 8% 66% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MATSUYAMA Hideki
 H. Matsuyama
1
11
12
 21.3 — T13 — T11 2 T8 T28 — T41 — 17% 12%
>99% 		>99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% 99% 11% 35% >99% 15% >99% >99% 6% 45% <1% >99% <1% <1% 3% 5% >99% 97% 71%
 FITZPATRICK Matt
 M. Fitzpatrick
1
43
24
 20.4 — — T63 — 9 T14 T24 — T41 — 37% 13% 22% >99% >99% 47% >99% >99% <1% >99% 18% 15% >99% 30% >99% >99% 12% 91% <1% >99% <1% 4% 8% 17% 94% 79% 53%
 MACINTYRE Robert
 R. MacIntyre
1
39
8
 22.7 — T4 T38 — — T37 T20 — T24 — 43% 29%
>99% 		>99% >99% 64% >99% >99% <1% 98% 35% 60% >99% 48% >99% >99% 23% 89% <1% >99% <1% 5% 6% 32% 97% 85% 59%
 ABERG Ludvig
 L. Aberg
1
24
21
 20.7 — — WD CUT — T37 T20 — T3 — 26% 13%
>99% 		>99% >99% 19% >99% >99% <1% 99% 16% 20% >99% 28% >99% >99% 16% 68% <1% >99% <1% 3% 5% 7% >99% 89% 62%
 KNAPP Jake
 J. Knapp
2
7
42
 22.9 — T11 — T5 8 T8 6 — — — 52% 87% 59% 43% >99% 64% 58% >99% <1% 94% 84% 99% 97% 57% 76% 95% 78% 56% 2% 59% 6% 6% 12% 25% >99% >99% 82%
 GRIFFIN Ben
 B. Griffin
1
60
13
 25.8 — T19 T24 — T28 T37 T41 — CUT —
>99% 		55% 29% >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% >99% 63% 88% >99% 47% >99% >99% 82% 61% 4% >99% <1% 34% 25% 63% 93% 79% 52%
 BHATIA Akshay
 A. Bhatia
1
2
19
 23.5 — — CUT CUT T3 T6 T16 — 1 —
>99% 		33% 13% >99% >99% 60% >99% >99% <1% >99% 29% 80% >99% 34% >99% >99% 33% 57% <1% >99% <1% 2% 3% 7% >99% >99% 99%
 FOWLER Rickie
 R. Fowler
1
27
60
 20.9 — — T18 — T18 T19 T28 — T9 — 17%
>99%
>99% 		32% >99% 25% >99% >99% <1% 99% 11% 55% >99% 26% 90% >99% 40% 40% 1% 78% 5% 6% 11% 23% 97% 81% 50%
 ENGLISH Harris
 H. English
1
44
16
 21.3 — — T27 T22 T28 T24 T22 — T24 — 27% 24% 31% >99% >99% 37% >99% >99% <1% >99% 18% 57% >99% 24% >99% >99% 14% 63% <1% >99% <1% 5% 3% 24% 89% 70% 40%
 LOWRY Shane
 S. Lowry
1
26
29
 18.9 — — — — — T8 T24 T2 CUT — 26% 7% 24% >99%
>99% 		29% >99% >99% <1% 98% 8% 15% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 4% 51% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 10% 97% 75% 40%
 MCNEALY Maverick
 M. McNealy
1
35
25
 23.0 — T24 — 10 T13 T29 CUT — T13 — 38% 31%
>99% 		>99% >99% 34% >99% >99% <1% 98% 29% 64% >99% 33% >99% >99% 34% 55% <1% >99% <1% 20% 6% 20% 97% 84% 57%
 LEE Min Woo
 M. Lee
2
6
30
 21.7 — — T38 — T28 T2 T12 — T6 — 47%
>99% 		46% >99% >99% 15% 62% >99% <1% 94% 63% 93% >99% 27% 77% >99% 9% 77% <1% 57% <1% <1% 7% <1% >99% >99% 94%
 HOVLAND Viktor
 V. Hovland
1
49
18
 18.4 — — — — T10 T58 T41 — T13 — 43% 12% 25% >99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% 98% 13% 8% >99% 23% >99% >99% 12% 84% <1% >99% <1% 7% 10% 12% 84% 63% 34%
 NOREN Alex
 A. Noren
4
52
17
 20.3 — — CUT CUT — T29 T12 — T24 — 72% 82% 77% >99% 43% 59% 46% 47% 23% 87% 59% 68% 55% 59% >99% 49% 11% 93% <1% >99% <1% 5% 15% 32% 70% 48% 25%
 CANTLAY Patrick
 P. Cantlay
1
54
33
 19.0 — — T13 CUT — T14 T37 — CUT — 28% 8% 33% >99% >99% 24% >99% >99% <1% 97% 14% 12% >99% 22% >99% >99% 13% 38% <1% >99% <1% 9% 15% 18% 80% 58% 30%
 HALL Harry
 H. Hall
1
28
56
 24.1 — T6 T24 — CUT T24 CUT — T9 — 49% 50% 19% >99% >99% 65% >99% >99% <1% 98% 54% 90% >99% 47% >99% >99% 56% 68% 1% >99% <1% 20% 19% 51% 97% 81% 49%
 BURNS Sam
 S. Burns
1
38
32
 20.5 — — T27 — CUT T6 CUT — CUT — 46% 18% 24% >99% >99% 34% >99% >99% <1% 98% 26% 34% >99% 40% >99% >99% 22% 62% <1% >99% <1% 31% 8% 25% 88% 64% 31%
 KITAYAMA Kurt
 K. Kitayama
1
19
31
 21.9 — T40 CUT — T24 T48 T2 — T18 — 30% 29% 21% >99% >99% 51% >99% >99% <1% >99% 24% 61% >99% 28% 93% >99% 32% 52% <1% 78% 1% 9% 4% 16% >99% 93% 65%
 SCOTT Adam
 A. Scott
3
15
50
 20.6 — T40 T24 T30 — — 4 — T11 — 62% 60% 81% >99% 93% 41% 43% 87% 1% 95% 37% 73% 80% 37% 73% 72% 8% 78% <1% >99% <1% <1% 2% 6% >99% 83% 52%
 BRIDGEMAN Jacob
 J. Bridgeman
1
3
22
 23.9 — T4 T13 — T18 T8 1 — T18 — 39% 50% 14% >99% >99% 69% >99% >99% <1% >99% 48% 86% >99% 34% >99% >99% 70% 62% <1% >99% <1% 4% 2% 13% >99% >99% 99%
 SPAUN J.J.
 J.J. Spaun
1
140
11
 24.4 — T40 — CUT — T45 CUT — CUT — 66% 37%
>99% 		>99% >99% 73% >99% >99% <1% >99% 54% 58% >99% 56% >99% >99% 65% 53% 28% >99% <1% 66% 30% 74% 81% 61% 36%
 GOTTERUP Chris
 C. Gotterup
1
4
7
 24.6 — 1 — T18 1 T37 CUT — T18 — 40%
>99% 		15% >99% >99% 70% >99% >99% <1% >99% 49% 90% >99% 39% >99% >99% 70% 72% <1% >99% <1% 4% 1% 10% >99% >99% 99%
 HOJGAARD Nicolai
 N. Hojgaard
3
33
52
 19.3 — — — T22 T3 — — T6 T24 — 70% 83% 49% 26% 48% 46% 54% 54% 14% 86% 76% 85% 48% 69% 64% 58% 29% 97% <1% >99% <1% 5% 46% 35% 86% 64% 36%
 STRAKA Sepp
 S. Straka
1
14
9
 21.3 — — CUT — T18 T2 T50 — T13 — 31% 18%
>99% 		>99% >99% 42% >99% >99% <1% 99% 18% 52% >99% 22% >99% >99% 28% 64% <1% >99% <1% 3% 2% 13% >99% 87% 49%
 GERARD Ryan
 R. Gerard
1
10
27
 24.0 — 2 T2 T11 — T45 T28 T23 CUT — 37% 36% 15% >99% >99% 66% >99% >99% <1% >99% 41% 77% >99% 31% 94% >99% 61% 59% <1% 75% 4% 3% 6% 21% >99% 98% 72%
 SPIETH Jordan
 J. Spieth
2
32
64
 19.7 — T24 — — CUT T29 T12 — T11 —
>99% 		55% 67% >99% 49% 23% 47% 51% 12% 87% 69% 98% 49% 42% 64% 48% 42% 47% 2% >99% <1% 6% 20% 36% 80% 53% 28%
 TAYLOR Nick
 N. Taylor
1
48
62
 21.4 — T13 T27 — T28 T24 T28 — T38 — 34% 23% 28% >99% >99% 60% >99% >99% <1% 97% 23% 45% >99% 40% >99% >99% 26% 67% <1% >99% <1% 11% 5% 42% 73% 47% 20%
 COODY Pierceson
 P. Coody
5
22
48
 25.1 — T13 T18 T2 T10 T48 T16 — CUT — 80%
>99% 		71% 33% 78% 85% 53% 77% 16% 90% 87% 99% 70% 64% 70% 73% 84% 62% 13% 50% 29% 15% 29% 42% >99% 84% 55%
 BRADLEY Keegan
 K. Bradley
1
121
23
 21.3 — CUT — T43 — T29 CUT — CUT —
>99% 		9% 52% >99% >99% 44% >99% >99% <1% >99% 29% 14% >99% 39% >99% >99% 27% 27% 22% >99% <1% 56% 36% 67% 59% 37% 15%
 ROSE Justin
 J. Rose
1
16
5
 19.4 — — CUT 1 — T37 CUT — CUT — 13% 5%
>99% 		>99% >99% 11% >99% >99% <1% >99% 4% 22% >99% 20% >99% >99% 1% 57% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 5% >99% 75% 32%
 HOJGAARD Rasmus
 R. Hojgaard
3
61
51
 20.7 — — T44 T30 T24 — — T9 — CUT 81% 86% 49% >99% 38% 54% 50% 44% 32% 75% 81% 77% 32% 73% 53% 43% 48% 99% <1% >99% <1% 33% 58% 54% 61% 37% 17%
 DAY Jason
 J. Day
1
40
40
 18.1 — — T2 T38 — T24 CUT — CUT — 16% 38% 37% >99% >99% 11% >99% >99% <1% >99% 6% 7% >99% 24% 89% >99% 37% 17% 2% 77% 4% 4% 7% 20% 65% 36% 13%
 PENDRITH Taylor
 T. Pendrith
1
58
66
 21.7 — T6 CUT CUT — T34 T45 — T38 — 35% 56% 36% 19% >99% 52% >99% >99% <1% >99% 32% 36% >99% 57% 82% >99% 46% 41% 12% 67% 25% 56% 23% 65% 71% 45% 18%
 THEEGALA Sahith
 S. Theegala
3
17
76
 24.2 — T31 T8 T7 T18 T60 T22 — T6 —
>99% 		97% 73% 30% 90% 84% 47% 84% 6% 89% 75% 94% 70% 59% 68% 69% 57% 58% 7% 46% 18% 23% 15% 28% >99% 81% 46%
 BEZUIDENHOUT Christiaan
 C. Bezuidenhout
3
77
89
 19.9 — — T38 T27 CUT — — T37 — T8 79% 65% 71% 10% 32% 66% 41% 36% 47% 65% 86% 99% 34% 61% 42% 32% 84% 79% 4% 37% 23% 65% 54% 82% 52% 31% 14%
 BERGER Daniel
 D. Berger
1
13
34
 21.8 — T6 T56 — T16 T75 CUT T32 2 — 19% 34% 26% 46% >99% 25% >99% >99% <1% 99% 14% 54% >99% 35% 94% >99% 35% 41% 2% >99% <1% 3% 4% 21% >99% 87% 44%
 MCCARTY Matt
 M. McCarty
3
31
43
 23.3 — T55 T2 T18 CUT T67 T24 — T41 — 61% 84% 61%
>99% 		43% 64% 44% 46% 34% 87% 87% 99% 42% 65% 66% 49% 77% 53% 6% 49% 18% 29% 42% 65% 81% 52% 25%
 THOMAS Justin
 J. Thomas
1
 —
14
 17.4 — — — — — — — — CUT —
>99% 		12% 50% >99% >99% 37% >99% >99% <1% >99% 32% 6% >99% 43% >99% >99% 34% 66% 10% >99% <1% 68% 44% 64% 45% 25% 8%
 FOX Ryan
 R. Fox
1
34
44
 18.8 — — — — T24 T24 T7 — T24 — 39% 27% 20% >99% >99% 50% >99% >99% <1% >99% 21% 28% >99% 38% 89% >99% 6% 86% <1% >99% <1% 4% 4% 36% 73% 41% 14%
 GREYSERMAN Max
 M. Greyserman
2
68
54
 23.0 — — T56 CUT CUT T37 T24 — T18 — 69% 89% 71% >99% 33% 77% 41% 36% 56% 73% 92% 99% 35% 71% 49% 39% 81% 63% 15% 40% 39% 71% 68% 87% 58% 35% 15%
 CONNERS Corey
 C. Conners
1
91
39
 20.2 — T24 — — CUT T70 T37 — T33 — 50% 10% 38% >99% >99% 35% >99% >99% <1% 91% 27% 13% >99% 49% >99% >99% 27% 65% 4% >99% <1% 32% 20% 47% 60% 36% 14%
 MITCHELL Keith
 K. Mitchell
3
45
114
 21.9 — T66 T44 T11 T41 T52 — T6 T33 — 61% 83% 66% 16% 32% 62% 37% 35% 34% 78% 79% 99% 38% 65% 54% 33% 85% 66% 4% 41% 27% 52% 51% 65% 68% 42% 19%
 STEVENS Sam
 S. Stevens
1
42
49
 25.4 — T31 T6 T30 T35 T55 T16 — CUT — 48% 68% 28% >99% >99% 73% >99% >99% <1% 97% 44% 79% >99% 51% 87% >99% 90% 56% 6% 66% 25% 47% 20% 70% 88% 65% 33%
 CASTILLO Ricky
 R. Castillo
7
23
95
 22.2 — T31 T44 T43 — — — 5 — 1 81% 94% 70% 22% 65% 87% 43% 62% 25% >99% 84% 98% 55% 64% 64% 55% 87% 60% 19% 40% 43% 20% 40% 41% 97% 71% 37%
 OLESEN Thorbjorn
 T. Olesen
3
T160
102
 17.1 — — — CUT CUT — — T40 — — 89% 79% 76% 4% 27% 59% 34% 29% 65% 39% 83% 64% 31% 80% 23% 26% 71% 95% <1% 28% 12% 70% 79% 82% 34% 19% 7%
 RAI Aaron
 A. Rai
2
97
35
 21.2 — T50 — — — T73 T28 T23 — — 81% 92% 73% >99% 34% 81% 39% 37% 57% 61% 92% 98% 34% 80% 39% 42% 74% 89% 3% >99% <1% 55% 64% 87% 56% 35% 16%
 ECHAVARRIA Nico
 N. Echavarria
2
8
37
 23.7 — CUT CUT — CUT T8 CUT 1 T44 — 29% 52% 23% >99% >99% 48% >99% >99% <1% >99% 22% 67% >99% 38% 94% >99% 73% 53% 1% 76% 8% 2% 11% 33% >99% 94% 47%
 MCGREEVY Max
 M. McGreevy
3
80
72
 23.4 — CUT T27 T30 T48 T29 CUT T40 — — 79% 89% 70% 12% 30% 86% 36% 33% 63% 65% 95% 99% 33% 80% 43% 35% 91% 64% 15% 35% 52% 73% 69% 90% 54% 32% 14%
 REITAN Kristoffer
 K. Reitan
4
94
46
 20.9 — CUT — T30 T41 — — T17 — — 95% 95% 69% >99% 31% 88% 41% 35% 59% 59% 90% 76% 28% 85% 40% 37% 72% 98% <1% >99% <1% 57% 67% 78% 49% 29% 12%
 RODGERS Patrick
 P. Rodgers
2
30
85
 21.7 — 3 T44 T27 T60 T52 T34 — T24 — 60% 91% 56% 26% 26% 61% 32% 27% 45% 85% 87% 99% 28% 66% 63% 27% 84% 78% <1% 45% 10% 49% 45% 80% 60% 28% 9%
 SMITH Jordan
 J. Smith
4
73
93
 19.9 — T66 T27 CUT T16 — — T23 — — 91% 92% 66% 11% 26% 87% 33% 30% 58% 66% 84% 80% 28% 76% 42% 26% 59% 98% <1% >99% <1% 40% 51% 73% 41% 22% 8%
 PARRY John
 J. Parry
4
69
83
 19.3 — T19 T56 T43 T35 — — T63 — T8 — 87% 88% 69% 16% 24% 85% 30% 25% 58% 72% 78% 81% 30% 74% 47% 24% 45% 97% <1% >99% <1% 32% 38% 72% 35% 17% 6%
 MEISSNER Mac
 M. Meissner
3
104
106
 21.7 — T40 T63 T49 T18 — — CUT — — 86% 90% 76% 4% 30% 84% 36% 32% 67% 46% 97% 99% 28% 84% 30% 30% 98% 33% 60% 24% 74% 90% 86% 94% 50% 30% 13%
 THORBJORNSEN Michael
 M. Thorbjornsen
3
47
59
 21.4 — — CUT T18 T3 T78 — CUT T33 — 70% 86% 57% 22% 34% 64% 40% 37% 43% 78% 88% 98% 33% 71% 58% 42% 79% 71% 4% 37% 25% 44% 60% 69% 67% 41% 19%
 MCCARTHY Denny
 D. McCarthy
1
115
94
 21.6 — T40 T56 T49 — T55 T47 — CUT — 51% 29% 49% 4% >99% 52% >99% >99% <1% >99% 32% 21% >99% 53% 56% >99% 92% 47% 29% 45% 45% 59% 44% 88% 37% 18% 6%
 POSTON J.T.
 J.T. Poston
1
112
70
 21.4 — — T38 — T35 T37 CUT — CUT — 61% 29% 49% 6% >99% 67% >99% >99% <1% >99% 36% 42% >99% 56% 61% >99% 93% 25% 43% 49% 42% 77% 40% 89% 45% 23% 8%
 LI Haotong
 H. Li
4
55
75
 21.7 — T55 T8 T11 CUT — — T32 CUT — 88% 93% 59% >99% 27% 84% 33% 28% 53% 75% 83% 82% 26% 75% 54% 29% 55% 98% <1% >99% <1% 31% 49% 66% 46% 24% 9%
 THOMPSON Davis
 D. Thompson
3
78
111
 20.7 — — CUT T43 T64 — — T60 — 4 72% 91% 70% 8% 30% 63% 34% 32% 59% 58% 92% 99% 30% 71% 40% 32% 97% 42% 23% 27% 51% 75% 83% 86% 57% 36% 16%
 GLOVER Lucas
 L. Glover
1
119
78
 18.1 — — — — — T64 CUT — T24 — 57% 18% 58% 7% >99% 56% >99% >99% <1% 82% 27% 34% >99% 53% 57% >99% 82% 21% 56% 58% 35% 59% 25% 93% 23% 9% 2%
 CLARK Wyndham
 W. Clark
2
76
68
 20.6 — — T13 T65 T35 T58 T41 — — — 69% 74% 64% >99% 24% 69% 29% 24% 48% >99% 86% 92% 25% 59% >99% 28% 35% 83% 1% >99% <1% 60% 57% 63% 42% 22% 8%
 ZALATORIS Will
 W. Zalatoris
9
118
279
 16.0 — — T18 CUT — — — — — — — 90%
>99% 		86% 2% 25% 86% 24% 27% 67% 19% 90% 83% 24% 64% 14% 17% 92% 43% 50% 12% 80% 69% 86% 83% 38% 22% 9%
 HISATSUNE Ryo
 R. Hisatsune
3
20
65
 23.8 — CUT T44 T2 T10 T8 T45 — T33 — 66% 89% 48% 33% 68% 70% 36% 60% 30% 87% 91% 99% 48% 74% 68% 54% 88% 76% <1% 40% 9% 35% 49% 62% 98% 67% 32%
 KIM Michael
 M. Kim
1
85
55
 24.3 — T31 CUT — T18 72 CUT — T33 — 58% 66% 39% >99% >99% 68% >99% >99% <1% 90% 46% 66% >99% 65% 72% >99% 93% 46% 30% 57% 40% 65% 51% 91% 51% 27% 9%
 SMALLEY Alex
 A. Smalley
3
83
123
 22.0 — T40 T44 CUT T35 T19 — T52 — — 81% 91% 71% 7% 24% 79% 30% 26% 71% 55% 95% 99% 24% 78% 36% 25% 97% 56% 28% 25% 67% 84% 84% 93% 45% 25% 10%
 HOMA Max
 M. Homa
3
75
149
 19.3 — — T27 CUT T66 — T37 T13 — — 55% 55%
>99% 		>99% 19% 57% 23% 19% 59% 58% 82% 98% 23% 65% 37% 17% 80% 40% 19% 29% 30% 62% 70% 83% 33% 16% 5%
 KEEFER Johnny
 J. Keefer
5
113
67
 23.4 — T61 T27 T43 T41 — — CUT — — 94%
>99% 		86% >99% 27% 92% 31% 29% 69% 43% 96% 96% 22% 86% >99% 31% 97% 55% 42% 23% 74% 88% 87% 92% 44% 25% 10%
 PENGE Marco
 M. Penge
4
98
38
 21.4 — — — CUT CUT T64 T16 — — — 95% 96% 70% >99% 29% 88% 33% 31% 64% 57% 90% 72% 26% 86% >99% 38% 72% 98% <1% >99% <1% 59% 66% 79% 52% 30% 13%
 VALIMAKI Sami
 S. Valimaki
3
110
53
 23.2 — — CUT CUT T41 T34 T37 CUT — — 90% 73% 68% >99% >99% 80% 30% 21% 76% >99% 96% 98% 18% 73% 32% 28% 87% 85% 3% 25% 24% 88% 87% 91% 27% 12% 4%
 POWER Seamus
 S. Power
7
88
157
 17.7 — T31 T63 T11 — — — T52 — CUT 88% 78% 91% 4% 17% 57% 19% 16% 52% 50% 63% 53% 20% 52% 30% 10% 81% 32% 52% 26% 62% 66% 70% 54% 19% 8% 2%
 KUCHAR Matt
 M. Kuchar
7
166
147
 14.7 — — T44 CUT — — — CUT — — — 91% 57% 96% 2% 11% 66% 15% 10% 66% 36% 64% 51% 25% 60% 19% 7% 80% 18% 71% 26% 60% 74% 81% 78% 7% 2% <1%
 NOVAK Andrew
 A. Novak
1
64
47
 23.8 — — CUT T7 CUT T48 T47 — T38 — 56% 42% 25% >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% 95% 51% 76% >99% 51% >99% >99% 66% 60% 6% >99% <1% 60% 30% 82% 51% 26% 8%
 NEERGAARD-PETERSEN Rasmus
 R. Neergaard-Petersen
4
134
63
 19.5 — — — T49 T41 — — T40 — 68 — 98% 96% 74% >99% 23% 92% 28% 24% 75% 38% 94% 65% 18% 90% 25% 27% 83% 98% <1% >99% <1% 84% 85% 91% 28% 14% 4%
 ROY Kevin
 K. Roy
3
59
138
 19.1 — T13 CUT CUT T13 — — T23 — — 62% 80% 67% 10% 16% 76% 20% 16% 70% 68% 88% 99% 21% 68% 44% 15% 86% 23% 41% 31% 49% 65% 62% 88% 30% 13% 4%
 HUGHES Mackenzie
 M. Hughes
2
89
110
 18.6 — — CUT T59 T28 T34 — T23 — — 73% 82% 76% 7% 18% 46% 20% 16% 71% 55% 87% 95% 21% 76% 35% 18% 57% 58% 18% 29% 35% 86% 55% 86% 24% 11% 4%
 KIRK Chris
 C. Kirk
2
143
99
 19.0 — CUT CUT — CUT T52 — CUT T47 — 65% 47% 86% 4% 13% 45% 18% 11% 77% 39% 78% 92% 21% 64% 21% 13% 80% 17% 56% 26% 49% 85% 88% 92% 11% 4% 1%
 FINAU Tony
 T. Finau
2
57
104
 17.9 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 18 T28 — — — 57% 71% 61% 16% 15% 54% 20% 14% 52% 72% 86% >99% 20% 46% 49% 16% 35% 30% 6% 36% 8% 79% 40% 79% 21% 9% 2%
 CAULEY Bud
 B. Cauley
1
74
81
 21.0 — T24 CUT — T68 T37 CUT — T18 — 38% 39% 37% 15% >99% 58% >99% >99% <1% 92% 29% 36% >99% 53% 75% >99% 67% 31% 21% 57% 29% 52% 36% 79% 38% 17% 4%
 BRENNAN Michael
 M. Brennan
3
133
45
 24.5 — CUT T56 DQ T48 — — T52 — T26 90%
>99% 		73% >99% >99% 84% 29% 26% 72% >99% 99% 99% 22% 81% 27% 35% 92% 60% 29% 22% 61% 93% 86% 93% 44% 25% 10%
 WHALEY Vince
 V. Whaley
3
T138
120
 21.5 — T40 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 87% 88% 80% 3% 17% 84% 21% 17% 82% 32% 97% 98% 16% 86% 20% 16% 98% 25% 71% 17% 81% 94% 93% 98% 19% 8% 2%
 BROWN Dan
 D. Brown
4
96
77
 18.7 — T19 CUT T30 CUT — — T40 — — — 94% 93% 70% 8% 18% 88% 21% 17% 76% 52% 88% 71% 16% 83% 35% 19% 67% 98% <1% >99% <1% 67% 73% 87% 17% 7% 2%
 HIGGO Garrick
 G. Higgo
3
150
74
 20.8 — — — CUT CUT T60 CUT T40 — — 85% 73% 73% 4% >99% 75% 23% 18% 80% 36% 98% 98% 15% 78% 24% 23% 91% 43% 40% 20% 62% 96% 89% 95% 23% 10% 3%
 DAHMEN Joel
 J. Dahmen
7
51
163
 17.5 — — T38 T7 CUT — — T9 CUT — 81% 88% 85% 10% 17% 66% 16% 16% 35% 67% 52% 72% 19% 52% 46% 11% 72% 38% 24% 31% 56% 47% 67% 33% 29% 13% 4%
 DOU Zecheng
 Z. Dou
5
66
178
 20.4 — T55 73 T49 T13 — — T17 — T57 86% 91% 71% 4% 15% 89% 18% 15% 72% 54% 91% 97% 14% 71% 35% 12% 90% 63% 17% 19% 54% 67% 78% 86% 21% 9% 2%
 VENTURA Kris
 K. Ventura
7
132
226
 16.5 — — CUT T22 — — — CUT — CUT — 93% 81% 91% <1% 14% 76% 16% 14% 72% 20% 76% 46% 12% 66% 13% 8% 88% 41% 54% 10% 86% 86% 93% 70% 13% 5% 1%
 BLANCHET Chandler
 C. Blanchet
5
53
105
 19.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — 2 — 78% 91% 75% 16% 15% 84% 19% 14% 68% 72% 87% 98% 15% 69% 50% 16% 83% 45% 28% 31% 47% 59% 67% 84% 22% 9% 2%
 DUMONT DE CHASSART Adrien
 A. Dumont De Chassart
5
92
159
 20.1 — T24 69 CUT CUT — — T23 — T26 — 92% 93% 73% 3% 17% 91% 20% 17% 79% 41% 94% 94% 14% 80% 28% 14% 93% 77% 13% 16% 65% 83% 87% 91% 21% 9% 2%
 JAEGER Stephan
 S. Jaeger
2
62
109
 17.8 — — CUT T5 T28 T67 — CUT — — 61% 84% 69% 15% 15% 49% 16% 13% 61% 69% 85% 97% 18% 57% 47% 15% 79% 20% 22% 34% 23% 42% 72% 88% 22% 9% 2%
 HORSCHEL Billy
 B. Horschel
3
63
82
 18.5 — 74 T27 CUT CUT T48 — 62 T13 — — 53% 69% 72% 21% 11% 59% 15% 9% 68% 72% 79% 99% 17% 60% 49% 13% 47% 36% 20% >99% <1% 46% 39% 90% 9% 3% <1%
 KANAYA Takumi
 T. Kanaya
3
102
127
 20.6 — T31 CUT CUT T60 — — T17 — CUT 82% 85% 67% 3% 15% 78% 19% 14% 82% 41% 94% 96% 13% 82% 26% 15% 89% 68% 17% 17% 60% 87% 87% 94% 18% 7% 2%
 COLE Eric
 E. Cole
3
100
121
 20.5 — CUT T27 T27 CUT — — T37 — CUT 79% 81% 77% 5% 12% 84% 15% 11% 83% 47% 93% >99% 17% 82% 28% 12% 95% 36% 42% 24% 52% 88% 66% 98% 15% 6% 1%
 YU Kevin
 K. Yu
2
175
115
 20.4 — — CUT CUT — T70 CUT CUT — — 88% 85% 77% 2% 17% 85% 19% 15% 84% 30% 98% >99% 15% 88% 20% 18% 98% 55% 38% 16% 78% 98% 90% 98% 19% 9% 3%
 GRILLO Emiliano
 E. Grillo
2
137
113
 20.6 — CUT CUT T38 CUT T64 — T56 — — 79% 76% 81% 3% 13% 59% 16% 11% 86% 33% 92% 97% 15% 79% 19% 14% 93% 30% 62% 19% 77% 98% 88% 96% 14% 6% 1%
 WALLACE Matt
 M. Wallace
7
T160
97
 18.2 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — 97% 96% 88% 5% 16% 95% 16% 15% 83% 36% 90% 75% 18% 87% 22% 17% 69% 87% 9% 22% 73% 94% 90% 94% 17% 8% 2%
 KIM Tom
 T. Kim
3
101
124
 19.7 — T61 T38 T65 T35 — T34 59 — — —
>99% 		70% 70% 4% 18% 57% 20% 17% 77% 40% 94% 96% 15% 81% 28% 20% 92% 62% 20% 16% 55% 88% 96% 90% 26% 12% 3%
 GHIM Doug
 D. Ghim
7
142
175
 18.2 — T55 CUT T59 — — — CUT — T26 — 96% 88% 91% 2% 16% 80% 15% 15% 72% 24% 80% 48% 14% 77% 17% 12% 95% 41% 50% 12% 84% 94% 97% 74% 18% 8% 2%
 MOORE Taylor
 T. Moore
7
41
140
 15.9 — — T56 T49 — — — T2 T44 — 81% 83% 80% 15% 18% 64% 15% 15% 26% 73% 53% 71% 15% 50% 50% 13% 65% 50% 12% 29% 24% 37% 73% 29% 32% 13% 4%
 SMOTHERMAN Austin
 A. Smotherman
5
36
100
 19.7 — CUT T8 CUT CUT — — T2 WD — 67% 87% 69% 25% 18% 83% 16% 17% 60% 79% 85% 98% 19% 65% 59% 20% 73% 26% 32% 35% 32% 27% 37% 72% 46% 19% 6%
 HARMAN Brian
 B. Harman
1
93
58
 21.4 — T61 CUT — CUT T19 T50 — 50 — 45% 10%
>99% 		>99% >99% 41% >99% >99% <1% >99% 25% 28% >99% 39% >99% >99% 18% 67% 3% >99% <1% 38% 21% 66% 24% 9% 2%
 HODGES Lee
 L. Hodges
7
84
133
 19.3 — T6 CUT CUT — — — T40 — — 88% 94% 84% 6% 15% 93% 15% 14% 80% 51% 89% 96% 14% 77% 33% 13% 96% 63% 28% 21% 63% 90% 89% 87% 23% 10% 3%
 KOEPKA Brooks
 B. Koepka
8
95
221
 17.9 — — — T56 CUT — — T9 — —
>99%
>99% 		76% >99% 15% 56% 12% 13% 49% >99% 76% 80% 15% 46% >99% 10% 56% 41% 16% >99% <1% 65% 70% 51% 24% 11% 3%
 HOEY Rico
 R. Hoey
3
114
80
 22.9 — T50 WD T70 T24 T67 CUT CUT — — 84% 90% 77% 7% 19% 83% 17% 17% 82% 41% 96% 98% 18% 87% 28% 23% 96% 23% 73% 22% 76% 94% 87% 97% 31% 16% 5%
 IM Sungjae
 S. Im
1
 —
79
 19.8 — — — — — — — — CUT — 63%
>99% 		37% >99% >99% 69% >99% >99% <1% 70% 62% 31% >99% 65% >99% >99% 90% 62% 18% >99% <1% 92% 54% 89% 44% 24% 8%
 SCHMID Matti
 M. Schmid
2
56
90
 22.5 — CUT CUT T56 CUT T73 49 T9 — T5 74% 90% 57% 18% 14% 65% 15% 12% 80% 71% 93% 99% 12% 81% 51% 17% 70% 72% 4% 28% 52% 81% 69% 91% 23% 9% 2%
 RAMEY Chad
 C. Ramey
3
81
155
 20.8 — T71 T63 T22 T48 — — T17 — CUT 73% 87% 67% 5% 11% 80% 11% 9% 87% 50% 93% >99% 12% 79% 32% 10% 95% 20% 66% 21% 73% 91% 86% 95% 16% 6% 1%
 BLAIR Zac
 Z. Blair
9
117
244
 8.1 — T50 — — — — — — — T8 — 10% 2% 6% <1% <1% 66% 20% 11% 60% 22% 45% 44% 2% 15% 7% 2% 55% <1% 78% 9% 54% 54% 16% 29% 2% <1% <1%
 KOHLES Ben
 B. Kohles
9
T171
253
 7.2 — — — — — — — — — T42 — 13% 2% 7% <1% <1% 62% 20% 9% 65% 19% 48% 37% 3% 12% 5% 2% 49% <1% 75% 9% 72% 52% 27% 31% 2% <1% <1%
 ECKROAT Austin
 A. Eckroat
3
145
161
 19.5 — CUT CUT T49 CUT — — T40 — T42 — 79% 85% 75% 1% 13% 71% 13% 10% 86% 24% 96% 98% 11% 76% 17% 11% 96% 38% 48% 10% 79% 99% 96% 98% 13% 5% 1%
 HOSSLER Beau
 B. Hossler
7
120
152
 19.4 — CUT CUT CUT — — — T23 — T37 — 96% 96% 88% 2% 12% 95% 11% 10% 89% 29% 94% 94% 12% 85% 18% 11% 99% 26% 73% 13% 81% 97% 96% 95% 15% 6% 2%
 FISK Steven
 S. Fisk
3
144
128
 21.3 — CUT CUT CUT — T60 — T37 — — 86% 71% 69% 2% >99% 89% 13% 10% 88% >99% 98% >99% 12% 78% 19% 13% 91% 49% 42% 14% 74% 96% 88% 97% 18% 7% 2%
 PUTNAM Andrew
 A. Putnam
7
46
122
 15.1 — — T2 CUT — — — CUT T44 — 75% 74% 83% 20% 10% 57% 9% 7% 31% 73% 47% 67% 10% 51% 51% 7% 58% 51% 13% 33% 38% 42% 56% 35% 10% 3% <1%
 JOHNSON Zach
 Z. Johnson
9
168
300
 7.2 — T61 T70 — — — — — — — — 7% <1% 8% >99% <1% 50% 11% 5% 38% 18% 22% 16% <1% 5% 4% <1% 24% <1% 44% >99% <1% 29% 12% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 NOH S.Y.
 S.Y. Noh
9
 —
326
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — 9% 7% 23% <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 18% 12% 19% <1% <1% 5% 3% <1% 10% 13% 20% 4% 24% 23% 51% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 MOUW William
 W. Mouw
3
86
126
 20.5 — T71 CUT CUT CUT — — T6 — — 78% 73% 57% 6% >99% 80% 12% 10% 84% >99% 97% 99% 11% 71% 32% 13% 88% 50% 24% 16% 54% 88% 83% 92% 21% 8% 2%
 WOODLAND Gary
 G. Woodland
3
173
148
 19.0 — CUT 72 CUT T64 — — CUT — — 76%
>99%
>99% 		3% 8% 42% 7% 5% 81% 30% 76% 88% 12% 74% >99% 6% 50% 42% 39% 19% 52% 95% 87% 94% 7% 2% <1%
 BAUCHOU Zach
 Z. Bauchou
5
65
172
 20.0 — 70 T13 T59 T48 — — T23 — T21 79% 89% 72% 6% 10% 85% 9% 7% 78% 54% 88% 97% 9% 70% 36% 8% 89% 40% 36% 18% 63% 70% 79% 87% 13% 5% <1%
 HOGE Tom
 T. Hoge
1
50
98
 20.5 — T40 T8 T70 CUT T14 CUT — CUT — 18% 29% 29% 25% >99% 50% >99% >99% <1% 95% 19% 42% >99% 40% 81% >99% 30% 41% 7% 56% 17% 63% 20% 63% 18% 5% <1%
 LIPSKY David
 D. Lipsky
7
105
150
 18.2 — — T44 T18 — — — CUT — T37 — 92% 94% 88% 4% 9% 94% 8% 7% 91% 38% 90% 94% 11% 83% 23% 8% 96% 20% 79% 18% 81% 94% 88% 93% 10% 4% <1%
 KIM S.H.
 S.H. Kim
5
71
153
 20.8 — T13 T18 63 T54 — — CUT — T42 82% 92% 73% 7% 12% 88% 10% 10% 82% 52% 93% 97% 11% 77% 36% 11% 94% 32% 52% 16% 71% 77% 81% 90% 22% 8% 2%
 SVENSSON Jesper
 J. Svensson
7
T128
167
 15.4 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — 97% 90% 79% 2% 12% 82% 10% 10% 78% 23% 76% 13% 9% 80% 16% 8% 67% 96% <1% 11% 32% 79% 90% 68% 10% 4% <1%
 FORD David
 D. Ford
3
72
279
 18.3 — T50 T13 CUT — — — T32 — T16 —
>99% 		92% 64% 1% 11% 91% 9% 10% 80% 32% 94% 96% 9% 73% 23% 9% 96% 64% 16% 8% 66% 78% 88% 88% 19% 8% 2%
 HUBBARD Mark
 M. Hubbard
3
116
139
 20.7 — T66 CUT 69 CUT — — T23 — T42 76% 86% 77% 4% 8% 84% 6% 6% 92% 32% 94% 99% 10% 85% 21% 8% 96% 23% 69% 16% 82% 94% 90% 98% 11% 4% <1%
 MONTGOMERY Taylor
 T. Montgomery
9
 —
177
 7.1 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 10% 7% 6% 2% <1% 65% 16% 8% 70% 23% 53% 13% 1% 18% 8% 1% 47% <1% 77% 10% 62% 59% 24% 27% <1% <1% <1%
 PHILLIPS Chandler
 C. Phillips
3
111
168
 19.6 — T19 T63 CUT T66 — — T63 — — 80% 87% 71% 3% 8% 79% 7% 6% 93% 28% 96% 98% 8% 85% 20% 7% 97% 27% 64% 11% 81% 97% 94% 98% 11% 4% <1%
 SIGG Greyson
 G. Sigg
9
 —
291
 6.7 — — — — — — — — — — — 14% 3% 4% <1% <1% 62% 11% 6% 72% 12% 53% 39% 2% 13% 4% 2% 65% <1% 80% 4% 74% 69% 48% 34% 2% <1% <1%
 HADWIN Adam
 A. Hadwin
9
147
218
 7.2 — — — — — — — CUT — T21 — 12% 2% 6% 2% <1% 62% 10% 5% 58% 20% 36% 13% 1% 19% 6% 1% 34% <1% 76% 9% 36% 59% 19% 31% 1% <1% <1%
 KIZZIRE Patton
 P. Kizzire
3
87
230
 16.8 — T24 CUT — 72 — — T13 — — 48% 69% 68% 2% 4% 68% 4% 3% 88% 36% 86% 97% 8% 65% 22% 3% 90% 12% 70% 13% 53% 90% 84% 94% 5% 1% <1%
 KIM Chan
 C. Kim
9
149
260
 8.8 — — CUT — — — — T56 — T26 — 10% 2% 5% <1% <1% 54% 9% 4% 73% 16% 45% 32% 2% 16% 5% 2% 44% <1% 81% 7% 69% 51% 27% 28% 1% <1% <1%
 YELLAMARAJU Sudarshan
 S. Yellamaraju
5
67
216
 20.0 — T13 CUT T56 T54 — — T17 — T37 82% 91% 69% 3% 9% 85% 6% 7% 79% 42% 91% 95% 7% 72% 31% 7% 93% 38% 40% 10% 70% 76% 87% 85% 15% 6% 1%
 WU Dylan
 D. Wu
6
126
361
 18.3 — T31 T44 CUT — — — 66 — T50 — 90% 80% 79% <1% 6% 92% 4% 5% 93% 8% 95% 95% 7% 76% 6% 5% 99% 23% 74% 3% 93% 95% 95% 97% 8% 3% <1%
 SADDIER Adrien
 A. Saddier
4
157
92
 19.0 — CUT T70 CUT T60 — — T56 — CUT — 94% 92% 72% 6% 9% 87% 5% 6% 91% 33% 88% 51% 8% 89% 22% 11% 67% 94% 1% >99% <1% 85% 82% 93% 8% 3% <1%
 SIMPSON Webb
 W. Simpson
3
177
485
 13.3 — T55 — — CUT — — CUT — — — 61% 30% 71% <1% 3% 51% 2% 2% 86% 7% 83% 93% 6% 53% 4% 2% 75% 8% 59% 3% 62% 80% 90% 96% 3% <1% <1%
 RYDER Sam
 S. Ryder
7
136
229
 16.1 — — T27 T59 — — — CUT — CUT — 93% 84% 91% <1% 5% 77% 3% 3% 85% 18% 70% 41% 5% 70% 11% 2% 91% 17% 80% 7% 84% 95% 97% 73% 3% <1% <1%
 NAKAJIMA Keita
 K. Nakajima
4
169
118
 18.1 — CUT CUT 64 71 — — WD — — — 96% 94% 67% 4% 8% 88% 5% 5% 92% 26% 92% 51% 5% 90% 19% 9% 81% 96% <1% >99% <1% 92% 93% 94% 6% 2% <1%
 CLANTON Luke
 L. Clanton
3
T106
192
 19.1 — CUT WD CUT — — — CUT — T5 —
>99%
>99% 		82% <1% 8% 94% 5% 6% 93% 17% 97% 91% 6% 87% 13% 7% 99% 39% 59% 6% 93% 97% 97% 97% 9% 3% <1%
 VANDERLAAN John
 J. VanDerLaan
5
124
255
 19.4 — CUT CUT T43 T60 — — CUT — T21 — 90% 87% 82% <1% 6% 91% 4% 5% 93% 13% 94% 91% 6% 80% 10% 5% 97% 33% 63% 4% 92% 95% 94% 96% 7% 2% <1%
 SVENSSON Adam
 A. Svensson
6
T138
353
 18.6 — T40 CUT CUT — — — CUT — T26 — 91% 91% 80% <1% 5% 95% 3% 5% 94% 8% 95% 97% 6% 83% 7% 5% >99% 17% 81% 3% 95% 99% 97% 98% 8% 3% <1%
 PAVON Matthieu
 M. Pavon
3
79
263
 17.9 — T55 T27 T38 CUT — — T17 — T42 62% 62% 51% 2% 4% 79% 3% 2% 86% 32% 90% 96% 5% 75% 22% 3% 70% 68% 5% 8% 26% 79% 63% 95% 5% 1% <1%
 FISHBURN Patrick
 P. Fishburn
7
T160
154
 17.7 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — 93% 94% 88% 3% 5% 93% 3% 3% 96% 23% 93% 79% 5% 87% 16% 4% 96% 17% 83% 10% 87% 98% 95% 97% 3% <1% <1%
 VEGAS Jhonattan
 J. Vegas
1
99
101
 19.6 — — CUT CUT — T78 44 — T18 — 39% 40% 40% 14% >99% 57% >99% >99% <1% >99% 27% 15% >99% 58% 63% >99% 50% 15% 40% 43% 47% 81% 35% 86% 7% 2% <1%
 SILVERMAN Ben
 B. Silverman
9
123
241
 7.3 — — — — — — — T40 — T16 — 9% 2% 5% 1% <1% 56% 6% 3% 75% 19% 41% 26% <1% 16% 6% <1% 37% <1% 82% 7% 48% 47% 20% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 MOLINARI Francesco
 F. Molinari
9
 —
295
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — 9% 6% 15% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 18% 15% 10% <1% <1% 6% 4% <1% <1% 54% <1% >99% <1% 4% 14% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 POTGIETER Aldrich
 A. Potgieter
2
29
71
 19.9 — — CUT CUT CUT T60 5 — CUT — 55% 75% 38% >99% >99% 50% 5% 9% 52% >99% 90% 98% 8% 63% 64% 16% 64% 43% 2% 24% 16% 50% 62% 59% 36% 11% 2%
 GONZALEZ Emilio
 E. Gonzalez
5
163
176
 17.5 — T50 CUT T65 WD — — — — — — 90% 91% 82% 2% 5% 89% 3% 3% 95% 19% 95% 88% 4% 84% 15% 4% 95% 31% 65% 7% 89% 97% 96% 98% 3% <1% <1%
 EWART A.J.
 A.J. Ewart
6
70
296
 19.9 — CUT T44 T49 T28 — — T13 — T26 79% 90% 64% 1% 5% 91% 3% 4% 87% 28% 93% 98% 5% 73% 22% 5% 96% 33% 48% 6% 79% 80% 87% 91% 11% 4% <1%
 SPRINGER Hayden
 H. Springer
9
T154
234
 7.2 — — — — — — — — — T26 — 8% 4% 4% <1% <1% 53% 6% 3% 76% 15% 51% 24% <1% 20% 5% <1% 53% <1% 82% 4% 75% 63% 43% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 VILIPS Karl
 K. Vilips
3
T106
145
 19.1 — — T18 T38 CUT — — CUT — — 84% 77% 62% 2% >99% 89% 3% 4% 95% 21% 99% 99% 4% 84% 17% 6% 95% 41% 45% 6% 75% 98% 93% 98% 7% 2% <1%
 YOUNG Carson
 C. Young
9
151
165
 9.7 — — T44 — — — — T52 — T66 — 9% 3% 4% 4% <1% 60% 6% 3% 79% 22% 51% 26% <1% 27% 8% <1% 53% <1% 84% 8% 79% 70% 40% 33% <1% <1% <1%
 SNEDEKER Brandt
 B. Snedeker
9
 —
305
 8.0 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — 6% <1% 4% <1% <1% 51% 3% <1% 72% 13% 28% 22% <1% 13% 4% <1% 23% <1% 46% 6% 18% 43% 14% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 LEBIODA Hank
 H. Lebioda
5
152
215
 18.8 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — T40 — T61 — 83% 76% 81% 1% 3% 87% 2% 2% 95% 16% 92% 78% 3% 79% 13% 3% 91% 13% 83% 6% 90% 93% 90% 96% 2% <1% <1%
 SHIPLEY Neal
 N. Shipley
5
184
134
 19.8 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — CUT — CUT —
>99%
>99% 		82% 3% 5% 90% 3% 2% 96% 21% 95% 86% 3% 88% 17% 6% 96% 31% 66% 7% 90% 98% 97% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 GRIFFIN Lanto
 L. Griffin
7
 —
220
 15.7 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — 86% 83% 90% 1% 3% 71% 1% 2% 86% 17% 66% 23% 3% 76% 13% 2% 88% 10% 87% 7% 91% 96% 97% 70% 1% <1% <1%
 PAUL Jeremy
 J. Paul
9
T128
293
 6.6 — — — CUT — — — — — T8 — 8% 2% 3% <1% <1% 53% 3% 1% 69% 11% 45% 16% <1% 16% 4% <1% 33% <1% 57% 3% 48% 40% 25% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 CHAMP Cameron
 C. Champ
9
 —
308
 5.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 8% 2% 3% <1% <1% 41% 3% 1% 58% 9% 45% 12% <1% 15% 3% <1% 42% <1% 67% 2% 40% 41% 36% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 CHATFIELD Davis
 D. Chatfield
5
164
248
 19.2 — CUT T63 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 — 89% 89% 77% <1% 3% 88% 1% 2% 96% 12% 94% 87% 3% 83% 10% 2% 97% 28% 68% 3% 93% 98% 97% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 GARNETT Brice
 B. Garnett
3
146
383
 17.9 — T31 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T50 — 64% 38% 68% <1% 1% 83% <1% <1% 97% 7% 92% 98% 3% 74% 5% 2% 95% 7% 87% 2% 80% 96% 88% 99% 2% <1% <1%
 MARTIN Ben
 B. Martin
9
 —
402
 4.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 8% 6% 19% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 19% 5% 16% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 19% 3% 49% 2% 64% 37% 58% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 RILEY Davis
 D. Riley
2
82
107
 21.0 — T6 T56 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 69% 91% 63% >99% 4% 68% 2% 2% 92% >99% 91% 97% 4% 81% 36% 7% 76% 40% 29% 14% 48% 91% 91% 94% 6% 2% <1%
 SKINNS David
 D. Skinns
9
T128
272
 5.7 — — — — — — — — — T8 — 6% 2% 5% 1% <1% 54% 1% <1% 75% 15% 33% 11% <1% 15% 4% <1% 26% <1% 84% 6% 56% 38% 12% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 LOWER Justin
 J. Lower
7
148
190
 15.9 — — CUT T30 — — — CUT — CUT — 90% 89% 90% 2% 2% 73% <1% 1% 86% 19% 68% 31% 3% 77% 14% 2% 82% 13% 83% 8% 91% 95% 96% 72% 2% <1% <1%
 SUBER Jackson
 J. Suber
7
170
194
 15.7 — — CUT T70 — — — T63 — CUT — 90% 87% 87% 1% 3% 69% 1% 2% 84% 15% 74% 21% 2% 76% 13% 2% 86% 24% 71% 4% 92% 94% 98% 72% 1% <1% <1%
 GOODWIN Noah
 N. Goodwin
9
 —
297
 6.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 8% 3% 3% <1% <1% 52% 2% <1% 72% 9% 49% 15% <1% 18% 3% <1% 48% <1% 73% 2% 66% 59% 45% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 NORLANDER Henrik
 H. Norlander
9
T181
317
 6.5 — — — CUT — — — — — T57 — 8% 3% 2% <1% <1% 59% 1% <1% 74% 10% 39% 10% <1% 20% 3% <1% 33% <1% 31% 3% 48% 54% 25% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 PETERSON Paul
 P. Peterson
9
T106
232
 5.6 — — — — — — — — — T5 — 6% 2% 5% 2% <1% 53% 2% <1% 71% 16% 36% 13% <1% 17% 6% <1% 23% <1% 77% 5% 59% 33% 11% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 NYHOLM Pontus
 P. Nyholm
5
90
249
 18.6 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — T13 — T16 — 80% 89% 70% 2% 2% 85% <1% 1% 91% 23% 90% 88% 2% 78% 19% 2% 93% 24% 61% 4% 83% 89% 92% 91% 2% <1% <1%
 SALINDA Isaiah
 I. Salinda
7
141
239
 18.0 — CUT CUT T30 — — — CUT — T50 — 88% 90% 81% <1% 3% 90% <1% 2% 95% 12% 91% 72% 3% 84% 11% 2% 95% 22% 74% 3% 93% 96% 95% 94% 3% <1% <1%
 LEE S.T.
 S.T. Lee
5
167
276
 16.9 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — — — — — 84% 86% 76% <1% 2% 87% <1% 1% 96% 10% 92% 83% 2% 81% 8% 1% 95% 19% 76% 2% 93% 97% 96% 97% 1% <1% <1%
 LAMPRECHT Christo
 C. Lamprecht
5
158
188
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — CUT — T50 — 88% 92% 78% 2% 3% 87% <1% 1% 97% 15% 95% 81% 2% 88% 13% 3% 96% 24% 72% 3% 93% 98% 97% 97% 2% <1% <1%
 STREELMAN Kevin
 K. Streelman
9
109
409
 11.3 — — CUT CUT — — — T32 — T8 — 61% 36% 84% <1% <1% 32% <1% <1% 49% 8% 37% 18% 1% 42% 6% <1% 51% 3% 74% 2% 50% 62% 69% 40% <1% <1% <1%
 VAN ROOYEN Erik
 E. Van Rooyen
2
 —
146
 18.6 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT 60% 63% 72% 5% 2% 62% <1% <1% 93% 22% 86% 73% 2% 88% 17% 3% 61% 39% 38% 8% 80% 98% 95% 96% 1% <1% <1%
 MULLINAX Trey
 T. Mullinax
9
 —
376
 4.4 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 1% 3% <1% <1% 56% <1% <1% 54% 5% 41% 12% <1% 12% 2% <1% 44% <1% 53% 1% 37% 56% 36% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 WALKER Danny
 D. Walker
3
135
227
 19.7 — CUT CUT T38 CUT — — T40 — T61 70% 79% 67% 1% 1% 79% <1% <1% 98% 12% 96% 95% 1% 87% 10% 1% 94% 17% 73% 3% 91% 98% 94% >99% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPBELL Brian
 B. Campbell
1
165
96
 22.8 — CUT CUT — T54 T78 CUT — CUT — 49% 34% 29% >99% >99% 72% >99% >99% <1% >99% 58% 21% >99% 72% 52% >99% 73% 16% 54% 21% 66% 96% 67% 96% 1% <1% <1%
 HIRATA Kensei
 K. Hirata
5
122
180
 19.0 — T24 CUT 74 T54 — — CUT — CUT — 89% 94% 72% 3% 2% 89% <1% 1% 97% 15% 94% 68% 2% 90% 15% 2% 94% 39% 53% 3% 87% 96% 95% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 KNOX Russell
 R. Knox
9
 —
358
 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 4% 19% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 15% 7% 10% <1% <1% 5% 3% <1% 4% <1% 43% 2% 27% 16% 34% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 LAIRD Martin
 M. Laird
9
T181
397
 2.5 — — — — — — — — — T57 — 4% 5% 12% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 20% 5% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 3% 12% 4% 1% 3% 15% 28% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HOFFMAN Charley
 C. Hoffman
9
 —
347
 13.4 — — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — 61% 53% 87% <1% <1% 49% <1% <1% 55% 8% 41% 16% <1% 58% 6% <1% 25% 5% 69% 3% 91% 76% 79% 53% <1% <1% <1%
 KANG Jeffrey
 J. Kang
5
 —
235
 18.7 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — 80% 85% 79% 1% <1% 85% <1% <1% 97% 12% 90% 73% <1% 83% 11% <1% 90% 13% 83% 3% 91% 96% 93% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 HARDY Nick
 N. Hardy
9
 —
482
 5.2 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 7% 12% 13% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 24% 3% 19% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 37% 2% 62% <1% 69% 62% 81% 14% <1% <1% <1%
 MALNATI Peter
 P. Malnati
3
T154
 — 17.8 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 — 61% 68% 61% <1% <1% 67% <1% <1% 96% 4% 89% 96% 1% 76% 4% <1% 97% 3% 88% 1% 70% 99% 95% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNCAN Tyler
 T. Duncan
9
T179
487
 3.6 — — — — — — — — — T50 — 4% 4% 16% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 5% 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 12% <1% 54% <1% 42% 26% 49% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HOSHINO Rikuya
 R. Hoshino
9
 —
375
 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 10% 15% 4% <1% <1% 12% <1% <1% 40% 5% 26% <1% <1% 16% 2% <1% 9% 66% <1% <1% 4% 30% 56% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 VILLEGAS Camilo
 C. Villegas
9
185
447
 6.1 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — 63 — 3% 3% 18% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 21% 5% 10% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 10% <1% 45% 1% 16% 19% 41% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 SCHENK Adam
 A. Schenk
3
103
141
 20.6 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 77 — T60 — — 69% 70% 55% 14% >99% 74% <1% <1% 96% >99% 95% 97% 1% 79% 24% 2% 86% 7% 63% 7% 40% 96% 87% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 FRITTELLI Dylan
 D. Frittelli
9
 —
439
 1.8 — — — — — — — — — — — 9% 9% 7% <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 18% 4% 12% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 2% 49% <1% <1% <1% 11% 34% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 BYRD Jonathan
 J. Byrd
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 2% 1% 20% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 12% 6% 6% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 2% <1% 42% 1% 22% 10% 20% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 GOMEZ Fabian
 F. Gomez
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 2% 3% 20% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 17% 5% 7% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 3% 2% 42% 1% 25% 17% 27% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 GORDON Will
 W. Gordon
9
 —
322
 4.9 — — — — — — — — — — — 6% 3% 2% <1% <1% 53% <1% <1% 58% 6% 42% 9% <1% 21% 3% <1% 44% <1% 75% <1% 40% 61% 41% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGS Harry
 H. Higgs
9
 —
250
 8.0 — — CUT — — — — CUT — CUT — 5% 2% 3% 3% <1% 48% <1% <1% 70% 10% 36% 8% <1% 22% 5% <1% 28% <1% 81% 2% 68% 55% 27% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 LIST Luke
 L. List
9
 —
496
 4.6 — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — 4% 10% 14% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 22% 5% 12% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 10% 5% 34% <1% 26% 34% 56% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNLAP Nick
 N. Dunlap
3
178
225
 16.4 — T61 WD — — — — CUT — CUT — 63% 91% 57% 1% <1% 64% <1% <1% 98% 9% 96% 82% <1% 91% 11% <1% 99% 6% 80% 1% 85% >99% >99% >99% <1% <1% <1%
 WARING Paul
 P. Waring
9
 —
292
 4.8 — — — — — — — CUT — CUT — 7% 14% 6% 1% <1% 13% <1% <1% 47% 9% 23% <1% <1% 19% 4% <1% 3% 57% <1% 2% 2% 21% 23% 31% <1% <1% <1%
 MERRITT Troy
 T. Merritt
9
187
493
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — T66 — 8% 5% 8% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 22% 5% 10% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 2% 43% <1% <1% 1% 13% 30% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 ROZO Marcelo
 M. Rozo
6
174
472
 18.6 — CUT CUT T65 CUT — — CUT — 65 — 77% 81% 72% <1% <1% 92% <1% <1% 98% 4% 92% 88% <1% 79% 4% <1% 95% 11% 85% <1% 95% 97% 93% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE K.H.
 K.H. Lee
9
 — — 9.7 — — — — — — — CUT — — — 68% 53% 78% <1% <1% 29% <1% <1% 55% 3% 53% 10% <1% 57% 4% <1% 72% 7% 64% <1% 78% 90% 95% 54% <1% <1% <1%
 WILLETT Danny
 D. Willett
9
T171
377
 11.0 — — — — — — — CUT — T42 — 80% 73% 65% >99% <1% 42% <1% <1% 60% 4% 44% 2% <1% 70% 5% <1% 39% 79% 1% <1% 25% 74% 91% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGHSMITH Joe
 J. Highsmith
2
153
132
 21.4 — T66 CUT CUT T54 T75 — 67 — — 77% 82% 56% 8% >99% 78% <1% <1% 98% >99% 97% 90% 1% 85% 18% 2% 93% 20% 63% 3% 76% >99% 96% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 CAMPOS Rafael
 R. Campos
3
127
414
 17.9 — CUT T44 CUT CUT — — CUT — T16 — 58% 67% 58% <1% <1% 60% <1% <1% 99% 4% 93% 95% <1% 81% 4% <1% 96% 3% 91% <1% 94% 98% 93% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 COODY Parker
 P. Coody
9
 — — 4.3 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 12% 8% <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 45% 3% 38% <1% <1% 13% 1% <1% 34% 4% 49% <1% 44% 58% 76% 36% <1% <1% <1%
 CROWE Trace
 T. Crowe
5
 — — 12.9 — — — — — — — — — — — 83% 90% 77% 3% 2% 85% <1% 2% 96% 12% 92% 69% 2% 87% 12% 3% 93% 13% 84% 3% 94% 96% 94% 95% 3% <1% <1%
 KISNER Kevin
 K. Kisner
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 3% 13% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 38% 4% 16% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 16% <1% 65% <1% 38% 41% 47% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 STALLINGS Scott
 S. Stallings
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 1% 2% 11% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 34% 4% 21% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 5% 1% 36% <1% 19% 16% 29% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 TODD Brendon
 B. Todd
9
 — — 11.1 — — — — — — — CUT — — — 66% 48% 79% <1% <1% 62% <1% <1% 81% 4% 64% 35% <1% 62% 4% <1% 80% 5% 80% <1% 78% 81% 93% 84% <1% <1% <1%
 MCGIRT William
 W. McGirt
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 2% 1% 20% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 14% 5% 6% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 2% <1% 46% 1% 26% 7% 18% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 THOMPSON Michael
 M. Thompson
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 5% 11% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 38% 5% 23% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 12% 2% 42% <1% 29% 37% 42% 34% <1% <1% <1%
 STUARD Brian
 B. Stuard
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 2% 21% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 15% 5% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% <1% 52% 1% 31% 14% 29% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 TWAY Kevin
 K. Tway
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 3% 12% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 12% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 7% 3% 29% <1% 24% 27% 48% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 KODAIRA Satoshi
 S. Kodaira
9
 — — 1.6 — — — — — — — — — — — 6% 7% 9% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 19% 4% 11% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 2% 24% 3% <1% 2% 13% 36% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 LASHLEY Nate
 N. Lashley
9
 — — 3.6 — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 7% 12% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 33% 5% 25% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 24% <1% 39% 1% 55% 51% 45% 33% <1% <1% <1%
 OVERTON Jeff
 J. Overton
9
 — — 1.9 — — — — — — — — — — — 9% 10% 12% <1% <1% 9% <1% <1% 21% 5% 9% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 2% 37% 3% 1% 3% 15% 33% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 HARRINGTON Padraig
 P. Harrington
9
 — — 4.1 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 4% 18% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 17% >99% 5% <1% <1% 5% >99% <1% <1% 12% 11% >99% <1% 7% 10% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 BADDELEY Aaron
 A. Baddeley
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 6% 14% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 38% 5% 15% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 4% <1% 66% 1% 47% 48% 50% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 DUFNER Jason
 J. Dufner
9
 — — 4.0 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — 3% 3% 13% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 14% >99% 6% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% <1% 11% 5% 1% 3% 6% 12% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 PALMER Ryan
 R. Palmer
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 2% 7% 22% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 21% 5% 8% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 10% <1% 49% 1% 27% 24% 29% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 PIERCY Scott
 S. Piercy
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 2% 2% 20% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 13% 5% 6% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 2% <1% 45% 1% 24% 11% 15% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 HAAS Bill
 B. Haas
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 5% 21% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 18% 5% 9% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 6% 2% 49% 1% 32% 23% 38% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 WATNEY Nick
 N. Watney
9
 — — 1.3 — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 3% 14% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 15% 5% 7% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 1% 4% 16% 1% 6% 10% 22% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 REAVIE Chez
 C. Reavie
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 3% 19% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 18% 5% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 6% <1% 50% 1% 30% 22% 36% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 BAE Sangmoon
 S. Bae
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — — — 5% 7% 19% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 20% 4% 10% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 8% 2% 50% <1% 35% 28% 48% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 LANDRY Andrew
 A. Landry
9
 — — 3.7 — — CUT — — — — — — — — 5% 8% 19% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 20% 4% 11% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 9% 3% 51% <1% 35% 30% 51% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 WERENSKI Richy
 R. Werenski
9
 — — 2.4 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 4% 15% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 12% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 8% <1% 45% <1% 32% 24% 52% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 DONALD Luke
 L. Donald
9
 — — 1.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 3% 10% <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 16% 5% 5% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% <1% 38% <1% 1% <1% 3% 12% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 WISE Aaron
 A. Wise
9
 — — 12.3 — — — CUT — — — CUT — CUT — 73% 65% 75% <1% <1% 38% <1% <1% 62% 3% 59% 11% <1% 62% 4% <1% 78% 9% 68% <1% 77% 93% 98% 59% <1% <1% <1%
 NORRMAN Vincent
 V. Norrman
9
 — — 8.9 — — — — — — — — — — — 73% 65% 72% <1% 1% 40% <1% 1% 58% 3% 61% 7% <1% 66% 4% <1% 60% 14% 52% <1% 69% 91% 98% 53% <1% <1% <1%
 COOK Austin
 A. Cook
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 3% 4% 15% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 7% <1% 42% <1% 30% 24% 49% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 HUH John
 J. Huh
9
 — — 3.4 — — — — — — — — — — — 3% 6% 9% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 40% 4% 28% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 18% 3% 42% <1% 32% 44% 55% 36% <1% <1% <1%
 LINGMERTH David
 D. Lingmerth
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 6% 11% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 40% 4% 25% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 15% 3% 44% <1% 32% 40% 47% 34% <1% <1% <1%
 HADLEY Chesson
 C. Hadley
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — — CUT — 3% 5% 17% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 19% 4% 11% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 9% <1% 48% <1% 28% 28% 49% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 LONG Adam
 A. Long
9
 — — 4.2 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — 3% 4% 17% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 5% <1% 46% <1% 31% 20% 42% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 PAN C.T.
 C.T. Pan
9
 — — 8.3 — — — — — — — — — — — 62% 47% 79% <1% 2% 30% <1% 1% 62% 4% 53% 8% 2% 58% 5% 1% 66% 3% 70% <1% 69% 70% 92% 45% 1% <1% <1%
 LINDHEIM Nicholas
 N. Lindheim
9
 — — 4.0 — — — — — — — — — WD — 2% 5% 11% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 39% 4% 22% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 13% 2% 45% <1% 30% 35% 40% 32% <1% <1% <1%
 TOSTI Alejandro
 A. Tosti
6
 — — 18.9 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — 84% 90% 73% <1% <1% 89% <1% <1% 99% 6% 93% 79% <1% 84% 7% <1% 98% 13% 84% <1% 97% 96% 98% 96% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIBBLE Cody
 C. Gribble
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — — — — 5% 9% 17% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 21% 4% 13% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 12% 3% 49% <1% 36% 33% 59% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 MCCUMBER Tyler
 T. McCumber
9
 — — 9.2 — — — — — — — — — — — 71% 61% 79% <1% <1% 40% <1% <1% 61% 4% 52% 11% <1% 60% 4% <1% 70% 8% 70% <1% 77% 91% 97% 60% <1% <1% <1%
 STANGER Jimmy
 J. Stanger
9
125
 — 6.6 — — CUT — — — — T32 — T26 — 4% 10% 8% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 44% 4% 32% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 26% 4% 43% <1% 41% 39% 55% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 SINGH Vijay
 V. Singh
9
159
 — 4.2 — T40 — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 18% >99% <1% 2% <1% <1% 19% >99% 4% <1% <1% 3% 2% <1% <1% <1% 30% 3% 10% 6% 3% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 DAVIS Cam
 C. Davis
2
176
 — 17.9 — CUT CUT T70 73 — — CUT — — 63% 73% 66% 4% <1% 64% <1% <1% 95% 14% 91% 87% <1% 82% 14% 1% 71% 10% 73% 3% 76% >99% 98% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 HAHN James
 J. Hahn
9
186
 — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — 64 — 2% 2% 18% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 14% 5% 8% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 3% <1% 45% 1% 18% 10% 22% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 SARGENT Gordon
 G. Sargent
3
T128
 — 18.2 — CUT CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 —
>99%
>99% 		66% <1% <1% 92% <1% <1% 98% 2% 96% 87% <1% 85% 4% <1% >99% 16% 81% <1% 97% 99% 98% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 BREHM Ryan
 R. Brehm
9
T154
 — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — T26 — 6% 8% 15% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 22% 5% 10% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 6% 4% 34% <1% 28% 17% 35% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 CAPAN III Frankie
 F. Capan III
9
T179
 — 9.0 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T50 — 5% 3% 2% 1% <1% 41% <1% <1% 72% 8% 44% 7% <1% 21% 4% <1% 36% <1% 73% 1% 62% 56% 40% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 STREB Robert
 R. Streb
9
T181
 — 3.0 — — — — — — — — — T57 — 3% 4% 17% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 15% 4% 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 5% <1% 47% <1% 22% 15% 34% 7% <1% <1% <1%