PGA Tour 
 DP World Tour
 LIV Golf
 Korn Ferry Tour
 Challenge Tour
| FedExCup |
 Projected Schedules 
 Projected Standings
 Current Standings
 PGA Tour Schedule
UPDATED —
Schedule Model Methodology
This table displays the probabilities (based on our season-long simulations) of each PGA Tour member starting each tournament on the 2026 schedule. We start by predicting a baseline probability for each player/event based on their age, position on the priority list, their DG and OWGR rank, their history at the event, and their general playing patterns (e.g. overall playing frequency, participation in DPWT events). For the Signature Events and the Majors (plus The Players), qualified players are locked into the field. During season simulations, players may also gain entry into certain events based on their performance, which overrides the baseline probability. In some cases, we manually adjust probabilities when we have reliable information that a player has commited to play (or not play) a tournament. These cases are denoted with a triangle, with more details available on hover.
Contributors: 
Eddie Bajek
, 
@Robopz
News/Announcements 
 | Manual Adjustments 
Player
Proj
Starts
SIG
Sentry
Sony Open 
The AMEX 
Farmers 
WMPO 
SIG
AT&T Pebble 
SIG
Genesis Inv 
Field
Cognizant 
SIG
Arnold Palmer
Puerto Rico
PLYRS
Field
The Players
Valspar
Houston Open
Valero
MAJ
Field
Masters
SIG
RBC Heritage
Zurich Classic
SIG
Miami
SIG
Truist
Myrtle Beach
MAJ
Field
PGA
CJ CUP
Charles Schwab
SIG
Memorial
Canadian Open
MAJ
Field
U.S. Open
SIG
Travelers
John Deere
Scottish Open
ISCO
MAJ
Field
The Open
Corales
3M Open
Rocket
Wyndham
St. Jude
BMW Champ
PLAYOFFS
TOUR Champ
 SCHEFFLER Scottie
 S. Scheffler
1
3
1
 20.8 — — 1 — T3 T4 T12 — >99% <1% >99% 31% 32% 34% >99% >99% 19% >99% >99% <1% >99% 23% 45% >99% 24% >99% >99% 17% 60% 2% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MCILROY Rory
 R. McIlroy
1
12
2
 18.5 — — — — — T14 T2 — >99% <1% >99% 30% 14% 36% >99% >99% 26% >99% >99% <1% >99% 9% 4% >99% 34% >99% >99% 5%
>99% 		<1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 93%
 FLEETWOOD Tommy
 T. Fleetwood
1
11
3
 18.5 — — — — — T4 T7 — >99% <1% >99% 47% 9% 34% >99% >99% 18% >99% >99% <1% >99% 12% 19% >99% 31% >99% >99% 8% 85% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 2% >99% 99% 88%
 SCHAUFFELE Xander
 X. Schauffele
1
25
9
 20.7 — — — CUT T41 T19 T7 — >99% <1% >99%
>99% 		8% 35% >99% >99% 22% >99% >99% <1% >99% 13% 10% >99% 21% >99% >99% 14% 70% <1% >99% <1% 3% 2% 5% 98% 92% 75%
 HENLEY Russell
 R. Henley
1
39
7
 19.0 — T19 T8 — — T19 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 26% 8% 38% >99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% 97% 11% 12% >99% 20% >99% >99% 13% 24% 3% >99% <1% 4% 3% 11% 90% 74% 47%
 MATSUYAMA Hideki
 H. Matsuyama
1
6
12
 21.1 — T13 — T11 2 T8 T28 — >99% <1% >99% 29% 12% 37% >99% >99% 21% >99% >99% <1% 97% 16% 27% >99% 22% >99% >99% 13% 38% 3% >99% <1% 3% 5% 9% >99% 98% 77%
 FITZPATRICK Matt
 M. Fitzpatrick
1
30
22
 20.8 — — T63 — 9 T14 T24 — >99% <1% >99% 41% 13% 30% >99% >99% 50% >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 12% >99% 33% >99% >99% 14% 89% <1% >99% <1% 4% 7% 14% 97% 89% 67%
 KIM Si Woo
 S. Kim
1
8
27
 25.2 — T11 T6 T2 T3 T45 T34 — >99% <1% >99% 31%
>99% 		48% >99% >99% 66% >99% >99% <1% >99% 37% 61% >99% 46% 86% >99% 66% 46% 13% >99% <1% 7% 4% 24% >99% >99% 89%
 MACINTYRE Robert
 R. MacIntyre
1
29
8
 22.2 — T4 T38 — — T37 T20 — >99% <1% >99% 50% 30% 31% >99% >99% 65% >99% >99% <1% 97% 38% 58% >99% 52% >99% >99% 26% 84% <1% >99% <1% 8% 7% 35% 96% 84% 60%
 GRIFFIN Ben
 B. Griffin
1
47
11
 25.1 — T19 T24 — T28 T37 T41 — >99% <1% >99% 62% 55% 34% >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% >99% 60% 88% >99% 46% >99% >99% 73% 51% 7% >99% <1% 24% 18% 53% 95% 84% 60%
 YOUNG Cameron
 C. Young
1
28
21
 20.9 — — — T22 T41 T55 T7 — >99% <1% >99% 55% 16% 30% >99% >99% 34% >99% >99% <1% >99% 25% 20% >99% 47% >99% >99% 29% 44% 2% >99% <1% 10% 17% 24% 96% 85% 59%
 KNAPP Jake
 J. Knapp
2
5
43
 24.8 — T11 — T5 8 T8 6 — >99% <1% >99% 73% 90% 78% 23% >99% 79% 52% >99% <1% 72% 91% 99% 98% 72% 53% 97% 90% 50% 27% 46% 30% 23% 20% 36% >99% >99% 87%
 ENGLISH Harris
 H. English
1
35
15
 21.5 — — T27 T22 T28 T24 T22 — >99% <1% >99% 29% 23% 38% >99% >99% 36% >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 56% >99% 26% >99% >99% 15% 57% 3% >99% <1% 6% 2% 20% 92% 78% 51%
 CANTLAY Patrick
 P. Cantlay
1
42
30
 19.1 — — T13 CUT — T14 T37 — >99% <1% >99% 27% 7% 35% >99% >99% 22% >99% >99% <1% 96% 12% 11% >99% 22% >99% >99% 13% 33% 3% >99% <1% 6% 11% 12% 89% 71% 42%
 MORIKAWA Collin
 C. Morikawa
1
4
5
 20.5 — CUT — — T54 1 T7 — >99% <1% >99% 30% 10% 32% >99% >99% 34% >99% >99% <1% >99% 16% 22% >99% 24% >99% >99% 17% 63% 1% >99% <1% <1% 3% 2% >99% >99% 95%
 BURNS Sam
 S. Burns
1
22
28
 20.9 — — T27 — CUT T6 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 53% 16% 32% >99% >99% 36% >99% >99% <1% 96% 28% 30% >99% 44% >99% >99% 24% 59% 2% >99% <1% 29% 7% 22% 94% 75% 43%
 NOREN Alex
 A. Noren
4
50
16
 21.1 — — CUT CUT — T29 T12 —
>99% 		<1%
>99% 		83% 83% 88% >99% 43% 67% 42% 46% 42% 78% 73% 44% 52% 65% >99% 50% 23% 89% 2% >99% <1% 19% 23% 40% 74% 53% 29%
 MCNEALY Maverick
 M. McNealy
1
31
25
 22.5 — T24 — 10 T13 T29 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 44% 29% 34% >99% >99% 35% >99% >99% <1% 96% 32% 65% >99% 38% >99% >99% 37% 49% 4% >99% <1% 29% 9% 26% 93% 78% 49%
 LOWRY Shane
 S. Lowry
1
32
31
 19.1 — — — — — T8 T24 >99% <1% >99% 38% 7% 37% >99%
>99% 		35% >99% >99% <1% 97% 13% 9% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 8% 43% 1% >99% <1% 5% 3% 18% 87% 68% 39%
 FOWLER Rickie
 R. Fowler
1
38
68
 20.3 — — T18 — T18 T19 T28 — >99% <1% >99% 22%
>99% 		49% 18% >99% 29% >99% >99% <1% 95% 13% 44% >99% 36% 82% >99% 47% 27% 12% 71% 11% 19% 24% 38% 86% 66% 36%
 SPAUN J.J.
 J.J. Spaun
1
110
10
 21.6 — T40 — CUT — T45 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 39% 34% 41% >99% >99% 54% >99% >99% <1% >99% 34% 73% >99% 37% >99% >99% 34% 44% 9% >99% <1% 27% 11% 46% 80% 61% 35%
 HOVLAND Viktor
 V. Hovland
1
57
17
 18.4 — — — — T10 T58 T41 — >99% <1% >99% 43% 10% 29% >99% >99% 15% >99% >99% <1% 96% 13% 8% >99% 26% >99% >99% 13% 83% <1% >99% <1% 10% 13% 13% 78% 58% 31%
 ABERG Ludvig
 L. Aberg
1
69
23
 19.5 — — WD CUT — T37 T20 — >99% <1% >99% 32% 12% 29% >99% >99% 20% >99% >99% <1% 96% 19% 14% >99% 33% >99% >99% 22% 65% 1% >99% <1% 14% 17% 22% 74% 54% 27%
 KITAYAMA Kurt
 K. Kitayama
1
16
29
 22.4 — T40 CUT — T24 T48 T2 — >99% <1% >99% 42% 31% 36% >99% >99% 57% >99% >99% <1% >99% 30% 52% >99% 36% 84% >99% 40% 47% 4% 73% 6% 18% 5% 23% >99% 92% 66%
 BRIDGEMAN Jacob
 J. Bridgeman
1
1
20
 24.8 — T4 T13 — T18 T8 1 — >99% <1% >99% 59% 52% 32% >99% >99% 77% >99% >99% <1% >99% 61% 76% >99% 48% >99% >99% 79% 52% 10% >99% <1% 12% 4% 22% >99% >99% 98%
 THOMAS Justin
 J. Thomas
1
 —
14
 15.5 — — — — — — — — >99% <1% >99% 48% 9% 35% >99% >99% 20% >99% >99% <1% >99% 15% 11% >99% 23% >99% >99% 14% 67% 1% >99% <1% 17% 14% 24% 70% 50% 26%
 GOTTERUP Chris
 C. Gotterup
1
2
6
 25.4 — 1 — T18 1 T37 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 59%
>99% 		33% >99% >99% 77% >99% >99% <1% >99% 61% 83% >99% 52% >99% >99% 77% 64% 5% >99% <1% 10% 3% 13% >99% >99% >99%
 GERARD Ryan
 R. Gerard
1
7
26
 24.7 — 2 T2 T11 — T45 T28 >99% <1% >99% 54% 37% 32% >99% >99% 74% >99% >99% <1% >99% 50% 65% >99% 43% 85% >99% 71% 51% 7% 69% 11% 7% 8% 24% >99% >99% 84%
 LEE Min Woo
 M. Lee
2
9
33
 22.1 — — T38 — T28 T2 T12 — >99% <1% >99% 72%
>99% 		60% >99% >99% 26% 52% 98% <1% 73% 77% 88% 94% 43% 54% 93% 27% 81% 1% 45% 7% 4% 24% 7% >99% 97% 82%
 HALL Harry
 H. Hall
1
43
60
 24.4 — T6 T24 — CUT T24 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 60% 50% 30% >99% >99% 68% >99% >99% <1% 94% 57% 89% >99% 56% >99% >99% 57% 59% 7% >99% <1% 36% 31% 65% 86% 65% 35%
 SCOTT Adam
 A. Scott
3
18
52
 20.9 — T40 T24 T30 — — 4 — >99% <1% >99% 86% 58% 93% >99% 77% 55% 38% 73% 17% 72% 63% 43% 71% 52% 45% 65% 28% 78% 12% >99% <1% 14% 7% 20% 96% 76% 48%
 BHATIA Akshay
 A. Bhatia
1
15
38
 23.8 — — CUT CUT T3 T6 T16 — >99% <1% >99% 53% 32% 26% >99% >99% 69% >99% >99% <1% 95% 39% 74% >99% 48% >99% >99% 47% 44% 4% >99% <1% 31% 25% 38% >99% 91% 61%
 BRADLEY Keegan
 K. Bradley
1
100
19
 18.9 — CUT — T43 — T29 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 32% 8% 41% >99% >99% 26% >99% >99% <1% >99% 14% 19% >99% 23% >99% >99% 10% 20% 5% >99% <1% 19% 16% 39% 61% 39% 17%
 ROSE Justin
 J. Rose
1
10
4
 19.4 — — CUT 1 — T37 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 24% 6% 47% >99% >99% 15% >99% >99% <1% >99% 8% 12% >99% 24% >99% >99% 4% 55% 2% >99% <1% 2% <1% 7% >99% 86% 47%
 COODY Pierceson
 P. Coody
5
13
45
 26.3 — T13 T18 T2 T10 T48 T16 — >99% <1% >99% 91% 95% 86% 22% 89% 91% 48% 87% 12% 68% 94% 96% 81% 76% 52% 81% 93% 57% 37% 40% 54% 31% 35% 50% >99% 92% 69%
 HOJGAARD Rasmus
 R. Hojgaard
3
75
48
 21.4 — — T44 T30 T24 — — 27% 11% >99% 86% 89% 63% >99% 42% 65% 47% 47% 42% 68% 83% 74% 42% 82% 50% 52% 59% 98% <1% >99% <1% 44% 61% 56% 72% 53% 30%
 TAYLOR Nick
 N. Taylor
1
34
57
 21.6 — T13 T27 — T28 T24 T28 — >99% <1% >99% 38% 23% 38% >99% >99% 60% >99% >99% <1% 95% 22% 35% >99% 44% >99% >99% 24% 64% 3% >99% <1% 12% 4% 38% 79% 55% 26%
 DAY Jason
 J. Day
1
26
36
 18.7 — — T2 T38 — T24 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 19% 34% 52% >99% >99% 13% >99% >99% <1% >99% 8% 2% >99% 28% 83% >99% 42% 10% 11% 74% 9% 7% 7% 18% 78% 50% 21%
 STRAKA Sepp
 S. Straka
1
17
13
 20.9 — — CUT — T18 T2 T50 — >99% <1% >99% 48% 17% 36% >99% >99% 49% >99% >99% <1% 96% 23% 37% >99% 29% >99% >99% 39% 58% 3% >99% <1% 11% 5% 21% 98% 79% 41%
 HOJGAARD Nicolai
 N. Hojgaard
3
41
55
 20.0 — — — T22 T3 — — 65% 6% >99% 83% 86% 65% 22% 47% 63% 46% 52% 36% 68% 83% 74% 47% 81% 51% 56% 47% 96% <1% >99% <1% 23% 64% 52% 82% 62% 38%
 SPIETH Jordan
 J. Spieth
2
40
73
 19.7 — T24 — — CUT T29 T12 —
>99% 		<1% >99% 73% 56% 76% >99% 36% 33% 38% 38% 38% 65% 76% 96% 39% 53% 44% 40% 59% 45% 19% >99% <1% 25% 38% 57% 64% 40% 19%
 PENDRITH Taylor
 T. Pendrith
1
51
63
 21.5 — T6 CUT CUT — T34 T45 — >99% <1% >99% 32% 55% 47% 17% >99% 50% >99% >99% <1% >99% 30% 21% >99% 60% 82% >99% 39% 27% 22% 68% 22% 55% 23% 59% 70% 45% 19%
 BEZUIDENHOUT Christiaan
 C. Bezuidenhout
3
96
89
 19.3 — — T38 T27 CUT — — 15% 24% >99% 77% 67% 73% 15% 29% 70% 38% 34% 51% 63% 81% 98% 33% 63% 43% 36% 83% 80% 7% 36% 26% 65% 53% 81% 50% 31% 14%
 MCCARTY Matt
 M. McCarty
3
20
39
 24.6 — T55 T2 T18 CUT T67 T24 — >99% <1% >99% 74% 88% 76%
>99% 		47% 76% 40% 50% 44% 68% 90% 98% 46% 73% 48% 51% 85% 49% 30% 40% 41% 47% 50% 70% 86% 60% 31%
 STEVENS Sam
 S. Stevens
1
27
44
 25.8 — T31 T6 T30 T35 T55 T16 — >99% <1% >99% 54% 69% 46% >99% >99% 76% >99% >99% <1% 95% 47% 71% >99% 58% 83% >99% 87% 42% 17% 67% 24% 47% 18% 63% 94% 77% 46%
 POSTON J.T.
 J.T. Poston
1
88
66
 20.2 — — T38 — T35 T37 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 40% 26% 47% 18% >99% 55% >99% >99% <1% >99% 20% 53% >99% 44% 82% >99% 80% 18% 18% 66% 16% 39% 17% 70% 60% 38% 16%
 FOX Ryan
 R. Fox
1
24
40
 19.4 — — — — T24 T24 T7 — >99% <1% >99% 52% 29% 34% >99% >99% 55% >99% >99% <1% >99% 30% 19% >99% 46% 82% >99% 10% 82% <1% >99% <1% 11% 7% 43% 74% 44% 16%
 CONNERS Corey
 C. Conners
1
82
37
 19.2 — T24 — — CUT T70 T37 — >99% <1% >99% 38% 9% 35% >99% >99% 25% >99% >99% <1% 95% 18% 14% >99% 40% >99% >99% 16% 64% 2% >99% <1% 17% 11% 31% 57% 34% 14%
 OLESEN Thorbjorn
 T. Olesen
3
 —
97
 17.1 — — — CUT CUT — — 11% 14% >99% 79% 81% 70% 13% 26% 56% 34% 28% 57% 62% 74% 71% 31% 74% 42% 30% 58% 95% <1% 36% 6% 53% 68% 70% 37% 21% 9%
 PARRY John
 J. Parry
4
65
84
 20.9 — T19 T56 T43 T35 — — 12% 47% 83% 93% 90% 82% 15% 28% 89% 31% 30% 64% 65% 86% 73% 33% 81% 41% 31% 55% 96% <1% >99% <1% 53% 46% 77% 47% 27% 11%
 NEERGAARD-PETERSEN Rasmus
 R. Neergaard-Petersen
4
118
58
 20.4 — — — T49 T41 — — 19% 42% 22% 96% 96% 75% >99% 34% 90% 39% 39% 57% 66% 92% 76% 31% 85% 47% 41% 77% 98% <1% >99% <1% 60% 67% 76% 57% 38% 18%
 GREYSERMAN Max
 M. Greyserman
2
76
51
 22.3 — — T56 CUT CUT T37 T24 — 11% 34% >99% 69% 91% 78% >99% 28% 80% 34% 31% 62% 68% 89% 99% 30% 73% 46% 36% 80% 59% 23% 37% 45% 75% 71% 87% 51% 31% 13%
 MCGREEVY Max
 M. McGreevy
3
61
69
 24.2 — CUT T27 T30 T48 T29 CUT 20% 30% >99% 80% 90% 74% 18% 34% 87% 36% 37% 59% 65% 92% 98% 37% 80% 45% 41% 89% 59% 21% 37% 49% 66% 62% 83% 64% 42% 21%
 VALIMAKI Sami
 S. Valimaki
3
83
47
 23.4 — — CUT CUT T41 T34 T37 18% 26% >99% 86% 77% 59% >99% >99% 77% 36% 29% 60% >99% 94% 99% 24% 64% 45% 32% 79% 91% 1% 35% 14% 66% 71% 76% 44% 24% 9%
 RAI Aaron
 A. Rai
2
97
32
 21.1 — T50 — — — T73 T28 17% 25% >99% 74% 94% 76% >99% 30% 81% 35% 32% 59% 70% 89% 97% 30% 77% 45% 36% 68% 87% 4% >99% <1% 48% 60% 84% 50% 31% 13%
 THEEGALA Sahith
 S. Theegala
3
21
94
 23.5 — T31 T8 T7 T18 T60 T22 — >99% <1% >99% 91% 96% 86% 13% 39% 91% 35% 41% 50% 59% 86% 78% 38% 73% 44% 41% 80% 53% 37% 32% 54% 72% 45% 64% 80% 51% 24%
 MCCARTHY Denny
 D. McCarthy
1
94
87
 20.0 — T40 T56 T49 — T55 T47 — >99% <1% >99% 28% 26% 44% 14% >99% 38% >99% >99% <1% >99% 16% 27% >99% 40% 80% >99% 76% 38% 12% 61% 16% 27% 24% 72% 39% 20% 7%
 MEISSNER Mac
 M. Meissner
3
73
103
 22.1 — T40 T63 T49 T18 — — 17% 33% >99% 79% 92% 71% 12% 31% 81% 36% 35% 61% 59% 93% >99% 33% 81% 43% 37% 94% 27% 57% 29% 61% 76% 76% 87% 59% 38% 18%
 RODGERS Patrick
 P. Rodgers
2
23
82
 22.7 — 3 T44 T27 T60 T52 T34 — >99% <1% >99% 76% 93% 74% 14% 25% 73% 30% 25% 67% 63% 90% 99% 27% 78% 41% 28% 92% 74% 10% 34% 32% 77% 62% 89% 59% 29% 10%
 MITCHELL Keith
 K. Mitchell
3
58
124
 21.7 — T66 T44 T11 T41 T52 — 17% 25% >99% 71% 85% 74% 9% 27% 71% 31% 29% 53% 57% 79% 98% 33% 74% 40% 32% 90% 66% 16% 30% 47% 72% 67% 78% 54% 33% 15%
 THORBJORNSEN Michael
 M. Thorbjornsen
3
37
50
 22.4 — — CUT T18 T3 T78 — 77% 7% >99% 79% 90% 70% 22% 39% 75% 38% 41% 51% 66% 90% 96% 38% 77% 47% 46% 84% 69% 16% 34% 45% 52% 63% 70% 75% 52% 27%
 REITAN Kristoffer
 K. Reitan
4
106
46
 20.9 — CUT — T30 T41 — — 17% 43% 28% 95% 96% 77% >99% 29% 89% 34% 32% 64% 68% 91% 73% 25% 85% 45% 33% 73% 97% <1% >99% <1% 64% 70% 79% 45% 26% 10%
 SMITH Jordan
 J. Smith
4
64
90
 21.2 — T66 T27 CUT T16 — — 14% 48% 90% 94% 93% 78% 14% 27% 90% 32% 29% 65% 61% 89% 73% 28% 83% 41% 29% 66% 97% <1% >99% <1% 59% 60% 78% 45% 26% 10%
 POWER Seamus
 S. Power
7
63
151
 18.2 — T31 T63 T11 — — — 10% 63% 95% 90% 73% 91% 7% 24% 54% 25% 23% 52% 52% 71% 55% 28% 50% 36% 20% 85% 38% 51% 29% 62% 64% 62% 52% 33% 17% 6%
 LI Haotong
 H. Li
4
48
72
 22.6 — T55 T8 T11 CUT — — 32% 37% >99% 95% 94% 77% >99% 31% 89% 32% 32% 63% 64% 90% 73% 29% 85% 43% 32% 69% 97% <1% >99% <1% 56% 60% 74% 56% 33% 13%
 KEEFER Johnny
 J. Keefer
5
89
61
 23.9 — T61 T27 T43 T41 — — 19% 56% >99% 91% 94% 83% >99% 32% 88% 34% 34% 62% 64% 94% 96% 27% 77% >99% 36% 93% 53% 38% 32% 59% 69% 73% 82% 55% 34% 15%
 SMALLEY Alex
 A. Smalley
3
60
119
 22.8 — T40 T44 CUT T35 T19 — 17% 33% >99% 80% 91% 71% 11% 27% 81% 31% 30% 65% 55% 92% 99% 31% 78% 41% 33% 96% 55% 30% 28% 61% 76% 79% 88% 54% 33% 15%
 KIRK Chris
 C. Kirk
2
128
95
 18.1 — CUT CUT — CUT T52 —
>99% 		<1% >99% 48% 48% 80% 14% 17% 37% 24% 17% 55% 61% 62% 95% 25% 51% 38% 19% 64% 17% 34% 34% 27% 61% 74% 78% 20% 9% 3%
 THOMPSON Davis
 D. Thompson
3
121
114
 20.0 — — CUT T43 T64 — — 14% 29% >99% 67% 92% 69% 12% 29% 65% 33% 31% 58% 55% 89% 99% 30% 72% 42% 34% 96% 39% 29% 28% 48% 74% 83% 85% 51% 33% 16%
 BERGER Daniel
 D. Berger
1
45
62
 21.2 — T6 T56 — T16 T75 CUT >99% <1% >99% 30% 30% 46% 19% >99% 33% >99% >99% <1% 93% 20% 32% >99% 48% 80% >99% 48% 24% 23% 63% 21% 29% 23% 52% 61% 36% 13%
 CLARK Wyndham
 W. Clark
2
55
64
 20.9 — — T13 T65 T35 T58 T41 — 8% 25% >99% 69% 79% 63% >99% 22% 70% 28% 24% 48% >99% 83% 88% 23% 59% >99% 27% 36% 88% 2% >99% <1% 58% 54% 59% 42% 23% 8%
 ZALATORIS Will
 W. Zalatoris
9
98
252
 18.0 — — T18 CUT — — — 10% 72% 37% 82%
>99% 		80% 4% 31% 80% 29% 34% 52% 34% 81% 87% 32% 62% 34% 28% 83% 48% 37% 19% 61% 49% 71% 74% 47% 29% 14%
 KUCHAR Matt
 M. Kuchar
7
T132
143
 15.1 — — T44 CUT — — — 4% 68% 9% 87% 50% 94% 7% 15% 54% 19% 14% 50% 53% 64% 58% 29% 50% 33% 12% 73% 20% 59% 32% 47% 59% 67% 67% 10% 4% 1%
 ECHAVARRIA Nico
 N. Echavarria
2
46
59
 21.8 — CUT CUT — CUT T8 CUT 34% 22% >99% 77% 86% 77% 19% 24% 71% 28% 24% 65% 65% 89% 97% 24% 70% 41% 27% 92% 55% 24% 34% 46% 50% 78% 84% 45% 24% 9%
 PENGE Marco
 M. Penge
4
66
34
 22.1 — — — CUT CUT T64 T16 — 12% 46% >99% 95% 96% 76% >99% 28% 88% 29% 29% 67% 68% 92% 69% 24% 86% >99% 33% 72% 97% <1% >99% <1% 61% 66% 75% 52% 31% 13%
 HISATSUNE Ryo
 R. Hisatsune
3
14
65
 24.9 — CUT T44 T2 T10 T8 T45 — >99% <1% >99% 83% 92% 69% 18% 72% 83% 32% 63% 35% 62% 95% >99% 51% 85% 43% 53% 95% 75% 12% 29% 40% 62% 65% 76% 98% 71% 35%
 KIM Michael
 M. Kim
1
71
49
 23.4 — T31 CUT — T18 72 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 50% 65% 48% >99% >99% 61% >99% >99% <1% 94% 37% 61% >99% 60% 79% >99% 85% 30% 30% 63% 28% 54% 46% 85% 40% 20% 6%
 GLOVER Lucas
 L. Glover
1
144
79
 16.5 — — — — — T64 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 36% 14% 57% 16% >99% 38% >99% >99% <1% 93% 15% 33% >99% 40% 75% >99% 59% 11% 30% 68% 13% 34% 13% 83% 16% 7% 2%
 HARMAN Brian
 B. Harman
1
72
53
 20.2 — T61 CUT — CUT T19 T50 — >99% <1% >99% 38% 9% 37% >99% >99% 33% >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 41% >99% 29% >99% >99% 12% 69% 1% >99% <1% 22% 13% 50% 31% 14% 4%
 HOEY Rico
 R. Hoey
3
91
74
 23.6 — T50 WD T70 T24 T67 CUT 13% 35% >99% 77% 91% 76% 17% 24% 80% 26% 25% 71% 61% 93% 98% 25% 80% 40% 29% 93% 22% 64% 30% 61% 78% 74% 89% 45% 26% 11%
 WHALEY Vince
 V. Whaley
3
T125
117
 20.6 — T40 CUT CUT CUT — — 8% 36% >99% 75% 88% 74% 10% 18% 79% 24% 17% 75% 54% 91% 98% 19% 78% 37% 19% 92% 22% 63% 26% 63% 77% 83% 94% 23% 11% 4%
 BRENNAN Michael
 M. Brennan
3
123
42
 22.5 — CUT T56 DQ T48 — — 17% 33% >99% 81% 81% 61% >99% >99% 77% 28% 26% 62% >99% 95% >99% 22% 69% 43% 30% 81% 64% 15% 30% 36% 73% 71% 83% 43% 25% 10%
 FINAU Tony
 T. Finau
2
44
96
 18.8 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 18 T28 — 5% 35% >99% 67% 75% 67% 13% 16% 59% 20% 16% 60% 58% 85% 98% 18% 52% 35% 17% 41% 32% 21% 30% 21% 83% 41% 80% 24% 10% 3%
 NOVAK Andrew
 A. Novak
1
52
41
 23.6 — — CUT T7 CUT T48 T47 — >99% <1% >99% 57% 44% 33% >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% 93% 48% 75% >99% 49% >99% >99% 57% 53% 9% >99% <1% 51% 26% 76% 50% 26% 9%
 HOMA Max
 M. Homa
3
93
150
 18.7 — — T27 CUT T66 — T37 7% 31% 31% 52% 59% 73% >99% 17% 59% 21% 16% 66% 48% 76% 96% 22% 68% 34% 17% 77% 38% 29% 24% 37% 70% 73% 86% 25% 11% 4%
 VENTURA Kris
 K. Ventura
7
104
212
 16.3 — — CUT T22 — — — 6% 66% 24% 88% 76% 84% 3% 20% 68% 22% 19% 53% 37% 69% 63% 19% 58% 32% 15% 82% 51% 39% 17% 71% 66% 84% 59% 23% 11% 4%
 ROY Kevin
 K. Roy
3
53
134
 20.1 — T13 CUT CUT T13 — — 12% 36% >99% 69% 82% 76% 8% 16% 82% 21% 16% 76% 50% 88% 98% 21% 75% 35% 16% 87% 19% 63% 26% 59% 77% 68% 90% 29% 13% 4%
 CASTILLO Ricky
 R. Castillo
7
102
161
 20.0 — T31 T44 T43 — — — 10% 72% 29% 91% 92% 81% 6% 24% 91% 26% 25% 69% 44% 92% 94% 21% 76% 36% 23% 95% 54% 41% 20% 74% 78% 84% 85% 37% 20% 8%
 WALLACE Matt
 M. Wallace
7
 —
91
 18.3 — — CUT CUT — — — 7% 69% 10% 96% 96% 88% 14% 21% 94% 20% 21% 73% 58% 90% 78% 20% 80% 36% 19% 60% 89% 7% 30% 60% 85% 81% 86% 25% 13% 5%
 HUGHES Mackenzie
 M. Hughes
2
84
104
 18.7 — — CUT T59 T28 T34 — 8% 27% >99% 68% 84% 77% 12% 17% 46% 21% 16% 68% 56% 83% 91% 20% 73% 35% 19% 51% 58% 20% 28% 36% 82% 50% 80% 24% 12% 4%
 BROWN Dan
 D. Brown
4
77
77
 20.1 — T19 CUT T30 CUT — — 10% 50% 41% 95% 94% 77% 16% 17% 89% 21% 16% 78% 60% 90% 66% 14% 85% 38% 17% 69% 97% <1% >99% <1% 73% 75% 86% 20% 9% 2%
 JAEGER Stephan
 S. Jaeger
2
49
102
 19.2 — — CUT T5 T28 T67 — 23% 27% >99% 68% 87% 78% 13% 18% 56% 19% 16% 69% 57% 88% 91% 21% 64% 35% 18% 81% 17% 45% 28% 39% 52% 73% 87% 30% 14% 4%
 KIM Tom
 T. Kim
3
74
116
 20.6 — T61 T38 T65 T35 — T34 13% 26% 51%
>99% 		71% 67% 11% 21% 53% 24% 21% 66% 51% 90% 97% 18% 76% 38% 24% 87% 69% 14% 23% 44% 73% 92% 82% 34% 19% 7%
 HIGGO Garrick
 G. Higgo
3
T137
75
 20.2 — — — CUT CUT T60 CUT 11% 35% >99% 71% 74% 61% 17% >99% 63% 23% 17% 68% 59% 94% 99% 15% 66% 40% 20% 78% 48% 22% 27% 37% 80% 76% 86% 22% 10% 3%
 KANAYA Takumi
 T. Kanaya
3
111
126
 19.9 — T31 CUT CUT T60 — — 9% 32% >99% 76% 86% 67% 9% 16% 78% 21% 16% 77% 50% 89% 96% 15% 80% 36% 18% 83% 69% 14% 22% 47% 79% 82% 91% 20% 9% 3%
 GRILLO Emiliano
 E. Grillo
2
115
109
 20.3 — CUT CUT T38 CUT T64 — 7% 30% >99% 64% 77% 75% 11% 15% 51% 19% 14% 74% 55% 83% 98% 16% 69% 36% 15% 83% 29% 48% 25% 59% 88% 75% 89% 17% 8% 2%
 YU Kevin
 K. Yu
2
147
105
 20.6 — — CUT CUT — T70 CUT 9% 37% >99% 76% 87% 71% 11% 18% 79% 22% 17% 78% 54% 93% 99% 15% 81% 36% 19% 95% 56% 25% 24% 56% 88% 77% 94% 23% 11% 4%
 COLE Eric
 E. Cole
3
85
118
 19.7 — CUT T27 T27 CUT — — 6% 39% >99% 74% 83% 78% 10% 15% 83% 18% 14% 76% 53% 88% 99% 18% 80% 33% 14% 91% 35% 38% 27% 41% 80% 57% 94% 19% 8% 2%
 CAULEY Bud
 B. Cauley
1
86
82
 20.4 — T24 CUT — T68 T37 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 32% 37% 48% 15% >99% 53% >99% >99% <1% 91% 23% 26% >99% 52% 75% >99% 56% 19% 25% 58% 24% 49% 35% 74% 29% 13% 4%
 IM Sungjae
 S. Im
1
 —
70
 18.3 — — — — — — — — >99% <1% >99% 40%
>99% 		29% >99% >99% 51% >99% >99% <1% 90% 41% 49% >99% 47% >99% >99% 71% 62% 4% >99% <1% 61% 28% 71% 48% 26% 9%
 DOU Zecheng
 Z. Dou
5
68
183
 20.5 — T55 73 T49 T13 — — 8% 72% 61% 91% 92% 80% 4% 18% 91% 20% 18% 76% 39% 92% 94% 17% 78% 33% 16% 92% 63% 27% 18% 64% 79% 81% 90% 27% 13% 4%
 GHIM Doug
 D. Ghim
7
130
168
 18.0 — T55 CUT T59 — — — 7% 66% 12% 93% 86% 86% 6% 19% 71% 20% 19% 56% 42% 77% 64% 16% 66% 33% 16% 92% 49% 36% 19% 73% 83% 93% 64% 22% 11% 4%
 RAMEY Chad
 C. Ramey
3
90
156
 20.5 — T71 T63 T22 T48 — — 6% 39% >99% 76% 89% 72% 6% 14% 82% 18% 13% 81% 45% 92% 99% 16% 80% 31% 15% 94% 19% 69% 20% 71% 89% 85% 95% 20% 9% 2%
 HODGES Lee
 L. Hodges
7
62
133
 20.4 — T6 CUT CUT — — — 8% 73% >99% 89% 93% 86% 8% 16% 93% 18% 15% 79% 49% 90% 95% 15% 77% 34% 15% 96% 67% 28% 21% 65% 89% 89% 88% 24% 11% 3%
 HORSCHEL Billy
 B. Horschel
3
101
81
 19.2 — 74 T27 CUT CUT T48 —
>99% 		<1% 16% 59% 72% 81% 16% 11% 64% 15% 9% 79% 59% 80% 95% 14% 64% 33% 12% 51% 32% 41% >99% <1% 64% 48% 91% 9% 3% <1%
 DAHMEN Joel
 J. Dahmen
7
56
181
 18.6 — — T38 T7 CUT — — 10% 66% >99% 92% 84% 90% 5% 18% 72% 15% 16% 61% 42% 69% 67% 19% 60% 30% 14% 87% 41% 48% 21% 76% 74% 81% 54% 30% 14% 4%
 DUMONT DE CHASSART Adrien
 A. Dumont De Chassart
5
105
164
 20.1 — T24 69 CUT CUT — — 8% 67% 21% 91% 94% 76% 5% 17% 91% 18% 16% 78% 41% 93% 93% 13% 83% 33% 15% 92% 75% 16% 17% 63% 82% 87% 92% 21% 10% 3%
 PUTNAM Andrew
 A. Putnam
7
33
115
 17.0 — — T2 CUT — — — 80% 14% >99% 90% 71% 91% 11% 14% 67% 15% 12% 64% 52% 68% 59% 14% 57% 32% 11% 80% 61% 29% 26% 67% 66% 68% 52% 22% 9% 2%
 KIM S.H.
 S.H. Kim
5
54
149
 21.3 — T13 T18 63 T54 — — 13% 68% >99% 88% 92% 81% 7% 18% 90% 17% 17% 78% 43% 94% 96% 17% 79% 33% 17% 95% 33% 59% 19% 73% 79% 80% 90% 33% 16% 5%
 ECKROAT Austin
 A. Eckroat
3
T140
154
 18.5 — CUT CUT T49 CUT — — 7% 36% 10% 62% 86% 67% 6% 14% 64% 17% 12% 74% 42% 90% 99% 13% 70% 32% 14% 89% 42% 29% 18% 55% 93% 91% 95% 15% 6% 2%
 WOODLAND Gary
 G. Woodland
3
145
144
 18.2 — CUT 72 CUT T64 — — 3% 26% >99% 64%
>99% 		78% 8% 10% 35% 11% 8% 63% 48% 61% 90% 15% 65% >99% 9% 35% 51% 21% 23% 33% 85% 75% 86% 9% 3% <1%
 BLANCHET Chandler
 C. Blanchet
5
 —
137
 19.5 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — 5% 69% 5% 85% 89% 83% 8% 13% 86% 15% 11% 82% 46% 91% 93% 11% 75% 31% 11% 90% 41% 49% 19% 69% 85% 85% 94% 10% 4% <1%
 HOGE Tom
 T. Hoge
1
36
93
 20.7 — T40 T8 T70 CUT T14 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 21% 28% 47% 14% >99% 54% >99% >99% <1% 88% 22% 33% >99% 44% 72% >99% 32% 34% 18% 54% 22% 67% 22% 61% 26% 9% 2%
 WU Dylan
 D. Wu
6
109
349
 18.5 — T31 T44 CUT — — — 4% 82% 19% 85% 78% 73% 1% 15% 90% 14% 14% 77% 16% 90% 98% 18% 75% 22% 12% 96% 36% 52% 7% 75% 84% 86% 94% 21% 10% 3%
 LIPSKY David
 D. Lipsky
7
87
146
 18.4 — — T44 T18 — — — 5% 79% 27% 92% 93% 89% 7% 13% 93% 12% 11% 84% 45% 91% 93% 14% 78% 30% 11% 95% 20% 77% 22% 75% 89% 84% 90% 16% 6% 2%
 PHILLIPS Chandler
 C. Phillips
3
92
160
 19.9 — T19 T63 CUT T66 — — 5% 41% >99% 73% 89% 68% 6% 11% 78% 14% 9% 85% 40% 92% >99% 10% 80% 30% 10% 94% 30% 50% 17% 66% 91% 89% 95% 12% 5% 1%
 FISK Steven
 S. Fisk
3
T137
120
 20.8 — CUT CUT CUT — T60 — 6% 44% >99% 75% 75% 59% 10% >99% 83% 15% 11% 79% >99% 95% 99% 11% 70% 32% 12% 81% 56% 25% 20% 49% 84% 76% 92% 16% 6% 2%
 BLAIR Zac
 Z. Blair
9
T140
264
 7.9 — T50 — — — — — — <1% 92% <1% 8% 1% 5% <1% 1% 65% 16% 8% 55% 22% 40% 57% 2% 15% 8% 1% 51% <1% 76% 8% 48% 58% 17% 34% 1% <1% <1%
 KOEPKA Brooks
 B. Koepka
8
148
263
 18.2 — — — T56 CUT — — 3% 48% >99%
>99%
>99% 		64% >99% 12% 51% 11% 10% 41% >99% 71% 88% 16% 45% >99% 8% 57% 55% 14% >99% <1% 67% 72% 60% 15% 7% 2%
 HOSSLER Beau
 B. Hossler
7
 —
153
 19.2 — CUT CUT CUT — — — 5% 78% 6% 93% 95% 86% 6% 13% 93% 12% 12% 84% 42% 92% 94% 11% 79% 29% 11% 97% 23% 72% 17% 70% 93% 93% 92% 13% 5% 1%
 RYDER Sam
 S. Ryder
7
108
213
 16.1 — — T27 T59 — — — 3% 74% 10% 91% 80% 88% 3% 9% 72% 10% 7% 70% 33% 69% 64% 11% 61% 25% 6% 89% 27% 67% 14% 73% 87% 93% 68% 6% 2% <1%
 SADDIER Adrien
 A. Saddier
4
139
85
 19.0 — CUT T70 CUT T60 — — 5% 53% 8% 94% 93% 79% 16% 12% 86% 12% 9% 85% 54% 89% 55% 10% 85% 31% 11% 63% 94% 1% >99% <1% 77% 76% 87% 12% 5% 1%
 KOHLES Ben
 B. Kohles
9
 —
271
 6.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 92% <1% 10% 1% 4% <1% 2% 59% 13% 8% 56% 21% 39% 46% 2% 12% 8% 2% 42% <1% 68% 7% 60% 50% 25% 31% 2% <1% <1%
 SVENSSON Jesper
 J. Svensson
7
 —
165
 15.6 — — CUT CUT — — — 5% 63% 8% 96% 90% 80% 6% 13% 79% 12% 12% 74% 39% 78% 23% 10% 78% 29% 10% 67% 96% <1% 16% 33% 73% 87% 66% 12% 5% 2%
 POTGIETER Aldrich
 A. Potgieter
2
19
71
 22.4 — — CUT CUT CUT T60 5 — >99% <1% >99% 78% 80% 57% >99% >99% 66% 14% 20% 68% >99% 94% 98% 16% 70% 35% 19% 83% 58% 16% 19% 52% 67% 72% 71% 58% 24% 7%
 MOORE Taylor
 T. Moore
7
124
189
 16.0 — — T56 T49 — — — 4% 72% 9% 92% 77% 88% 4% 12% 71% 10% 10% 65% 35% 69% 61% 10% 60% 26% 8% 85% 54% 34% 14% 67% 82% 93% 67% 11% 4% 1%
 JOHNSON Zach
 Z. Johnson
9
142
281
 8.0 — T61 T70 — — — — — <1% 89% <1% 6% <1% 8% >99% <1% 48% 8% 4% 35% 21% 20% 16% <1% 6% 6% <1% 20% <1% 46% >99% <1% 33% 10% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 FISHBURN Patrick
 P. Fishburn
7
 —
148
 17.7 — — CUT CUT — — — 3% 81% 4% 91% 93% 88% 7% 9% 90% 9% 6% 89% 41% 91% 82% 7% 79% 27% 7% 94% 19% 79% 16% 76% 93% 90% 92% 6% 2% <1%
 SIGG Greyson
 G. Sigg
9
 —
277
 7.4 — — — — — — — — <1% 91% <1% 12% 3% 3% <1% 2% 62% 13% 6% 62% 19% 46% 56% 2% 14% 8% 2% 58% <1% 73% 6% 62% 63% 40% 33% 2% <1% <1%
 SMOTHERMAN Austin
 A. Smotherman
5
67
127
 19.7 — CUT T8 CUT CUT — — 6% 73% 64% 82% 87% 84% 9% 11% 88% 9% 9% 86% 43% 92% 86% 9% 76% 29% 9% 86% 18% 73% 18% 68% 74% 70% 91% 13% 5% 1%
 SIMPSON Webb
 W. Simpson
3
150
474
 12.5 — T55 — — CUT — — 2% 39% 6% 47% 30% 60% <1% 5% 46% 6% 4% 66% 9% 63% 96% 15% 54% 15% 3% 57% 15% 31% 5% 33% 66% 81% 94% 3% <1% <1%
 NAKAJIMA Keita
 K. Nakajima
4
143
111
 19.2 — CUT CUT 64 71 — — 6% 55% 6% 95% 95% 71% 12% 11% 87% 10% 8% 87% 45% 92% 58% 6% 88% 30% 9% 77% 96% <1% >99% <1% 84% 90% 90% 9% 3% <1%
 HADWIN Adam
 A. Hadwin
9
 —
209
 7.1 — — — — — — — 2% 90% 6% 12% 2% 7% 2% 2% 62% 11% 7% 53% 29% 33% 12% 2% 17% 8% 2% 31% <1% 72% 10% 32% 54% 16% 29% 2% <1% <1%
 HUBBARD Mark
 M. Hubbard
3
146
135
 19.8 — T66 CUT 69 CUT — — 3% 41% >99% 67% 88% 77% 9% 8% 80% 8% 6% 88% 43% 89% 98% 9% 81% 26% 7% 91% 21% 62% 18% 74% 87% 86% 95% 8% 3% <1%
 SCHMID Matti
 M. Schmid
2
112
101
 21.9 — CUT CUT T56 CUT T73 49 5% 39% >99% 82% 93% 69% 13% 9% 72% 9% 7% 90% 47% 94% 95% 7% 87% 29% 8% 77% 65% 19% 18% 73% 94% 85% 96% 9% 3% <1%
 BAUCHOU Zach
 Z. Bauchou
5
70
179
 19.6 — 70 T13 T59 T48 — — 4% 75% 44% 85% 89% 81% 4% 9% 87% 8% 7% 86% 34% 91% 91% 7% 76% 26% 7% 92% 38% 53% 12% 76% 85% 86% 92% 10% 3% <1%
 MOUW William
 W. Mouw
3
T156
138
 20.6 — T71 CUT CUT CUT — — 5% 44% >99% 75% 75% 55% 8% >99% 79% 9% 6% 83% >99% 95% >99% 6% 72% 28% 8% 85% 52% 26% 14% 56% 88% 85% 93% 10% 4% <1%
 NOH S.Y.
 S.Y. Noh
9
 —
463
 2.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 49% <1% 4% 4% 12% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 10% 7% 12% <1% <1% 3% 5% <1% 8% 10% 13% 2% 14% 17% 44% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 KIM Chan
 C. Kim
9
 —
260
 8.6 — — CUT — — — — 2% 89% 6% 9% 3% 4% 1% 2% 53% 10% 5% 64% 20% 40% 41% 3% 16% 7% 2% 40% <1% 74% 7% 61% 48% 23% 26% 2% <1% <1%
 YOUNG Carson
 C. Young
9
T132
158
 9.7 — — T44 — — — — 1% 89% 6% 9% 3% 6% 5% 1% 60% 11% 5% 70% 34% 50% 38% 2% 21% 10% 2% 52% <1% 80% 11% 72% 60% 34% 29% 2% <1% <1%
 SNEDEKER Brandt
 B. Snedeker
9
 —
289
 8.1 — — CUT CUT — — — <1% 89% 3% 7% 1% 5% <1% 1% 55% 6% 4% 64% 19% 25% 33% 1% 14% 6% 1% 22% <1% 48% 7% 17% 44% 12% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 FORD David
 D. Ford
3
80
317
 18.8 — T50 T13 CUT — — — 4% 81% 36%
>99% 		91% 68% 1% 11% 93% 8% 10% 84% 14% 93% 96% 10% 82% 20% 9% 96% 67% 23% 5% 75% 87% 91% 94% 18% 8% 2%
 VILIPS Karl
 K. Vilips
3
81
142
 19.2 — — T18 T38 CUT — — 5% 49% >99% 76% 80% 53% 8% >99% 85% 8% 6% 85% 38% 97% 99% 6% 76% 27% 8% 88% 53% 22% 13% 50% 88% 84% 94% 12% 4% <1%
 MONTGOMERY Taylor
 T. Montgomery
9
 —
187
 6.4 — — — — — — — — <1% 91% <1% 8% 7% 5% 3% <1% 61% 9% 4% 67% 29% 50% 10% <1% 16% 9% <1% 42% <1% 73% 8% 59% 54% 19% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 VANDERLAAN John
 J. VanDerLaan
5
120
254
 19.0 — CUT CUT T43 T60 — — 2% 79% 7% 85% 87% 78% 2% 8% 87% 6% 6% 86% 21% 90% 92% 8% 76% 21% 6% 93% 38% 52% 8% 80% 88% 90% 93% 7% 3% <1%
 SVENSSON Adam
 A. Svensson
6
T125
341
 18.4 — T40 CUT CUT — — — 2% 85% 6% 87% 91% 75% <1% 7% 92% 5% 6% 89% 12% 90% 98% 9% 83% 17% 5% 98% 19% 73% 5% 86% 96% 95% 97% 8% 3% <1%
 MOLINARI Francesco
 F. Molinari
9
 —
279
 3.2 — — — — — — — — <1% 43% <1% 7% 6% 17% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 20% 18% 11% <1% <1% 5% 6% <1% <1% 46% 2% >99% <1% 6% 13% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 SHIPLEY Neal
 N. Shipley
5
T154
121
 19.6 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — 5% 72% 4%
>99% 		93% 81% 10% 8% 85% 7% 5% 90% 40% 93% 88% 4% 81% 26% 6% 94% 37% 54% 13% 79% 91% 93% 94% 5% 1% <1%
 SPRINGER Hayden
 H. Springer
9
 —
222
 7.0 — — — — — — — — <1% 91% <1% 7% 4% 4% 2% <1% 52% 9% 4% 68% 23% 47% 36% 1% 19% 8% <1% 50% <1% 78% 6% 68% 60% 39% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 SUBER Jackson
 J. Suber
7
T156
186
 15.6 — — CUT T70 — — — 3% 73% 4% 89% 84% 84% 4% 7% 64% 6% 5% 72% 29% 75% 37% 4% 65% 23% 4% 86% 39% 53% 9% 86% 83% 96% 66% 4% 1% <1%
 GONZALEZ Emilio
 E. Gonzalez
5
129
170
 18.0 — T50 CUT T65 WD — — — 2% 75% <1% 85% 90% 80% 5% 6% 84% 5% 4% 90% 32% 91% 89% 4% 79% 24% 4% 92% 34% 56% 10% 79% 90% 92% 94% 3% <1% <1%
 KIZZIRE Patton
 P. Kizzire
3
107
243
 16.2 — T24 CUT — 72 — — 1% 41% 8% 46% 71% 72% 1% 4% 70% 3% 2% 88% 23% 83% 94% 7% 69% 17% 2% 88% 10% 76% 10% 58% 93% 88% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 MARTIN Ben
 B. Martin
9
 —
377
 3.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 48% <1% 7% 6% 15% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 12% 8% 14% <1% <1% 3% 4% <1% 17% 5% 40% 2% 51% 28% 51% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 YELLAMARAJU Sudarshan
 S. Yellamaraju
5
78
226
 19.5 — T13 CUT T56 T54 — — 4% 79% 33% 87% 91% 77% 2% 8% 87% 6% 6% 88% 23% 92% 92% 6% 80% 22% 6% 95% 39% 51% 8% 83% 88% 92% 93% 10% 4% <1%
 CLANTON Luke
 L. Clanton
3
 —
211
 18.6 — CUT WD CUT — — — 3% 83% 4%
>99% 		94% 76% 3% 7% 90% 6% 5% 90% 25% 94% 93% 4% 82% 22% 5% 97% 41% 52% 7% 85% 93% 96% 96% 5% 2% <1%
 GRIFFIN Lanto
 L. Griffin
7
 —
198
 15.3 — — CUT CUT — — — 1% 77% 3% 84% 81% 89% 4% 5% 63% 3% 3% 77% 29% 68% 27% 4% 66% 19% 2% 87% 13% 81% 10% 86% 90% 94% 63% 2% <1% <1%
 SALINDA Isaiah
 I. Salinda
7
T113
229
 18.1 — CUT CUT T30 — — — 2% 83% 8% 87% 89% 81% 2% 8% 88% 4% 6% 86% 23% 90% 84% 6% 78% 19% 6% 94% 34% 57% 8% 83% 86% 89% 90% 8% 3% <1%
 LEBIODA Hank
 H. Lebioda
5
T154
214
 18.1 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — 2% 77% 3% 76% 75% 80% 3% 6% 82% 4% 3% 88% 24% 87% 74% 4% 74% 21% 3% 85% 14% 73% 8% 79% 83% 83% 93% 3% <1% <1%
 GARNETT Brice
 B. Garnett
3
116
348
 16.9 — T31 CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 53% 6% 55% 43% 66% <1% 3% 83% 2% 2% 89% 11% 83% 98% 9% 75% 14% 3% 86% 9% 71% 5% 55% 90% 78% 97% 3% <1% <1%
 LOWER Justin
 J. Lower
7
T113
177
 15.7 — — CUT T30 — — — 1% 75% 6% 90% 86% 90% 5% 5% 67% 3% 3% 77% 32% 72% 43% 4% 67% 20% 3% 82% 21% 73% 12% 86% 89% 93% 66% 3% <1% <1%
 VEGAS Jhonattan
 J. Vegas
1
117
99
 18.7 — — CUT CUT — T78 44 — >99% <1% >99% 30% 39% 53% 16% >99% 47% >99% >99% <1% >99% 24% 8% >99% 51% 61% >99% 36% 8% 33% 45% 37% 74% 31% 76% 3% <1% <1%
 PAVON Matthieu
 M. Pavon
3
95
273
 17.0 — T55 T27 T38 CUT — — 2% 48% 14% 69% 68% 60% <1% 4% 83% 3% 3% 90% 18% 86% 89% 5% 84% 17% 3% 70% 70% 10% 6% 38% 88% 71% 97% 3% <1% <1%
 GOODWIN Noah
 N. Goodwin
9
 —
288
 6.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 93% <1% 9% 2% 3% <1% <1% 54% 5% 2% 64% 13% 45% 30% <1% 17% 6% <1% 46% <1% 69% 3% 62% 51% 41% 30% <1% <1% <1%
 CHAMP Cameron
 C. Champ
9
 —
300
 5.4 — — — — — — — — <1% 94% <1% 8% 2% 3% <1% <1% 40% 5% 2% 56% 13% 40% 17% <1% 16% 5% <1% 38% <1% 64% 3% 39% 39% 31% 27% <1% <1% <1%
 CHATFIELD Davis
 D. Chatfield
5
152
235
 18.9 — CUT T63 CUT CUT — — 2% 78% 3% 84% 90% 77% 2% 5% 85% 3% 3% 90% 20% 91% 90% 3% 79% 19% 3% 94% 35% 54% 5% 84% 93% 95% 95% 3% <1% <1%
 SILVERMAN Ben
 B. Silverman
9
 —
261
 6.2 — — — — — — — — <1% 93% <1% 8% 2% 5% <1% <1% 53% 4% 2% 70% 17% 38% 26% <1% 16% 5% <1% 35% <1% 82% 5% 49% 53% 23% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 VAN ROOYEN Erik
 E. Van Rooyen
2
 —
140
 17.8 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — 2% 34% >99% 54% 67% 73% 9% 5% 62% 3% 3% 85% 36% 81% 78% 4% 79% 20% 4% 54% 53% 21% 12% 68% 92% 91% 91% 3% 1% <1%
 PAUL Jeremy
 J. Paul
9
 —
308
 6.7 — — — CUT — — — — <1% 91% <1% 8% 2% 3% <1% <1% 54% 4% 2% 66% 12% 39% 22% <1% 17% 5% <1% 32% <1% 55% 3% 47% 47% 28% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 RILEY Davis
 D. Riley
2
59
98
 20.7 — T6 T56 CUT CUT — — 4% 40% >99% 75% 93% 73% >99% 5% 72% 3% 3% 93% >99% 92% 94% 3% 80% 24% 4% 78% 44% 37% 13% 63% 89% 92% 92% 6% 2% <1%
 NORLANDER Henrik
 H. Norlander
9
 —
297
 7.0 — — — CUT — — — — <1% 91% <1% 9% 3% 4% <1% <1% 65% 3% 1% 75% 12% 42% 16% <1% 24% 4% <1% 34% <1% 39% 4% 49% 61% 28% 32% <1% <1% <1%
 LAMPRECHT Christo
 C. Lamprecht
5
T135
173
 19.1 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — 2% 77% 4% 86% 93% 78% 6% 6% 84% 3% 4% 92% 28% 93% 85% 4% 81% 20% 4% 94% 32% 59% 8% 84% 91% 94% 94% 4% 1% <1%
 BYRD Jonathan
 J. Byrd
9
 — — 2.0 — — — — — — — — <1% 52% <1% 2% <1% 20% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 10% 6% 6% <1% <1% 2% 2% <1% 3% 1% 36% 2% 19% 10% 17% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HIRATA Kensei
 K. Hirata
5
103
167
 19.0 — T24 CUT 74 T54 — — 2% 79% 11% 90% 95% 78% 6% 4% 86% 2% 2% 94% 26% 93% 74% 3% 85% 19% 3% 92% 49% 40% 7% 80% 90% 93% 93% 4% 1% <1%
 EWART A.J.
 A.J. Ewart
6
99
364
 19.1 — CUT T44 T49 T28 — — 1% 88% 14% 84% 88% 69% <1% 5% 91% 2% 3% 92% 7% 93% 97% 4% 82% 13% 4% 98% 33% 58% 2% 87% 93% 94% 96% 6% 2% <1%
 LEE S.T.
 S.T. Lee
5
T135
265
 17.5 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — — <1% 82% <1% 82% 86% 77% <1% 3% 83% 1% 2% 92% 15% 90% 85% 2% 78% 14% 2% 92% 27% 63% 4% 85% 91% 93% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 MULLINAX Trey
 T. Mullinax
9
 —
354
 5.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 94% <1% 4% 2% 3% <1% <1% 59% 1% 1% 56% 7% 38% 20% <1% 15% 3% <1% 44% <1% 55% 1% 39% 55% 35% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 SKINNS David
 D. Skinns
9
 —
278
 5.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 95% <1% 7% 1% 6% <1% <1% 52% 1% <1% 73% 13% 34% 7% <1% 15% 3% <1% 26% <1% 86% 4% 58% 49% 15% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 KANG Jeffrey
 J. Kang
5
 —
221
 18.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 82% 1% 81% 86% 83% 3% 3% 84% <1% 1% 94% 20% 88% 78% 2% 78% 14% 1% 88% 22% 69% 6% 85% 91% 89% 95% <1% <1% <1%
 HARDY Nick
 N. Hardy
9
 —
472
 4.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 50% <1% 7% 11% 10% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 17% 4% 17% <1% <1% 7% 3% <1% 37% 3% 55% <1% 62% 50% 79% 15% <1% <1% <1%
 GORDON Will
 W. Gordon
9
 —
293
 6.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 94% <1% 9% 3% 3% <1% <1% 59% 2% <1% 63% 10% 45% 19% <1% 20% 4% <1% 48% <1% 76% 2% 46% 59% 41% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 HOFFMAN Charley
 C. Hoffman
9
 —
327
 13.1 — — CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 69% 1% 64% 49% 87% <1% 1% 48% <1% <1% 51% 10% 44% 26% 3% 53% 8% <1% 28% 15% 59% 4% 89% 72% 76% 55% <1% <1% <1%
 WALKER Danny
 D. Walker
3
119
220
 18.8 — CUT CUT T38 CUT — — <1% 54% >99% 61% 83% 66% 3% 2% 77% <1% <1% 95% 18% 91% 93% 1% 82% 14% 1% 88% 19% 60% 4% 83% 93% 91% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPBELL Brian
 B. Campbell
1
131
92
 21.4 — CUT CUT — T54 T78 CUT — >99% <1% >99% 38% 35% 33% >99% >99% 58% >99% >99% <1% >99% 48% 23% >99% 57% 55% >99% 54% 15% 29% 31% 41% 79% 51% 86% 1% <1% <1%
 PETERSON Paul
 P. Peterson
9
 —
254
 5.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 94% <1% 6% 2% 5% 1% <1% 50% <1% <1% 72% 14% 36% 9% <1% 16% 3% <1% 23% <1% 80% 3% 65% 43% 18% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 LAIRD Martin
 M. Laird
9
 —
396
 2.2 — — — — — — — — <1% 50% <1% 4% 5% 13% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 22% 4% 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 4% 11% 7% 1% 5% 21% 34% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 HOSHINO Rikuya
 R. Hoshino
9
 —
367
 3.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 41% <1% 11% 18% 6% <1% <1% 14% <1% <1% 44% 4% 28% <1% <1% 15% 2% <1% 11% 67% <1% <1% 7% 34% 59% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGS Harry
 H. Higgs
9
 —
227
 8.3 — — CUT — — — — <1% 92% 2% 7% 2% 5% 2% <1% 53% <1% <1% 74% 15% 42% 11% <1% 20% 4% <1% 34% <1% 84% 3% 75% 53% 27% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 VILLEGAS Camilo
 C. Villegas
9
 —
445
 5.7 — — CUT CUT — — — <1% 53% 1% 4% 3% 17% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 18% 4% 11% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 11% <1% 44% 1% 19% 18% 40% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 FRITTELLI Dylan
 D. Frittelli
9
 —
440
 2.8 — — — — — — — — <1% 58% <1% 11% 9% 10% <1% <1% 9% <1% <1% 27% 3% 16% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 4% 50% 1% <1% 3% 17% 39% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNLAP Nick
 N. Dunlap
3
151
207
 15.6 — T61 WD — — — — 1% 54% 2% 54% 93% 59% 4% 2% 62% <1% <1% 94% 17% 93% 79% 1% 86% 14% 1% 97% 9% 64% 3% 77% 98% 98% 98% 1% <1% <1%
 DUNCAN Tyler
 T. Duncan
9
 —
488
 3.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 55% <1% 3% 3% 14% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 14% 3% 10% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 12% 1% 52% <1% 45% 25% 51% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 KNOX Russell
 R. Knox
9
 —
345
 2.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 53% <1% 2% 3% 18% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 16% 6% 10% <1% <1% 3% 2% <1% 4% <1% 48% 1% 33% 13% 29% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 SCHENK Adam
 A. Schenk
3
79
136
 21.2 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 77 — <1% 54% >99% 76% 76% 62% 11% >99% 75% <1% <1% 93% >99% 96% 96% 1% 74% 13% 1% 86% 11% 64% 6% 53% 93% 86% 92% 2% <1% <1%
 ROZO Marcelo
 M. Rozo
6
153
471
 18.4 — CUT CUT T65 CUT — — <1% 92% 2% 78% 80% 76% <1% 1% 91% <1% <1% 96% 3% 90% 89% 2% 81% 6% 1% 93% 19% 74% 1% 88% 93% 89% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 MALNATI Peter
 P. Malnati
3
 — — 16.9 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 54% 1% 54% 72% 59% <1% <1% 64% <1% <1% 91% 4% 81% 97% 1% 78% 6% <1% 93% 5% 77% <1% 57% 97% 94% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 LIST Luke
 L. List
9
 —
490
 4.2 — — — CUT — — — — <1% 52% <1% 4% 9% 15% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 22% 3% 14% <1% <1% 6% 1% <1% 12% 6% 39% <1% 32% 33% 56% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 WARING Paul
 P. Waring
9
 —
268
 4.5 — — — — — — — <1% 44% 2% 9% 19% 11% 1% <1% 15% <1% <1% 58% 11% 30% <1% <1% 17% 2% <1% 3% 49% 3% 2% 5% 24% 25% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 GOMEZ Fabian
 F. Gomez
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 61% <1% 3% 3% 22% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 17% 3% 8% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 5% 2% 46% 1% 30% 18% 26% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 NYHOLM Pontus
 P. Nyholm
5
 —
287
 18.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 86% 1% 82% 88% 75% <1% 1% 83% <1% <1% 94% 8% 90% 74% <1% 81% 9% <1% 94% 20% 71% 2% 91% 95% 96% 94% <1% <1% <1%
 TOSTI Alejandro
 A. Tosti
6
 —
285
 18.7 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — <1% 87% 2% 85% 92% 76% <1% 2% 86% <1% <1% 97% 9% 93% 81% 1% 82% 9% <1% 97% 19% 75% 2% 94% 90% 97% 93% <1% <1% <1%
 STREELMAN Kevin
 K. Streelman
9
 — — 11.7 — — CUT CUT — — — <1% 76% <1% 64% 32% 83% <1% <1% 28% <1% <1% 59% 4% 39% 15% 1% 48% 5% <1% 55% 5% 81% 2% 68% 75% 77% 54% <1% <1% <1%
 DAVIS Cam
 C. Davis
2
149
162
 18.1 — CUT CUT T70 73 — — <1% 46% >99% 59% 77% 71% 8% 2% 63% <1% <1% 92% 21% 87% 85% 1% 76% 13% <1% 64% 13% 62% 5% 72% 97% 95% 95% <1% <1% <1%
 MERRITT Troy
 T. Merritt
9
 —
497
 2.8 — — — — — — — — <1% 53% <1% 11% 5% 11% <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 31% 3% 16% <1% <1% 9% 1% <1% 4% 43% 3% <1% 5% 24% 38% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE K.H.
 K.H. Lee
9
 —
496
 10.4 — — — — — — — <1% 69% 1% 68% 47% 74% <1% <1% 25% <1% <1% 54% 3% 53% 20% 1% 56% 6% <1% 73% 19% 52% <1% 80% 84% 93% 57% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGHSMITH Joe
 J. Highsmith
2
122
129
 21.6 — T66 CUT CUT T54 T75 — 1% 55% >99% 75% 86% 56% 12% >99% 74% <1% <1% 93% >99% 95% 90% 1% 76% 15% 1% 90% 30% 46% 5% 69% 96% 93% 93% 1% <1% <1%
 CAPAN III Frankie
 F. Capan III
9
 —
262
 9.2 — — CUT CUT — — — <1% 92% <1% 6% 3% 3% 1% <1% 43% <1% <1% 75% 10% 45% 9% <1% 21% 3% <1% 40% <1% 76% 1% 72% 55% 41% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 HADLEY Chesson
 C. Hadley
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — <1% 58% <1% 4% 5% 16% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 19% 3% 12% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 11% <1% 49% <1% 33% 24% 47% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 CROWE Trace
 T. Crowe
5
 — — 13.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 84% <1% 83% 91% 81% 4% 3% 82% <1% 2% 95% 17% 91% 64% 2% 83% 12% 2% 92% 18% 78% 4% 91% 91% 91% 91% 3% <1% <1%
 SARGENT Gordon
 G. Sargent
3
 — — 18.0 — CUT CUT CUT — — — <1% 91% <1%
>99% 		90% 65% <1% 1% 90% <1% <1% 96% 3% 94% 93% <1% 85% 7% <1% 98% 26% 66% <1% 93% 98% 98% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 COODY Parker
 P. Coody
9
 — — 4.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 51% <1% 3% 13% 7% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 36% 2% 31% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 31% 5% 41% <1% 39% 46% 74% 31% <1% <1% <1%
 MCGIRT William
 W. McGirt
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 61% <1% 1% 1% 21% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 3% 7% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 3% <1% 50% <1% 31% 8% 17% 5% <1% <1% <1%
 KISNER Kevin
 K. Kisner
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 50% <1% 3% 3% 13% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 32% 3% 16% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 16% <1% 63% <1% 38% 36% 46% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 HAHN James
 J. Hahn
9
 — — 2.4 — — — — — — — — <1% 61% <1% 2% 2% 19% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 15% 3% 8% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 3% <1% 49% <1% 24% 14% 25% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 STALLINGS Scott
 S. Stallings
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 47% <1% <1% 2% 11% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 27% 3% 17% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 4% 1% 33% <1% 19% 13% 26% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 TODD Brendon
 B. Todd
9
 — — 11.7 — — — — — — — <1% 83% <1% 67% 45% 79% <1% <1% 57% <1% <1% 77% 4% 60% 46% <1% 61% 6% <1% 79% 11% 70% 1% 76% 76% 92% 84% <1% <1% <1%
 WILLETT Danny
 D. Willett
9
 — — 11.7 — — — — — — — <1% 67% <1% 86% 73% 71% >99% <1% 44% <1% <1% 71% 4% 52% 7% <1% 75% 6% <1% 49% 89% 1% 1% 40% 81% 94% 56% <1% <1% <1%
 THOMPSON Michael
 M. Thompson
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 47% <1% 2% 5% 11% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 31% 3% 19% <1% <1% 7% 1% <1% 11% 3% 38% <1% 26% 31% 39% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 STUARD Brian
 B. Stuard
9
 — — 2.8 — — — — — — — — <1% 70% <1% 3% 2% 22% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 17% 3% 10% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 5% <1% 56% <1% 38% 15% 28% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 TWAY Kevin
 K. Tway
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 50% <1% 4% 3% 12% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 17% 3% 12% <1% <1% 6% 1% <1% 8% 3% 34% <1% 30% 24% 48% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 KODAIRA Satoshi
 S. Kodaira
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 61% <1% 8% 6% 12% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 27% 3% 16% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 4% 23% 8% <1% 7% 18% 40% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 LASHLEY Nate
 N. Lashley
9
 — — 3.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 47% <1% 2% 8% 14% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 30% 5% 24% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 23% <1% 38% 1% 51% 43% 42% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 OVERTON Jeff
 J. Overton
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — <1% 66% <1% 12% 9% 15% <1% <1% 11% <1% <1% 30% 3% 14% <1% <1% 8% 1% <1% 4% 40% 7% <1% 10% 24% 38% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 PIERCY Scott
 S. Piercy
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — <1% 59% <1% 1% 1% 21% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 14% 4% 6% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 3% <1% 48% <1% 29% 11% 14% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 HARRINGTON Padraig
 P. Harrington
9
 — — 5.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 65% <1% 5% 3% 24% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 24% >99% 8% <1% <1% 4% >99% <1% 1% 12% 22% >99% <1% 12% 13% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 BADDELEY Aaron
 A. Baddeley
9
 — — 3.6 — — — — — — — — <1% 51% <1% 3% 5% 15% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 32% 3% 16% <1% <1% 7% 1% <1% 4% 1% 64% <1% 45% 44% 49% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 CRANE Ben
 B. Crane
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 69% <1% 3% 3% 25% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 18% 4% 8% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 4% 2% 55% 1% 35% 18% 24% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 DUFNER Jason
 J. Dufner
9
 — — 3.9 — — CUT — — — — — <1% 59% <1% 5% 3% 18% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 22% >99% 8% <1% <1% 5% 1% <1% 1% 10% 13% 1% 8% 11% 15% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 PALMER Ryan
 R. Palmer
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 59% <1% 2% 5% 22% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 21% 3% 11% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 11% <1% 52% <1% 32% 24% 29% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HAAS Bill
 B. Haas
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 69% <1% 4% 4% 21% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 20% 3% 10% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 7% 3% 53% <1% 37% 23% 37% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 BREHM Ryan
 R. Brehm
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — <1% 66% <1% 7% 7% 17% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 24% 3% 14% <1% <1% 6% 1% <1% 9% 4% 42% <1% 35% 25% 45% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 WATNEY Nick
 N. Watney
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 59% <1% 3% 3% 17% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 20% 3% 9% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 2% 4% 24% <1% 12% 13% 24% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 REAVIE Chez
 C. Reavie
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 61% <1% 3% 2% 20% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 19% 3% 8% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 7% <1% 53% <1% 37% 21% 34% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 ARMOUR Ryan
 R. Armour
9
 — — 2.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 67% <1% 2% 2% 25% <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 16% 4% 7% <1% <1% 2% 1% <1% 2% <1% 56% 1% 26% 11% 16% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 BAE Sangmoon
 S. Bae
9
 — — 3.4 — — — — — — — — <1% 69% <1% 5% 6% 20% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 21% 3% 12% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 11% 3% 52% <1% 41% 25% 46% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 LANDRY Andrew
 A. Landry
9
 — — 4.5 — — CUT — — — — — <1% 70% <1% 6% 6% 19% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 20% 3% 13% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 12% 4% 54% <1% 43% 28% 51% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 WERENSKI Richy
 R. Werenski
9
 — — 2.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 60% <1% 3% 4% 14% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 16% 3% 12% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 9% <1% 46% <1% 37% 20% 49% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 DONALD Luke
 L. Donald
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 60% <1% 7% 3% 15% <1% <1% 9% <1% <1% 28% 3% 9% <1% <1% 5% 1% <1% <1% 36% 2% 1% 2% 7% 16% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 WISE Aaron
 A. Wise
9
 — — 12.0 — — — CUT — — — <1% 69% <1% 72% 60% 70% <1% <1% 34% <1% <1% 59% 3% 56% 24% <1% 60% 7% <1% 78% 22% 53% <1% 80% 87% 98% 63% <1% <1% <1%
 NORRMAN Vincent
 V. Norrman
9
 — — 9.8 — — — — — — — — <1% 71% <1% 73% 59% 68% <1% 2% 37% <1% 1% 59% 3% 61% 18% 1% 66% 7% <1% 63% 30% 41% <1% 74% 87% 98% 59% <1% <1% <1%
 STANGER Jimmy
 J. Stanger
9
 — — 5.8 — — CUT — — — — <1% 51% <1% 3% 10% 8% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 36% 3% 27% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 22% 4% 37% <1% 36% 39% 60% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 COOK Austin
 A. Cook
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 57% <1% 3% 3% 14% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 15% 3% 11% <1% <1% 4% 1% <1% 8% 1% 43% <1% 34% 19% 47% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HUH John
 J. Huh
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 49% <1% 2% 7% 9% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 32% 3% 22% <1% <1% 7% 1% <1% 16% 4% 38% <1% 30% 37% 51% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 LINGMERTH David
 D. Lingmerth
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — <1% 50% <1% 2% 6% 11% <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 33% 3% 21% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 13% 3% 40% <1% 28% 32% 43% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 STREB Robert
 R. Streb
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — <1% 62% <1% 3% 3% 17% <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 16% 3% 10% <1% <1% 3% 1% <1% 6% <1% 48% <1% 28% 17% 38% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 LONG Adam
 A. Long
9
 — — 3.8 — — CUT — — — — — <1% 62% <1% 3% 3% 16% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 17% 3% 10% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 6% <1% 49% <1% 37% 17% 40% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 PAN C.T.
 C.T. Pan
9
 — — 8.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 73% <1% 60% 39% 75% <1% 3% 27% <1% 2% 59% 4% 50% 15% 2% 56% 7% 2% 68% 8% 61% <1% 73% 63% 91% 50% 2% <1% <1%
 LINDHEIM Nicholas
 N. Lindheim
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — <1% 52% <1% 2% 5% 12% <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 33% 3% 19% <1% <1% 6% 1% <1% 11% 3% 41% <1% 28% 29% 35% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIBBLE Cody
 C. Gribble
9
 — — 3.5 — — — — — — — — <1% 67% <1% 6% 7% 16% <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 20% 3% 14% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 15% 4% 50% <1% 41% 30% 58% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 MCCUMBER Tyler
 T. McCumber
9
 — — 9.9 — — — — — — — — <1% 73% <1% 70% 55% 75% <1% <1% 36% <1% <1% 59% 3% 53% 22% <1% 57% 6% <1% 73% 19% 57% <1% 80% 87% 97% 65% <1% <1% <1%
 SINGH Vijay
 V. Singh
9
T125
 — 4.5 — T40 — — — — — — <1% 34% <1% <1% <1% 20% >99% <1% 2% <1% <1% 17% >99% 4% <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% <1% <1% 34% 2% 11% 6% 3% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPOS Rafael
 R. Campos
3
T132
 — 17.2 — CUT T44 CUT CUT — — <1% 58% 1% 54% 72% 58% <1% <1% 58% <1% <1% 95% 3% 86% 97% 1% 82% 6% <1% 92% 5% 81% 1% 86% 96% 91% 98% <1% <1% <1%