PGA Tour 
 DP World Tour
 LIV Golf
 Korn Ferry Tour
 Challenge Tour
| FedExCup |
 Projected Schedules 
 Projected Standings
 Current Standings
 PGA Tour Schedule
UPDATED —
Schedule Model Methodology
This table displays the probabilities (based on our season-long simulations) of each PGA Tour member starting each tournament on the 2026 schedule. We start by predicting a baseline probability for each player/event based on their age, position on the priority list, their DG and OWGR rank, their history at the event, and their general playing patterns (e.g. overall playing frequency, participation in DPWT events). For the Signature Events and the Majors (plus The Players), qualified players are locked into the field. During season simulations, players may also gain entry into certain events based on their performance, which overrides the baseline probability. In some cases, we manually adjust probabilities when we have reliable information that a player has commited to play (or not play) a tournament. These cases are denoted with a triangle, with more details available on hover.
Contributors: 
Eddie Bajek
, 
@Robopz
News/Announcements 
 | Manual Adjustments 
Player
Proj
Starts
SIG
Sentry
Sony Open 
The AMEX 
Farmers 
WMPO 
SIG
AT&T Pebble 
SIG
Genesis Inv 
Cognizant 
SIG
Arnold Palmer 
Puerto Rico 
PLYRS
The Players 
Valspar 
Houston Open 
Field
Valero 
MAJ
Field
Masters
SIG
RBC Heritage
Zurich Classic
SIG
Miami
SIG
Truist
Myrtle Beach
MAJ
Field
PGA
CJ CUP
Charles Schwab
SIG
Memorial
Canadian Open
MAJ
Field
U.S. Open
SIG
Travelers
John Deere
Scottish Open
ISCO
MAJ
Field
The Open
Corales
3M Open
Rocket
Wyndham
St. Jude
BMW Champ
PLAYOFFS
TOUR Champ
 SCHEFFLER Scottie
 S. Scheffler
1
7
1
 19.7 — — 1 — T3 T4 T12 — T24 — T22 — — — >99% >99% 14% >99% >99% <1% >99% 15% 49% >99% 16% >99% >99% 9% 65% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 MCILROY Rory
 R. McIlroy
1
30
2
 17.6 — — — — — T14 T2 — WD — T46 — — — >99% >99% 21% >99% >99% <1% >99% 7% 7% >99% 31% >99% >99% 3%
>99% 		<1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% 99% 89%
 SCHAUFFELE Xander
 X. Schauffele
1
10
6
 20.3 — — — CUT T41 T19 T7 — T24 — 3 T4 — — >99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% >99% 9% 19% >99% 15% >99% >99% 6% 71% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 93%
 YOUNG Cameron
 C. Young
1
2
3
 19.9 — — — T22 T41 T55 T7 — T3 — 1 — — — >99% >99% 25% >99% >99% <1% >99% 18% 35% >99% 35% >99% >99% 16% 56% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 FLEETWOOD Tommy
 T. Fleetwood
1
12
4
 18.5 — — — — — T4 T7 — 49 — T8 — — >99% >99% 14% >99% >99% <1% >99% 8% 26% >99% 22% >99% >99% 3% 87% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 1% >99% >99% 89%
 FITZPATRICK Matt
 M. Fitzpatrick
1
3
5
 20.9 — — T63 — 9 T14 T24 — T41 — 2 1 — — >99% >99% 38% >99% >99% <1% >99% 13% 23% >99% 22% >99% >99% 6% 91% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 HENLEY Russell
 R. Henley
1
28
10
 19.5 — T19 T8 — — T19 CUT — T6 — T13 — — >99%
>99%
<1%
>99% 		>99% <1% 99% 9% 19% >99% 15% >99% >99% 8% 31% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 4% >99% 94% 70%
 MACINTYRE Robert
 R. MacIntyre
1
23
11
 22.1 — T4 T38 — — T37 T20 — T24 — 4 — — >99% >99% 59% >99% >99% <1% 98% 32% 66% >99% 43% >99% >99% 20% 89% <1% >99% <1% 1% 2% 15% >99% 99% 83%
 ABERG Ludvig
 L. Aberg
1
13
18
 20.5 — — WD CUT — T37 T20 — T3 — T5 — — >99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% 99% 14% 23% >99% 25% >99% >99% 14% 69% <1% >99% <1% <1% 2% 2% >99% >99% 85%
 MATSUYAMA Hideki
 H. Matsuyama
1
16
14
 21.1 — T13 — T11 2 T8 T28 — T41 — T27 — — >99% >99% 17% >99% >99% <1% 99% 12% 35% >99% 17% >99% >99% 8% 45% <1% >99% <1% 1% 3% 5% >99% 98% 73%
 MORIKAWA Collin
 C. Morikawa
1
6
8
 20.6 — CUT — — T54 1 T7 — 5 — WD — — >99% >99% 26% >99% >99% <1% >99% 10% 33% >99% 16% >99% >99% 9% 66% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% <1% >99% >99% >99%
 LEE Min Woo
 M. Lee
2
8
25
 21.3 — — T38 — T28 T2 T12 — T6 — T32 — T3 — >99% >99% 15% >99% >99% <1% 95% 66% 93% >99% 29% 78% >99% 10% 78% <1% 59% <1% <1% 7% <1% >99% >99% 97%
 KIM Si Woo
 S. Kim
1
17
30
 24.3 — T11 T6 T2 T3 T45 T34 — T13 — T50 — — >99% >99% 56% >99% >99% <1% >99% 29% 76% >99% 35% 94% >99% 60% 60% 1% >99% <1% 3% 3% 23% >99% >99% 85%
 KNAPP Jake
 J. Knapp
2
9
42
 23.1 — T11 — T5 8 T8 6 — — — CUT — T6 — >99% >99% 64% >99% >99% <1% 94% 86% >99% >99% 58% 78% 99% 79% 56% 2% 60% 6% 7% 11% 27% >99% >99% 85%
 BRIDGEMAN Jacob
 J. Bridgeman
1
1
17
 23.9 — T4 T13 — T18 T8 1 — T18 — T5 T14 — — >99% >99% 69% >99% >99% <1% >99% 49% 89% >99% 35% >99% >99% 71% 65% <1% >99% <1% 2% <1% 7% >99% >99% >99%
 CANTLAY Patrick
 P. Cantlay
1
49
34
 19.5 — — T13 CUT — T14 T37 — CUT — T32 T7 — — >99% >99% 23% >99% >99% <1% 98% 13% 14% >99% 21% >99% >99% 12% 39% <1% >99% <1% 6% 11% 14% 91% 71% 40%
 BHATIA Akshay
 A. Bhatia
1
4
20
 22.1 — — CUT CUT T3 T6 T16 — 1 — T13 — — — >99% >99% 59% >99% >99% <1% >99% 32% 80% >99% 36% >99% >99% 34% 57% <1% >99% <1% 3% 4% 8% >99% >99% >99%
 BURNS Sam
 S. Burns
1
34
33
 20.8 — — T27 — CUT T6 CUT — CUT — T13 — T21 — >99% >99% 34% >99% >99% <1% 98% 26% 36% >99% 39% >99% >99% 22% 64% <1% >99% <1% 26% 6% 22% 96% 75% 39%
 MCNEALY Maverick
 M. McNealy
1
44
27
 22.5 — T24 — 10 T13 T29 CUT — T13 — T32 — — >99% >99% 37% >99% >99% <1% 98% 31% 65% >99% 36% >99% >99% 38% 55% <1% >99% <1% 26% 8% 25% 97% 83% 54%
 HOVLAND Viktor
 V. Hovland
1
50
22
 18.7 — — — — T10 T58 T41 — T13 — T13 CUT — — >99% >99% 16% >99% >99% <1% 98% 14% 8% >99% 25% >99% >99% 12% 84% <1% >99% <1% 7% 11% 13% 86% 62% 31%
 NOREN Alex
 A. Noren
4
63
19
 18.8 — — CUT CUT — T29 T12 — T24 — T32 — — >99% 28% 61% 43% 38% 33% 85% 63% 67% 50% 62% >99% 46% 15% 93% <1% >99% <1% 8% 20% 40% 66% 42% 19%
 HOJGAARD Nicolai
 N. Hojgaard
3
18
36
 23.1 — — — T22 T3 — — T6 T24 — T27 T55 2 — >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% 92% 74% 89% 94% 66% 74% 93% 24% 97% <1% >99% <1% 1% 23% 16% >99% 97% 72%
 FOWLER Rickie
 R. Fowler
1
39
65
 20.3 — — T18 — T18 T19 T28 — T9 — T42 — CUT <1% >99% 26% >99% >99% <1% 98% 12% 52% >99% 29% 88% >99% 45% 38% 2% 75% 7% 11% 19% 34% 92% 67% 34%
 GOTTERUP Chris
 C. Gotterup
1
5
9
 24.1 — 1 — T18 1 T37 CUT — T18 — T56 — T6 — >99% >99% 70% >99% >99% <1% >99% 49% 92% >99% 39% >99% >99% 69% 73% <1% >99% <1% 4% 2% 11% >99% >99% >99%
 ENGLISH Harris
 H. English
1
54
21
 21.4 — — T27 T22 T28 T24 T22 — T24 — CUT — T21 — >99% >99% 39% >99% >99% <1% >99% 21% 55% >99% 27% >99% >99% 17% 61% 1% >99% <1% 10% 5% 32% 84% 60% 29%
 STRAKA Sepp
 S. Straka
1
11
12
 21.1 — — CUT — T18 T2 T50 — T13 — T8 — — >99% >99% 41% >99% >99% <1% 99% 17% 56% >99% 21% >99% >99% 28% 65% <1% >99% <1% 1% 1% 8% >99% >99% 69%
 GRIFFIN Ben
 B. Griffin
1
73
16
 26.2 — T19 T24 — T28 T37 T41 — CUT — CUT CUT T28 — >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% >99% 67% 86% >99% 52% >99% >99% 85% 60% 8% >99% <1% 51% 37% 77% 87% 68% 38%
 LOWRY Shane
 S. Lowry
1
33
32
 19.9 — — — — — T8 T24 T2 CUT — CUT — T28 — >99%
>99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% 98% 10% 14% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% 5% 51% <1% >99% <1% 1% 1% 13% 97% 70% 32%
 SPIETH Jordan
 J. Spieth
2
35
63
 19.9 — T24 — — CUT T29 T12 — T11 — T32 T11 — >99% 43% 24% 54% 51% 13% 86% 71% 98% 53% 43% 65% 53% 44% 49% 3% >99% <1% 6% 19% 35% 88% 60% 32%
 SCOTT Adam
 A. Scott
3
24
53
 20.0 — T40 T24 T30 — — 4 — T11 — T56 — T21 — >99% 98% 42% 90% 87% 2% 92% 40% 72% 79% 38% 70% 69% 9% 77% <1% >99% <1% 1% 2% 9% >99% 80% 42%
 HALL Harry
 H. Hall
1
40
59
 24.2 — T6 T24 — CUT T24 CUT — T9 — CUT — T28 — >99% >99% 67% >99% >99% <1% 97% 57% 90% >99% 51% >99% >99% 60% 67% 2% >99% <1% 28% 26% 62% 96% 75% 40%
 SPAUN J.J.
 J.J. Spaun
1
115
13
 24.1 — T40 — CUT — T45 CUT — CUT — T24 CUT — >99% >99% 71% >99% >99% <1% >99% 53% 61% >99% 55% >99% >99% 63% 53% 24% >99% <1% 67% 31% 77% 76% 55% 28%
 ROSE Justin
 J. Rose
1
20
7
 18.4 — — CUT 1 — T37 CUT — CUT — T13 — — — >99% >99% 12% >99% >99% <1% >99% 4% 23% >99% 20% >99% >99% 2% 58% <1% >99% <1% <1% <1% 5% >99% 82% 35%
 GERARD Ryan
 R. Gerard
1
15
28
 24.2 — 2 T2 T11 — T45 T28 T23 CUT — T27 — CUT — >99% >99% 66% >99% >99% <1% >99% 43% 76% >99% 33% 94% >99% 64% 59% <1% 74% 5% 4% 7% 27% >99% 98% 69%
 THOMAS Justin
 J. Thomas
1
56
15
 15.7 — — — — — — — — CUT — T8 T30 — — >99% >99% 23% >99% >99% <1% >99% 17% 14% >99% 26% >99% >99% 15% 68% <1% >99% <1% 16% 13% 25% 79% 54% 25%
 DAY Jason
 J. Day
1
42
41
 18.5 — — T2 T38 — T24 CUT — CUT — T59 — T6 — >99% >99% 12% >99% >99% <1% >99% 7% 7% >99% 24% 88% >99% 39% 17% 2% 77% 4% 3% 6% 17% 80% 48% 18%
 CONNERS Corey
 C. Conners
1
57
43
 19.8 — T24 — — CUT T70 T37 — T33 — T13 T14 — — >99% >99% 27% >99% >99% <1% 97% 20% 21% >99% 41% >99% >99% 18% 68% <1% >99% <1% 14% 10% 32% 69% 42% 17%
 KITAYAMA Kurt
 K. Kitayama
1
26
35
 21.9 — T40 CUT — T24 T48 T2 — T18 — CUT — T60 — >99% >99% 51% >99% >99% <1% >99% 26% 59% >99% 31% 92% >99% 34% 52% <1% 76% 2% 17% 6% 25% >99% 81% 41%
 THEEGALA Sahith
 S. Theegala
3
19
71
 24.2 — T31 T8 T7 T18 T60 T22 — T6 — T32 CUT T10 — <1% >99% 84% 97% 94% 2% 90% 77% 95% 79% 60% 70% 76% 60% 58% 8% 47% 19% 24% 16% 29% >99% 88% 48%
 TAYLOR Nick
 N. Taylor
1
59
66
 22.6 — T13 T27 — T28 T24 T28 — T38 — T42 CUT — >99% >99% 63% >99% >99% <1% 96% 26% 43% >99% 42% >99% >99% 29% 67% 1% >99% <1% 15% 7% 51% 67% 39% 14%
 MITCHELL Keith
 K. Mitchell
3
48
105
 21.8 — T66 T44 T11 T41 T52 — T6 T33 — T46 — T14 <1% 22% 64% 35% 31% 37% 79% 81% >99% 37% 68% 54% 32% 87% 67% 5% 42% 29% 55% 53% 69% 69% 42% 18%
 BRADLEY Keegan
 K. Bradley
1
128
26
 20.8 — CUT — T43 — T29 CUT — CUT — T50 T55 — — >99% >99% 44% >99% >99% <1% >99% 30% 14% >99% 40% >99% >99% 29% 27% 24% >99% <1% 63% 42% 74% 52% 30% 10%
 STEVENS Sam
 S. Stevens
1
38
44
 25.2 — T31 T6 T30 T35 T55 T16 — CUT — 58 — 5 — >99% >99% 72% >99% >99% <1% 98% 44% 82% >99% 51% 89% >99% 89% 58% 5% 70% 22% 39% 15% 63% 97% 80% 46%
 THORBJORNSEN Michael
 M. Thorbjornsen
3
45
54
 21.5 — — CUT T18 T3 T78 — CUT T33 — T22 — T14 <1% 28% 65% 45% 41% 39% 82% 90% 99% 38% 70% 61% 50% 79% 75% 3% 41% 23% 37% 55% 66% 82% 56% 27%
 HOJGAARD Rasmus
 R. Hojgaard
3
74
55
 20.6 — — T44 T30 T24 — — T9 — CUT CUT T68 T28 — >99% 23%
>99% 		39% 32% 44% 68% 83% 74% 25% 77% 49% 36% 54% 98% <1% >99% <1% 45% 69% 66% 48% 26% 9%
 BERGER Daniel
 D. Berger
1
22
38
 22.6 — T6 T56 — T16 T75 CUT T32 2 — T66 — — >99% >99% 27% >99% >99% <1% 99% 16% 52% >99% 38% 93% >99% 39% 40% 3% >99% <1% 5% 5% 27% >99% 82% 35%
 BEZUIDENHOUT Christiaan
 C. Bezuidenhout
3
91
91
 20.3 — — T38 T27 CUT — — T37 — T8 CUT T30 T51 <1% 21% 69% 32% 27% 60% 57% 88% 99% 27% 66% 36% 24% 87% 79% 7% 32% 30% 80% 67% 91% 33% 17% 5%
 OLESEN Thorbjorn
 T. Olesen
3
123
104
 17.4 — — — CUT CUT — — T40 — — CUT CUT T14 <1% 18% 61% 28% 24% 70% 41% 84% 68% 28% 80% 24% 22% 71% 95% <1% 28% 11% 74% 83% 85% 25% 13% 4%
 MCGREEVY Max
 M. McGreevy
3
80
73
 23.7 — CUT T27 T30 T48 T29 CUT T40 — — T50 CUT T19 <1% 21% 85% 33% 29% 67% 65% 95% >99% 30% 80% 44% 33% 92% 64% 15% 36% 52% 76% 73% 92% 48% 26% 10%
 HISATSUNE Ryo
 R. Hisatsune
3
21
64
 25.2 — CUT T44 T2 T10 T8 T45 — T33 — T13 T30 — <1% 99% 72% 93% 89% 8% 88% 92% >99% 76% 74% 69% 75% 90% 80% <1% 44% 10% 27% 41% 56% >99% 89% 50%
 SMALLEY Alex
 A. Smalley
3
65
113
 22.6 — T40 T44 CUT T35 T19 — T52 — — T24 T46 T21 <1% 20% 77% 31% 27% 67% 67% 94% 99% 28% 74% 46% 27% 97% 60% 18% 32% 57% 75% 81% 91% 51% 28% 10%
 RODGERS Patrick
 P. Rodgers
2
31
72
 23.0 — 3 T44 T27 T60 T52 T34 — T24 — T11 T40 CUT <1% 31% 61% 38% 31% 43% 87% 87% >99% 33% 67% 65% 32% 84% 78% <1% 49% 9% 44% 40% 78% 88% 38% 11%
 SMITH Jordan
 J. Smith
4
43
67
 21.3 — T66 T27 CUT T16 — — T23 — — CUT 3 T44 <1% 92% 82% 36% 75% 16% 83% 79% 86% 37% 71% 60% 38% 46% 98% <1% >99% <1% 14% 28% 51% 74% 43% 19%
 MCCARTHY Denny
 D. McCarthy
1
83
92
 22.6 — T40 T56 T49 — T55 T47 — CUT — CUT T26 T12 <1% >99% 44% >99% >99% <1% >99% 26% 30% >99% 44% 71% >99% 87% 49% 13% 53% 29% 35% 30% 79% 45% 22% 6%
 FOX Ryan
 R. Fox
1
47
48
 17.8 — — — — T24 T24 T7 — T24 — — — CUT — >99% >99% 52% >99% >99% <1% >99% 25% 25% >99% 41% 87% >99% 8% 85% <1% >99% <1% 7% 6% 46% 60% 29% 8%
 COODY Pierceson
 P. Coody
5
32
52
 22.5 — T13 T18 T2 T10 T48 T16 — CUT — CUT T55 WD — <1% 19% 85% 36% 31% 50% 86% 89% 99% 32% 69% 66% 41% 86% 58% 18% 43% 37% 32% 51% 65% 93% 49% 17%
 MCCARTY Matt
 M. McCarty
3
46
46
 22.7 — T55 T2 T18 CUT T67 T24 — T41 — CUT CUT —
>99% 		25% 66% 36% 29% 50% 81% 89% >99% 29% 70% 61% 37% 81% 50% 12% 43% 26% 45% 55% 77% 64% 33% 12%
 WOODLAND Gary
 G. Woodland
3
25
51
 21.9 — CUT 72 CUT T64 — — CUT — — CUT T14 1 >99% >99% 20% >99% >99% <1% >99% 7% 40% >99% 38% >99% >99% 12% 48% 1% 79% 4% 13% 6% 30% >99% 68% 22%
 CASTILLO Ricky
 R. Castillo
7
29
86
 23.0 — T31 T44 T43 — — — 5 — 1 T70 T46 T44 <1% >99% 87% 53% >99% <1% >99% 86% 98% 44% 67% 63% 47% 87% 59% 21% 38% 46% 26% 47% 50% 97% 61% 25%
 RAI Aaron
 A. Rai
2
114
40
 19.2 — T50 — — — T73 T28 T23 — — CUT CUT — — >99% 17% 83% 28% 21% 74% 51% 94% 97% 25% 85% 33% 33% 80% 87% 5% >99% <1% 75% 79% 96% 33% 17% 5%
 PARRY John
 J. Parry
4
89
84
 19.8 — T19 T56 T43 T35 — — T63 — T8 — T55 T48 <1% 15% 87% 22% 19% 71% 62% 84% 79% 28% 79% 40% 22% 52% 97% <1% >99% <1% 46% 49% 81% 28% 13% 4%
 POSTON J.T.
 J.T. Poston
1
121
76
 22.2 — — T38 — T35 T37 CUT — CUT — T50 — CUT <1% >99% 68% >99% >99% <1% >99% 39% 41% >99% 58% 57% >99% 95% 27% 47% 46% 47% 80% 43% 91% 45% 24% 8%
 PENDRITH Taylor
 T. Pendrith
1
76
74
 22.4 — T6 CUT CUT — T34 T45 — T38 — T46 CUT CUT — <1% >99% 54% >99% >99% <1% >99% 36% 28% >99% 64% 76% >99% 52% 37% 23% 58% 34% 73% 34% 76% 55% 29% 9%
 DUMONT DE CHASSART Adrien
 A. Dumont De Chassart
5
69
145
 20.8 — T24 69 CUT CUT — — T23 — T26 — T26 T12 <1% 22% 90% 26% 27% 64% 58% 93% 97% 20% 76% 40% 20% 91% 80% 7% 23% 49% 67% 78% 86% 37% 19% 6%
 ECHAVARRIA Nico
 N. Echavarria
2
14
39
 23.5 — CUT CUT — CUT T8 CUT 1 T44 — T66 — CUT — >99% >99% 48% >99% >99% <1% >99% 24% 65% >99% 40% 94% >99% 74% 50% 1% 74% 10% 4% 17% 43% >99% 83% 22%
 MEISSNER Mac
 M. Meissner
3
108
115
 21.6 — T40 T63 T49 T18 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T28 <1% 17% 84% 25% 22% 77% 41% 97% 99% 23% 85% 28% 25% 98% 31% 63% 21% 76% 94% 91% 97% 39% 21% 7%
 PENGE Marco
 M. Penge
4
66
37
 21.5 — — — CUT CUT T64 T16 — — — CUT T4 CUT >99% 30% 84% 31% 34% 53% 73% 87% 79% 28% 81% >99% 41% 62% 98% <1% >99% <1% 35% 52% 66% 62% 37% 16%
 JAEGER Stephan
 S. Jaeger
2
52
99
 18.8 — — CUT T5 T28 T67 — CUT — — T62 T7 T28 <1% 18% 50% 20% 19% 51% 76% 86% 98% 24% 54% 53% 18% 77% 24% 16% 40% 18% 32% 64% 84% 34% 14% 4%
 KIRK Chris
 C. Kirk
2
116
97
 18.9 — CUT CUT — CUT T52 — CUT T47 — T27 — T51 <1% 12% 42% 17% 12% 72% 45% 77% 95% 23% 62% 26% 14% 78% 19% 49% 30% 42% 82% 87% 92% 11% 4% 1%
 ZALATORIS Will
 W. Zalatoris
9
137
299
 14.9 — — T18 CUT — — — — — — — — CUT <1% 11% 85% 17% 14% 80% 15% 91% 84% 20% 64% 11% 15% 93% 43% 51% 9% 84% 78% 91% 89% 28% 14% 5%
 GREYSERMAN Max
 M. Greyserman
2
95
62
 21.0 — — T56 CUT CUT T37 T24 — T18 — CUT — CUT — >99% 15% 80% 22% 17% 79% 58% 94% >99% 19% 78% 38% 24% 87% 59% 26% 31% 57% 91% 86% 96% 27% 12% 3%
 YELLAMARAJU Sudarshan
 S. Yellamaraju
5
27
131
 21.3 — T13 CUT T56 T54 — — T17 — T37 T5 — T6 <1% 51% 84% 42% 36% 42% 79% 88% 99% 31% 65% 60% 31% 89% 55% 14% 31% 40% 30% 55% 59% 94% 47% 15%
 HARMAN Brian
 B. Harman
1
55
50
 20.5 — T61 CUT — CUT T19 T50 — 50 — T11 — — >99% >99% 35% >99% >99% <1% >99% 19% 43% >99% 29% >99% >99% 12% 72% <1% >99% <1% 12% 8% 43% 50% 23% 7%
 CLARK Wyndham
 W. Clark
2
93
75
 20.7 — — T13 T65 T35 T58 T41 — — — T42 CUT CUT — >99% 14% 71% 20% 15% 63% >99% 89% 91% 22% 64% >99% 24% 42% 82% 3% >99% <1% 74% 68% 73% 32% 16% 5%
 LI Haotong
 H. Li
4
77
81
 21.1 — T55 T8 T11 CUT — — T32 CUT — CUT — CUT >99% 16% 85% 23% 18% 70% 64% 87% 77% 21% 80% 44% 23% 64% 98% <1% >99% <1% 48% 61% 77% 35% 16% 5%
 FINAU Tony
 T. Finau
2
58
107
 18.9 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 18 T28 — — — T70 T18 T39 <1% 12% 55% 18% 14% 52% 72% 87% >99% 20% 45% 50% 16% 37% 31% 6% 36% 9% 78% 39% 78% 24% 10% 2%
 THOMPSON Davis
 D. Thompson
3
103
120
 20.9 — — CUT T43 T64 — — T60 — 4 CUT T46 CUT <1% 19% 67% 22% 21% 74% 43% 95% 99% 21% 77% 29% 24% 98% 39% 37% 19% 67% 90% 93% 94% 37% 20% 7%
 KEEFER Johnny
 J. Keefer
5
60
60
 23.0 — T61 T27 T43 T41 — — CUT — — CUT CUT T3 >99% 50% 85% 27% 40% 51% 72% 92% 98% 21% 76% >99% 31% 91% 53% 28% 33% 51% 61% 72% 82% 51% 26% 9%
 REITAN Kristoffer
 K. Reitan
4
110
49
 20.7 — CUT — T30 T41 — — T17 — — T66 CUT CUT >99% 17% 89% 23% 18% 78% 49% 92% 70% 19% 88% 33% 29% 76% 98% <1% >99% <1% 75% 79% 89% 29% 14% 4%
 KOEPKA Brooks
 B. Koepka
8
62
165
 16.8 — — — T56 CUT — — T9 — — T13 T18 CUT — >99% 10%
>99% 		15% 12% 30% >99% 71% 88% 20% 41% >99% 13% 42% 47% 6% >99% <1% 41% 53% 38% 33% 14% 4%
 HOEY Rico
 R. Hoey
3
100
78
 23.5 — T50 WD T70 T24 T67 CUT CUT — — T62 T26 T28 <1% 16% 82% 20% 18% 80% 51% 96% 99% 23% 84% 35% 26% 96% 27% 66% 27% 69% 91% 85% 96% 38% 20% 6%
 KIM Michael
 M. Kim
1
99
56
 24.8 — T31 CUT — T18 72 CUT — T33 — CUT T30 — >99% >99% 69% >99% >99% <1% 86% 51% 62% >99% 69% 69% >99% 95% 44% 39% 51% 46% 76% 59% 94% 42% 20% 5%
 NEERGAARD-PETERSEN Rasmus
 R. Neergaard-Petersen
4
146
68
 18.6 — — — T49 T41 — — T40 — 68 — T55 CUT — >99% 14% 91% 20% 15% 83% 36% 94% 66% 15% 90% 25% 24% 83% 98% <1% >99% <1% 87% 88% 93% 20% 9% 2%
 RAMEY Chad
 C. Ramey
3
75
144
 21.6 — T71 T63 T22 T48 — — T17 — CUT T27 T64 T28 <1% 11% 79% 15% 12% 82% 57% 93% >99% 16% 78% 37% 11% 95% 24% 60% 25% 68% 89% 84% 95% 20% 8% 2%
 HOMA Max
 M. Homa
3
90
156
 19.1 — — T27 CUT T66 — T37 T13 — — T32 CUT — >99% 11% 58% 14% 10% 73% 46% 85% 97% 17% 69% 29% 11% 83% 37% 29% 23% 42% 75% 79% 89% 21% 8% 2%
 PUTNAM Andrew
 A. Putnam
7
51
114
 16.2 — — T2 CUT — — — CUT T44 — T32 T30 T44 <1% 11% 61% 14% 11% 33% 74% 51% 73% 16% 52% 51% 11% 63% 57% 12% 37% 40% 41% 54% 36% 17% 6% 1%
 COLE Eric
 E. Cole
3
104
119
 21.2 — CUT T27 T27 CUT — — T37 — CUT T32 CUT T51 <1% 10% 84% 14% 10% 85% 45% 93% >99% 19% 83% 28% 14% 96% 39% 43% 26% 53% 89% 68% 98% 17% 7% 2%
 BRENNAN Michael
 M. Brennan
3
120
45
 23.5 — CUT T56 DQ T48 — — T52 — T26 69 CUT T28 — >99% >99% 83% 22% 16% 81% >99% 99% 99% 17% 82% 29% 31% 92% 60% 26% 22% 60% 95% 89% 95% 31% 15% 5%
 POWER Seamus
 S. Power
7
98
164
 18.1 — T31 T63 T11 — — — T52 — CUT T70 T30 CUT <1% 9% 58% 11% 9% 62% 43% 67% 50% 17% 55% 27% 8% 84% 30% 57% 23% 67% 74% 75% 59% 15% 6% <1%
 IM Sungjae
 S. Im
1
97
70
 19.6 — — — — — — — — CUT — CUT T4 T60 — >99% >99% 64% >99% >99% <1% 84% 57% 42% >99% 58% >99% >99% 85% 66% 8% >99% <1% 82% 40% 82% 55% 31% 11%
 CAULEY Bud
 B. Cauley
1
87
80
 22.0 — T24 CUT — T68 T37 CUT — T18 — T32 74 — <1% >99% 60% >99% >99% <1% 89% 32% 33% >99% 57% 71% >99% 71% 30% 30% 53% 36% 60% 40% 83% 37% 16% 4%
 WHALEY Vince
 V. Whaley
3
131
124
 21.6 — T40 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 CUT T68 T28 <1% 10% 83% 14% 11% 88% 31% 97% 98% 13% 86% 21% 13% 98% 25% 72% 17% 81% 96% 95% 99% 11% 4% <1%
 NOVAK Andrew
 A. Novak
1
85
47
 25.0 — — CUT T7 CUT T48 T47 — T38 — CUT T55 — >99% >99%
>99% 		>99% >99% <1% 90% 56% 71% >99% 58% >99% >99% 72% 58% 12% >99% <1% 72% 39% 87% 49% 25% 7%
 KIM Tom
 T. Kim
3
96
129
 20.1 — T61 T38 T65 T35 — T34 59 — — — T18 T56 <1% 14% 55% 17% 15% 77% 43% 94% 97% 15% 81% 30% 18% 92% 63% 19% 17% 52% 87% 96% 90% 24% 12% 3%
 DOU Zecheng
 Z. Dou
5
78
185
 21.0 — T55 73 T49 T13 — — T17 — T57 CUT CUT T21 <1% 10% 90% 13% 11% 80% 47% 92% 97% 14% 74% 31% 11% 92% 63% 21% 18% 62% 74% 82% 89% 22% 8% 2%
 VALIMAKI Sami
 S. Valimaki
3
130
57
 21.7 — — CUT CUT T41 T34 T37 CUT — — CUT — — >99% >99% 81% 17% 13% 86% >99% 98% 97% 14% 78% 26% 23% 89% 83% 6% 21% 32% 95% 92% 94% 17% 7% 2%
 SMOTHERMAN Austin
 A. Smotherman
5
37
90
 19.3 — CUT T8 CUT CUT — — T2 WD — T13 CUT — <1% 12% 83% 16% 13% 63% 80% 86% 98% 19% 66% 61% 20% 74% 28% 33% 37% 32% 26% 37% 73% 51% 19% 5%
 MOUW William
 W. Mouw
3
81
121
 20.6 — T71 CUT CUT CUT — — T6 — — T24 — T44 <1% >99% 83% 17% 13% 79% >99% 97% >99% 15% 70% 37% 18% 88% 55% 20% 20% 49% 85% 80% 91% 30% 13% 4%
 WALLACE Matt
 M. Wallace
7
153
96
 18.4 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T40 T51 <1% 11% 96% 12% 11% 86% 37% 91% 78% 20% 87% 23% 18% 70% 88% 8% 22% 73% 94% 89% 93% 19% 9% 3%
 HUGHES Mackenzie
 M. Hughes
2
106
118
 19.2 — — CUT T59 T28 T34 — T23 — — CUT T55 CUT <1% 10% 49% 11% 9% 83% 44% 89% 94% 18% 80% 28% 15% 63% 54% 26% 23% 47% 93% 66% 90% 17% 7% 2%
 HODGES Lee
 L. Hodges
7
82
132
 19.6 — T6 CUT CUT — — — T40 — — T59 T18 T65 <1% 10% 93% 13% 11% 82% 53% 89% 97% 14% 77% 36% 14% 95% 64% 26% 22% 62% 89% 89% 87% 24% 10% 2%
 ROY Kevin
 K. Roy
3
79
140
 20.0 — T13 CUT CUT T13 — — T23 — — T59 73 T65 <1% 9% 78% 11% 7% 84% 56% 91% >99% 15% 74% 36% 11% 88% 21% 57% 24% 63% 79% 73% 93% 19% 8% 2%
 KUCHAR Matt
 M. Kuchar
7
172
160
 14.9 — — T44 CUT — — — CUT — — — CUT T56 <1% 6% 62% 6% 4% 70% 34% 64% 48% 18% 61% 18% 4% 79% 14% 74% 22% 62% 79% 84% 79% 3% <1% <1%
 GHIM Doug
 D. Ghim
7
143
184
 18.2 — T55 CUT T59 — — — CUT — T26 — T40 CUT <1% 9% 79% 11% 9% 77% 22% 81% 50% 12% 77% 15% 10% 95% 40% 50% 12% 85% 96% 98% 76% 13% 5% 1%
 DAHMEN Joel
 J. Dahmen
7
71
175
 16.9 — — T38 T7 CUT — — T9 CUT — CUT T64 — <1% 7% 69% 8% 6% 53% 56% 58% 67% 13% 58% 36% 7% 78% 34% 37% 24% 68% 66% 80% 45% 14% 5% <1%
 BLANCHET Chandler
 C. Blanchet
5
61
112
 20.7 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — 2 — T18 CUT <1% 93% 84% 12% 63% 31% 66% 89% 97% 12% 72% 47% 13% 85% 42% 34% 27% 53% 61% 67% 84% 26% 10% 2%
 BROWN Dan
 D. Brown
4
113
85
 18.8 — T19 CUT T30 CUT — — T40 — — — CUT CUT <1% 10% 90% 11% 8% 87% 41% 90% 64% 11% 88% 28% 14% 72% 97% <1% >99% <1% 81% 82% 92% 9% 3% <1%
 HORSCHEL Billy
 B. Horschel
3
86
94
 19.7 — 74 T27 CUT CUT T48 — 62 T13 — — T68 CUT <1% 7% 63% 8% 6% 80% 58% 85% 98% 14% 66% 39% 10% 55% 32% 36% >99% <1% 62% 49% 94% 8% 2% <1%
 LIPSKY David
 D. Lipsky
7
36
88
 19.0 — — T44 T18 — — — CUT — T37 — 2 CUT <1% >99% 88% 12% >99% <1% 82% 79% 98% 15% 71% 61% 14% 85% 23% 53% 41% 49% 47% 51% 65% 49% 15% 3%
 ECKROAT Austin
 A. Eckroat
3
141
174
 20.0 — CUT CUT T49 CUT — — T40 — T42 — CUT T39 <1% 8% 70% 9% 7% 89% 22% 97% 98% 11% 76% 17% 10% 96% 40% 47% 10% 79% 99% 97% 98% 11% 4% <1%
 HOSSLER Beau
 B. Hossler
7
112
159
 19.5 — CUT CUT CUT — — — T23 — T37 — CUT T21 <1% 8% 94% 8% 7% 91% 32% 93% 95% 11% 83% 22% 9% 99% 25% 72% 14% 78% 97% 95% 95% 11% 4% <1%
 KANAYA Takumi
 T. Kanaya
3
109
126
 20.9 — T31 CUT CUT T60 — — T17 — CUT 73 T46 T60 <1% 9% 78% 10% 7% 89% 35% 94% 95% 9% 83% 25% 11% 90% 67% 20% 16% 64% 92% 90% 97% 9% 3% <1%
 SCHMID Matti
 M. Schmid
2
67
87
 22.1 — CUT CUT T56 CUT T73 49 T9 — T5 T46 T40 74 — <1% 9% 67% 10% 7% 86% 64% 94% >99% 11% 84% 47% 16% 74% 71% 7% 26% 59% 88% 74% 94% 18% 6% 1%
 MOORE Taylor
 T. Moore
7
53
147
 16.1 — — T56 T49 — — — T2 T44 — T50 CUT CUT <1% 7% 65% 8% 7% 36% 65% 55% 67% 11% 54% 47% 9% 69% 47% 17% 25% 32% 49% 80% 35% 20% 7% 2%
 FISK Steven
 S. Fisk
3
139
137
 22.0 — CUT CUT CUT — T60 — T37 — — T62 CUT T48 <1% >99% 88% 10% 7% 91% >99% 98% >99% 12% 79% 20% 13% 93% 49% 42% 13% 74% 97% 89% 98% 17% 7% 2%
 VENTURA Kris
 K. Ventura
7
150
239
 16.4 — — CUT T22 — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT <1% 6% 74% 7% 5% 79% 18% 76% 43% 8% 66% 12% 5% 88% 35% 60% 7% 87% 88% 95% 73% 7% 2% <1%
 GLOVER Lucas
 L. Glover
1
138
93
 19.5 — — — — — T64 CUT — T24 — CUT CUT CUT <1% >99% 52% >99% >99% <1% 75% 27% 25% >99% 58% 55% >99% 81% 14% 66% 49% 42% 71% 32% 95% 8% 2% <1%
 JOHNSON Zach
 Z. Johnson
9
180
314
 6.9 — T61 T70 — — — — — — — — — — — >99% <1% 49% 8% 5% 36% 18% 22% 18% <1% 5% 4% <1% 25% <1% 44% >99% <1% 29% 13% 19% <1% <1% <1%
 YU Kevin
 K. Yu
2
159
117
 20.4 — — CUT CUT — T70 CUT CUT — — CUT T30 CUT <1% 9% 83% 9% 7% 93% 29% 98% 98% 9% 89% 21% 12% 98% 49% 42% 13% 81% 99% 92% 99% 9% 3% <1%
 KOHLES Ben
 B. Kohles
9
182
272
 6.9 — — — — — — — — — T42 — — — — <1% <1% 60% 12% 7% 66% 17% 47% 37% 3% 12% 5% 2% 49% <1% 75% 7% 73% 53% 29% 32% 1% <1% <1%
 MONTGOMERY Taylor
 T. Montgomery
9
 —
170
 6.9 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 66% 16% 10% 67% 26% 55% 16% 2% 18% 9% 2% 47% <1% 76% 11% 61% 59% 24% 28% 1% <1% <1%
 BLAIR Zac
 Z. Blair
9
136
246
 9.0 — T50 — — — — — — — T8 — CUT — — <1% <1% 66% 11% 8% 65% 19% 48% 41% 2% 16% 6% 2% 57% <1% 82% 8% 60% 60% 18% 32% 1% <1% <1%
 KIM S.H.
 S.H. Kim
5
64
141
 10.0 — T13 T18 63 T54 — — CUT — T42 CUT T7 CUT
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1% 		<1% <1% <1%
 SIMPSON Webb
 W. Simpson
3
134
416
 13.8 — T55 — — CUT — — CUT — — — T18 — <1% 3% 52% 2% 3% 86% 8% 85% 95% 9% 52% 5% 4% 77% 11% 57% 4% 63% 77% 88% 96% 5% 1% <1%
 BAUCHOU Zach
 Z. Bauchou
5
84
176
 20.7 — 70 T13 T59 T48 — — T23 — T21 T50 CUT CUT <1% 6% 87% 5% 5% 86% 43% 91% 95% 8% 75% 30% 7% 92% 38% 48% 14% 73% 81% 85% 92% 10% 3% <1%
 GRILLO Emiliano
 E. Grillo
2
101
109
 20.6 — CUT CUT T38 CUT T64 — T56 — — CUT T7 T71 <1% 8% 50% 6% 5% 88% 45% 88% 97% 9% 77% 30% 10% 87% 24% 57% 19% 70% 95% 81% 94% 10% 3% <1%
 SADDIER Adrien
 A. Saddier
4
158
95
 19.5 — CUT T70 CUT T60 — — T56 — CUT — CUT T39 <1% 7% 88% 6% 5% 91% 32% 89% 56% 11% 87% 23% 13% 70% 95% <1% >99% <1% 84% 81% 93% 11% 4% <1%
 FORD David
 D. Ford
3
94
267
 19.9 — T50 T13 CUT — — — T32 — T16 CUT T46 CUT <1% 6% 93% 6% 6% 89% 23% 96% 95% 9% 79% 18% 8% 97% 64% 24% 6% 78% 88% 93% 93% 16% 6% 1%
 PAVON Matthieu
 M. Pavon
3
72
224
 19.4 — T55 T27 T38 CUT — — T17 — T42 CUT T11 T51 <1% 5% 80% 4% 4% 83% 44% 90% 97% 7% 75% 29% 4% 68% 74% 4% 14% 23% 73% 56% 94% 7% 2% <1%
 VEGAS Jhonattan
 J. Vegas
1
92
101
 20.2 — — CUT CUT — T78 44 — T18 — CUT — T14 <1% >99% 56% >99% >99% <1% >99% 28% 22% >99% 54% 67% >99% 51% 18% 34% 49% 40% 75% 28% 83% 14% 4% <1%
 MOLINARI Francesco
 F. Molinari
9
 —
253
 2.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 20% 20% 12% <1% <1% 7% 6% <1% <1% 61% <1% >99% <1% 5% 14% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 WU Dylan
 D. Wu
6
118
331
 18.8 — T31 T44 CUT — — — 66 — T50 — T26 CUT <1% 4% 92% 3% 3% 94% 11% 96% 96% 7% 77% 8% 5% 98% 26% 70% 4% 92% 95% 94% 97% 9% 3% <1%
 HIGGO Garrick
 G. Higgo
3
162
83
 20.7 — — — CUT CUT T60 CUT T40 — — CUT CUT T69 <1% >99% 69% 5% 4% 93% 31% 97% 96% 7% 81% 24% 12% 88% 32% 49% 13% 66% 98% 93% 97% 6% 2% <1%
 YOUNG Carson
 C. Young
9
167
163
 9.7 — — T44 — — — — T52 — T66 — — — — <1% <1% 62% 10% 7% 76% 25% 53% 34% 2% 26% 9% 1% 56% <1% 84% 10% 76% 68% 40% 35% 1% <1% <1%
 SVENSSON Jesper
 J. Svensson
7
142
181
 15.4 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT T69 <1% 5% 80% 3% 3% 83% 21% 74% 11% 5% 81% 15% 5% 66% 94% <1% 8% 32% 82% 92% 71% 5% 1% <1%
 LEBIODA Hank
 H. Lebioda
5
117
206
 19.5 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — T40 — T61 — T14 CUT <1% 4% 87% 3% 3% 93% 22% 92% 85% 6% 77% 16% 4% 91% 17% 77% 8% 86% 89% 86% 95% 5% 1% <1%
 RYDER Sam
 S. Ryder
7
145
230
 16.4 — — T27 T59 — — — CUT — CUT — T64 T60 <1% 3% 75% 2% 2% 85% 18% 71% 45% 5% 71% 12% 2% 92% 17% 80% 8% 84% 96% 97% 75% 2% <1% <1%
 NOH S.Y.
 S.Y. Noh
9
 —
339
 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 18% 10% 18% <1% <1% 5% 3% <1% 9% 10% 20% 3% 23% 23% 51% 17% <1% <1% <1%
 POTGIETER Aldrich
 A. Potgieter
2
41
77
 19.8 — — CUT CUT CUT T60 5 — CUT — CUT — T21 — >99% >99% 55% 9% 7% 60% >99% 92% 99% 9% 64% 60% 17% 70% 45% 3% 22% 22% 58% 67% 66% 38% 13% 2%
 NAKAJIMA Keita
 K. Nakajima
4
181
122
 15.5 — CUT CUT 64 71 — — WD — — — — — — <1% 4% 88% 3% 2% 94% 26% 93% 50% 5% 91% 20% 8% 82% 95% <1% >99% <1% 93% 95% 96% 3% <1% <1%
 VILIPS Karl
 K. Vilips
3
102
146
 19.7 — — T18 T38 CUT — — CUT — — CUT T64 T19 <1% >99% 87% 3% 3% 93% 33% 99% >99% 5% 80% 26% 7% 93% 45% 31% 10% 61% 96% 90% 98% 9% 3% <1%
 SNEDEKER Brandt
 B. Snedeker
9
140
276
 9.9 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — T18 — <1% <1% 53% 3% 3% 72% 17% 30% 26% 1% 15% 5% <1% 24% <1% 46% 8% 19% 35% 10% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 VANDERLAAN John
 J. VanDerLaan
5
133
266
 19.8 — CUT CUT T43 T60 — — CUT — T21 — T46 CUT <1% 4% 91% 2% 2% 95% 13% 95% 91% 5% 79% 10% 4% 97% 32% 64% 5% 91% 96% 95% 97% 6% 2% <1%
 GRIFFIN Lanto
 L. Griffin
7
 —
216
 13.2 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — — — <1% 2% 71% 1% <1% 86% 19% 68% 28% 4% 75% 13% 2% 89% 12% 86% 8% 89% 96% 97% 73% 2% <1% <1%
 FISHBURN Patrick
 P. Fishburn
7
166
168
 17.9 — — CUT CUT — — — T40 — CUT — T46 CUT <1% 3% 93% 2% 2% 97% 23% 93% 81% 5% 86% 17% 4% 97% 16% 84% 10% 88% 98% 95% 97% 3% <1% <1%
 EWART A.J.
 A.J. Ewart
6
68
233
 20.7 — CUT T44 T49 T28 — — T13 — T26 CUT T11 CUT <1% 4% 91% 2% 3% 89% 38% 94% 98% 6% 77% 30% 5% 96% 35% 47% 9% 77% 79% 85% 92% 11% 4% <1%
 HUBBARD Mark
 M. Hubbard
3
135
149
 21.0 — T66 CUT 69 CUT — — T23 — T42 CUT CUT CUT <1% 4% 82% 2% 2% 97% 26% 94% 98% 6% 88% 18% 5% 96% 18% 76% 11% 87% 97% 93% 99% 4% 1% <1%
 HOGE Tom
 T. Hoge
1
70
106
 21.5 — T40 T8 T70 CUT T14 CUT — CUT — CUT — T71 <1% >99% 50% >99% >99% <1% 88% 21% 29% >99% 48% 75% >99% 33% 31% 16% 44% 29% 77% 28% 71% 8% 1% <1%
 CROWE Trace
 T. Crowe
5
 —
212
 10.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% 3% 91% 2% 1% 97% 16% 95% 90% 4% 84% 13% 3% 96% 31% 67% 6% 92% 98% 97% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 SIGG Greyson
 G. Sigg
9
 —
297
 6.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 58% 4% 2% 74% 12% 51% 33% 1% 15% 4% 1% 63% <1% 81% 3% 74% 71% 50% 33% <1% <1% <1%
 GONZALEZ Emilio
 E. Gonzalez
5
176
187
 14.8 — T50 CUT T65 WD — — — — — — — — — <1% 3% 89% 2% 1% 97% 18% 95% 89% 3% 85% 15% 4% 96% 31% 66% 7% 90% 98% 97% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 SVENSSON Adam
 A. Svensson
6
155
377
 18.9 — T40 CUT CUT — — — CUT — T26 — CUT CUT <1% 2% 94% 1% 2% 97% 6% 95% 96% 6% 83% 5% 4% >99% 14% 84% 2% 96% 99% 98% 98% 5% 1% <1%
 NYHOLM Pontus
 P. Nyholm
5
88
227
 19.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — T13 — T16 — CUT T14 <1% 4% 87% 2% 2% 89% 29% 91% 93% 4% 77% 23% 3% 94% 32% 54% 7% 81% 86% 89% 92% 5% 2% <1%
 KIM Chan
 C. Kim
9
163
278
 8.4 — — CUT — — — — T56 — T26 — — — — <1% <1% 51% 3% 2% 75% 14% 44% 27% 1% 16% 5% <1% 42% <1% 81% 5% 69% 52% 27% 27% <1% <1% <1%
 HADWIN Adam
 A. Hadwin
9
160
236
 7.7 — — — — — — — CUT — T21 — CUT — — <1% <1% 59% 3% 2% 60% 17% 35% 11% <1% 20% 6% <1% 32% <1% 76% 7% 36% 59% 19% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 SPRINGER Hayden
 H. Springer
9
T168
238
 7.0 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — <1% <1% 53% 4% 3% 75% 14% 52% 25% 1% 21% 5% <1% 54% <1% 82% 4% 75% 65% 43% 24% <1% <1% <1%
 SKINNS David
 D. Skinns
9
129
247
 6.7 — — — — — — — — — T8 — T30 — — <1% <1% 56% 2% 1% 74% 19% 34% 14% <1% 16% 6% <1% 28% <1% 86% 8% 56% 37% 10% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 SUBER Jackson
 J. Suber
7
154
198
 15.2 — — CUT T70 — — — T63 — CUT — CUT T28 — <1% 3% 71% 1% <1% 84% 16% 76% 25% 2% 75% 14% 2% 88% 26% 69% 5% 92% 94% 98% 75% 1% <1% <1%
 CHATFIELD Davis
 D. Chatfield
5
161
262
 19.7 — CUT T63 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 — T40 CUT <1% 2% 89% 1% 1% 97% 11% 95% 89% 3% 82% 10% 2% 97% 29% 66% 3% 93% 97% 98% 97% 2% <1% <1%
 SHIPLEY Neal
 N. Shipley
5
191
152
 19.9 — CUT CUT CUT T68 — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT <1% 3% 88% 2% 1% 97% 20% 96% 87% 3% 88% 17% 5% 96% 31% 65% 6% 91% 98% 98% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 GOODWIN Noah
 N. Goodwin
9
 —
304
 6.6 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 54% 3% 2% 71% 9% 52% 20% 1% 17% 4% <1% 51% <1% 72% 2% 66% 58% 46% 29% <1% <1% <1%
 KIZZIRE Patton
 P. Kizzire
3
107
258
 18.0 — T24 CUT — 72 — — T13 — — CUT CUT CUT <1% 1% 68% <1% <1% 94% 21% 88% 95% 3% 72% 15% 1% 92% 7% 83% 7% 67% 95% 89% 96% 2% <1% <1%
 PETERSON Paul
 P. Peterson
9
T126
235
 6.6 — — — — — — — — — T5 — CUT — — <1% <1% 54% 2% 1% 72% 17% 38% 17% <1% 15% 7% <1% 26% <1% 77% 6% 59% 34% 13% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 WALKER Danny
 D. Walker
3
111
215
 20.6 — CUT CUT T38 CUT — — T40 — T61 T62 T18 68 <1% 2% 79% <1% <1% 97% 20% 96% 98% 3% 84% 17% 2% 94% 24% 61% 6% 86% 96% 92% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 PHILLIPS Chandler
 C. Phillips
3
T126
182
 19.8 — T19 T63 CUT T66 — — T63 — — CUT T55 CUT <1% 2% 77% <1% <1% 99% 18% 96% 96% 3% 89% 15% 3% 97% 17% 77% 6% 89% 99% 97% 99% 3% <1% <1%
 SILVERMAN Ben
 B. Silverman
9
144
245
 6.9 — — — — — — — T40 — T16 — — — — <1% <1% 51% 1% <1% 76% 16% 40% 20% <1% 19% 6% <1% 34% <1% 84% 5% 49% 48% 20% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 SALINDA Isaiah
 I. Salinda
7
152
257
 17.5 — CUT CUT T30 — — — CUT — T50 — T46 CUT — <1% <1% 90% <1% <1% 97% 11% 92% 77% 3% 82% 10% 2% 96% 25% 71% 3% 93% 96% 96% 95% 2% <1% <1%
 CLANTON Luke
 L. Clanton
3
125
204
 18.9 — CUT WD CUT — — — CUT — T5 — CUT 75 <1% 2% 92% <1% 1% 97% 14% 97% 87% 2% 89% 14% 3% 98% 29% 68% 3% 95% 98% 98% 98% 3% <1% <1%
 PAUL Jeremy
 J. Paul
9
T148
307
 7.3 — — — CUT — — — — — T8 — CUT — — <1% <1% 50% <1% <1% 70% 9% 43% 13% <1% 17% 4% <1% 31% <1% 56% 2% 48% 41% 24% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 FRITTELLI Dylan
 D. Frittelli
9
 —
404
 1.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 11% <1% <1% 18% 5% 15% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 3% 62% <1% 1% <1% 12% 39% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 STREELMAN Kevin
 K. Streelman
9
124
413
 12.2 — — CUT CUT — — — T32 — T8 — T68 — <1% <1% 36% <1% <1% 60% 6% 42% 18% 2% 45% 5% <1% 57% 3% 83% 2% 63% 72% 75% 49% <1% <1% <1%
 CHAMP Cameron
 C. Champ
9
 —
311
 5.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 38% 1% <1% 59% 8% 44% 9% <1% 16% 4% <1% 39% <1% 67% 2% 39% 43% 35% 26% <1% <1% <1%
 VAN ROOYEN Erik
 E. Van Rooyen
2
178
158
 19.7 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT CUT CUT T48 <1% 1% 62% <1% <1% 93% 21% 86% 76% 2% 88% 17% 2% 63% 40% 36% 8% 79% 98% 96% 96% 1% <1% <1%
 MARTIN Ben
 B. Martin
9
 —
418
 3.9 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 19% 6% 16% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 17% 2% 51% 1% 64% 38% 57% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 GARNETT Brice
 B. Garnett
3
156
391
 19.1 — T31 CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T50 — CUT T71 <1% <1% 81% <1% <1% 98% 6% 92% 97% 2% 76% 5% 1% 94% 5% 89% 2% 80% 96% 89% 99% 1% <1% <1%
 LEE S.T.
 S.T. Lee
5
179
289
 14.4 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 86% <1% <1% 97% 8% 93% 84% 1% 82% 9% 1% 95% 19% 76% 2% 93% 97% 96% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 LAMPRECHT Christo
 C. Lamprecht
5
173
201
 18.6 — CUT CUT CUT T48 — — CUT — T50 — — CUT <1% 1% 87% <1% <1% 97% 14% 95% 81% 2% 87% 13% 2% 96% 23% 73% 3% 93% 98% 98% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 NORLANDER Henrik
 H. Norlander
9
183
330
 7.3 — — — CUT — — — — — T57 — T68 — — <1% <1% 56% <1% <1% 73% 9% 38% 10% <1% 21% 4% <1% 32% <1% 29% 2% 48% 52% 25% 25% <1% <1% <1%
 KNOX Russell
 R. Knox
9
 —
364
 1.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 15% 7% 11% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 5% 1% 43% 2% 27% 17% 35% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 HIRATA Kensei
 K. Hirata
5
132
197
 19.5 — T24 CUT 74 T54 — — CUT — CUT — T46 CUT <1% 1% 88% <1% <1% 98% 14% 94% 72% 2% 90% 14% 2% 95% 40% 52% 3% 89% 97% 96% 96% 2% <1% <1%
 LOWER Justin
 J. Lower
7
157
199
 16.0 — — CUT T30 — — — CUT — CUT — T55 CUT <1% <1% 68% <1% <1% 87% 16% 66% 23% 1% 79% 14% 1% 79% 9% 88% 5% 94% 96% 96% 71% <1% <1% <1%
 MULLINAX Trey
 T. Mullinax
9
 —
395
 5.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — CUT — <1% <1% 54% <1% <1% 53% 5% 40% 12% <1% 12% 2% <1% 45% <1% 53% <1% 36% 57% 38% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 KANG Jeffrey
 J. Kang
5
T170
241
 19.3 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 <1% <1% 86% <1% <1% 97% 11% 90% 79% <1% 83% 12% <1% 91% 15% 81% 3% 91% 96% 93% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 MALNATI Peter
 P. Malnati
3
165
 — 18.9 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — T26 — CUT T65 <1% <1% 68% <1% <1% 97% 4% 90% 97% 1% 76% 5% <1% 97% 4% 87% 1% 71% 99% 96% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 HARDY Nick
 N. Hardy
9
 —
484
 5.0 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 24% 4% 21% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 38% 2% 62% <1% 68% 64% 82% 16% <1% <1% <1%
 RILEY Davis
 D. Riley
2
105
116
 20.9 — T6 T56 CUT CUT — — CUT — T42 CUT CUT T60 — >99% <1% 67% <1% <1% 97% >99% 92% 92% 1% 87% 27% 3% 78% 29% 50% 7% 65% 96% 94% 96% 1% <1% <1%
 WARING Paul
 P. Waring
9
T170
298
 7.5 — — — — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT T39 <1% <1% 14% <1% <1% 47% 10% 25% <1% <1% 18% 4% <1% 3% 62% <1% 2% 2% 16% 19% 27% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPBELL Brian
 B. Campbell
1
177
111
 23.7 — CUT CUT — T54 T78 CUT — CUT — CUT WD CUT — >99% >99% 71% >99% >99% <1% >99% 59% 20% >99% 72% 50% >99% 73% 15% 56% 18% 68% 97% 71% 97% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNCAN Tyler
 T. Duncan
9
T187
493
 3.4 — — — — — — — — — T50 — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 14% 5% 12% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 12% 1% 54% <1% 44% 27% 50% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGHSMITH Joe
 J. Highsmith
2
151
139
 22.2 — T66 CUT CUT T54 T75 — 67 — — T42 CUT CUT <1% >99% 78% <1% <1% 98% >99% 97% 93% 2% 84% 18% 3% 94% 23% 60% 4% 74% >99% 96% 98% 2% <1% <1%
 STANGER Jimmy
 J. Stanger
9
122
 — 9.2 — — CUT — — — — T32 — T26 — T30 T56 <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 41% 4% 34% <1% <1% 11% 2% <1% 27% 4% 40% <1% 38% 34% 52% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 BYRD Jonathan
 J. Byrd
9
 — — 2.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 13% 5% 6% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 2% <1% 42% 2% 22% 10% 19% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 HOFFMAN Charley
 C. Hoffman
9
 —
370
 14.3 — — CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT <1% <1% 47% <1% <1% 53% 6% 40% 14% <1% 58% 5% <1% 24% 5% 69% 2% 91% 77% 81% 54% <1% <1% <1%
 HOSHINO Rikuya
 R. Hoshino
9
 —
394
 2.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 11% <1% <1% 38% 3% 26% <1% <1% 16% 2% <1% 9% 62% <1% <1% 4% 31% 57% 20% <1% <1% <1%
 VILLEGAS Camilo
 C. Villegas
9
192
460
 6.9 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — 63 — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 21% 5% 11% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 10% <1% 44% 1% 16% 19% 40% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 LAIRD Martin
 M. Laird
9
T189
407
 2.1 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 19% 5% 9% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 3% 9% 4% <1% 3% 14% 28% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 DUNLAP Nick
 N. Dunlap
3
186
244
 17.2 — T61 WD — — — — CUT — CUT — CUT CUT <1% <1% 64% <1% <1% 98% 8% 97% 83% <1% 90% 10% <1% 99% 6% 80% 1% 85% >99% >99% >99% <1% <1% <1%
 GOMEZ Fabian
 F. Gomez
9
 — — 2.7 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 16% 5% 7% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% 2% 43% 1% 25% 18% 29% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 HIGGS Harry
 H. Higgs
9
 —
275
 7.8 — — CUT — — — — CUT — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 47% <1% <1% 69% 9% 39% 9% <1% 21% 4% <1% 31% <1% 80% 2% 68% 54% 29% 22% <1% <1% <1%
 SCHENK Adam
 A. Schenk
3
119
150
 21.9 — CUT CUT T11 CUT 77 — T60 — — CUT CUT CUT <1% >99% 76% <1% <1% 98% >99% 96% 96% 1% 83% 20% 2% 89% 7% 74% 5% 52% 98% 90% 97% 1% <1% <1%
 MERRITT Troy
 T. Merritt
9
194
494
 2.5 — — — — — — — — — T66 — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 21% 5% 11% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 2% 43% <1% <1% 2% 13% 30% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 WILLETT Danny
 D. Willett
9
174
393
 10.9 — — — — — — — CUT — T42 — CUT T56 — >99% <1% 41% <1% <1% 59% 4% 46% 2% <1% 69% 4% <1% 44% 79% <1% <1% 25% 74% 91% 45% <1% <1% <1%
 ROZO Marcelo
 M. Rozo
6
184
485
 18.4 — CUT CUT T65 CUT — — CUT — 65 — CUT — <1% <1% 92% <1% <1% 98% 4% 92% 88% <1% 81% 4% <1% 96% 11% 86% <1% 95% 97% 94% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 TOSTI Alejandro
 A. Tosti
6
164
308
 19.4 — CUT CUT CUT CUT — — CUT — CUT — T30 CUT <1% <1% 88% <1% <1% 99% 6% 93% 80% <1% 85% 8% <1% 98% 13% 84% 1% 97% 95% 98% 95% <1% <1% <1%
 LIST Luke
 L. List
9
 —
499
 4.4 — — — CUT — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 22% 5% 12% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 10% 5% 34% <1% 26% 37% 58% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 LEE K.H.
 K.H. Lee
9
 — — 9.8 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — CUT <1% <1% 28% <1% <1% 55% 4% 56% 10% <1% 58% 4% <1% 73% 7% 64% <1% 78% 90% 95% 57% <1% <1% <1%
 GORDON Will
 W. Gordon
9
 —
337
 4.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 51% <1% <1% 59% 5% 43% 8% <1% 20% 3% <1% 44% <1% 75% <1% 39% 64% 44% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 COODY Parker
 P. Coody
9
 — — 4.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 44% 3% 39% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 34% 4% 48% <1% 44% 58% 77% 38% <1% <1% <1%
 KISNER Kevin
 K. Kisner
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 38% 5% 17% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 17% <1% 64% 1% 38% 43% 49% 21% <1% <1% <1%
 STALLINGS Scott
 S. Stallings
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 33% 4% 21% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 5% 1% 36% <1% 20% 17% 31% 28% <1% <1% <1%
 TODD Brendon
 B. Todd
9
 — — 10.2 — — — — — — — CUT — — — — — <1% <1% 61% <1% <1% 81% 4% 65% 38% <1% 62% 4% <1% 80% 5% 81% <1% 79% 81% 93% 84% <1% <1% <1%
 MCGIRT William
 W. McGirt
9
 — — 2.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 14% 5% 6% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 2% <1% 47% 1% 26% 8% 17% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 THOMPSON Michael
 M. Thompson
9
 — — 2.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 37% 5% 23% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 13% 3% 41% <1% 28% 37% 42% 35% <1% <1% <1%
 STUARD Brian
 B. Stuard
9
 — — 1.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 5% <1% <1% 15% 5% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 4% <1% 53% 1% 33% 15% 29% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 TWAY Kevin
 K. Tway
9
 — — 1.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 5% 12% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 7% 2% 29% <1% 24% 27% 49% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 KODAIRA Satoshi
 S. Kodaira
9
 — — 1.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 19% 5% 12% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 2% 25% 3% <1% 2% 13% 36% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 LANDRY Andrew
 A. Landry
9
 — — 3.5 — — CUT — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 20% 4% 12% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 10% 3% 53% <1% 36% 31% 53% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 HAAS Bill
 B. Haas
9
 — — 2.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 19% 5% 9% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 6% 2% 49% 1% 32% 23% 39% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 HARRINGTON Padraig
 P. Harrington
9
 — — 3.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 18% >99% 5% <1% <1% 6% >99% <1% <1% 12% 12% >99% <1% 7% 10% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 BADDELEY Aaron
 A. Baddeley
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 37% 5% 17% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 4% <1% 66% 1% 47% 49% 50% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 DUFNER Jason
 J. Dufner
9
 — — 3.8 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 15% >99% 6% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% <1% 11% 5% 2% 4% 6% 13% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 PALMER Ryan
 R. Palmer
9
 — — 4.0 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 20% 6% 8% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 10% <1% 49% 2% 26% 23% 30% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 PIERCY Scott
 S. Piercy
9
 — — 2.4 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 14% 6% 7% <1% <1% 3% 2% <1% 2% <1% 44% 1% 23% 11% 16% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 WATNEY Nick
 N. Watney
9
 — — 1.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 15% 5% 8% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 2% 4% 16% 1% 6% 10% 23% 8% <1% <1% <1%
 LASHLEY Nate
 N. Lashley
9
 — — 3.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 33% 5% 25% <1% <1% 13% 2% <1% 26% <1% 38% 1% 54% 52% 48% 34% <1% <1% <1%
 REAVIE Chez
 C. Reavie
9
 — — 2.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 18% 4% 8% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 6% <1% 51% <1% 31% 22% 36% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 BAE Sangmoon
 S. Bae
9
 — — 2.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 20% 5% 11% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 9% 3% 49% <1% 34% 28% 49% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 OVERTON Jeff
 J. Overton
9
 — — 1.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 10% <1% <1% 21% 5% 10% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 2% 37% 2% <1% 4% 15% 32% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 COOK Austin
 A. Cook
9
 — — 3.1 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 12% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 7% <1% 42% <1% 30% 24% 50% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 WERENSKI Richy
 R. Werenski
9
 — — 2.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 13% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% 8% <1% 46% <1% 31% 24% 52% 10% <1% <1% <1%
 DONALD Luke
 L. Donald
9
 — — 1.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 8% <1% <1% 16% 6% 6% <1% <1% 6% 2% <1% <1% 38% <1% 1% <1% 3% 12% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 HUH John
 J. Huh
9
 — — 3.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 40% 4% 28% <1% <1% 10% 2% <1% 18% 3% 43% <1% 32% 44% 55% 37% <1% <1% <1%
 WISE Aaron
 A. Wise
9
 — — 11.3 — — — CUT — — — CUT — CUT — — CUT — <1% <1% 38% <1% <1% 62% 3% 60% 12% <1% 62% 4% <1% 78% 9% 69% <1% 78% 93% 99% 61% <1% <1% <1%
 NORRMAN Vincent
 V. Norrman
9
 — — 6.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 39% <1% <1% 59% 3% 62% 7% <1% 66% 5% <1% 60% 14% 52% <1% 68% 93% 98% 57% <1% <1% <1%
 LINGMERTH David
 D. Lingmerth
9
 — — 3.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 39% 5% 25% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 15% 3% 43% <1% 31% 39% 48% 35% <1% <1% <1%
 HADLEY Chesson
 C. Hadley
9
 — — 3.3 — — — — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 19% 5% 12% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 10% <1% 49% <1% 29% 30% 51% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 LONG Adam
 A. Long
9
 — — 3.9 — — CUT — — — — — — CUT — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 4% 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 6% <1% 47% <1% 30% 20% 41% 9% <1% <1% <1%
 PAN C.T.
 C.T. Pan
9
 — — 6.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 30% <1% <1% 64% 3% 53% 8% 1% 58% 5% 1% 67% 3% 70% <1% 69% 73% 94% 50% <1% <1% <1%
 LINDHEIM Nicholas
 N. Lindheim
9
 — — 3.9 — — — — — — — — — WD — — — — <1% <1% 7% <1% <1% 40% 4% 23% <1% <1% 9% 2% <1% 13% 2% 45% <1% 31% 36% 41% 34% <1% <1% <1%
 GRIBBLE Cody
 C. Gribble
9
 — — 2.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 6% <1% <1% 19% 4% 13% <1% <1% 7% 2% <1% 12% 3% 49% <1% 36% 34% 60% 11% <1% <1% <1%
 MCCUMBER Tyler
 T. McCumber
9
 — — 7.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <1% <1% 39% <1% <1% 62% 3% 54% 11% <1% 59% 5% <1% 70% 8% 70% <1% 77% 91% 97% 62% <1% <1% <1%
 CAMPOS Rafael
 R. Campos
3
147
 — 19.1 — CUT T44 CUT CUT — — CUT — T16 — CUT CUT <1% <1% 59% <1% <1% 99% 4% 93% 96% <1% 82% 5% <1% 96% 3% 92% <1% 94% 98% 94% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 SINGH Vijay
 V. Singh
9
175
 — 4.0 — T40 — — — — — — — — — — — — >99% <1% 2% <1% <1% 19% >99% 5% <1% <1% 3% 2% <1% <1% <1% 31% 3% 10% 6% 3% 12% <1% <1% <1%
 DAVIS Cam
 C. Davis
2
185
 — 16.8 — CUT CUT T70 73 — — CUT — — CUT CUT — — <1% <1% 63% <1% <1% 96% 12% 91% 88% <1% 81% 14% <1% 74% 10% 72% 3% 75% >99% 98% 99% <1% <1% <1%
 HAHN James
 J. Hahn
9
193
 — 2.4 — — — — — — — — — 64 — — — — <1% <1% 2% <1% <1% 14% 5% 7% <1% <1% 4% 2% <1% 3% <1% 46% <1% 18% 11% 23% 7% <1% <1% <1%
 SARGENT Gordon
 G. Sargent
3
T148
 — 18.6 — CUT CUT CUT — — — CUT — T8 — CUT CUT <1% <1% 92% <1% <1% 99% 3% 97% 88% <1% 86% 4% <1% >99% 17% 80% <1% 97% 99% 99% 98% <1% <1% <1%
 BREHM Ryan
 R. Brehm
9
T168
 — 2.9 — — — — — — — — — T26 — — — — <1% <1% 4% <1% <1% 22% 4% 11% <1% <1% 8% 2% <1% 7% 4% 34% <1% 28% 18% 35% 6% <1% <1% <1%
 CAPAN III Frankie
 F. Capan III
9
T187
 — 8.9 — — CUT CUT — — — CUT — T50 — — — — <1% <1% 40% <1% <1% 70% 7% 44% 8% <1% 21% 4% <1% 38% <1% 72% <1% 61% 58% 41% 23% <1% <1% <1%
 STREB Robert
 R. Streb
9
T189
 — 2.8 — — — — — — — — — T57 — — — — <1% <1% 3% <1% <1% 15% 5% 10% <1% <1% 5% 2% <1% 5% <1% 47% <1% 22% 17% 35% 7% <1% <1% <1%